REVIEW 1 cited by
On the Non-Associativity of Analog Computations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The energy efficiency of analog forms of computing makes it one of the most promising candidates to deploy resource-hungry machine learning tasks on resource-constrained system such as mobile or embedded devices. However, it is well known that for analog computations the safety net of discretization is missing, thus all analog computations are exposed to a variety of imperfections of corresponding implementations. Examples include non-linearities, saturation effect and various forms of noise. In this work, we observe that the ordering of input operands of an analog operation also has an impact on the output result, which essentially makes analog computations non-associative, even though the underlying operation might be mathematically associative. We conduct a simple test by creating a model of a real analog processor which captures such ordering effects. With this model we assess the importance of ordering by comparing the test accuracy of a neural network for keyword spotting, which is trained based either on an ordered model, on a non-ordered variant, and on real hardware. The results prove the existence of ordering effects as well as their high impact, as neglecting ordering results in substantial accuracy drops.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On Hardening DNNs against Noisy Computations
On CIFAR-10, quantization-aware training with large constant scaling factors improves noise robustness, but noisy training (injecting matching Gaussian noise during training) gives far larger robustness gains, and qua...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.