REVIEW 2 cited by
The Creative Frontier of Generative AI: Managing the Novelty-Usefulness Tradeoff
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, drawing inspiration from the human creativity literature, we explore the optimal balance between novelty and usefulness in generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. We posit that overemphasizing either aspect can lead to limitations such as hallucinations and memorization. Hallucinations, characterized by AI responses containing random inaccuracies or falsehoods, emerge when models prioritize novelty over usefulness. Memorization, where AI models reproduce content from their training data, results from an excessive focus on usefulness, potentially limiting creativity. To address these challenges, we propose a framework that includes domain-specific analysis, data and transfer learning, user preferences and customization, custom evaluation metrics, and collaboration mechanisms. Our approach aims to generate content that is both novel and useful within specific domains, while considering the unique requirements of various contexts.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Creative Transformation in Literary Texts: Modelling Change Across Representational Levels
Historically linked literary pairs show selective multi-level retention-and-divergence profiles that separate from controls more strongly than any single similarity channel.
-
Agentic AI: Autonomy, Accountability, and the Algorithmic Society
The paper is a conceptual essay claiming agentic AI creates new accountability gaps and market-collusion risks that current legal and economic frameworks are not equipped to handle.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.