Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Effect of Different Writing Tasks on Linguistic Style: A Case Study of the ROC Story Cloze Task

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1702.01841 v3 pith:HJNOW7PU submitted 2017-02-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords storywritingtaskclozedifferentstyleaddingcase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A writer's style depends not just on personal traits but also on her intent and mental state. In this paper, we show how variants of the same writing task can lead to measurable differences in writing style. We present a case study based on the story cloze task (Mostafazadeh et al., 2016a), where annotators were assigned similar writing tasks with different constraints: (1) writing an entire story, (2) adding a story ending for a given story context, and (3) adding an incoherent ending to a story. We show that a simple linear classifier informed by stylistic features is able to successfully distinguish among the three cases, without even looking at the story context. In addition, combining our stylistic features with language model predictions reaches state of the art performance on the story cloze challenge. Our results demonstrate that different task framings can dramatically affect the way people write.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Commonsense Knowledge Mining from Pretrained Models

    cs.CL 2019-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A masked-language-model pointwise mutual information score, with no fine-tuning on commonsense databases, matches or beats supervised baselines when mining novel Wikipedia triples, though the evaluation is weakened by...

Pith tools