Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 43 references

StimulHeat: a Low-Energy Wearable Thermal Feedback Device Using Peltier Elements with Heat Flow Controlled Loop for Hand Interactions in Virtual Reality

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A clip-on Peltier device brings low-power hot and cold feedback to VR palm interactions.

desk verdict A solid, open-source thermal haptic clip-on for Valve Index with a genuine heat-flow control mode; the precision claim rests on a circular validation, but the device and user study stand on their own. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.05020 v1 pith:HJQ5AGFR submitted 2025-09-05 eess.SY cs.SY

Matthieu Mesnage , Sophie Villenave , Bertrand Massot , Matthieu Blanchard , Pierre Raimbaud , Guillaume Lavoué , Claudine Gehin This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords ThermalFeedbackHapticsVirtualRealityPeltierHeatflowcontrolLow-powerwearableNon-intrusiveOpen-sourcehardware
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

StimulHeat is a wearable thermal device that clips onto Valve Index controllers and delivers hot, neutral, or cold sensations to the palm during virtual reality use. Its central claim is that controlling the heat flow through a Peltier element—rather than regulating its surface temperature with a PID loop—yields faster, more accurate, and more energy-efficient thermal feedback. The device derives the required current directly from an analytic relation between current and heat flow, eliminating per-device PID tuning. The authors validate the approach with a technical characterization and a 16-participant user study, and release the design as open source. If correct, realistic thermal feedback in VR no longer requires specialized gloves or bulky power supplies.

What carries the argument

The central object is Equation (1), the steady-state relation between the current injected into a thermoelectric (Peltier) device and the heat flow at its absorbed face: Q1 = -R/2 I^2 + α T_a I + (T_a - T_e)/θ_m. This quadratic is the mechanism: it converts a desired heat-flow setpoint into a current command, and the same relation is used in reverse to estimate the heat flow actually produced. The hardware counterpart is a current source built from an op-amp, a sense resistor, an N-MOS transistor, and an H-bridge, which injects a continuous bidirectional current so the Peltier element heats or cools without the losses and ripple of PWM voltage modulation.

What would settle it

Mount an independent heat-flux sensor between the Peltier module and the palm, then command a step from 0 W to 2 W over repeated trials while varying contact pressure. If the measured skin heat flux departs from the setpoint or drifts with contact temperature, the claim that heat-flow control is precise and calibration-free fails. A second check: run the same device under temperature control with an optimally tuned PID and compare response time and energy draw; if the temperature-controlled version matches or beats heat-flow control, the claimed advantage is not inherent to the approach.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's discovery is that the heat flow delivered to the skin through a Peltier module can be treated as the controlled variable. Equation (1) expresses the absorbed-side heat flow Q1 as a quadratic function of the injected current I, using constant device parameters (electrical resistance R, Seebeck coefficient α, thermal resistivity θm) and the two measured face temperatures. Given a heat setpoint in watts, the firmware solves the quadratic for the required current, and a custom continuous bidirectional current source injects that current directly, without PWM and without a feedback PID. The technical characterization reports that heat-flow control responds instantaneously and tracks t

Load-bearing premise

The control law assumes Equation (1), with constant device parameters and the two measured face temperatures, exactly describes the heat delivered to the palm; the paper's own validation deduces heat flow from that same equation, so there is no independent measure of skin heat flux.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Thermal feedback systems can be commanded in watts, giving a physical unit tied to what the skin actually feels rather than a surface temperature that depends on contact and the object's thermal properties.
  • Because no PID calibration is needed per unit, devices can be replicated and swapped without tuning; the open-source firmware and hardware make the design reproducible at roughly $400.
  • Power consumption of 2.22 W per controller is within the range of a small battery, so thermal feedback can be untethered and clipped onto existing controllers rather than worn as a glove.
  • The same driver offers both heat-flow and temperature control, letting developers choose the mode suited to the virtual object—continuous heat source versus an object that cools to body temperature.
  • The user study's confusion matrix suggests users robustly discriminate hot, neutral, and cold, supporting the integration of thermal feedback into VR interaction design.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's validation reuses Equation (1) to estimate the heat flow delivered to the skin; an independent measurement using a heat-flux sensor between the Peltier module and the palm would settle whether the model tracks true skin heat transfer as contact pressure or skin temperature varies.
  • Heat-flow control could be extended toward rendering material properties: since perceived warmth depends on thermal effusivity, a heat-flow setpoint modulated according to a virtual object's effective effusivity might reproduce the 'wood versus steel' sensation the paper invokes.
  • The reported cooling limitation at sustained VERY COLD use suggests a testable extension: a heat-flow controller paired with an active heat sink or feedforward compensation for rising hot-side temperature could keep Equation (1) valid for longer.
  • Because the driver is current-based and the control law is parameterized by (α, R, θm), the same approach should transfer to other Peltier modules, making heat-flow control a generic building block for thermal haptics beyond the specific hardware presented.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents StimulHeat, a clip-on wearable thermal feedback device for Valve Index VR controllers. The hardware includes a custom continuous bidirectional current source driving a Peltier element, two face-mounted thermistors, BLE communication, a LiPo battery, and a 3D-printed shell. Two control modes are implemented: conventional temperature control with a PID loop, and heat-flow control based on the steady-state TED equation Q1 = −R/2·I² + α·Ta·I + (Ta−Te)/θ_m (Eq. 1). The authors report a technical characterization on a single participant comparing six heat-flow setpoints and six temperature setpoints, and claim that heat-flow control is more precise, responds faster, and is more robust because it avoids PID calibration. They also report a user study (N=16) in which participants distinguish HOT, NEUTRAL, and COLD heat commands while grasping virtual totems. The paper additionally provides open-source design files, firmware, a Unity package, and a Bill of Materials, and reports a maximum power consumption of 2.22 W per controller.

Significance. The open-source, low-power, controller-integrated design is a genuine contribution to VR thermal feedback hardware. The authors should be credited for releasing hardware and firmware under open licenses, providing a complete Bill of Materials and build instructions, and obtaining ethics approval for the user study. The behavioral validation (N=16) does support the basic claim that the device can deliver distinguishable hot, neutral, and cold palm sensations in a VR grasping task. However, the central quantitative claim—that heat-flow control is more precise and more reactive than temperature PID control—is not independently established by the technical characterization, because the validation is circular and based on a single subject. If the heat-flow-control advantage could be rigorously demonstrated, this would be a meaningful step toward simplifying thermal feedback systems; at present, that advantage remains a model-consistency claim rather than a measured result.

major comments (4)
  1. [§7.1, Eq. (1)] The central quantitative claim—that heat-flow control is more precise than temperature control—is not independently established. The current injected for each heat setpoint is computed by solving Eq. (1), and the 'real heat flow' used for comparison in Figure 13 is then recomputed from the same equation using the same two thermistor measurements. The agreement therefore verifies only that the firmware and current source consistently implement Eq. (1); it does not verify that the commanded Q_setpoint equals the heat actually exchanged with the skin. An independent measure of skin heat flux (e.g., a heat-flux sensor) or a calibrated thermal load is needed. Without this, the claimed precision advantage over temperature PID is a model-consistency loop.
  2. [§7.1] The technical characterization is based on a single participant (N=1), with no repeated trials, no error bars, and no statistical analysis. The claims that heat control is 'more precise' and that the temperature mode operates at 'approximately 2.25 °C/s' cannot be assessed without variance information. Moreover, the temperature-control results depend on the PID gains, which are not reported; §2.2 only says that 'default values' are embedded in the firmware. Please report the PID gains, the number of repetitions, and per-condition variability. Otherwise the comparison is not reproducible.
  3. [§7.1, Results and discussion] The claim that heat control responds 'instantaneously because the current value is derived using equation (1)' is an inference from the control law, not an empirical step-response measurement. No rise time, settling time, or other quantitative response metric is reported. A meaningful comparison would measure the time to reach a defined fraction of the commanded heat flux (or a defined skin-temperature change) under both controllers, with the same contact conditions. As written, the response-time advantage is asserted rather than demonstrated.
  4. [§2.2 and §7.1] Eq. (1) treats α, R, and θ_m as constants, but these parameters are temperature- and mounting-dependent for real TEDs, and the paper provides no calibration data or sensitivity analysis over the operating range (heating and cooling, face temperatures spanning more than 10 °C). Since both the heat-flow control law and the validation rely on these constants, parameter drift could directly bias the setpoint. In addition, Eq. (1) describes the heat flow at the TED face, not necessarily the heat delivered into the skin; contact resistance and skin thermal properties also matter. Please provide calibration measurements or a sensitivity analysis, and clarify that 'eliminating PID calibration' still requires identification of the TED parameters.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.2] The sign convention for heat setpoints is confusing: VERY HOT is −4 W, HOT is −2 W, COLD is +2 W, VERY COLD is +4 W, while Eq. (1) defines Q1 on the absorbed side. Please clarify whether negative Q denotes heat flowing into the skin and add the convention to Figure 13.
  2. [§7.2, Figure 15] The confusion matrix is presented only in percentages. Please report raw counts and, ideally, per-participant data, so that the number of trials (192) and the distribution of errors are transparent.
  3. [§2.3] The ISP1807 is described as 'nRF52804-based'; this appears to be a typo for nRF52840. Please verify the module part number.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typos and inconsistencies: 'Proportionnal' in §2.2, 'welding' for soldering in §5.2, 'N N one' in §7.2, and inconsistent capitalization of 'Stimulheat/StimulHeat'. A careful proofreading pass is recommended.
  5. [§7.1, Figure 13] Figure 13 is difficult to interpret as printed: axis labels, legends, and error bars should be added, and the heat-flow and temperature panels should be clearly separated.
  6. [§8 and §2.2] The effective operating envelope is narrower than the claimed [−9 W, 9 W] range: §8 acknowledges that VERY COLD stimuli degrade after about five minutes, and §2.2 notes that cold heat flows above 6 W and temperatures below 25 °C would require a better heat sink. This should be stated in the specifications and reflected in the abstract or conclusion.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Section 7.1 heat-flow validation is circular: the 'real heat flow' is computed from the same Eq. (1) used to set the current, so the precision comparison only tests model self-consistency.

  1. self definitional [Section 7.1 (Materials and Methods); cf. Section 2.2 and Eq. (1)]
    "The equation 1 was utilised to deduce the heat flow present in the TED, facilitating the comparison between the setpoint in heat flow and the real heat flow."

    The control law is built from Eq. (1): Section 2.2 states that 'it is possible to control a given heat flow by injecting a specific current value, and conversely, to determine the required current from a desired heat flow' using the same second-order equation. In Section 7.1 the 'real heat flow' used to evaluate the heat-flow setpoint is not measured independently; it is deduced from Eq. (1) using the same thermistor temperatures that enter the control calculation. Thus the agreement between setpoint and 'real' heat flow is a test of whether the firmware and current source consistently implement Eq. (1), not a test of whether Eq. (1) accurately gives the heat exchanged with the skin. The claimed precision advantage over temperature control is therefore not independently established by this

full rationale

The only load-bearing circular step is the technical validation of heat-flow control in Section 7.1. Both the commanded current and the 'real heat flow' used as ground truth are generated by Eq. (1), so the resulting precision and instantaneous-response conclusions are partly by construction. The user study (N=16) is independent behavioral evidence that HOT/NEUTRAL/COLD commands are perceptually distinguishable, and the hardware/software are open-source and benchmarked against existing devices, so the paper is not wholly circular. No load-bearing self-citation, imported uniqueness theorem, or ansatz-by-citation was found; the references to the authors' own IEEE VR demo are non-essential. The score reflects the partial circularity of the quantitative validation rather than the entire contribution. The paper's own limitation section honestly notes cooling saturation, which does not mitigate this validation issue.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard thermoelectric relation Eq. (1), on assumptions about skin contact and perception, and on device parameters taken from datasheet or benchmark rather than independently verified. No new physical entities are introduced. The main burden is that Eq. (1) is used both to generate and to validate the heat-flow setpoint.

free parameters (4)
  • TED equivalent electrical resistance R = Not stated in paper (datasheet or own benchmark for ET-071-08-15)
    Used in Eq. (1) to convert current setpoint to heat flow; if inaccurate, the heat-flow control precision claim fails.
  • TED Seebeck coefficient alpha = Not stated in paper (datasheet or own benchmark)
    Used in Eq. (1) for the Peltier term; device-specific and not independently verified in the paper.
  • TED thermal resistivity theta_m = Not stated in paper (datasheet or own benchmark)
    Used in Eq. (1) for the conduction term; device-specific and central to heat-flow setpoint calculation.
  • PID gains Kp, Ki, Kd in temperature mode = Default values embedded in firmware, values not reported
    Determine the temperature-control response used in the Section 7.1 comparison; without reporting them, the claim that heat-flow control is faster is incomplete.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Heat flow through the TED obeys Q1 = -R/2 I^2 + alpha*Ta*I + (Ta-Te)/theta_m with constant alpha, R, theta_m.
    Standard thermoelectric model used both to generate the current setpoint and to infer the real heat flow in validation; assumes parameters are constant and temperatures are measured accurately. Invoked in Section 2.2 and Section 7.1.
  • domain assumption Skin contact with the TED is primarily conductive and convection losses are minimized by good thermal contact.
    Justifies controlling heat flow through the contact zone; if contact is variable, delivered heat flow to the skin differs from the setpoint. Stated in Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption Perceived thermal sensation is better reproduced by modulating heat flow than by holding a fixed surface temperature.
    Motivates the heat-flow control mode, based on thermal effusivity and cited studies [22,21,13,29]; not directly tested against temperature control in the user study. Stated in Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption The two thermistor measurements accurately represent the absorbed-side and emitted-side temperatures of the TED.
    Both control modes depend on these temperatures; thermistors are attached with Kapton tape, and no calibration or error analysis is provided. Described in Section 5.1 and used in Section 7.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of StimulHeat: a Low-Energy Wearable Thermal Feedback Device Using Peltier Elements with Heat Flow Controlled Loop for Hand Interactions in Virtual Reality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HJQ5AGFR

@misc{pith2026250905020,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: StimulHeat: a Low-Energy Wearable Thermal Feedback Device Using Peltier Elements with Heat Flow Controlled Loop for Hand Interactions in Virtual Reality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HJQ5AGFR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.05020}
}
read the original abstract

Nowadays, the majority of wearable thermal feedback systems designed for use in virtual reality applications are not compatible or not integrated to standard controllers and are based on temperature control. The objectives of the present work is to enable integration with existing controllers, in this case Valve Index controllers, and to propose an alternative approach to managing thermal stimulation with Peltier modules by controlling heat flow instead of temperature. We introduce StimulHeat as a wireless, low power thermal feedback system, based on the continuous relationship between heat and current injection in thermoelectric device (TED). First, we designed an optimized TED driver capable of injecting a continuous, bidirectional current into the TED, thereby driving it as a heater or cooler. Subsequently, this driver was implemented in an electronic board to include temperature and heat flow control loops, as well as Bluetooth Low Energy interface for remote control. A mechanical integration was conducted, in the form of a controller extension which is non-intrusive and can be clipped to Valve Index controllers to enclose the TED, temperature sensors and electronics. Finally, we present a user study validating StimulHeat for use in Virtual Reality, utilizing a Unity-built virtual environment with our open-source package.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.05020 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Electronic Design of driver based on continuous current source for a TED [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A: Picture of a TED with a ceramic heat sink - B: Schematic of a TED (PID) controller serves to improve the precision and response time of the targeted temperature. The default values of parameters Kp, Ki and Kd of the PID controller are embedded in the firmware, yet these parameters can be modified through the wireless interface. The selection of each control methods depends on the specific requirements of the VR a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Flowchart of Stimulheat from the BLE command received to the current control through the Peltier [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 3D model of the accessory fitting on the Valve Index controller [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Building instructions - Wiring Harness 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Building instructions - Rechargeabable Battery Installation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Building instructions - Assembly of the whole project [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Operation instructions - Install-Uninstall StimulHeat on a Valve Index controller [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Operation instructions - Web App (screenshot) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Configuration - Unity Desktop App (screenshot) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Control Panel - Unity Desktop App (screenshot) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Technical Characterisation - Protocol Picture [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Technical Characterisation - Global Results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: User experience - Protocol Comfort of use was also evaluated. To assess this, a survey with three affirmations was administered to each participant. We used a scale ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 denotes ’Strongly Disagree’ and 7 denotes ’Strongly Agree’ with the corres…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: User validation – Thermal perception confusion matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: User validation – Survey results group by level of VR experience [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S. Cai, P. Ke, T. Narumi, and K. Zhu. Thermairglove: A pneumatic glove for thermal perception and material identification in virtual reality. In2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), pages 248–257. IEEE, 2020. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00044

    arXiv 2020

  2. [3]

    Rodrigues, Estevao B

    Aleph Campos Da Silveira, Eduardo C. Rodrigues, Estevao B. Saleme, Alexandra Covaci, Gheorghita Ghinea, and Celso A. S. Santos. Thermal and wind devices for multisensory human-computer interaction: an overview.Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(22):34485–34512, September 2023. ISSN 1380-7501, 1573-7721. doi: 10.1007/s11042-023-14672-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s11042-023-14672-y 2023

  3. [4]

    Dionisio

    J. Dionisio. Virtual hell: a trip through the flames.IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 17(3): 11–14, 1997. doi: 10.1109/38.586012

    work page doi:10.1109/38.586012 1997

  4. [5]

    Davide Filingeri, Hui Zhang, and Edward A. Arens. Characteristics of the local cutaneous sensory ther- moneutral zone.Journal of Neurophysiology, 117(4):1797–1806, 2017. doi: 10.1152/jn.00845.2016

    work page arXiv 2017

  5. [6]

    Julian Goldsmid.Introduction to Thermoelectricity

    H. Julian Goldsmid.Introduction to Thermoelectricity. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [7]

    Hamazaki, T

    T. Hamazaki, T. Takami, K. Ushiyama, I. Mizoguchi, and H. Kajimoto. Alcool: Utilizing alcohol’s evapo- rative cooling for ubiquitous cold sensation feedback. InProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2024. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642113

    arXiv 2024

  7. [8]

    Hapmosphere: Simulating the weathers for walking around in immersive environment with haptics feedback

    Ping-Hsuan Han, Yang-Sheng Chen, Chiao-En Hsieh, Hao-Cheng Wang, and Yi-Ping Hung. Hapmosphere: Simulating the weathers for walking around in immersive environment with haptics feedback. In2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), pages 247–252, 2019. doi: 10.1109/WHC.2019.8816140. 22

    work page arXiv 2019

  8. [9]

    T. Han, S. Wang, S. Wang, X. Fan, J. Liu, F. Tian, and M. Fan. Mouill´ e: Exploring wetness illusion on fingertips to enhance immersive experience in vr. InProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–10. ACM, 2020. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376138

    arXiv 2020

Show all 43 references
  1. [10]

    Hardy, Harold G

    James D. Hardy, Harold G. Wolff, and Helen Goodell. Pricking pain threshold in different body areas. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 80(3):425–427, 1952. doi: 10.3181/ 00379727-80-19644

    1952

  2. [11]

    Cold-evoked pain varies with skin type and cooling rate: a psy- chophysical study in humans.PAIN, 83(2):123–135, 1999

    Joel L.K Harrison and Karen D Davis. Cold-evoked pain varies with skin type and cooling rate: a psy- chophysical study in humans.PAIN, 83(2):123–135, 1999. ISSN 0304-3959. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99) 00099-8

    1999 doi

  3. [12]

    Development of wearable electronically controlled heating and cooling equipment (traduction).Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, 82(10):919–924, 2016

    Kiyoshi Itao, Hiroshi Hosaka, Kaoru Tachibana, Mikio Takahashi, and Guillaume Lopez. Development of wearable electronically controlled heating and cooling equipment (traduction).Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, 82(10):919–924, 2016. doi: 10.2493/jjspe.82.919

    2016 doi

  4. [13]

    A. Jain. The role of thermal effusivity in heat exchange between finite-sized bodies.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 202:123721, 2023. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.123721

    2023

  5. [14]

    Jiang, C

    C. Jiang, C. Yanjun, F. Mingming, W. Liuping, S. Luyao, L. Nianlong, S. Wei, Z. Yu, T. Feng, and H. Teng. Douleur: Creating pain sensation with chemical stimulant to enhance user experience in virtual reality. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquit...

    2021 doi

  6. [15]

    Flip-pelt: Motor-driven peltier elements for rapid thermal stimulation and congruent pressure feedback in virtual reality

    Seongjun Kang, Gwangbin Kim, Seokhyun Hwang, Jeongju Park, Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed Mohamed Elsharkawy, and SeungJun Kim. Flip-pelt: Motor-driven peltier elements for rapid thermal stimulation and congruent pressure feedback in virtual reality. InProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM ...

    2024

  7. [16]

    Karmakar, A

    S. Karmakar, A. Kesh, and M. Muniyandi. Thermal illusions for thermal displays: a review.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 17:1278894, 2023. URL https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1278894

    2023

  8. [17]

    C. V. Keef, Laure V. Kayser, Stazia Tronboll, Cody W. Carpenter, Nicholas B. Root, Mickey Finn III, Timothy F. O’Connor, Sami N. Abuhamdieh, Daniel M. Davies, Rory Runser, Ying Shirley Meng, Vi- layanur S. Ramachandran, and Darren J. Lipomi. Virtual texture generated using ela...

    2020 doi

  9. [18]

    S. W. Kim, Sung Hee Kim, Choong Sun Kim, Kyoungsoo Yi, Jun-Sik Kim, Byung Jin Cho, and Youngsu Cha. Thermal display glove for interacting with virtual reality.Scientific Reports, 10(1):11403, 2020. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68362-y

    2020 doi

  10. [19]

    J. Lee, D. Kim, H. Sul, and S. H. Ko. Thermo-haptic materials and devices for wearable virtual and augmented reality.Advanced Functional Materials, 31(39):2007376, 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.1002/ adfm.202007376

    2021

  11. [20]

    Maeda and T

    T. Maeda and T. Kurahashi. Thermodule: Wearable and modular thermal feedback system based on a wireless platform. InProceedings of the 10th Augmented Human International Conference 2019. ACM,

    2019

  12. [21]

    Manasrah, Nathan Crane, Rasim Guldiken, and Kyle B

    A. Manasrah, Nathan Crane, Rasim Guldiken, and Kyle B. Reed. Perceived cooling using asymmetrically- applied hot and cold stimuli.IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 10(1):75–83, 2017. URL https://doi.org/10. 1109/TOH.2016.2578334

    2017

  13. [22]

    Ahmad Manasrah, Nathan Crane, Rasim Guldiken, and Kyle B. Reed. Asymmetrically-applied hot and cold stimuli gives perception of constant heat. In2017 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), pages 484–489, 2017. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2017.7989949. 23

    2017

  14. [23]

    Mazursky, Jas Brooks, Beza Desta, and Pedro Lopes

    A. Mazursky, Jas Brooks, Beza Desta, and Pedro Lopes. Thermalgrasp: Enabling thermal feedback even while grasping and walking. In2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), pages 342–353. IEEE, 2024. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/VR58804.2024.00056

    2024

  15. [24]

    Mellin and F

    O. Mellin and F. Muret. Driving a peltier element (tec): Efficiency and aging. Application Report SLUA979A, Texas Instruments, 2020. URL https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slua979a/slua979a.pdf

    2020

  16. [26]

    Meta quest touch pro, 2025

    Meta. Meta quest touch pro, 2025. URL https://www.meta.com/fr/quest/accessories/ quest-touch-pro-controllers-and-charging-dock/

    2025

  17. [27]

    Meta quest 3, 2025

    Meta. Meta quest 3, 2025. URL https://www.meta.com/fr/quest/quest-3/

    2025

  18. [28]

    Extension of a virtual reality simulation environment with an immersive experience of thermal radiation for the user

    Christoph Nytsch-Geusen and Kushagra Mathur. Extension of a virtual reality simulation environment with an immersive experience of thermal radiation for the user. InProceedings of Building Simulation 2023: 18th Conference of IBPSA, volume 18, pages 369–376. IBPSA, 2023. URL ht...

    2023

  19. [29]

    S. Oss. A simple model of thermal conduction in human skin: temperature perception and thermal effusivity.European Journal of Physics, 43(3):035101, 2022. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ ac4c8a

    2022 doi

  20. [30]

    Parida, H

    K. Parida, H. Bark, and P. See Lee. Emerging thermal technology enabled augmented reality.Advanced Functional Materials, 31(39):2007952, 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202007952

    2021 doi

  21. [31]

    R. L. Peiris, Wei Peng, Zikun Chen, Liwei Chan, and Kouta Minamizawa. Thermovr: Exploring integrated thermal haptic feedback with head mounted displays. InProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 5452–5456. ACM, 2017. URL https://doi....

    2017

  22. [32]

    Philippe, Jeanne Hecquard, Emilie Hummel, Ferran Argelaguet, Marc Mac´ e, Val´ erie Gouranton, Claudio Pacchierotti, Anatole L´ ecuyer, and Justine Saint-Aubert

    V. Philippe, Jeanne Hecquard, Emilie Hummel, Ferran Argelaguet, Marc Mac´ e, Val´ erie Gouranton, Claudio Pacchierotti, Anatole L´ ecuyer, and Justine Saint-Aubert. Cool me down: Effects of thermal feedback on cognitive stress in virtual reality. InHaptics: Understanding Touch...

    2025 doi

  23. [33]

    Playstation vr2, 2025

    Playstation. Playstation vr2, 2025. URL https://www.playstation.com/fr-fr/ps-vr2/

    2025

  24. [34]

    Plijnaer, G¨ unter Wallner, and Regina Bernhaupt

    Bas A. Plijnaer, G¨ unter Wallner, and Regina Bernhaupt. Ethermal - lightweight thermal feedback for vr games. In2022 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), pages 41–48, 2022. doi: 10.1109/CoG51982.2022. 9893627

    2022

  25. [35]

    Ragozin, D

    K. Ragozin, D. Zheng, G. Chernyshov, and D. Hynds. Sophroneo: Fear not. a vr horror game with thermal feedback and physiological signal loop. InExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–6. ACM, 2020. URL https://doi.org/10.114...

    2020

  26. [37]

    Ranasinghe, Pravar Jain, Shienny Karwita, David Tolley, and Ellen Yi-Luen Do

    N. Ranasinghe, Pravar Jain, Shienny Karwita, David Tolley, and Ellen Yi-Luen Do. Ambiotherm: Enhanc- ing sense of presence in virtual reality by simulating real-world environmental conditions. InProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, page...

    2017

  27. [38]

    Controllers valve index, 2025

    Valve Index. Controllers valve index, 2025. URL https://www.valvesoftware.com/fr/index/controllers

    2025

  28. [39]

    Dynamic and modular thermal feedback for interactive 6dof vr: Implementation and evaluation

    Sophie Villenave, Pierre Raimbaud, and Guillaume Lavou´ e. Dynamic and modular thermal feedback for interactive 6dof vr: Implementation and evaluation. In2025 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW), pages 1204–1205, 2025. doi: 1...

    2025

  29. [40]

    Vive controllers, 2025

    Vive. Vive controllers, 2025. URL https://www.vive.com/fr/accessory/controller/

    2025

  30. [41]

    Fiery hands: Designing thermal glove through thermal and tactile integration for virtual object manipulation

    Haokun Wang, Yatharth Singhal, Hyunjae Gil, and Jin Ryong Kim. Fiery hands: Designing thermal glove through thermal and tactile integration for virtual object manipulation. InProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’24, New ...

  31. [42]

    Immersive and wearable thermal rendering for augmented reality, 2025

    Alexandra Watkins, Ritam Ghosh, Evan Chow, and Nilanjan Sarkar. Immersive and wearable thermal rendering for augmented reality, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20646

    2025 arXiv

  32. [43]

    Thermal perception method of virtual chemistry experiments.Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 2(4):305–315, 2020

    Hengwei Xu, Siru Li, Wenpeng Song, Jiajun Sun, Xinli Wu, Xiaoqi Wang, Wenzhen Yang, Zhigeng Pan, and Abdennour El Rhalibi. Thermal perception method of virtual chemistry experiments.Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 2(4):305–315, 2020. ISSN 2096-5796. URL https://www.sci...

    2020

  33. [44]

    Zhu, Simon Perrault, Taizhou Chen, Shaoyu Cai, and Roshan Lalintha Peiris

    K. Zhu, Simon Perrault, Taizhou Chen, Shaoyu Cai, and Roshan Lalintha Peiris. A sense of ice and fire: Exploring thermal feedback with multiple thermoelectric-cooling elements on a smart ring.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 130(C):234–247, 2019. URL https://do...

    2019 doi

  34. [2019]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3311823.3311826

  35. [2024]

    ISBN 9798400706288

    Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9798400706288. doi: 10.1145/3654777.3676457

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.