Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

A bialgebra theory of post-Lie algebras via Manin triples and generalized Hessian Lie groups

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper builds a Manin-triple bialgebra theory for post-Lie algebras, using an invariant bilinear form derived from generalized pseudo-Hessian Lie groups.

desk verdict A genuinely new Manin-triple bialgebra theory for post-Lie algebras, worth refereeing, but the central matched-pair proposition is asserted without proof and needs a full verification before acceptance. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04954 v1 pith:HKBJU4QL submitted 2025-02-07 math.QA math.DGmath.RA

Dilei Lu , Chengming Bai , Li Guo This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.QAmath.DGmath.RA MSC 17D2517B6222E6017B3858D1753C0516T1017A30
keywords Post-LiealgebraHessianLiegroupManintripleBialgebraClassicalYang-BaxterequationO-operatorPre-Liepp-post-Lie
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to give post-Lie algebras a bialgebra theory in the Manin-triple style, on the same footing as Lie bialgebras and pre-Lie bialgebras. The obstacle is that post-Lie algebras have no usable dual representations for their adjoint representations, so the required invariant bilinear form is found instead by generalizing pseudo-Hessian Lie groups to allow the flat connection to have constant torsion. The resulting generalized pseudo-Hessian post-Lie algebra carries the invariant form, and the algebraic structure that supports the bialgebra is a partial splitting of the post-Lie operation, called a pp-post-Lie algebra. The central theorem states that Manin triples of post-Lie algebras, matched pairs of the dual type, and pp-post-Lie bialgebras are equivalent descriptions of the same data. If correct, this completes the Manin-triple program for post-Lie algebras and links it to a classical Yang-Baxter equation, O-operators, and pre-pp-post-Lie algebras.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery has two parts. The invariant bilinear form $B$ on a post-Lie algebra $(A,\circ,[-,-])$ is defined by $B([x,y],z)=B(x,[y,z])$ and $B(x\circ y,z)-B(x,y\circ z)=B(y\circ x,z)-B(y,x\circ z)$; geometrically it is the algebraic shadow of a left-invariant pseudo-Riemannian metric on a generalized pseudo-Hessian Lie group, where the flat connection has constant torsion. The second part is the pp-post-Lie algebra $(A,\lhd,\rhd,[-,-])$, a Lie algebra with two extra operations whose sum $\circ=\lhd+\rhd$ makes the quadruple a post-Lie algebra; it is characterized by the dual maps $(L_{\lhd}^*-R_{\rhd}^*, -R_{\rhd}^*, \mathrm{ad}^*)$ forming a representation of the associated post-Lie algebra on $A^*$, which is what connects it to matched pairs and bialgebras.

What would settle it

Take two small finite-dimensional post-Lie algebras $A$ and $B$, define linear maps by equations (51)–(60), and check directly whether the operations (49)–(50) on $A\oplus B$ satisfy the post-Lie identities (2)–(3); if the ten equations hold but the direct sum is not a post-Lie algebra, the characterization in Proposition 4.1 and hence the equivalence in Theorem 4.10 would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 4.10: for pp-post-Lie algebras on $A$ and $A^*$ whose associated horizontal structures are post-Lie algebras, the following are equivalent: (a) a Manin triple of post-Lie algebras on $A\oplus A^*$ relative to the invariant bilinear form $B_d$; (b) a matched pair of post-Lie algebras of the dual type $(A, A^*, L_{\lhd_A}^* - R_{\rhd_A}^*, -R_{\rhd_A}^*, \mathrm{ad}_{A}^*, L_{\lhd_{A^*}}^* - R_{\rhd_{A^*}}^*, -R_{\rhd_{A^*}}^*, \mathrm{ad}_{A^*}^*)$; and (c) a pp-post-Lie bialgebra structure on $A$, with the comultiplications dual to the operations on $A^*$. The invariant form itself comes from a generalized pseudo-Hessian structure: a post-Lie algebra $(A,\circ,[-,-])$ together with a nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form $B$ satisfying $B([x,y],z)=B(x,[y,z])$ and $B(x\circ y,z)-B(x,y\circ z)=B(y\circ x,z)-B(y,x\circ z)$. This is precisely the algebraic shadow of the Codazzi equation and the constant-torsion compatibility condition on a generalized pseudo-Hessian Lie group.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the unproved 'straightforward' claim in Proposition 4.1 that the ten equations (51)–(60) are exactly the conditions under which the direct sum of two post-Lie algebras is again a post-Lie algebra.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every generalized pseudo-Hessian post-Lie algebra carries a compatible pp-post-Lie algebra structure, so an invariant bilinear form automatically yields bialgebra-type data.
  • Quadratic Rota-Baxter Lie algebras of weight one produce generalized pseudo-Hessian post-Lie algebras, giving a systematic source of examples such as $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C})$ with the Killing form.
  • Antisymmetric solutions of the pp-post-classical Yang-Baxter equation give pp-post-Lie bialgebras, and O-operators together with pre-pp-post-Lie algebras construct such solutions.
  • When the Lie bracket is zero the construction recovers L-dendriform bialgebras, and the bracket component alone is a Lie bialgebra, placing the new theory between known bialgebra theories.
  • The operad of pre-pp-post-Lie algebras is the successor of the operad of pp-post-Lie algebras, matching the splitting-operations pattern used in other Manin-triple bialgebras.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One extension is to press the geometric origin of the invariant form: for other algebraic structures whose adjoint representations lack duals, a generalized Hessian-type geometry might supply the bilinear form needed for a Manin-triple bialgebra theory.
  • A testable extension is to examine the ten matched-pair equations (51)–(60) on low-dimensional post-Lie algebras; if any of them is redundant, the equivalence in Theorem 4.10 could be compressed, and if one is missing the equivalence would need revision.
  • The quadratic Rota-Baxter construction could be pushed past $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C})$ to other simple Lie algebras with the Killing form, producing explicit generalized pseudo-Hessian post-Lie algebras and then explicit pp-post-Lie bialgebras.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Manin-triple bialgebra theory for post-Lie algebras. It introduces generalized pseudo-Hessian post-Lie algebras, defined as post-Lie algebras equipped with a nondegenerate symmetric invariant bilinear form, and motivates them through generalized Hessian Lie groups with flat connections of constant torsion. It then introduces partial-pre-post-Lie (pp-post-Lie) algebras by splitting only the operation ◦ of a post-Lie algebra, characterizes pp-post-Lie algebras through representations on dual spaces, and proves the central equivalence Theorem 4.10: a Manin triple of post-Lie algebras associated to the invariant bilinear form is equivalent to a matched pair of post-Lie algebras of a specific dual type, and equivalently to a pp-post-Lie bialgebra. The paper also develops pp-post-classical Yang-Baxter equations, O-operators, and pre-pp-post-Lie algebras, with explicit examples including sl(2,C).

Significance. If the central equivalence is fully verified, this is a substantial contribution to the bialgebra theory of post-Lie algebras and to the Manin-triple approach more generally. The paper provides a new geometric source of invariant bilinear forms (generalized pseudo-Hessian Lie groups), introduces a genuinely new kind of partial operadic splitting, and connects the theory to Rota-Baxter operators, the classical Yang-Baxter equation, and pre-Lie-type structures. The paper includes many concrete computations and explicit examples, and Theorem 4.10 is a genuine algebraic equivalence rather than a fitted or tautological statement. The main risk is that the load-bearing matched-pair characterization is not verified in detail.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.1, Proposition 4.1] The proof of Proposition 4.1 is omitted: the ten conditions (51)-(60) are asserted with the single sentence 'The checking is straightforward.' This is load-bearing for the paper's central claim, because Proposition 4.4 identifies the matched pair in Theorem 4.10(b) using this characterization, and Proposition 4.9 rewrites each of (51)-(60) as one of the bialgebra compatibility conditions (69)-(77). A single misstated mixed term would alter the matched-pair notion and hence the pp-post-Lie bialgebra axioms. Please provide a complete verification, or at minimum a detailed derivation exhibiting the key cancellations, or an appendix containing the full check.
  2. [Definition 3.1, Eq. (19)] Equation (19) is printed as '[x, y ⊳ z + z ⊳ y] = [x, z] ⊳ y + y ⊳ [x, z] = 0', which is ambiguous and inconsistent with its use in the proof of Lemma 3.3(a). In that proof, Eq. (19) is invoked to replace x ⊳ [y,z] with -[y,z] ⊳ x and to conclude that 2(y ⊳ [x,z] + [x,z] ⊳ y) = 0 implies Eq. (19). This indicates the intended axiom is an identity of the form x ⊳ [y,z] + [y,z] ⊳ x = 0, not the bracket expression printed. As written, the axiom is not usable, and since Proposition 3.11 and hence Proposition 4.9 depend on this axiom through Lemma 3.3, the ambiguity affects the central equivalence. Please correct the equation to the intended identity and re-verify the subsequent proofs.
  3. [Section 4.1, Proposition 4.9] The proof of Proposition 4.9, which is essential for the equivalence (b)⇔(c) in Theorem 4.10, is only sketched. The displayed list of equivalences (e.g., Eq. (54) ⇔ Eq. (70), Eq. (51) ⇔ Eq. (53) ⇔ Eq. (69)) is asserted without showing the dualization computations that transform each matched-pair equation into the corresponding bialgebra compatibility condition. Given the length and complexity of Eqs. (51)-(60) and (69)-(77), a detailed verification, or at least a representative worked example plus a clear statement that the remaining cases are analogous, is needed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2, Definition 2.5 and Proposition 2.7] The sign convention for the torsion T is potentially confusing: Definition 2.5 states ⟨T(X,Y), Z⟩ = ⟨X, T(Y,Z)⟩, but Proposition 2.7 defines the post-Lie bracket as -T(-−,-−). A brief remark reconciling these signs would improve readability.
  2. [Section 4.2, Propositions 4.13 and 4.14] The proofs of Propositions 4.13 and 4.14 spell out only one case each and state that the others are obtained similarly. Since the displayed equations (85)-(96) are very long, the reader would benefit from a fuller derivation or an appendix listing the remaining computations.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues: 'Main triple' in Section 1.3 should be 'Manin triple'; 'consequnce' in Corollary 4.16 should be 'consequence'; 'sextuple-tuple' in Definition 4.25 is redundant; and the title contains 'AN D' instead of 'AND' in the full text.
  4. [Section 3.1, Proposition 3.11] The notation for dual maps, introduced in Eq. (34), is used heavily in Proposition 3.11 and later sections; a short notational reminder near the statement of Proposition 3.11 would help the reader track the various starred operators.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Manin-triple and pp-post-Lie bialgebra equivalence is a genuine algebraic equivalence; the unproved matched-pair verification is a rigor gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central Theorem 4.10 is an algebraic equivalence among a Manin triple of post-Lie algebras with an invariant form, a matched pair of a specific dual type, and a pp-post-Lie bialgebra. Each direction is supported by explicit formulas: Proposition 4.4 constructs the Manin triple operations (61)-(62) from the matched pair data and checks invariance of Bd, and Proposition 4.9 rewrites the matched-pair equations (51)-(60) as the bialgebra compatibility equations (69)-(77). The invariant form (13)-(14) is not fitted to the bialgebra conclusion; it is independently motivated by the Codazzi and constant-torsion conditions (11)-(12) and is shown to arise from quadratic Rota-Baxter Lie algebras in Proposition 2.15. The main weakness is Proposition 4.1, whose ten-equation matched-pair characterization is asserted with 'The checking is straightforward' and no calculation; this is a load-bearing proof gap but not circularity, because the assertion is not equivalent to its conclusion by construction. The self-citations (e.g., the representation definition from [45] and the Rota-Baxter construction from [9]) are published external results with stated content and are not invoked to forbid alternatives. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no known result is merely renamed.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 4 invented entities

No numeric free parameters are fitted. The paper relies on standard or cited background results; its genuinely new contributions are algebraic structures, listed as invented entities. The least verified internal component is the matched pair characterization in Proposition 4.1.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption All vector spaces and algebras are finite-dimensional over a field F of characteristic 0
    Stated in the Notations; used for identifying A with the dual of A* and for finite tensor constructions.
  • standard math Post-Lie algebras correspond to flat left-invariant affine connections with constant torsion on Lie groups
    From Munthe-Kaas and Lundervold [35]; used in Section 2.2 to motivate the invariant bilinear form via the Codazzi equation and torsion condition.
  • standard math The representation theory of post-Lie algebras as given by Tang, Bai, Guo and Sheng [45]
    Used in Proposition 3.11 and in the matched pair and semidirect product constructions.
  • standard math A Rota-Baxter Lie algebra of weight one induces a post-Lie algebra via x∘y=[P(x),y]
    From Bai, Guo and Ni [9]; used in Proposition 2.15 to construct generalized pseudo-Hessian post-Lie algebras from quadratic Rota-Baxter Lie algebras.
invented entities (4)
  • Generalized pseudo-Hessian post-Lie algebra
    purpose: Provides a nondegenerate symmetric invariant bilinear form for Manin triples of post-Lie algebras
    New definition in Section 2.2, motivated by geometry and quadratic Rota-Baxter constructions, but with no external falsifiable prediction.
  • Partial-pre-post-Lie (pp-post-Lie) algebra
    purpose: Serves as the underlying algebraic structure obtained by partially splitting the product of a post-Lie algebra
    New structure in Section 3.1; its axioms are reverse-engineered from the desired representation on the dual space.
  • Pp-post-Lie bialgebra
    purpose: Equivalent algebraic object to Manin triples of post-Lie algebras
    New structure in Section 4.1; the equivalence theorem is internal to the paper.
  • Pre-pp-post-Lie algebra
    purpose: Produces O-operators and antisymmetric solutions of the PPP-CYBE
    New structure in Section 4.3, introduced to make the diagram parallel to existing bialgebra theories.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A bialgebra theory of post-Lie algebras via Manin triples and generalized Hessian Lie groups." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HKBJU4QL

@misc{pith2026250204954,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A bialgebra theory of post-Lie algebras via Manin triples and generalized Hessian Lie groups},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HKBJU4QL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04954}
}
abstract

We develop a bialgebra theory of post-Lie algebras that can be characterized by Manin triples of post-Lie algebras associated to a bilinear form satisfying certain invariant conditions. In the absence of dual representations for adjoint representations of post-Lie algebras, we utilize the geometric interpretation of post-Lie algebras to find the desired invariant condition, by generalizing pseudo-Hessian Lie groups to allow constant torsion for the flat connection. The resulting notion is a generalized pseudo-Hessian post-Lie algebra, which is a post-Lie algebra equipped with a nondegenerate symmetric invariant bilinear form. Moreover, generalized pseudo-Hessian post-Lie algebras are also naturally obtained from quadratic Rota-Baxter Lie algebras of weight one. On the other hand, the notion of partial-pre-post-Lie algebra (pp-post-Lie algebras) is introduced as the algebraic structure underlying generalized pseudo-Hessian post-Lie algebras, by splitting one of the two binary operations of post-Lie algebras. The notion of pp-post-Lie bialgebras is introduced as the equivalent structure of Manin triples of post-Lie algebras associated to a nondegenerate symmetric invariant bilinear form, thereby establishing a bialgebra theory for post-Lie algebras via the Manin triple approach. We also study the related analogs of the classical Yang-Baxter equation, $\mathcal O$-operators and successors for pp-post-Lie algebras. In particular, there is a construction of pp-post-Lie bialgebras from the successors of pp-post-Lie algebras.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An infinitesimal deformation of the post-Lie and post-Hopf algebra correspondence

    math.QA 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Infinitesimal post-Lie/post-Hopf structures preserve the U⊣P adjunction and yield a Cartier–Milnor–Moore equivalence, with classifications on sl(2) and H4 and Koszulity of the IPL operad.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Aguiar, Infinitesimal Hopf algebras

    M. Aguiar, Infinitesimal Hopf algebras. Contemp. Math. 267 (2000) 1-29. 2

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Aguiar, On the associative analog of Lie bialgebras

    M. Aguiar, On the associative analog of Lie bialgebras. J. Algebra 244 (2001) 492-532. 2

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Bai, A unified algebraic approach to classical Y ang-Ba xter equation

    C. Bai, A unified algebraic approach to classical Y ang-Ba xter equation. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 40 (2007) 11073-11082. 2

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Bai, Left-symmetric bialgebras and an analogue of the classical Y ang–Baxter equation

    C. Bai, Left-symmetric bialgebras and an analogue of the classical Y ang–Baxter equation. Commun. Contemp. Math. 10 (2008) 221-260. 2, 3, 7

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Bai, Double constructions of Frobenius algebras, Con nes cocycles and their duality

    C. Bai, Double constructions of Frobenius algebras, Con nes cocycles and their duality. J. Noncommut. Geom. 4 (2010) 475-530. 2

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    C. Bai, O. Bellier, L. Guo and X. Ni, Splitting of operatio ns, Manin products and Rota-Baxter operators. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2013 (2013) 485-524. 3, 4, 13, 14, 26

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    C. Bai, L. Guo, G. Liu and T. Ma, Rota-Baxter Lie bialgebra s, classical Y ang-Baxter equations and special L-dendriform bialgebras. Algebr . Represent. Theory27 (2024) 1347-1372. 2, 9

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    C. Bai, L. Guo and T. Ma, Bialgebras, Frobenius algebras a nd associative Y ang-Baxter equations for Rota- Baxter algebras. Asian J. Math. 38 (2024) 411-435. 2

    work page 2024

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    C. Bai, L. Guo and X. Ni, Nonabelian generalized Lax pairs , the classical Y ang-Baxter equation and PostLie algebras. Commun. Math. Phys. 297 (2010) 553-596. 3, 4, 8

    2010

  2. [10]

    C. Bai, L. Guo and Y . Sheng, Bialgebras, the classical Y a ng-Baxter equation and Manin triples for 3-Lie algebras. Adv. Theor . Math. Phys.23 (2019) 27-74. 2

    2019

  3. [11]

    C. Bai, D. Hou and Z. Chen, On a class of Lie groups with a le ft invariant flat pseudo-metric. Monatsh. Math. 164 (2011) 243-269. 2, 9

    2011

  4. [12]

    C. Bai, Y . Lin and P . Zhou, Infinite-dimensional Lie bial gebras via a ffinization of perm bialgebras and pre-Lie bialgebras. J. Algebra 663 (2025) 210-258. 2

    2025

  5. [13]

    C. Bai, L. Liu and X. Ni, Some results on L-dendriform alg ebras. J. Geom. Phys. 60 (2010) 940-950. 10, 26

    2010

  6. [14]

    Bruned and F

    Y . Bruned and F. Katsetsiadis, Post-Lie algebras in reg ularity structures. F orum Math. Sigma11 (2023) 1-20. 3

    2023

  7. [15]

    Burde, Left-symmetric algebras, or pre-Lie algebra s in geometry and physics

    D. Burde, Left-symmetric algebras, or pre-Lie algebra s in geometry and physics. Cent. Eur . J. Math. 4 (2006) 323-357. 5, 6

    2006

  8. [16]

    Cardoso and T

    G. Cardoso and T. Mohaupt, Special geometry, Hessian st ructures and applications. Phys. Rep. 855 (2020) 1-141. 6

    2020

  9. [17]

    Cartan, La g´ eom´ etrie des groupes de transformation

    E. Cartan, La g´ eom´ etrie des groupes de transformation. J. Math. Pures Appl. 6 (1927) 1-119. 8

    1927

  10. [18]

    Cartan and J

    E. Cartan and J. A. Schouten, On the geometry of the group -manifold of simple and semi-simple groups. Proc. Akad. W etensch.29 (1926) 803-815. 8

    1926

  11. [19]

    Chari and A

    V . Chari and A. Pressley, A Guide to Quantum Groups. Camb ridge University Press (1995). 2, 20

    1995

  12. [20]

    Dotsenko, Functorial PBW theorems for post-Lie alge bras

    V . Dotsenko, Functorial PBW theorems for post-Lie alge bras. Commun. Algebra 48 (2020) 2072-2080. 3

    2020

  13. [21]

    V . G. Drinfeld, Hamiltonian structures on Lie groups, L ie bialgebras and the geometric meaning of classical Y ang–Baxter equations. Sov. Math. Dokl. 27 (1983) 68-71. 2

    1983

  14. [22]

    V . G. Drinfeld, Quantum groups, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Berkeley 1986). Amer. Math. Soc. (1987) 798-820. 2

    1987

  15. [23]

    Ebrahimi-Fard, I

    K. Ebrahimi-Fard, I. Mencattini and H. Z. Munthe-Kaas, Post-Lie algebras and factorization theorems. J. Geom. Phys. 119 (2017) 19-33. 3

    2017

  16. [24]

    X. Gao, M. Liu, C. Bai and N. Jing, Rota-Baxter operators on Witt and Virasoro algebras. J. Geom. Phys. 108 (2016) 1-20. 3

    2016

  17. [25]

    L. Guo, H. Lang and Y . Sheng, Integration and geometriza tion of Rota-Baxter Lie algebras. Adv. Math. 387 (2021) 34. 9 30 DILEI LU, CHENGMING BAI, AND LI GUO

    2021

  18. [26]

    Y . Hong, C. Bai and L. Guo, Infinite-dimensional Lie bial gebras via a ffinization of Novikov bialgebras and Koszul duality. Comm. Math. Phys. 401 (2023) 2011-2049. 2

    2023

  19. [27]

    S. A. Joni and G.-C. Rota, Coalgebras and bialgebras in c ombinatorics. Studies in Appl. Math. 61 (1979) 93-

    1979

  20. [28]

    A. W . Knapp, Lie Groups beyond an Introduction. Birkh¨ auser(1996). 7

    1996

  21. [29]

    Kupershmidt, What a classical r-matrix really is

    B. Kupershmidt, What a classical r-matrix really is. J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 6 (1999) 448-488. 2

    1999

  22. [30]

    Kupershmidt, Phase spaces of algebras

    B. Kupershmidt, Phase spaces of algebras. Mathematics Publications and Other W orks , (2010). http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk mathpubs/2. 3, 14

    2010

  23. [31]

    Liu and C

    G. Liu and C. Bai, A bialgebra theory for transposed Pois son algebras via anti-pre-Lie bialgebras and anti-pre- Lie Poisson bialgebras. Comm. Contemp. Math. 26 (2024), 2350050. 3

    2024

  24. [32]

    L. Liu, X. Ni and C. Bai, L-quadri-algebras (in Chinese) . Sci. Sin. Math. 41 (2011) 105-124. 26

    2011

  25. [33]

    Milnor, Curvatures of left invariant metrics on Lie g roups

    J. Milnor, Curvatures of left invariant metrics on Lie g roups. Adv. Math. 21 (1976) 293-329. 9

    1976

  26. [34]

    H. Z. Munthe-Kaas and S. Krogstad, On enumeration probl ems in Lie-Butcher theory. Future Gener . Comput. Syst. 19 (2003) 1197-1205. 3

    2003

  27. [35]

    H. Z. Munthe-Kaas and A. Lundervold, On post-Lie algebr as, Lie-Butcher series and moving frames. F ound. Comput. Math. 13 (2013) 583-613. 3, 6

    2013

  28. [36]

    H. Z. Munthe-Kaas and W . M. Wright, On the Hopf algebraic structure of Lie group integrators. F ound. Comput. Math. 8 (2008) 227-257. 3

    2008

  29. [37]

    Ni and C

    X. Ni and C. Bai, Pseudo-Hessian Lie algebras and L-dend riform bialgebras. J. Algebra 400 (2014) 273-289. 3, 4, 7, 20

    2014

  30. [38]

    Nomizu, Invariant a ffine connections on homogeneous spaces

    K. Nomizu, Invariant a ffine connections on homogeneous spaces. Amer . J. Math.76 (1954) 33-65. 8

    1954

  31. [39]

    Y . Pan, Q. Liu, C. Bai and L. Guo, PostLie algebra structu res on the Lie algebra SL(2, C). Electron J. Linear Algebra 23 (2012) 180-197. 9

    2012

  32. [40]

    M. M. Postnikov, Geometry VI: Riemannian Geometry. Encyclopedia of Math. Sci. , Springer (2001). 6, 8

    2001

  33. [41]

    Semonov-Tian-Shansky, What is a classical r-matrix? Funct

    M. Semonov-Tian-Shansky, What is a classical r-matrix? Funct. Anal. Appl. 17 (1983) 259-272. 2

    1983

  34. [42]

    Shima, Homogeneous Hessian manifolds

    H. Shima, Homogeneous Hessian manifolds. Ann. Inst. F ourier30 (1980) 91-128. 6

    1980

  35. [43]

    Shima, The Geometry of Hessian Structures

    H. Shima, The Geometry of Hessian Structures. World Sci entific Publishing Co. (2007). 6

    2007

  36. [44]

    M. E. Sweedler, Hopf Algebras. Benjamin (1969). 2

    1969

  37. [45]

    R. Tang, C. Bai, L. Guo and Y . Sheng, Homotopy Rota–Baxte r operators and post-Lie algebras. J. Noncommut. Geom. 17 (2023) 1-35. 12

    2023

  38. [46]

    Tang and Y

    R. Tang and Y . Sheng, Leibniz bialgebras, relative Rota-Baxter operators and the classical Leibniz Y ang-Baxter equation. J. Noncommut. Geom. 16 (2022) 1179-1211. 2

    2022

  39. [47]

    V allette, Homology of generalized partition posets

    B. V allette, Homology of generalized partition posets . J. Pure Appl. Algebra 208 (2007) 699-725. 3, 5, 6 Chern Institute of Mathematics& LPMC, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China Email address: ludyray@126.com Chern Institute of Mathematics& LPMC, Nankai University, Tia...

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.