pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23124 · v1 · pith:HK2H4OV2new · submitted 2026-05-22 · 📡 eess.SP · cs.IT· math.IT

Deep-Learning-Aided Successive Cancellation List Flip Decoding for Polar Codes

Fu-Siang Liang , Shan Lu , Yeong-Luh Ueng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 04:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP cs.ITmath.IT
keywords polar codesSCLF decodingdeep learningLSTMerror correctionbit flip predictionchannel codingsuccessive cancellation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Stacked LSTM networks predict erroneous bits to enhance SCLF decoding for polar codes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Polar codes achieve channel capacity at infinite length. The paper proposes deep-learning-aided successive cancellation list flip decoding that uses stacked LSTM networks to identify positions of erroneous bits. Separate models are trained to predict the first erroneous bit, the second erroneous bit, and whether flipping should continue. This yields better error-correction performance than prior algorithms while lowering the average number of decoding attempts.

Core claim

The DL-aided SCLF decoding algorithms based on the proposed stacked LSTM flip-1 model, stacked LSTM flip-2 model, and the stacked LSTM continue-flipping check (CFC) model are able to provide a better performance at a lower number of average decoding attempts when compared to other state-of-the-art decoding algorithms.

What carries the argument

Stacked LSTM network trained on new features to predict positions of erroneous bits in SCLF decoding.

If this is right

  • The flip-1 model improves prediction accuracy for the first erroneous bit.
  • The flip-2 model improves prediction accuracy for the second erroneous bit.
  • The CFC model decides whether additional flips are warranted.
  • The combined models deliver better performance at lower average decoding attempts than existing SCLF variants.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the learned features prove robust, the same models could be applied to polar codes of lengths not seen during training.
  • The approach could be combined with other list-decoding families that also rely on reliability metrics.
  • Hardware acceleration of the LSTM inference step might enable lower-latency decoding in practical communication hardware.

Load-bearing premise

The stacked LSTM models trained on specific features and data will accurately predict erroneous bit positions under channel conditions, code lengths, and rates different from those used during training.

What would settle it

Testing on code lengths, rates or SNRs outside the training set and finding that average decoding attempts do not drop below those of conventional SCLF would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23124 by Fu-Siang Liang, Shan Lu, Yeong-Luh Ueng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Decoding trees for (a) CA-SCL decoding, where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Prediction architecture of flipping positions based on the stacked [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Probability of identifying the position of the first erroneous bit using a different number of LSTM layers for (128, 56+8) polar codes at SNR=2 dB. than the number of LSTM cells within the layer. In other words, the increase in layer size does not significantly improve the accuracy of the model. Hence, we adopt the stacked LSTM model of two LSTM layers to assist with the flipping during SCLF decoding and t… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Probability of identifying the position of the first erroneous bit using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Probability of identifying the position of the second erroneous bit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Accuracy comparison of the stacked LSTM flip-1 model trained with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Performance comparison for different SCLF-1 decoding schemes for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Performance comparison of different SCLF-1 and SCLF-2 decoding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Performance comparison for (1024, 496+16) polar codes where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Performance comparison for (1024, 496+16) polar codes where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Polar codes are the first error-correcting code proven to achieve channel capacity based on infinite code length. The Successive Cancellation List Flip (SCLF) decoding algorithm was proposed by flipping an erroneous bit during the next decoding attempt. To identify the erroneous bits, the Log-Likelihood Ratio (LLR) is used to indicate the reliability of each decision bit. To improve the accuracy of the erroneous bit prediction, we propose deep-learning-aided (DL-aided) SCLF decoding algorithms. We first offer a stacked LSTM network that contains new features to train our models, which are able to improve the accuracy of the prediction of positions of erroneous bits. Then we separately train the stacked LSTM models to predict the position of both the first and second erroneous bits and whether to continue flipping. As a result, the DL-aided SCLF decoding algorithms based on the proposed stacked LSTM \mbox{flip-1} model, stacked LSTM \mbox{flip-2} model, and the stacked LSTM \mbox{continue-flipping} check (CFC) model are able to provide a better performance at a lower number of average decoding attempts when compared to other state-of-the-art decoding algorithms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes deep-learning-aided successive cancellation list flip (SCLF) decoding algorithms for polar codes. It introduces stacked LSTM networks trained on new features extracted from log-likelihood ratios (LLRs) and bit decisions. Separate models are trained to predict the position of the first erroneous bit (flip-1 model), the second erroneous bit (flip-2 model), and whether to continue flipping (continue-flipping check or CFC model). The central claim is that these DL-aided SCLF algorithms achieve better block error rate performance at a lower number of average decoding attempts compared to other state-of-the-art decoding algorithms.

Significance. If the claimed performance improvements are substantiated with reproducible numerical results and the models are shown to generalize, the work could offer a practical enhancement to polar code decoding by using learned predictions to reduce the average number of list-flip attempts while improving reliability. The approach builds on existing SCLF methods by incorporating data-driven error-position prediction, which may be relevant for finite-length polar codes in communication systems.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The abstract asserts performance gains for the stacked LSTM flip-1, flip-2, and CFC models but supplies no numerical results, error bars, training details, ablation studies, or comparisons. This prevents verification of the central claim that the DL-aided algorithms outperform state-of-the-art methods in BLER and average decoding attempts.
  2. The stacked LSTM models are trained on features from LLRs and bit decisions for specific code parameters. No evidence is provided that prediction accuracy for erroneous bit positions and continue-flipping decisions holds under code lengths, rates, or channel conditions different from the training set. This generalization is load-bearing for the claim, as drops in accuracy outside the training regime would mean gains cannot be attributed to the DL component.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments. We address the major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The abstract asserts performance gains for the stacked LSTM flip-1, flip-2, and CFC models but supplies no numerical results, error bars, training details, ablation studies, or comparisons. This prevents verification of the central claim that the DL-aided algorithms outperform state-of-the-art methods in BLER and average decoding attempts.

    Authors: We agree that including numerical results in the abstract would strengthen the presentation of our central claims. In the revised manuscript, we will update the abstract to incorporate specific performance metrics, such as BLER improvements and average decoding attempt reductions compared to state-of-the-art methods, while keeping within the word limit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The stacked LSTM models are trained on features from LLRs and bit decisions for specific code parameters. No evidence is provided that prediction accuracy for erroneous bit positions and continue-flipping decisions holds under code lengths, rates, or channel conditions different from the training set. This generalization is load-bearing for the claim, as drops in accuracy outside the training regime would mean gains cannot be attributed to the DL component.

    Authors: The current results focus on specific code parameters as described in the manuscript. We recognize the importance of demonstrating generalization. We will include additional simulation results for varying code lengths, rates, and channel conditions to show that the prediction accuracy holds and that the performance gains are attributable to the DL-aided approach. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical ML application with independent evaluation

full rationale

The paper trains stacked LSTM models on extracted LLR/bit features to predict flip positions in SCLF decoding, then reports simulation-based BLER and average attempt counts versus baselines. No equations, derivations, or self-citations reduce the performance claims to fitted inputs by construction; the models are trained separately and the gains are measured on decoding outcomes. This matches the default expectation of a non-circular empirical contribution.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The performance claims rest on the generalization ability of LSTM models whose architecture, training data distribution, and optimization choices are not specified in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • LSTM model hyperparameters
    Number of layers, hidden units, learning rate, and other architecture/training choices optimized on simulation data.
  • Training data generation parameters
    Code length, rate, SNR range, and channel model used to create labeled erroneous-bit examples.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption LLR and other listed features are sufficient statistics for erroneous-bit prediction
    The paper states that LLR indicates reliability and uses it as input to the LSTM.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5744 in / 1055 out tokens · 24947 ms · 2026-05-25T04:06:15.009516+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Channel polarization: a method for constructing capacity- achieving codes for symmetric binary-input memoryless channels,

    E. Arıkan, “Channel polarization: a method for constructing capacity- achieving codes for symmetric binary-input memoryless channels,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 3051-3073, Jul. 2009

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    List decoding of polar codes,

    I. Tal and A. Vardy, “List decoding of polar codes,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 2213-2226, May 2015

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    LLR-based successive cancellation list decoding of Polar codes,

    A. Balatsoukas-Stimming, M. B. Parizi and A. Burg, “LLR-based successive cancellation list decoding of Polar codes,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 63, no. 19, pp. 5165-5179, Oct. 1, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    CRC-aided decoding of Polar codes,

    K. Niu and K. Chen, “CRC-aided decoding of Polar codes,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1668-1671, Oct. 2012

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    A low-complexity improved successive cancellation decoder for polar codes,

    O. Afisiadis, A. Balatsoukas-Stimming and A. Burg, “A low-complexity improved successive cancellation decoder for polar codes,” in48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2014, pp. 2116-2120

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Improved successive cancellation flip decoding of polar codes based on error distribution,

    C. Condo, F. Ercan and W. J. Gross, “Improved successive cancellation flip decoding of polar codes based on error distribution,” in2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW), 2018, pp. 19-24

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Improved bit-flipping algorithm for successive cancellation decoding of polar codes,

    F. Ercan, C. Condo and W. J. Gross, “Improved bit-flipping algorithm for successive cancellation decoding of polar codes,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 61-72, Jan. 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Progressive bit-flipping decoding of Polar codes over layered critical sets,

    Z. Zhang, K. Qin, L. Zhang, H. Zhang and G. T. Chen, “Progressive bit-flipping decoding of Polar codes over layered critical sets,” in2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2017

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Partitioned successive-cancellation flip decoding of Polar codes,

    F. Ercan, C. Condo, S. A. Hashemi and W. J. Gross, “Partitioned successive-cancellation flip decoding of Polar codes,” in2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2018

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Dynamic-SCFlip decoding of Polar codes,

    L. Chandesris, V . Savin and D. Declercq, “Dynamic-SCFlip decoding of Polar codes,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 2333-2345, Jun. 2018

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Successive cancellation list bit-flip decoder for Polar codes,

    Y . Yongrun, P. Zhiwen, L. Nan and Y . Xiaohu, “Successive cancellation list bit-flip decoder for Polar codes,” in10th International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), 2018

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Bit-flip algorithm for successive cancellation list decoder of Polar codes,

    F. Cheng, A. Liu, Y . Zhang and J. Ren, “Bit-flip algorithm for successive cancellation list decoder of Polar codes,”IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 58346- 58352, 2019

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Generalized SCL-flip decod- ing of Polar codes,

    Y . -H. Pan, C. -H. Wang and Y . -L. Ueng, “Generalized SCL-flip decod- ing of Polar codes,” in2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2020

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Dynamic SCL decoder with path-flipping for 5G Polar codes,

    Y . Shen, A. Balatsoukas-Stimming, X. You, C. Zhang and A. P. Burg, “Dynamic SCL decoder with path-flipping for 5G Polar codes,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 391-395, Feb. 2022

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Learning to flip successive cancellation decoding of Polar codes with LSTM networks,

    X. Wang et al., “Learning to flip successive cancellation decoding of Polar codes with LSTM networks,” in2019 IEEE 30th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Com- munications (PIMRC), 2019

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    A machine learning based multi-flips successive cancellation decoding scheme of Polar codes,

    B. He, S. Wu, Y . Deng, H. Yin, J. Jiao and Q. Zhang, “A machine learning based multi-flips successive cancellation decoding scheme of Polar codes,” in2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Spring), 2020

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Low-complexity LSTM- assisted bit-flipping algorithm for successive cancellation list Polar decoder,

    C. -H. Chen, C. -F. Teng and A. -Y . Wu, “Low-complexity LSTM- assisted bit-flipping algorithm for successive cancellation list Polar decoder,” in2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2020, pp. 1708-1712

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Exploiting error-correction-CRC for Polar SCL decoding: a deep learning-based approach,

    X. Liu, S. Wu, Y . Wang, N. Zhang, J. Jiao and Q. Zhang, “Exploiting error-correction-CRC for Polar SCL decoding: a deep learning-based approach,”IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Net- working, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 817-828, Jun. 2020. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COGNITIVE COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING 14

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    DNC-aided SCL-flip decoding of Polar codes,

    Y . Tao and Z. Zhang, “DNC-aided SCL-flip decoding of Polar codes,” in 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2021

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    A node-reliability based CRC- aided successive cancellation list Polar decoder architecture combined with post-processing,

    H. -Y . Lee, Y . -H. Pan and Y . -L. Ueng, “A node-reliability based CRC- aided successive cancellation list Polar decoder architecture combined with post-processing,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 68, pp. 5954-5967, 2020

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    A simplified successive- cancellation decoder for Polar codes,

    A. Alamdar-Yazdi and F. R. Kschischang, “A simplified successive- cancellation decoder for Polar codes,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1378-1380, December 2011

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    Fast Polar decoders: Algorithm and implementation,

    G. Sarkis, P. Giard, A. Vardy, C. Thibeault and W. J. Gross, “Fast Polar decoders: Algorithm and implementation,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 946-957, May 2014

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Neural successive cancellation flip decoding of Polar codes,

    Doan, N., S. A. Hashemi, F. Ercan, T. Tonnellier and W. J. Gross, “Neural successive cancellation flip decoding of Polar codes,”J Sign Process Syst93, pp. 631–642, 2021

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Fast SC-flip decoding of Polar codes with reinforcement learning,

    N. Doan, S. A. Hashemi, F. Ercan and W. J. Gross, “Fast SC-flip decoding of Polar codes with reinforcement learning,” in2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2021

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Deep- learning-aided successive-cancellation decoding of Polar codes,

    S. A. Hashemi, N. Doan, T. Tonnellier and W. J. Gross, “Deep- learning-aided successive-cancellation decoding of Polar codes,” in2019 53rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 2019, pp. 532-536

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Fast successive-cancellation list flip decoding of Polar codes,

    N. Doan, S. A. Hashemi and W. J. Gross, “Fast successive-cancellation list flip decoding of Polar codes,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 5568-5584, 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Long short-term memory,

    S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, “Long short-term memory,”Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735– 1780, 1997

    work page 1997

  28. [28]

    Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks,

    A. Graves, A. Mohamed and G. Hinton, “Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks,” in2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2013, pp. 6645-6649

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Self- normalizing neural networks,

    G. Klambauer, T. Unterthiner, A. Mayr, and S. Hochreiter, “Self- normalizing neural networks,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2017, pp. 971-980

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Polar code design and rate matching,

    3GPP R1-167209, “Polar code design and rate matching,” TSG RAN WG1 Meeting#86, Gothenberg Sweden, Aug. 2016. Fu-Siang Liangreceived his B.S. degree in com- munication engineering from the National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan, in 2019, and his M.S. degree in electrical engineering from the National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, in

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Shan Lureceived her B.S

    His research interests include channel coding and deep learning. Shan Lureceived her B.S. and M.S. degrees in telecommunications engineering from Xidian Uni- versity, Xi’an, China, in 2007 and 2010, respectively, and her Ph.D. degree in information and computer science from Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan, in 2014. From 2014 to 2016, she was a research ...

    work page 2007