Pith. sign in

REVIEW 124 references

Place Recognition Meet Multiple Modalitie: A Comprehensive Review, Current Challenges and Future Directions

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A survey of visual, LiDAR, and cross-modal place recognition with a unified code library, but riddled with errors and disclaimer-ridden experimental comparisons.

desk verdict A useful taxonomy but an unreliable benchmark; the survey's central numbers are self-disclaimed and the paper needs major correction before it can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.14068 v3 pith:HI5JLXY4 submitted 2025-05-20 cs.CV

Zhenyu Li , Tianyi Shang , Pengjie Xu , Zhaojun Deng This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords placerecognitionadvancementsapproacheschallengescross-modalcurrentdirections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Place recognition helps autonomous vehicles know if they have visited a location before, which is important for correcting drift in maps (loop closure in SLAM). This paper organizes the field into three families: methods that use ordinary camera images (visual place recognition), methods that use LiDAR point clouds, and cross-modal methods that match text descriptions against images or point clouds. It then lists many well-known methods from each family, describes common datasets, and compares results on standard benchmarks.

The authors also built a GitHub repository that merges many public place recognition implementations into one code base and ran the methods themselves to produce comparison tables. This is a useful idea: a single benchmark with consistent code would let researchers compare methods fairly.

However, the paper has serious quality problems. Several tables are mislabeled, some dataset names appear to be wrong, the formula for Recall@N is garbled, and the same figure is presented twice. Most importantly, the experimental section repeatedly says that some results were obtained by running the code with settings that may not match the original papers, so the numbers may be inconsistent. This makes the benchmark conclusions unreliable. The survey also claims to be the first to cover all three modalities, despite citing earlier surveys that cover parts of them, without showing a detailed comparison. Because a survey's value depends on accuracy and completeness, these issues undermine the paper's central purpose.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim, stated in the introduction, is: "To the best of our knowledge, this survey represents the first comprehensive survey of place recognition methods, including VPR, LPR, and CMPR methods, developed over the past decade," and that "most publicly accessible place recognition methods are merged into a single code base for the first time." If true, the paper would be a one-stop reference for the field and a reproducible comparison of SOTA methods.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's experimental comparison, which is one of its two advertised contributions, assumes that the authors' runs of each public codebase, with their chosen parameter settings, produce results that are comparable to those reported in the original papers. This assumption is load-bearing because the survey uses the resulting Recall@N tables to rank methods and draw conclusions about which architectures are superior. The paper itself repeatedly undermines this assumption: Sections 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, 5.2.1, and 5.2.2 state that "some parameter settings may not be consistent with the original paper, inconsistent results may occur." Without a fixed protocol and commit-pinned code, the benchmark conclusions are not reproducible.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This review introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. Its non-taxonomic content, the benchmark comparison, depends on the three axioms above; the dataset-naming and experimental-fidelity axioms are contradicted by the paper itself.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math Precision, Recall (Eq. 1) and Recall@N (Eq. 2) as defined in Section 4.2 are the standard and sufficient evaluation metrics for place recognition.
    The paper uses these metrics to rank all methods. The Recall@N formula (2) is garbled, with an undefined symbol and malformed summation, which weakens the definitional base.
  • domain assumption The benchmark datasets listed in Table 11 are correctly named and described.
    The paper evaluates methods on these datasets and draws comparative conclusions. The dataset labeled "Nardo-Air R" with 3464x5202 aerial nighttime RAW images appears to be 360Loc (cited as [122]) under a wrong name, so the assumption is violated.
  • domain assumption The experimental runs reported in Section 5 faithfully represent the performance of each cited method.
    This is the premise of the benchmark comparison. It is contradicted by the paper's own repeated caveat that parameter settings may not be consistent with original papers and that inconsistent results may occur.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Place Recognition Meet Multiple Modalitie: A Comprehensive Review, Current Challenges and Future Directions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HI5JLXY4

@misc{pith2026250514068,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Place Recognition Meet Multiple Modalitie: A Comprehensive Review, Current Challenges and Future Directions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HI5JLXY4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.14068}
}
read the original abstract

Place recognition is a cornerstone of vehicle navigation and mapping, which is pivotal in enabling systems to determine whether a location has been previously visited. This capability is critical for tasks such as loop closure in Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) and long-term navigation under varying environmental conditions. In this survey, we comprehensively review recent advancements in place recognition, emphasizing three representative methodological paradigms: Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based approaches, Transformer-based frameworks, and cross-modal strategies. We begin by elucidating the significance of place recognition within the broader context of autonomous systems. Subsequently, we trace the evolution of CNN-based methods, highlighting their contributions to robust visual descriptor learning and scalability in large-scale environments. We then examine the emerging class of Transformer-based models, which leverage self-attention mechanisms to capture global dependencies and offer improved generalization across diverse scenes. Furthermore, we discuss cross-modal approaches that integrate heterogeneous data sources such as Lidar, vision, and text description, thereby enhancing resilience to viewpoint, illumination, and seasonal variations. We also summarize standard datasets and evaluation metrics widely adopted in the literature. Finally, we identify current research challenges and outline prospective directions, including domain adaptation, real-time performance, and lifelong learning, to inspire future advancements in this domain. The unified framework of leading-edge place recognition methods, i.e., code library, and the results of their experimental evaluations are available at https://github.com/CV4RA/SOTA-Place-Recognitioner.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.14068 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Place Recognition (PR) in SLAM. Place recognition plays a critical role in SLAM, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Structural framework of this survey. Place Recognition in Autonomous Driving Introductions Place Recognition in SLAM The development of Autonomous Driving Background The Challenges of Place Recognition Sequence-Based VPR Methods SeqSLAM, OpenSeqSLAM, MRS-VPR,... Traditional VPR Methods Hand-Crafted VPR Methods Fab-Map, DBoW, Landmark,... Pooling-Based Methods NetVLAD, GeM, MAC, ... Global Descriptor Methods Learned … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Evolution of VPR, LPR, and CMPR methods over time. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (21 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The development timeline of autonomous driving application technology. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The mainstream SLAM technologies. vSLAMDSO ORB-SLAM VINS-Mono DeepVO VLocNet++ DeepFusio Multi-Modal SLAM Transformer SLAM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Various factors affecting lane visibility in the real-world environments. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The general structure of place recognition technology. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The different mainstream methods in the field of VPR in the recent decade. Accord [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: CNN-based VPR paradigm. The figure describes two different feature representation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Transformer-based VPR paradigm. The figure describes two different feature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Reranking-based VPR paradigm. Reranking-based place recognition enhances the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: PR addresses two key issues: On the left, blue lines represent vehicle trajectories, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The different mainstream methods in the field of LPR in the recent decade. Accord￾ing to the point encoding method, LPR methods are subdivided into point-based methods, voxel-based methods, and Transformer-based methods. 3.2.1. Point-Based Methods Point-Based VPR Meth…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Point-based LPR uses point cloud features to generate global descriptors, match candidate places from a database, and verify geometry for accurate localization in 3D envi￾ronments. perceptrons (MLPs) that directly processes unordered 3D point sets, effectively [PITH_…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Voxel-based LPR converts raw point clouds into voxel grids, extracts structured [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Transformer-based LPR method uses Transformer networks to model long-range [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: The mainstream methods in the field of CMPR in recent years. According to the fused modalities, CMPR methods are subdivided into text-Lidar methods, text-image methods. cross-modal approaches that aim to bridge natural language and Lidar-based 3D representations. Thes…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: CMPR includes two main paradigms: Text-to-Image, which matches language to visual semantics via shared embedding spaces, and Text-to-LiDAR, which aligns textual descriptions with 3D geometric structures through direct localization or matching. While Text-to-Image meth…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Performance evaluation of SeqSLAM, FAB-MAP, DBoW, MRS-VPR, and OpenSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Recall@1 and Recall@5 of SOTA CNN-based VPR methods on mainstream bench [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Recall@1 and Recall@5 of SOTA Transformer-based VPR methods on mainstream benchmark datasets. 5.2. Performance Evaluation of LPR Methods 5.2.1. Performance Evaluation of Point-based LPR Methods A comparative analysis of eight representative point-based place recogniti…
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Performance evaluation of point-based LPR methods across different datasets. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Performance evaluation of Transformer-based LPR methods across different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Recall@1, 5, 10 of SOTA CMPR methods on benchmark datasets. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_24.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. Fang, G. Mei, X. Yuan, L. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Wang, Visual slam for robot navigation in healthcare facility, Pattern recognition 113 (2021) 107822. 53

    2021

  2. [2]

    K. A. Tsintotas, L. Bampis, A. Gast eratos, The revisiting problem in si- multaneous localization and mapping: A survey on visual loop closure de- tection, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23 (11) (2022) 19929–19953

    2022

  3. [3]

    I. A. Kazerouni, L. Fitzgerald, G. Dooly, D. Toal, A survey of state-of-the- art on visual slam, Expert Systems with Applications 205 (2022) 117734

    2022

  4. [4]

    Lauri, D

    M. Lauri, D. Hsu, J. Pajarinen, Partially observable markov decision pro- cesses in robotics: A survey, IEEE Transactions on Robotics 39 (1) (2022) 21–40

    2022

  5. [5]

    G u o , F

    H . G u o , F . W u , Y . Q i n , R . L i , K . L i , K . L i , R e c e n t t r e n d s i n t a s k a n d motion planning for robotics: A surv ey, ACM Computing Surveys 55 (13s) (2023) 1–36

    2023

  6. [6]

    Z. Li, P. Xu, Z. Dong, R. Zhang, Z. Deng, Feature-level knowledge distil- lation for place recognition based on soft-hard labels teaching paradigm, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Tran sportation Systems 26 (2) (2025) 2091–2101. doi:10.1109/TITS.2024.3495656

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Z. Li, T. Shang, P. Xu, Z. Deng, R. Zhang, Toward robust visual place recognition for mobile robots with an end-to-end dark-enhanced net, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Info rmatics 21 (2) (2025) 1359–1368. doi:10.1109/TII.2024.3476574

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Z. Li, P. Xu, Cspformer: A cross-sp atial pyramid transformer for visual place recognition, Neurocomputing 580 (2024) 127472

    2024

Show all 124 references
  1. [9]

    M. A. Khan, H. E. Sayed, S. Malik, T. Zia, J. Khan, N. Alkaabi, H. Igna- tious, Level-5 autonomous driving—are we there yet? a review of research literature, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 55 (2) (2022) 1–38

    2022

  2. [10]

    Y. D. Yasuda, L. E. G. Martins, F. A. Cappabianco, Autonomous vi- sual navigation for mobile robots: A systematic literature review, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 53 (1) (2020) 1–34. 54

    2020

  3. [11]

    Munoz-Salinas, M

    R. Munoz-Salinas, M. J. Marin-Jime nez, R. Medina-Carnicer, Spm-slam: Simultaneous localization and mapping with squared planar markers, Pat- tern Recognition 86 (2019) 156–171

    2019

  4. [12]

    Nahavandi, R

    S. Nahavandi, R. Alizadehsani, D. Nahavandi, S. Mohamed, N. Mohajer, M. Rokonuzzaman, I. Hossain, A comp rehensive review on autonomous navigation, ACM Computing Surveys (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    F. Gu, X. Hu, M. Ramezani, D. Acharya, K. Khoshelham, S. Valaee, J. Shang, Indoor localization improved by spatial context—a survey, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 52 (3) (2019) 1–35

    2019

  6. [14]

    Cruz-Mota, I

    J. Cruz-Mota, I. Bogdanova, B. Paquier, M. Bierlaire, J.-P. Thiran, Scale invariant feature transform on the sphere: Theory and applications, In- ternational journal of computer vision 98 (2012) 217–241

    2012

  7. [15]

    H. Bay, A. Ess, T. Tuytelaars, L. Van Gool, Speeded-up robust features (surf), Computer Vision and Image Understanding 110 (2008) 346–359

    2008

  8. [16]

    Lowry, N

    S. Lowry, N. Su¨nderhauf, P. Newman, J. J. Leonard, D. Cox, P. Corke, M. J. Milford, Visual place recognit ion: A survey, IEEE Transactions on Robotics 32 (1) (2015) 1–19

    2015

  9. [17]

    Zhang, L

    X. Zhang, L. Wang, Y. Su, Visual place recognition: A survey from deep learning perspective, Pattern Recognition 113 (2021) 107760

    2021

  10. [18]

    Z. Li, P. Xu, T. Shang, Cwpformer: Towards high-performance visual place recognition for robot with cross-weight attention learning, IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    Izquierdo, J

    S. Izquierdo, J. Civera, Optimal tr ansport aggregation for visual place recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 17658–17668

    2024

  12. [20]

    Hausler, P

    S. Hausler, P. Moghadam, Pair-vpr: Place-aware pre-training and con- trastive pair classification for visual place recognition with vision trans- formers, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2025). 55

    2025

  13. [21]

    X i a , L

    Y . X i a , L . S h i , Z . D i n g , J . F . H e n r i q u e s , D . C r e m e r s , T e x t 2 l o c : 3 d point cloud localization from natural language, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2024, pp. 14958–14967

    2024

  14. [22]

    Kolmet, Q

    M. Kolmet, Q. Zhou, A. Oˇsep, L. Leal-Taix´e, Text2pos: Text-to-point- cloud cross-modal localization, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 6687–6696

    2022

  15. [23]

    G. Wang, H. Fan, M. Kankanhalli, Te xt to point cloud localization with relation-enhanced transformer, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 37, 2023, pp. 2501–2509

    2023

  16. [24]

    Barros, R

    T. Barros, R. Pereira, L. Garrote, C. Premebida, U. J. Nunes, Place recog- nition survey: An update on deep le arning approaches, arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10458 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Z h a n g , P

    Y . Z h a n g , P . S h i , J . L i , L i d a r - b ased place recognition for autonomous driving: A survey, ACM Computing Surveys 57 (4) (2024) 1–36

    2024

  18. [26]

    K. Luo, H. Yu, X. Chen, Z. Yang, J. Wang, P. Cheng, A. Mian, 3d point cloud-based place recognition: a survey, Artificial Intelligence Re- view 57 (4) (2024) 83

    2024

  19. [27]

    H. J. S. Feder, J. J. Leonard, C. M. Smith, Adaptive mobile robot naviga- tion and mapping, The International Journal of Robotics Research 18 (7) (1999) 650–668

    1999

  20. [28]

    Thrun, M

    S. Thrun, M. Montemerlo, The graph slam algorithm with applications to large-scale mapping of urban structures, The International Journal of Robotics Research 25 (5-6) (2006) 403–429

    2006

  21. [29]

    Montemerlo, S

    M. Montemerlo, S. Thrun, D. Koller, B. Wegbreit, et al., Fastslam: A factored solution to the simultaneous localization and mapping problem, AAAI 593598 (2002) 593–598. 56

    2002

  22. [30]

    M. G. Dissanayake, P. Newman, S. Clark, H. F. Durrant-Whyte, M. Csorba, A solution to the simultaneous localization and map building (slam) problem, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 17 (3) (2001) 229–241

    2001

  23. [31]

    Mur-Artal, J

    R. Mur-Artal, J. M. M. Montiel, J. D. Tardos, Orb-slam: A versatile and accurate monocular slam system, IEEE Transactions on Robotics 31 (5) (2015) 1147–1163

    2015

  24. [32]

    Engel, V

    J. Engel, V. Koltun, D. Cremers, Direct sparse odometry, IEEE Transac- tions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 40 (3) (2017) 611–625

    2017

  25. [33]

    S. Wang, R. Clark, H. Wen, N. Trigoni, Deepvo: Towards end-to-end vi- sual odometry with deep recurrent convolutional neural networks, in: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE, 2017, pp . 2043–2050

    2017

  26. [34]

    Radwan, A

    N. Radwan, A. Valada, W. Burgard, Vlocnet++: Deep multitask learn- ing for semantic visual localization and odometry, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3 (4 ) (2018) 4407–4414

    2018

  27. [35]

    J. Liu, G. Wang, C. Jiang, Z. Liu, H. Wang, Translo: A window-based masked point transformer framework for large-scale lidar odometry, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 37, 2023, pp. 1683–1691

    2023

  28. [36]

    Taketomi, H

    T. Taketomi, H. Uchiyama, S. Ikeda, Visual slam algorithms: A survey from 2010 to 2016, IPSJ transactions on computer vision and applications 9 (1) (2017) 16

    2017

  29. [37]

    Y. Wang, Y. Tian, J. Chen, K. Xu, X. Ding, A survey of visual slam in dynamic environment: The evolution from geometric to semantic approaches, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (2024). 57

    2024

  30. [38]

    C. Yan, D. Qu, D. Xu, B. Zhao, Z. Wang, D. Wang, X. Li, Gs-slam: Dense visual slam with 3d gaussian splatting, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 19595–19604

    2024

  31. [39]

    M . L i , S . L i u , H . Z h o u , G . Z h u , N . C h e n g , T . D e n g , H . W a n g , S g s - slam: Semantic gaussian splatting for neural dense slam, in: European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer, 2024, pp. 163–179

    2024

  32. [40]

    M. J. Milford, G. F. Wyeth, Seqslam: Visual route-based navigation for sunny summer days and stormy winter nights, in: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, 2012, pp. 1643–1649

    2012

  33. [41]

    Talbot, S

    B. Talbot, S. Garg, M. Milford, Openseqslam2. 0: An open source tool- box for visual place recognition under changing conditions, in: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE, 2018, pp. 7758–7765

    2018

  34. [42]

    P. Yin, R. A. Srivatsan, Y. Chen, X. Li, H. Zhang, L. Xu, L. Li, Z. Jia, J. Ji, Y. He, Mrs-vpr: a multi-resolu tion sampling base d global visual place recognition method, in: 2019 In ternational Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE, 2019, pp. 7137–7142

    2019

  35. [43]

    Cummins, P

    M. Cummins, P. Newman, Fab-map: Probabilistic localization and map- ping in the space of appearance, The International Journal of Robotics Research 27 (6) (2008) 647–665

    2008

  36. [44]

    G´alvez-L´opez, J

    D. G´alvez-L´opez, J. D. Tardos, Bags of binary words for fast place recog- nition in image sequences, IEEE Transactions on Robotics 28 (5) (2012) 1188–1197

    2012

  37. [45]

    Z. Chen, O. Lam, A. Jacobson, M. Milford, Convolutional neural network- based place recognition, arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1509 (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Su¨nderhauf, S

    N. Su¨nderhauf, S. Shirazi, F. Dayoub, B. Upcroft, M. Milford, On the performance of convnet features for place recognition, in: 2015 IEEE/RSJ 58 International Conference on intelligent robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE, 2015, pp. 4297–4304

    2015

  39. [47]

    L o w r y , G

    S . L o w r y , G . W y e t h , M . M i l f o r d , U n s u p e r v i s e d o n l i n e l e a r n i n g o f condition-invariant images for place recognition, in: Australasian Con- ference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2014, 2014

    2014

  40. [48]

    Finman, L

    R. Finman, L. Paull, J. J. Leonard, Toward object-based place recognition in dense rgb-d maps, in: ICRA Workshop Visual Place Recognition in Changing Environments, Seattle, WA, Vol. 76, 2015, p. 480

    2015

  41. [49]

    A r a n d j e l o v i c , P

    R . A r a n d j e l o v i c , P . G r o n a t , A . T o r i i , T . P a j d l a , J . S i v i c , N e t v l a d : C n n architecture for weakly supervised place recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016, pp. 5297–5307

    2016

  42. [50]

    Jin Kim, E

    H. Jin Kim, E. Dunn, J.-M. Frahm, Learned contextual feature reweight- ing for image geo-localization, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017, pp. 2136–2145

    2017

  43. [51]

    Panphattarasap, A

    P. Panphattarasap, A. Calway, Visual place recognition using landmark distribution descriptor s, in: Computer Vision–ACCV 2016: 13th Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Taipei, Taiwan, November 20-24, 2016, Revised Selected Papers, Part IV 13, Springer, 2017, pp. 487–502

    2016

  44. [52]

    Radenovi´c, G

    F. Radenovi´c, G. Tolias, O. Chum, Fine-tuning cnn image retrieval with no human annotation, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 41 (7) (2018) 1655–1668

    2018

  45. [53]

    J . Y u , C . Z h u , J . Z h a n g , Q . H u a n g , D . T a o , S p a t i a l p y r a m i d - e n h a n c e d netvlad with weighted triplet loss for place recognition, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 31 (2) (2019) 661–674

    2019

  46. [54]

    Y. Ge, H. Wang, F. Zhu, R. Zhao, H. Li, Self-supervising fine-grained region similarities for large-scale image localization, in: Computer Vision– 59 ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part IV 16, Springer, 2020, pp. 369–386

    2020

  47. [55]

    B. Cao, A. Araujo, J. Sim, Unifying deep local and global features for im- age search, in: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XX 16, Springer, 2020, pp. 726–743

    2020

  48. [56]

    Khaliq, S

    A. Khaliq, S. Ehsan, Z. Chen, M. Milford, K. McDonald-Maier, A holistic visual place recognition approach using lightweight cnns for significant viewpoint and appearance changes, IEEE Transactio ns on Robotics 36 (2) (2019) 561–569

    2019

  49. [57]

    Hausler, S

    S. Hausler, S. Garg, M. Xu, M. Milford, T. Fischer, Patch-netvlad: Multi- scale fusion of locally-gl obal descriptors for place recognition, in: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021, pp. 14141–14152

    2021

  50. [58]

    Ali-Bey, B

    A. Ali-Bey, B. Chaib-Draa, P. Giguere, Mixvpr: Feature mixing for visual place recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/ CVF winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 2998–3007

    2023

  51. [59]

    Berton, G

    G. Berton, G. Trivigno, B. Caputo, C. Masone, Eigenp laces: Training viewpoint robust models for visual place recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 11080–11090

    2023

  52. [60]

    Berton, C

    G. Berton, C. Masone, B. Caputo, Reth inking visual geo-localization for large-scale applications, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 4878–4888

    2022

  53. [61]

    Ali-bey, B

    A. Ali-bey, B. Chaib-draa, P. Gigu`ere, Gsv-cities: Toward appropriate supervised visual place recognition, Neurocomputing 513 (2022) 194–203

    2022

  54. [62]

    R. Wang, Y. Shen, W. Zuo, S. Zhou , N. Zheng, Transvpr: Transformer- based place recognition wi th multi-level attention aggregation, in: Pro- 60 ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 13648–13657

    2022

  55. [63]

    Oquab, T

    M. Oquab, T. Darcet, T. Moutakanni, H. Vo, M. Szafraniec, V. Khali- dov, P. Fernandez, D. Haziza, F. Massa, A. El-Nouby, et al., Di- nov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision, arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Sarlin, D

    P.-E. Sarlin, D. DeTone, T. Malisiewicz, A. Rabinovich, Superglue: Learn- ing feature matching with graph neural networks, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020, pp. 4938–4947

    2020

  57. [65]

    Y. Xu, P. Shamsolmoali, E. Granger, C. Nicodeme, L. Gardes, J. Yang, Transvlad: Multi-scale attention-based global descriptors for visual geo- localization, in: Proceedings of th e IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 2840–2849

    2023

  58. [66]

    F . L u , S . D o n g , L . Z h a n g , B . L i u , X . L a n , D . J i a n g , C . Y u a n , D e e p homography estimation for visual pl ace recognition, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 38, 2024, pp. 10341– 10349

    2024

  59. [67]

    Ali-Bey, B

    A. Ali-Bey, B. Chaib-draa, P. Gigu`ere, Boq: A place is worth a bag of learnable queries, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recogn ition, 2024, pp. 17794–17803

    2024

  60. [68]

    F . L u , X . L a n , L . Z h a n g , D . J i a n g , Y . W a n g , C . Y u a n , C r i c a v p r : C r o s s - image correlation-aware representation learning for visual place recogni- tion, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CV F Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognitio...

    2024

  61. [69]

    F . L u , L . Z h a n g , X . L a n , S . D o n g , Y . W a n g , C . Y u a n , T o w a r d s s e a m - less adaptation of pre-trained models for visual place recognition, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14505 (2024). 61

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    J. Hu, C. Mao, C. Tan, H. Li, H. Liu, M. Zheng, Progeo: Gener- ating prompts through image-text cont rastive learning for visual geo- localization, in: International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Springer, 2024, pp. 448–462

    2024

  63. [71]

    K. Garg, S. S. Puligilla, S. Kolathaya, M. Krishna, S. Garg, Revisit any- thing: Visual place recognition via image segment retrieval, in: European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer, 2024, pp. 326–343

    2024

  64. [72]

    Tzachor, B

    I. Tzachor, B. Lerner, M. Levy, M. Green, T. B. Shalev, G. Habib, D. Samuel, N. K. Zailer, O. Shimshi, N. Darshan, et al., Effovpr: Ef- fective foundation model utilization for visual place recognition, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.18065 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    W. Zuo, L. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Shen, F. Xiang, J. Xin, N. Zheng, Prgs: Patch- to-region graph search for visual pl ace recognition, Pattern Recognition (2025) 111673

    2025

  66. [74]

    F . L u , T . J i n , X . L a n , L . Z h a n g , Y . L i u , Y . W a n g , C . Y u a n , S e l a v p r + + : Towards seamless adaptation of foun dation models for efficient place recognition, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16601 (2025)

    2025

  67. [75]

    Keetha, A

    N. Keetha, A. Mishra, J. Karhade, K. M. Jatavallabhu la, S. Scherer, M. Krishna, S. Garg, Anyloc: Towards universal visual place recognition, IEEE Robotics and Automation Le tters 9 (2) (2023) 1286–1293

    2023

  68. [76]

    S. Zhu, L. Yang, C. Chen, M. Shah, X. Shen, H. Wang, R2former: Unified retrieval and reranking transformer for place recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Comp uter Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion, 2023, pp. 19370–19380

    2023

  69. [77]

    Hansen, B

    P. Hansen, B. Browning, Visual pl ace recognition using hmm sequence matching, in: 2014 IEEE/RSJ Internat ional Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE, 2014, pp. 4549–4555. 62

    2014

  70. [78]

    Mohan, D

    M. Mohan, D. G´alvez-L´opez, C. Monteleoni, G. Sibley, Environment se- lection and hierarchical place recogn ition, in: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE, 2015, pp. 5487– 5494

    2015

  71. [79]

    Revaud, J

    J. Revaud, J. Almaz´an, R. S. Rezende, C. R. d. Souza, Learning with average precision: Training image retrieval with a listwise loss, in: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2019, pp. 5107–5116

    2019

  72. [80]

    L. Liu, H. Li, Y. Dai, Stochastic attraction-repulsion embedding for large scale image localization, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2019, pp. 2570–2579

    2019

  73. [81]

    Caron, H

    M. Caron, H. Touvron, I. Misra, H. J´egou, J. Mairal, P. Bojanowski, A. Joulin, Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vi- sion, 2021, pp. 9650–9660

    2021

  74. [82]

    Y a n , Y

    L . Y a n , Y . C u i , Y . C h e n , D . L i u , H i e r a r c h i c a l a t t e n t i o n f u s i o n f o r g e o - localization, in: ICASSP 2021-2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processi ng (ICASSP), IEEE, 2021, pp. 2220– 2224

    2021

  75. [83]

    Leyva-Vallina, N

    M. Leyva-Vallina, N. Strisciuglio, N. Petkov, Generalized contrastive optimization of siamese networks fo r place recognition, arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.06638 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  76. [84]

    C. R. Qi, H. Su, K. Mo, L. J. Guibas, Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segm entation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 652–660

    2017

  77. [85]

    C. R. Qi, L. Yi, H. Su, L. J. Guibas, Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space, Advances in neural infor- mation processing systems 30 (2017). 63

    2017

  78. [86]

    M. A. Uy, G. H. Lee, Pointnetvlad: Deep point cloud based retrieval for large-scale place recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 4470–4479

    2018

  79. [87]

    Zhang, C

    W. Zhang, C. Xiao, Pcan: 3d atte ntion map learning using contex- tual information for point cloud based retrieval, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 12436–12445

    2019

  80. [88]

    J. Du, R. Wang, D. Cremers, Dh3d: Deep hierarchical 3d descriptors for robust large-scale 6dof relocalization, in: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceed- ings, Part IV 16, Springer, 2020, pp. 744–762

    2020

  81. [89]

    Cattaneo, M

    D. Cattaneo, M. Vaghi, A. Valada, Lcdnet: Deep loop closure detection and point cloud registration for lidar slam, IEEE Transactions on Robotics 38 (4) (2022) 2074–2093

    2022

  82. [90]

    Y. Zhou, Y. Wang, F. Poiesi, Q. Qin, Y. Wan, Loop closure detection using local 3d deep descriptors, I EEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7 (3) (2022) 6335–6342

    2022

  83. [91]

    H. Kim, J. Choi, T. Sim, G. Kim, Y. Cho, Narrowing your fov with solid: Spatially organized and lightweight global descriptor for fov-constrained lidar place recognition, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2024)

    2024

  84. [92]

    A. Zeng, S. Song, M. Nießner, M. Fish er, J. Xiao, T. Funkhouser, 3dmatch: Learning local geometric descriptors from rgb-d reconstructions, in: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recogni- tion, 2017, pp. 1802–1811

    2017

  85. [93]

    Gojcic, C

    Z. Gojcic, C. Zhou, J. D. Wegner, A. Wieser, The perfect match: 3d point cloud matching with smoothed densities, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 5545–5554. 64

    2019

  86. [94]

    M. Y. Chang, S. Yeon, S. Ryu, D. Lee, Spoxelnet: Sp herical voxel-based deep place recognition for 3d point clouds of crowded indoor spaces, in: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Sys- tems (IROS), IEEE, 2020, pp. 8564–8570

    2020

  87. [95]

    S. Siva, Z. Nahman, H. Zhang, Voxe l-based representation learning for place recognition based on 3d point clouds, in: 2020 IEEE/RSJ Interna- tional Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE, 2020, pp. 8351–8357

    2020

  88. [96]

    Komorowski, Minkloc3d: Point cloud based large-scale place recogni- tion, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, 2021, pp

    J. Komorowski, Minkloc3d: Point cloud based large-scale place recogni- tion, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, 2021, pp. 1790–1799

    2021

  89. [97]

    J. Komorowski, Improving point cl oud based place recognition with ranking-based loss and large batch training, in: 2022 26th international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR), IEEE, 2022, pp. 3699–3705

    2022

  90. [98]

    Vidanapathirana, M

    K. Vidanapathirana, M. Ramezani, P. Moghadam, S. Sridharan, C. Fookes, Logg3d-net: Locally guided global descriptor learning for 3d place recognition, in: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Au- tomation (ICRA), IEEE, 2022, pp. 2215–2221

    2022

  91. [99]

    L u o , S

    L . L u o , S . Z h e n g , Y . L i , Y . F a n , B . Y u , S . - Y . C a o , J . L i , H . - L . S h e n , Bevplace: Learning lidar-based place recognition using bird’s eye view images, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/ CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 8700–8709

    2023

  92. [100]

    J u n g , W

    M . J u n g , W . Y a n g , D . L e e , H . G i l , G . K i m , A . K i m , H e l i p r : H e t e r o g e - neous lidar dataset for inter-lidar place recognition under spatiotemporal variations, The International Journal of Robotics Research 43 (12) (2024) 1867–1883

    2024

  93. [101]

    Xu, Y.-C

    T.-X. Xu, Y.-C. Guo, Z. Li, G. Yu, Y.-K. Lai, S.-H. Zhang, Transloc3d: 65 Point cloud based large-scale place recognition using adaptive receptive fields, arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.11605 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Z. Zhou, C. Zhao, D. Adolfsson, S. Su, Y. Gao, T. Duckett, L. Sun, Ndt- transformer: Large-scale 3d point cloud localisation using the normal distribution transform representation, in: 2021 IEEE international con- ference on robotics and automation (ICRA), IEEE, 2021, pp. 5654–5660

    2021

  95. [103]

    Z. Hou, Y. Yan, C. Xu, H. Kong, Hitpr: Hierarchical transformer for place recognition in point cloud, in: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE, 2022, pp. 2612–2618

    2022

  96. [104]

    J. Ma, J. Zhang, J. Xu, R. Ai, W. Gu, X. Chen, Overlaptransformer: An efficient and yaw-angle-invariant transformer network for lidar-based place recognition, IEEE Robotics an d Automation Letters 7 (3) (2022) 6958–6965

    2022

  97. [105]

    Barros, L

    T. Barros, L. Garrote, R. Pereira, C. Premebida, U. J. Nunes, Attdlnet: Attention-based deep network for 3d lidar place recognition, in: Iberian Robotics conference, Springer, 2022, pp. 309–320

    2022

  98. [106]

    J. Ma, X. Chen, J. Xu, G. Xiong, Se qot: A spatial–temp oral transformer network for place recognition using sequential lidar data, IEEE Transac- tions on Industrial Electronics 70 (8) (2022) 8225–8234

    2022

  99. [107]

    Z. Fan, Z. Song, H. Liu, Z. Lu, J. He, X. Du, Svt-net: Super light-weight sparse voxel transformer for large scale place recognition, in: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 36, 2022, pp. 551– 560

    2022

  100. [108]

    R. G. Goswami, N. Patel, P. Krishnamurthy, F. Khorrami, Salsa: Swift adaptive lightweight self-attention for enhanced lidar place recognition, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2024). 66

    2024

  101. [109]

    K a n g , M

    S . K a n g , M . Y . L i a o , Y . X i a , O . W y s o c k i , B . J u t z i , D . C r e m e r s , O p a l : Visibility-aware lidar-to-openstreetmap place recognition via adaptive ra- dial fusion, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19258 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  102. [110]

    X. Wang, G. Tian, J. Zhao, S. Tao, Q. Gu, Q. Yu, T. Feng, Ranking- aware continual learning for lidar place recognition, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07198 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Radford, J

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G . S a s t r y , A . A s k e l l , P . M i s h k i n , J . C l a r k , e t a l . , L e a r n i n g t r a n s f e r a b l e visual models from natural language supervision, in: International confer- ence on mach...

    2021

  104. [112]

    Shang, Z

    T. Shang, Z. Li, W. Pei, P. Xu, Z. Deng, F. Kong, Mambaplace: Text-to- point-cloud cross-modal place recognition with attention mamba mecha- nisms, arXiv preprint ar Xiv:2408.15740 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Shang, Z

    T. Shang, Z. Li, P. Xu, Z. Deng, R. Zhang, Text-driven 3d lidar place recognition for autonomous driving, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.18035 (2025)

    2025

  106. [114]

    Shang, Z

    T. Shang, Z. Li, P. Xu, J. Qiao, G. Chen, Z. Ruan, W. Hu, Bridging text and vision: A multi-view text-vision registration approach for cross-modal place recognition, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14195 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  107. [115]

    T or ii , J

    A . T or ii , J . Si vic , T . P a j dl a , M. O k ut om i , V is u a l p la c e r eco gn it io n wi th repetitive structures, in: Proceeding s of the IEEE Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2013, pp. 883–890

    2013

  108. [116]

    Neuhold, T

    G. Neuhold, T. Ollmann, S. Rota Bulo, P. Kontschieder, The mapillary vistas dataset for semantic understand ing of street scenes, in: Proceed- ings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2017, pp. 4990–4999

    2017

  109. [117]

    A . J . G l o v e r , W . P . M a d d e r n , M . J . M i l f o r d , G . F . W y e t h , F a b - m a p + ratslam: Appearance-based slam for multiple times of day, in: 2010 IEEE 67 international conference on roboti cs and automation, IEEE, 2010, pp. 3507–3512

    2010

  110. [118]

    T o r i i , R

    A . T o r i i , R . A r a n d j e l o v i c , J . S i v i c , M . O k u t o m i , T . P a j d l a , 2 4 / 7 p l a c e recognition by view synthesis, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2015, pp. 1808–1817

    2015

  111. [119]

    D. Olid, J. M. F´acil, J. Civera, Single-view place recognition under sea- sonal changes, arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.06516 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  112. [120]

    X. Sun, Y. Xie, P. Luo, L. Wang, A dataset for benchmarking image-based localization, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017, pp. 7436–7444

    2017

  113. [121]

    B. Zhou, A. Lapedriza, J. Xiao, A. Torralba, A. Oliva, Learning deep features for scene recognition using places database, Advances in neural information processing systems 27 (2014)

    2014

  114. [122]

    Hu a n g, C

    H . Hu a n g, C . L iu , Y. Zh u, H . C h eng , T . B r a ud , S. -K . Y eu n g, 36 0 lo c: A dataset and benchmark for omnidirectional visual localization with cross- device queries, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024...

    2024

  115. [123]

    Maddern, G

    W. Maddern, G. Pascoe, C. Linegar, P. Newman, 1 year, 1000 km: The oxford robotcar dataset, The International Journal of Robotics Research 36 (1) (2017) 3–15

    2017

  116. [124]

    Huang, Z

    H. Huang, Z. Nie, Z. Wang, Z. Sh ang, Cross-modal and uni-modal soft- label alignment for image-text retr ieval, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 38, 2024, pp. 18298–18306

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.