Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Model Validation Practice in Banking: A Structured Approach for Predictive Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.13877 v2 pith:HHMFZZC3 submitted 2024-10-02 cs.CY stat.AP

classification cs.CYstat.AP
keywords modelmodelsvalidationbankingregulatoryconsistentlydesignedensure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive overview of model validation practices and advancement in the banking industry based on the experience of managing Model Risk Management (MRM) since the inception of regulatory guidance SR11-7/OCC11-12 over a decade ago. Model validation in banking is a crucial process designed to ensure that predictive models, which are often used for credit risk, fraud detection, and capital planning, operate reliably and meet regulatory standards. This practice ensures that models are conceptually sound, produce valid outcomes, and are consistently monitored over time. Model validation in banking is a multi-faceted process with three key components: conceptual soundness evaluation, outcome analysis, and on-going monitoring to ensure that the models are not only designed correctly but also perform reliably and consistently in real-world environments. Effective validation helps banks mitigate risks, meet regulatory requirements, and maintain trust in the models that underpin critical business decisions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How to Choose a Threshold for an Evaluation Metric for Large Language Models

    stat.ML 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A recipe that maps stakeholder risk tolerance to a confidence level and then uses statistical methods, with conformal prediction performing best, to set thresholds on LLM evaluation metrics.

Pith tools