Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 15 references

Wan-Animate-2: Pushing the Application Boundaries of Character Animation

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Wan-Animate-2 claims that character animation needs no motion extractor: a dual-branch diffusion transformer consumes the driving video directly, and its distilled variant streams at 24 fps.

desk verdict A real architecture-and-systems contribution with a coherent real-time streaming story, but the headline 'superior' claims rest on an evaluation that is partly circular and statistically thin. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06009 v2 pith:HKHASV4G submitted 2026-08-06 cs.CV

Guangyuan Wang , Li Hu , Dechao Meng , Zhongyi Zhang , Peng Zhang , Xindi Zhang , Mingyang Huang , Ruoshi Zhang
show 6 more authors
Ke Sun Zhe Zhang Xingjun Wang Gang Cheng Hai Xu Bang Zhang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords characterimageanimationdiffusiontransformermotiontransfervideogenerationviewpointcontrolreal-timeinferenceself-forcingdistillationlow-rankadaptation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Wan-Animate-2 tries to show that character animation does not need an intermediate pose, skeleton, or motion-latent extractor: the driving video itself, patchified and fed into a diffusion transformer, is a complete motion prior. The paper's system adds a second branch for reference-video tokens, time-aligned rotary positions, and sparse frame-aligned attention so that each target token attends only to its temporally matched reference token, keeping cost linear in sequence length rather than quadratic. It also separates camera viewpoint from driving motion by training a text-conditioned low-rank adapter over 48 discrete views, so a user can request a 'right 60-degree view' and get that perspective. A distilled variant, Wan-Animate-2-Lite, reformulates the diffusion model as a chunk-wise causal generator trained with teacher forcing, an error buffer, and self-forcing distillation, and the paper reports 24 frames per second at 400x720 on a four-GPU pipeline, crossing the real-time threshold. If these claims hold, one open-source system could cover high-fidelity animation, text-controlled cameras, and live streaming avatars.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a dual-branch Diffusion Transformer with the reference branch fixed at timestep $t=0$. The reference and latent branches share projection weights, but the latent branch runs at the diffusion timestep while the reference branch stays clean; Time-Align RoPE prepends reference tokens frame-by-frame with a spatial offset, and Sparse-Ref Attention restricts cross-branch attention to temporally aligned reference tokens, cutting cross-branch attention from $O(N_r N_l)$ to $O(N_l)$. The Viewpoint LoRA, applied only to cross-attention projections, embeds a discrete 48-view camera space into text. For the Lite variant, the causal reformulation is carried by teacher-forced chunk training with an error buffer that corrupts clean context with stored residuals, plus Self-Forcing distillation with chunk-wise gradient accumulation, reducing denoising to three steps at the 14B scale.

What would settle it

Reproduce Wan-Animate-2-Lite on the same four-GPU pipeline at 400x720 over a sustained stream: if average throughput falls below 24 fps, the real-time claim fails. Separately, run Wan-Animate-2-Base against Wan-Animate on real driving videos that never passed through the Wan-Animate synthesis pipeline and compare identity preservation and motion accuracy; no advantage would falsify the claim that eliminating motion extractors yields superior fidelity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Wan-Animate-2's central claim is that an end-to-end Diffusion Transformer can outperform extractor-based character animation by treating the reference video as a direct conditioning signal. The reference branch is anchored at timestep $t=0$, shares QKV projections with the latent branch, and feeds keys and values through a Sparse-Ref attention mask that limits each latent token to its temporally aligned reference counterpart; Time-Align RoPE synchronizes the two branches frame-by-frame. On top of this, a Viewpoint LoRA maps text descriptions of azimuth and elevation into cross-attention, decoupling the output camera from the driver's camera. For real-time use, Wan-Animate-2-Lite turns the model into a causal generator over 8-frame chunks, injects stored prediction residuals during training to stop error accumulation, and distills multi-step denoising to three steps with chunk-wise backpropagation that keeps 14B-parameter training memory proportional to one chunk; the reported result is 24 fps streaming at 400x720. The paper also reports user-study preferences over its predecessor and a commercial platform, positioning the system as an open-source stack that combines these three capabilities.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that paired training videos synthesized by Wan-Animate are a fair and representative way to learn and evaluate motion transfer, so that gains measured on them are not just the model learning the preferences of its own data generator.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the 24 fps measurement holds, character animation becomes usable in live-streaming, digital-avatar, and interactive virtual environments where per-frame latency is the binding constraint.
  • If the reference video is truly a sufficient motion prior, pose and skeleton extractors become optional, removing a common source of extraction errors and cross-identity drift.
  • Text-driven viewpoint control makes the output camera an independent knob, so a single driving performance can be re-rendered from many perspectives without recapturing motion.
  • The chunk-wise Self-Forcing backpropagation recipe, if correct, provides a path to streaming inference for other large diffusion models that cannot afford full-sequence rollout training.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An independent test of the architecture's claim would train the same dual-branch DiT on real paired video rather than Wan-Animate-synthesized pairs; if the gains over Wan-Animate persist, the superiority is not an artifact of the data generator.
  • The 24 fps figure assumes a four-GPU pipeline-parallel deployment, so single-GPU or consumer-hardware throughput is the natural next benchmark for whether the streaming capability reaches end users.
  • The discrete 48-view text space invites a continuous-viewpoint extension, where the same Viewpoint LoRA is asked to interpolate between annotated azimuth and elevation prompts.
  • The chunk-wise Self-Forcing backpropagation recipe is not character-specific and could be ported to other long-video diffusion generators that need streaming inference.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Wan-Animate-2, a character image animation framework built on a dual-branch Diffusion Transformer that consumes the driving video directly without intermediate motion extractors. Three contributions are claimed: (i) higher motion fidelity and identity preservation through dual-branch design, Time-Align RoPE, and Sparse-Ref Attention; (ii) text-driven viewpoint control via a Viewpoint LoRA trained on synthetic multi-view data; and (iii) a real-time variant, Wan-Animate-2-Lite, obtained through teacher-forcing pretraining with an error buffer and Self-Forcing distillation with chunk-wise backpropagation. The authors report qualitative comparisons, a user study, and a throughput of 24 fps on a 4-GPU pipeline-parallel deployment. The main weaknesses are that the paired training corpus is synthesized by Wan-Animate, which is also the primary baseline; the evaluation is largely qualitative with no quantitative metrics, no ablations, and no statistical reporting for the user study.

Significance. If the claims are substantiated, the paper would make a useful contribution: removing explicit motion extractors, enabling text-controlled viewpoint changes, and demonstrating a path to streaming real-time character animation are all of practical interest, and the planned release of base model weights would be valuable to the open-source community. The proposed architectural components (Sparse-Ref Attention, Time-Align RoPE, error-buffer teacher forcing, chunk-wise Self-Forcing distillation) are clearly described and are plausible engineering contributions. However, the current evidence is insufficient to establish the central superiority claims: the training data are generated by the main baseline, the evaluation is mostly qualitative, and the user study lacks basic statistical reporting. The significance of the work is therefore conditional on additional, independent evaluation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.1, Sec. 5.3, Sec. 5.4] The central claim that Wan-Animate-2 surpasses Wan-Animate is not established independently of the baseline. Section 2.1 states that the paired training corpus is synthesized by Wan-Animate: reference videos are paired with target videos generated by Wan-Animate from edited reference images. The model is therefore trained to regress to Wan-Animate's output distribution, including any systematic motion or identity biases. The qualitative comparison in Section 5.3 and the user study in Section 5.4 then compare Wan-Animate-2 against Wan-Animate on outputs that come from, or are statistically close to, the training distribution. This does not disprove the architecture, but it means the reported superiority may partly reflect in-family imitation. Please add evaluation on independently collected paired data (or on real-world motion-transfer benchmarks with quantitative metrics) and explicitly discuss the potential circularity and its effect on the comparison.
  2. [Sec. 5.4] The user study is reported without a sample size, confidence intervals, or significance tests. The text states that 'over 70% of pairwise comparisons favor our method' and that Kling-MotionControl results were rated as 'equivalent quality' in most cases, but without the number of participants, the number of video pairs, or any statistical test it is impossible to assess whether these differences are meaningful. Please report the full protocol: number of participants, number of stimuli per dimension, inter-annotator agreement, and either confidence intervals or a significance test for the pairwise preferences.
  3. [Sec. 5] The evaluation lacks quantitative generation-quality metrics. There are no FVD, LPIPS, identity-similarity, or motion-fidelity measurements, and there are no ablations isolating the proposed components: Sparse-Ref Attention (Sec. 3.4), Time-Align RoPE (Sec. 3.3), the Viewpoint LoRA (Sec. 3.5), the error buffer (Sec. 4.2), and the chunk-wise Self-Forcing distillation (Sec. 4.3) are each described as critical, but none is ablated or measured. Without ablations or quantitative metrics, the reader cannot attribute the observed qualitative behavior to the proposed mechanisms, and the real-time variant's quality relative to the base model is not established. Please add quantitative comparisons and component ablations.
  4. [Sec. 5.5] The real-time claim is presented as a single throughput number: 24 fps at 400x720 on a 4-GPU pipeline-parallel cluster. This does not fully support the claim of 'real-time' or 'streaming' interaction, because end-to-end latency is not reported, and throughput on a multi-GPU pipeline is not the same as per-request latency. No comparison is provided against other accelerated or streaming animation methods, and the hardware/energy cost of the 4-GPU setup is omitted. Please report end-to-end latency, per-stage timing, memory usage, and a comparison with at least one efficient baseline under the same hardware.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 6] The user-study figure is described as a visualization of results but does not appear to include error bars, axis labels, or a legend; please add these so the reported preferences can be interpreted.
  2. [Sec. 3.3] The description of Time-Align RoPE says the spatial offset is 'Ht x Wt'; please clarify whether the reference tokens are offset by the total number of target spatial tokens and how this behaves when reference and target resolutions differ.
  3. [Sec. 5.2] Viewpoint control is evaluated only on the 48 discrete labels used in training; the claim of 'flexible camera manipulation through natural language' would be stronger with a test on unseen or free-form prompt variants and a quantitative measure of viewpoint accuracy.
  4. [References] Several commercial baselines (Dreamina, Kling-MotionControl) are cited only by a URL and a company name; please provide version identifiers or technical reports so that the comparison is reproducible.
  5. [Sec. 5.1] The qualitative results in Figure 3 show many animated characters, but there is no description of how representative examples were selected or whether failures were encountered; a brief failure analysis would improve the paper's credibility.
  6. [Sec. 4.2] The error buffer is described as a running estimate of prediction residuals, but the update rule and the scale of the injected corruption are not specified; please give the exact formula or algorithm for maintaining and applying the buffer.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Primary training corpus is synthesized by Wan-Animate, the same-model-family baseline used in the headline comparison; superiority claims are therefore not established independently of the baseline.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2 (Data, first paragraph) and Section 5.4 (User Study)]
    "a large-scale collection of paired video data synthesized by Wan-Animate models, which serves as the primary training corpus for both the Wan-Animate-2-Base architecture and the Wan-Animate-2-Lite acceleration variant ... The results, as illustrated in Figure 6, demonstrate that Wan-Animate-2 consistently outperforms Wan-Animate across all metrics, with over 70% of pairwise comparisons favoring our method in overall quality."

    Wan-Animate-2 is trained to regress to video pairs generated by Wan-Animate, and Wan-Animate is also the primary baseline in the subsequent comparison. Because the training target is the baseline's own output distribution, any systematic motion or identity biases in Wan-Animate are absorbed into the student model. The claimed superiority over Wan-Animate is therefore not an independent test of motion fidelity; it partly measures how well the model replicates the generator that produced its training labels. The authors of Wan-Animate overlap with the present paper, making this an in-family data-and-evaluation loop.

full rationale

The main circularity concern is the paired-video training corpus. Section 2 states that the primary training corpus is synthesized by Wan-Animate models, and the same method is the primary baseline in Sections 5.3 and 5.4, with overlapping authorship. Because Wan-Animate-2 is trained to regress to Wan-Animate's output distribution, any artifacts or biases in Wan-Animate's motion transfer are absorbed into the student; a user-study comparison against Wan-Animate then partly measures how well the model replicates the generator that produced its training labels, not an independent ground-truth improvement. This is not a formal definitional reduction: the user study may use held-out real videos, and the paper also compares against Dreamina and Kling-MotionControl, so the central architecture retains independent content. The viewpoint LoRA is trained on a separate Unreal Engine multi-view dataset and evaluated qualitatively; the real-time Lite variant is an empirical throughput measurement; no other load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs. Score 4 reflects partial circularity from in-family training data, not full circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on synthetic data from the predecessor model, a handful of architectural assumptions, and a distillation argument asserted without proof. No new physical entities are introduced, but several design choices such as viewpoint grid, chunk size, step count, and filtering thresholds are hand-set and not ablated.

free parameters (4)
  • Viewpoint discretization grid = 12 azimuth x 4 elevation = 48 viewpoints
    Manual choice of camera states for Viewpoint LoRA; no evidence is given that this grid covers the space of useful viewpoints or transfers beyond synthetic renders.
  • Temporal chunk size = 8 frames
    Autoregressive chunk length chosen for Wan-Animate-2-Lite; no ablation is reported for this value.
  • Distilled denoising steps = 3 steps during Lite inference
    The step count used to claim 24 fps is chosen for speed; no quality versus latency tradeoff analysis is given.
  • Quality filtering thresholds
    The synthetic data filtering thresholds in Section 2.1 are described qualitatively as 'stringent' but never specified, so they are effectively hand-set and unreproducible.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Paired training videos synthesized by Wan-Animate are a valid supervision signal to learn animation that surpasses Wan-Animate.
    Section 2.1 builds all paired data with the predecessor model, so the training distribution inherits that model's biases and failure modes.
  • domain assumption Fixing the reference branch at t=0 preserves a clean motion prior and stabilizes training.
    Section 3.2 states this anchoring without empirical comparison to other timestep choices or theoretical justification.
  • domain assumption Frame-wise temporal alignment between reference and target makes Sparse-Ref attention sufficient.
    Section 3.4 restricts attention to temporally corresponding reference tokens; this is valid only if reference and target frames are always aligned, which holds for the synthetic paired data but may be fragile for unconstrained driving videos.
  • domain assumption Text descriptions of discrete synthetic viewpoints transfer to real images and videos via LoRA.
    Sections 2.2 and 3.5 assume that a LoRA trained on 48 Unreal Engine viewpoints generalizes to natural images; no viewpoint accuracy metric is reported.
  • domain assumption Chunk-wise gradient severing preserves the theoretical guarantees of Distribution Matching Distillation.
    Section 4.3 asserts this preservation but provides no proof that detaching the computational graph between chunks leaves the DMD objective or its convergence properties intact.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wan-Animate-2: Pushing the Application Boundaries of Character Animation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HKHASV4G

@misc{pith2026260806009,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wan-Animate-2: Pushing the Application Boundaries of Character Animation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HKHASV4G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06009}
}
read the original abstract

Character image animation remains a foundational yet challenging task in computer vision. Existing approaches can be broadly categorized into three paradigms: methods based on explicit motion representations suffer from extraction errors and identity drift; methods based on implicit motion features lose fine-grained dynamics through compression; and in-context learning approaches avoid intermediate representations but incur prohibitive computational costs. Furthermore, all current systems are designed for offline synthesis, unable to meet the real-time requirements of interactive applications such as digital avatars and live-streaming hosts. To address these limitations, we present Wan-Animate-2, an end-to-end character animation framework that directly consumes the driving video within a redesigned Diffusion Transformer. Our architecture achieves superior motion fidelity and identity preservation by eliminating intermediate motion extractors entirely. We further introduce text driven viewpoint control that decouples the output camera perspective from the driving video--a capability rarely supported by prior character animation methods that rely on explicit motion representations. Beyond generation quality, we present Wan-Animate-2-Lite, an efficient variant that reduces inference latency to real-time thresholds through a three-stage training paradigm: teacher forcing pretraining with error buffer mechanism, and Self-Forcing distillation with chunk-wise backpropagation. This enables streaming character animation for interactive applications, opening new deployment scenarios that were previously infeasible. Qualitative evaluations and user studies demonstrate that Wan-Animate-2 achieves high-fidelity animation results across diverse characters and motion patterns. To foster further research and community development, we will release the Wan-Animate-2-Base model weights to the public.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 11 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Dreamina.https://dreaminai.org/

    ByteDance. Dreamina.https://dreaminai.org/. Huanqia Cai, Sihan Cao, Ruoyi Du, Peng Gao, Steven Hoi, Zhaohui Hou, Shijie Huang, Dengyang Jiang, Xin Jin, Liangchen Li, et al. Z-image: An efficient image generation foundation model with single-stream diffusion transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.22699,

    arXiv

  2. [6]

    Dreampose: Fashion image-to-video synthesis via stable diffusion, 2023.https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06025

    Johanna Karras, Aleksander Holynski, Ting-Chun Wang, and Ira Kemelmacher-Shlizerman. Dreampose: Fashion image-to-video synthesis via stable diffusion, 2023.https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06025. Jeongho Kim, Min-Jung Kim, Junsoo Lee, and Jaegul Choo. Tcan: Animating human images with temporally consistent pose guidance using diffusion models, 2024.https://arxi...

    arXiv 2023

  3. [7]

    Dreamactor-m2: Universal character image animation via spatiotemporal in-context learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21716,

    Mingshuang Luo, Shuang Liang, Zhengkun Rong, Yuxuan Luo, Tianshu Hu, Ruibing Hou, Hong Chang, Yong Li, Yuan Zhang, and Mingyuan Gao. Dreamactor-m2: Universal character image animation via spatiotemporal in-context learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21716,

    arXiv

  4. [8]

    Follow your pose: Pose-guided text-to-video generation using pose-free videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.01186,

    Yue Ma, Yingqing He, Xiaodong Cun, Xintao Wang, Ying Shan, Xiu Li, and Qifeng Chen. Follow your pose: Pose-guided text-to-video generation using pose-free videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.01186,

    arXiv

  5. [11]

    Unianimate: Taming unified video diffusion models for consistent human image animation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.01188, 2024a

    Xiang Wang, Shiwei Zhang, Changxin Gao, Jiayu Wang, Xiaoqiang Zhou, Yingya Zhang, Luxin Yan, and Nong Sang. Unianimate: Taming unified video diffusion models for consistent human image animation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.01188, 2024a. Yaohui Wang, Di Yang, Francois Bremond, and Antitza Dantcheva. Latent image animator: Learning to animate images via laten...

    arXiv

  6. [12]

    Lia: Latent image animator.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 46(12):10829–10844, 2024b

    Yaohui Wang, Di Yang, Francois Bremond, and Antitza Dantcheva. Lia: Latent image animator.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 46(12):10829–10844, 2024b. Chenfei Wu, Jiahao Li, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kaiyuan Gao, Kun Yan, Sheng-ming Yin, Shuai Bai, Xiao Xu, Yilei Chen, et al. Qwen-image technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:...

    arXiv

  7. [13]

    Vitpose++: Vision transformer for generic body pose estimation.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 46(2):1212–1230, 2023a

    Yufei Xu, Jing Zhang, Qiming Zhang, and Dacheng Tao. Vitpose++: Vision transformer for generic body pose estimation.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 46(2):1212–1230, 2023a. Zhongcong Xu, Jianfeng Zhang, Jun Hao Liew, Hanshu Yan, Jia-Wei Liu, Chenxu Zhang, Jiashi Feng, and Mike Zheng Shou. Magicanimate: Temporally consistent ...

    arXiv 2026

  8. [14]

    Improved distribution matching distillation for fast image synthesis.Adv

    Tianwei Yin, Michaël Gharbi, Taesung Park, Richard Zhang, Eli Shechtman, Fredo Durand, and William T Freeman. Improved distribution matching distillation for fast image synthesis.Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst., 37: 47455–47487, 2024a. Tianwei Yin, Michaël Gharbi, Richard Zhang, Eli Shechtman, Fredo Durand, William T Freeman, and Taesung Park. One-step...

    arXiv 2025

Show all 15 references
  1. [15]

    Champ: Controllable and consistent human image animation with 3d parametric guidance

    Shenhao Zhu, Junming Leo Chen, Zuozhuo Dai, Yinghui Xu, Xun Cao, Yao Yao, Hao Zhu, and Siyu Zhu. Champ: Controllable and consistent human image animation with 3d parametric guidance. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2024

    2024

  2. [2017]

    Magicdance: Realistic human dance video generation with motions & facial expressions transfer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12052,

    Di Chang, Yichun Shi, Quankai Gao, Jessica Fu, Hongyi Xu, Guoxian Song, Qing Yan, Xiao Yang, and Mohammad Soleymani. Magicdance: Realistic human dance video generation with motions & facial expressions transfer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12052,

    arXiv

  3. [2019]

    X- unimotion: Animating human images with expressive, unified and identity-agnostic motion latents

    Guoxian Song, Hongyi Xu, Xiaochen Zhao, You Xie, Tianpei Gu, Zenan Li, Chenxu Zhang, and Linjie Luo. X- unimotion: Animating human images with expressive, unified and identity-agnostic motion latents. InProceedings of the SIGGRAPH Asia 2025 Conference Papers, pages 1–11,

    2025

  4. [2022]

    Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17117,

    Li Hu, Xin Gao, Peng Zhang, Ke Sun, Bang Zhang, and Liefeng Bo. Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17117,

    arXiv

  5. [2023]

    Longlive2.0: An nvfp4 parallel infrastructure for long video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv: 2605.18739,

    Yukang Chen, Luozhou Wang, Wei Huang, Shuai Yang, Bohan Zhang, Yicheng Xiao, Ruihang Chu, Weian Mao, Qixin Hu, Shaoteng Liu, Yuyang Zhao, Huizi Mao, Ying-Cong Chen, Enze Xie, Xiaojuan Qi, and Song Han. Longlive2.0: An nvfp4 parallel infrastructure for long video generation.arX...

    arXiv

  6. [2024]

    Tan Wang, Linjie Li, Kevin Lin, Yuanhao Zhai, Chung-Ching Lin, Zhengyuan Yang, Hanwang Zhang, Zicheng Liu, and Lijuan Wang

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10306. Tan Wang, Linjie Li, Kevin Lin, Yuanhao Zhai, Chung-Ching Lin, Zhengyuan Yang, Hanwang Zhang, Zicheng Liu, and Lijuan Wang. Disco: Disentangled control for realistic human dance generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.00040,

    arXiv

  7. [2026]

    Wan-animate: Unified character animation and replacement with holistic replication, 2025.https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14055

    Gang Cheng, Xin Gao, Li Hu, Siqi Hu, Mingyang Huang, Chaonan Ji, Ju Li, Dechao Meng, Jinwei Qi, Penchong Qiao, Zhen Shen, Yafei Song, Ke Sun, Linrui Tian, Feng Wang, Guangyuan Wang, Qi Wang, Zhongjian Wang, Jiayu Xiao, Sheng Xu, Bang Zhang, Peng Zhang, Xindi Zhang, Zhe Zhang, ...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.