Scaffolding Residues in Yang-Mills-Scalar \`a la CHY

Jaroslav Scheinpflug; Yale Yauk; Zurab Jashi

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Scaffolding Residues in Yang-Mills-Scalar \`a la CHY

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Scaffolding scalar amplitudes yields pure gluon amplitudes via the CHY formalism.

desk verdict A useful, explicit CHY computation of the scaffolding residue with one load-bearing unproved Pfaffian step that should be fixed before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12807 v1 pith:HKXWU2MC submitted 2024-11-19 hep-th

Zurab Jashi , Jaroslav Scheinpflug , Yale Yauk This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords scaffoldingresidueYang-Mills-ScalaramplitudesCHYformalismscatteringequationsPfaffianmulti-collinearlimitsEinstein-Maxwell-Scalarcolor-dressed

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Within the CHY (Cachazo-He-Yuan) formulation of tree-level amplitudes, the paper shows that the scaffolding limit of a $2n$-scalar Yang-Mills-Scalar amplitude — sending each paired invariant $s_{ii'}$ to zero — reproduces the $n$-gluon Yang-Mills amplitude multiplied by a product of $1/s_{ii'}$ factors. The result is consequential because it exhibits a pure gluon amplitude, polarization vectors and all, as the most singular residue of a much simpler scalar integrand built from the matrix $A$. The same computation turns $2n$-scalar Einstein-Maxwell-Scalar amplitudes into $n$-graviton amplitudes, and partial multi-collinear limits yield mixed gluon-scalar amplitudes as well as the expected poles in color-dressed amplitudes.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the scaffolding residue computed inside the CHY integral: parameterize the limit by $s_{ii'} = \tau \hat{s}_{ii'}$ and $u_{i'} = u_i + \tau x_i$, so that the Parke-Taylor factor, the Pfaffian of $X$, and the integration measure each supply powers of $1/\tau$; the primed scattering equations then fix the $x_i$ and produce the diagonal entries of $\Psi$. The load-bearing linear-algebra step is the congruence $A_{\mathrm{final}} = S A S^{T}$ (row $i \to$ row $i$ + row $i'$, column $i \to$ column $i$ + column $i'$) with $\det S = 1$, under which the reduced Pfaffian (the Pfaffian with two rows and columns removed, as used in CHY formulas) is asserted to be invariant, so that $\mathrm{Pf}' A$ evaluated at the solutions $x_i^\circ$ equals $\mathrm{Pf}' \Psi$. The explicit map $k_i := k_i + k_{i'}$, $\varepsilon_i := k_{i'}$ geometrizes gauge invariance: shifting the pair $(k_i, k_{i'})$ parallel to $k_i + k_{i'}$ leaves the amplitude unchanged.

What would settle it

Take a small antisymmetric matrix $A$, say $6\times 6$ or $8\times 8$ with generic entries, build $S$ from the operations column $i \to$ column $i$ + column $i'$ and row $i \to$ row $i$ + row $i'$, and compare $\mathrm{Pf}'$ of $A$ with $\mathrm{Pf}'$ of $S A S^T$; any mismatch disproves the asserted invariance and thus eq. (2.21). Alternatively, evaluate both sides of eq. (2.35) numerically at a random kinematic point for $n=4$ in the $s_{ii'} \to 0$ limit and check equality including the product of poles.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is eq. (2.35): in the limit $s_{ii'} \to 0$, the YMS scalar amplitude $\mathcal{A}^{\mathrm{YMS}}(1,1',\ldots,n,n')$ equals $\left(\prod_i 1/s_{ii'}\right)\mathcal{A}^{\mathrm{YM}}(1,\ldots,n)$ plus subleading terms, with the reduced Pfaffian of the simple momentum matrix $A$ evaluated on the scattering-equation solutions equal to the reduced Pfaffian of the polarization-rich matrix $\Psi$ (eq. 2.21). The proof passes through a row-and-column operation on $A$ that turns it into $\Psi$ once the identifications $k_i := k_i + k_{i'}$ and $\varepsilon_i := k_{i'}$ are made, and once the primed scattering equations supply the diagonal entries of $\Psi$. The analogous statement for the EMS theory is eq. (3.6), producing $n$-graviton amplitudes. The paper also extends the argument to partial scaffolding (some pairs collinear, others untouched), obtaining mixed gluon-scalar amplitudes, and to color-dressed amplitudes, where the collinear poles come with the structure constants $f_{jj'j^\star}$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof rests on the unproved linear-algebra premise that the reduced Pfaffian ($\mathrm{Pf}'$) is invariant under the row-and-column congruence $A_{\mathrm{final}} = S A S^T$ with $\det S = 1$; if that invariance fails, the identification $\mathrm{Pf}' A = \mathrm{Pf}' \Psi$, and with it the central scaffolding identity, does not follow. This is a separate mathematical premise from the collinear limit itself.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any $n$-gluon CHY amplitude can be recovered as the most singular term of a $2n$-scalar YMS amplitude, so gluon polarization data need not be inserted by hand.
The same identity upgrades to gravity: the scaffolding residue of $2n$ EMS scalars is the pure $n$-graviton amplitude (eq. 3.6).
Partial scaffolding produces mixed amplitudes with $m$ gluons and $n-m$ scalars, taking the expected Yang-Mills-scalar form (eq. 4.22).
In color-dressed amplitudes the collinear poles appear multiplied by the structure constants $f_{jj'j^\star}$, so color and kinematics factor in the multi-collinear limit (eq. 4.25).
The diagonal entries $C_{ii}$ of $\Psi$ emerge from the primed scattering equations (eq. 2.34), resolving a previously opaque part of the CHY matrix from scalar kinematics alone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

We would expect the asserted $\mathrm{Pf}'$ congruence invariance to be checkable by direct numerical evaluation on random small antisymmetric matrices; a counterexample there would break the derivation before any physics enters.
The same row-and-column mechanism may generate the richer CHY matrix $\Pi$ of Einstein-Yang-Mills amplitudes from a simpler scalar integrand, a step the paper mentions only as future work.
The geometric picture of gauge invariance as vertex shifts along $k_i + k_{i'}$ suggests a wider family of 'scaffolded' theories in which any polygon vertex carries a pair of scalar momenta, possibly extending the construction beyond tree level.
Because the residue formula (2.35) is exact at leading order in $\tau$, an explicit $n=4$ evaluation on both sides would provide a sharp end-to-end test of the sign and normalization of the product of poles.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Good news first: this is a clean, mostly explicit CHY computation that does what it says. The scaffolding construction itself is from Arkani-Hamed et al., but this paper gives the first detailed CHY-level derivation of the residue, shows how Pf' Psi emerges from Pf' A via row/column operations and the xi equations, and extends the story to multi-collinear limits and color-dressed amplitudes. The map epsilon_i = k_i' is derived, not assumed, and the emergence of the C_ii diagonal entries from the scattering equations is a genuinely nice observation. For the EMS case, the same computation correctly yields graviton amplitudes from scalar amplitudes. The paper is also honest about its provenance as a PSI winter project, and the writing is clear.

The soft spot is the one the stress-test flagged, and it is load-bearing. In Section 2.1.1, after eq. (2.29), and again in Section 4.1, after eq. (4.18), the paper asserts that Pf'(A_final) = Pf'(A) because the matrices are related by row and column operations. That is not generically true for reduced Pfaffians. For a fixed deletion pair, a determinant-1 congruence on the full matrix does not by itself preserve the reduced Pfaffian; one needs the induced congruence on the deleted submatrix to have determinant 1. For the specific operations used here, the equality does hold when the deletion is chosen among the unprimed indices, and the stress-test note says the lemma can be proved in a few lines. But the paper does not state or prove it. Since this equality is exactly what identifies the scalar integrand with the gluon Pfaffian, a referee should ask for that proof before the central identity (2.35) is taken as established.

There are minor issues too: the 'trivially generalises' claim for non-canonically-ordered partial amplitudes in Section 4.2 is too quick, and there are no numerical checks. None of this makes the central claim look false; it is a rigor gap rather than a demonstrated error. The paper is worth a serious referee, and the missing Pfaffian lemma is easily fixed.

Who is this for? People who work on CHY formulations, combinatorial origins of amplitudes, or the scaffolding program. A reader in that area gets value from the explicit derivation and the multi-collinear extensions. I would not cite it in my own work next year, but I would bring it to a reading group focused on CHY.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a CHY-formalism derivation of the 'scaffolding residue' of 2n-scalar Yang-Mills-Scalar (YMS) amplitudes: in the limit s_{ii'} -> 0 for all i, the most singular term is shown to equal the n-gluon Yang-Mills amplitude multiplied by the product of 1/s_{ii'} (eq. 2.35). The central technical step is the identification Pf' A|_{x_i=x_i^o} = Pf' Psi (eq. 2.21), where the simple momentum matrix A is transformed by row/column operations into the rich Psi matrix of the gluon CHY integrand, with the derived map k_i = k_i + k_i' and epsilon_i = k_i'. The same computation is repeated for Einstein-Maxwell-Scalar (EMS) scalars, yielding the n-graviton amplitude (eq. 3.6). The paper also treats partial (non-maximal) multi-collinear limits, obtaining amplitudes with m gluons and n-m scalars (eq. 4.22), and discusses color-dressed amplitudes, deriving the appearance of structure constants in the pole expansion (eq. 4.25).

Significance. If the derivation is made fully rigorous, the paper provides a self-contained CHY-level proof of the scaffolding construction of gluon amplitudes from scalar data, explicitly showing how the complicated Psi matrix arises from the simple A matrix. The map epsilon_i = k_i' is derived rather than assumed, and the derivation contains no fitting parameters, which are notable strengths. The extension to gravity and to partial multi-collinear limits, as well as the treatment of color-dressed amplitudes, broadens the scope. The main weakness is a missing linear-algebra lemma about the behavior of reduced Pfaffians under the congruence A -> S A S^T; this property is true for the specific S used here but is asserted without proof in two places. The physical results are consistent with expectations from ref. [1], so the novelty is moderate, but the CHY derivation is a useful contribution.

major comments (2)

[Section 2.1.1, after eq. (2.29)] The equality Pf'(A_final) = Pf'(A) is asserted without proof. The paper justifies it by noting that A_final is obtained from A by row and column operations, but the reduced Pfaffian is not invariant under an arbitrary determinant-1 congruence for a fixed deletion pair: the induced congruence on the deleted (2n-2)x(2n-2) submatrix need not have determinant 1. For the specific matrix S here, the equality does hold when the deleted rows and columns are chosen among the unprimed indices, because the operations then act trivially on the deleted rows/columns and with determinant 1 on the remaining submatrix; the claim then follows from the standard independence of Pf' from the deletion pair. This argument is absent, and the step is load-bearing for eqs. (2.21) and (2.35). Please add a short lemma with proof.
[Section 4.1, after eq. (4.18)] The analogous statement Pf'(Psi~) = Pf'(A) for the partial multi-collinear limit is also asserted without proof. Here the row and column operations are followed by block swaps, so the determinant of the induced congruence on the reduced submatrix is not immediate. Since this equality underlies eq. (4.22), a proof of the congruence property, or at least a precise statement of the deletion choice that makes it valid, is needed here as well.

minor comments (4)

[Eq. (3.4)] The determinant of X is stated as 1/(tau^{2n} (sum x_i)^2), but from (Pf X)^2 = det X and eq. (2.10) it should be 1/(tau^{2n} (prod x_i)^2). The subsequent integration over x_i implicitly uses the product form, so this appears to be a typo rather than a substantive error.
[Eqs. (2.17)-(2.18)] The notation k_j is used ambiguously: in the sum (s_{i'j}+s_{i'j'})/u_{ij} it denotes the combined gluon momentum k_j+k_j', while elsewhere k_j denotes the unprimed scalar momentum. Please clarify to avoid confusion.
[Section 2.1.1, around eqs. (2.8)-(2.10)] The overall sign of the leading term of Pf X is not tracked; the combination of signs from the Parke-Taylor factor and the Pfaffian is left implicit. Since the final amplitude is compared with the standard CHY formula, please state the sign convention used for the leading term.
[Section 4.1, after eq. (4.11)] The statement that M = O(tau^{-1}) is imprecise, as the submatrix of M with both indices unprimed is O(1). What is needed is only that the leading singular part of Pf(M) is 1/(tau^m prod x_i). Please rephrase.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the scaffolding derivation is self-contained, and the only flagged issue is an unproved (but true) reduced-Pfaffian invariance, which is a rigor gap rather than a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation starts from the CHY formula for the 2n-scalar YMS amplitude, eq. (2.5), and computes the coefficient of the most singular term as s_ii' -> 0. Each factor (PT, Pf X, measure, delta functions) is transformed by explicit expansion in tau, and the matrix A is mapped to Psi by explicit row/column operations plus the identification epsilon_i = k_i' derived by matching matrix entries, not assumed from [1] (the text says 'we will not assume it and try to discover it'). The target Psi is not an input; it emerges from A_final after the scattering equations set the diagonal C_ii. No parameter is fitted to the final YM amplitude, and no load-bearing conclusion rests on a self-citation: ref [1] supplies the scaffolding idea, but the CHY computation is independent. The only weakness is that the equality Pf'(A_final) = Pf'(A) under the row/column congruence is asserted (after eq. 2.29 and after eq. 4.18) without proving the reduced-Pfaffian transformation property; this is a rigor gap in linear algebra, not a circular definition, and the authors' conclusion would be valid once the lemma is supplied. The same holds for the EMS-to-gravity extension in Section 3, which inherits the same algebraic step rather than assuming the graviton result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted. The paper takes CHY formulas and the compactification factorization as inputs. The main unstated assumption is the invariance of the reduced Pfaffian under row and column operations, which is load-bearing and not proved. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)

standard math CHY integral formulas for YM, YMS scalars and EMS scalars are valid (eqs (1.2), (2.4), (3.1)).
These are established formulas from refs [31-35] and are used as input, not derived in this paper.
domain assumption Compactification factorization Pf' Psi = Pf X Pf' A for all-scalar amplitudes (eq (2.3)).
The paper takes this factorization as known from the compactification of Yang-Mills.
domain assumption Leading-order behavior of the Parke-Taylor factor and Pf X under the deformation ui' = ui + tau xi (eqs (2.8), (2.10)).
These are expanded in the paper but rely on the structure of the matrices and the collinear parametrization.
ad hoc to paper The reduced Pfaffian is invariant under the row and column congruence A -> S A S^T with det S = 1 (used in Section 2.1.1 and Section 4.1).
This is asserted without proof or citation; it is load-bearing for the identification Pf' A = Pf' Psi.
domain assumption In the color-dressed multi-collinear limit, only permutations keeping the pairs (i,i') adjacent contribute at leading order (Section 4.2).
Stated in the paper; no detailed proof is given, though it is standard in collinear analyses.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scaffolding Residues in Yang-Mills-Scalar \`a la CHY." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HKXWU2MC

@misc{pith2026241112807,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scaffolding Residues in Yang-Mills-Scalar \`a la CHY},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HKXWU2MC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12807}
}

abstract

Motivated by recent work by Arkani-Hamed et al. arXiv:2401.00041, we compute the ''scaffolding'' residue of $2n$-scalar Yang-Mills-Scalar amplitudes to obtain pure $n$-gluon amplitudes \`a la Cachazo-He-Yuan (CHY). In particular, we show how the Pfaffian of $\Psi$, which is a matrix rich in structure, emerges from that of the simple $A$ matrix. The same CHY computation straightforwardly produces $n$-graviton amplitudes from $2n$-scalar amplitudes in the Einstein-Maxwell-Scalar theory. We also consider partial ''scaffolding'' residues, i.e., general multi-collinear limits and their interplay with color-dressed amplitudes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

[1]

Arkani-Hamed, Q

N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He, Scalar-Scaﬀolded Gluons and the Combinatorial Origins of Yang-Mills Theory , arXiv:2401.00041

arXiv
[2]

S. J. Parke and T. R. Taylor, An Amplitude for n Gluon Scattering , Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 2459

work page 1986
[3]

Witten, Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor spac e, Commun

E. Witten, Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor spac e, Commun. Math. Phys. 252 (2004) 189–258, [ hep-th/0312171]

arXiv 2004
[4]

Cachazo, P

F. Cachazo, P. Svrcek, and E. Witten, MHV vertices and tree amplitudes in gauge theory , JHEP 09 (2004) 006, [ hep-th/0403047]

arXiv 2004
[5]

Britto, F

R. Britto, F. Cachazo, and B. Feng, New recursion relations for tree amplitudes of gluons , Nucl. Phys. B715 (2005) 499–522, [ hep-th/0412308]

arXiv 2005
[6]

Roiban, M

R. Roiban, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich, On the tree level S matrix of Yang-Mills theory , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 026009, [ hep-th/0403190]

arXiv 2004
[7]

N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, D. C. Dunbar, H. Ita, W. B. Perkins, an d K. Risager, MHV-vertices for gravity amplitudes , JHEP 01 (2006) 009, [ hep-th/0509016]

arXiv 2006
[8]

Risager, A Direct proof of the CSW rules , JHEP 12 (2005) 003, [ hep-th/0508206]

K. Risager, A Direct proof of the CSW rules , JHEP 12 (2005) 003, [ hep-th/0508206]

arXiv 2005

Show all 36 references

[9]

Britto, F

R. Britto, F. Cachazo, B. Feng, and E. Witten, Direct proof of the tree-level scattering amplitude recursion relation in yang-mills theory , Physical review letters 94 (2005), no. 18 181602

2005
[10]

Postnikov, Total positivity, Grassmannians, and networks , arXiv Mathematics e-prints (Sept., 2006) math/0609764, [ math/0609764]

A. Postnikov, Total positivity, Grassmannians, and networks , arXiv Mathematics e-prints (Sept., 2006) math/0609764, [ math/0609764]

2006 arXiv
[11]

Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, and H. Johansson, New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes , Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 085011, [ arXiv:0805.3993]

2008 arXiv
[12]

Arkani-Hamed and J

N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Kaplan, On Tree Amplitudes in Gauge Theory and Gravity , JHEP 04 (2008) 076, [ arXiv:0801.2385]

2008 arXiv
[13]

Arkani-Hamed, J

N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, S. Caron-Huot , and J. Trnka, The All-Loop Integrand For Scattering Amplitudes in Planar N=4 SYM , JHEP 01 (2011) 041, [arXiv:1008.2958]

2011 arXiv
[14]

Arkani-Hamed, J

N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. B. Goncharo v, A. Postnikov, and J. Trnka, Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes . Cambridge University Press, 2016

2016
[15]

Arkani-Hamed and J

N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka, The Amplituhedron, JHEP 10 (2014) 030, [arXiv:1312.2007]

2014 arXiv
[16]

Arkani-Hamed, J

N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. Postnikov, a nd J. Trnka, On-Shell Structures of MHV Amplitudes Beyond the Planar Limit , JHEP 06 (2015) 179, [arXiv:1412.8475]

2015 arXiv
[17]

J. J. M. Carrasco, C. R. Mafra, and O. Schlotterer, Semi-abelian Z-theory: NLSM +φ3 from the open string , JHEP 08 (2017) 135, [ arXiv:1612.06446]

2017 arXiv
[18]

Arkani-Hamed, Y

N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai, S. He, and G. Yan, Scattering Forms and the Positive Geometry of Kinematics, Color and the Worldsheet , JHEP 05 (2018) 096, [ arXiv:1711.09102]

2018 arXiv
[19]

Mastrolia and S

P. Mastrolia and S. Mizera, Feynman Integrals and Intersection Theory , JHEP 02 (2019) 139, [ arXiv:1810.03818]. – 20 –

2019 arXiv
[20]

Cachazo, N

F. Cachazo, N. Early, and B. Gim´ enez Umbert, Smoothly splitting amplitudes and semi-locality, JHEP 08 (2022) 252, [ arXiv:2112.14191]

2022 arXiv
[21]

M. L. Mangano and S. J. Parke, Multi-parton amplitudes in gauge theories , Physics Reports 200 (1991), no. 6 301–367

1991
[22]

L. J. Dixon, Calculating scattering amplitudes eﬃciently , in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 95): QCD and Beyond, pp. 539–584, 1, 1996. hep-ph/9601359

1996 arXiv
[23]

Cachazo and P

F. Cachazo and P. Svrcek, Lectures on twistor strings and perturbative Yang-Mills th eory, PoS RTN2005 (2005) 004, [ hep-th/0504194]

2005 arXiv
[24]

Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and D. A. Kosower, On-Shell Methods in Perturbative QCD , Annals Phys. 322 (2007) 1587–1634, [ arXiv:0704.2798]

2007 arXiv
[25]

Benincasa, New structures in scattering amplitudes: a review , Int

P. Benincasa, New structures in scattering amplitudes: a review , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (2014), no. 5 1430005, [ arXiv:1312.5583]

2014 arXiv
[26]

L. J. Dixon, A brief introduction to modern amplitude methods , in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Particle P hysics: The Higgs Boson and Beyond, pp. 31–67, 2014. arXiv:1310.5353

2014 arXiv
[27]

Elvang and Y.-t

H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang, Scattering Amplitudes, arXiv:1308.1697

arXiv
[28]

Mizera, Status of Intersection Theory and Feynman Integrals , PoS MA2019 (2019) 016, [arXiv:2002.10476]

S. Mizera, Status of Intersection Theory and Feynman Integrals , PoS MA2019 (2019) 016, [arXiv:2002.10476]

2019 arXiv
[29]

Travaglini et al., The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes , J

G. Travaglini et al., The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes , J. Phys. A 55 (2022), no. 44 443001, [ arXiv:2203.13011]

2022 arXiv
[30]

Badger, J

S. Badger, J. Henn, J. C. Plefka, and S. Zoia, Scattering Amplitudes in Quantum Field Theory, Lect. Notes Phys. 1021 (2024) pp., [ arXiv:2306.05976]

2024 arXiv
[31]

Cachazo, S

F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, Scattering in three dimensions from rational maps , Journal of High Energy Physics 2013 (Oct, 2013) 141

2013
[32]

Cachazo, S

F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, Scattering equations and kawai-lewellen-tye orthogonality, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 065001, [ arXiv:1306.6575]

2014 arXiv
[33]

Cachazo, S

F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, Scattering of Massless Particles in Arbitrary Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014), no. 17 171601, [ arXiv:1307.2199]

2014 arXiv
[34]

Cachazo, S

F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, Scattering of massless particles: scalars, gluons and gravitons, Journal of High Energy Physics 2014 (2014), no. 7 33, [ arXiv:1309.0885]

2014 arXiv
[35]

Cachazo, S

F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, Scattering equations and matrices: from einstein to yang-mills, dbi and nlsm , Journal of High Energy Physics 2015 (2015), no. 7 149, [arXiv:1412.3479]

2015 arXiv
[36]

Dolan and P

L. Dolan and P. Goddard, Proof of the Formula of Cachazo, He and Yuan for Yang-Mills Tree Amplitudes in Arbitrary Dimension , JHEP 05 (2014) 010, [ arXiv:1311.5200]. – 21 –

2014 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Arkani-Hamed, Q

N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He, Scalar-Scaﬀolded Gluons and the Combinatorial Origins of Yang-Mills Theory , arXiv:2401.00041

arXiv

[2] [2]

S. J. Parke and T. R. Taylor, An Amplitude for n Gluon Scattering , Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 2459

work page 1986

[3] [3]

Witten, Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor spac e, Commun

E. Witten, Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor spac e, Commun. Math. Phys. 252 (2004) 189–258, [ hep-th/0312171]

arXiv 2004

[4] [4]

Cachazo, P

F. Cachazo, P. Svrcek, and E. Witten, MHV vertices and tree amplitudes in gauge theory , JHEP 09 (2004) 006, [ hep-th/0403047]

arXiv 2004

[5] [5]

Britto, F

R. Britto, F. Cachazo, and B. Feng, New recursion relations for tree amplitudes of gluons , Nucl. Phys. B715 (2005) 499–522, [ hep-th/0412308]

arXiv 2005

[6] [6]

Roiban, M

R. Roiban, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich, On the tree level S matrix of Yang-Mills theory , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 026009, [ hep-th/0403190]

arXiv 2004

[7] [7]

N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, D. C. Dunbar, H. Ita, W. B. Perkins, an d K. Risager, MHV-vertices for gravity amplitudes , JHEP 01 (2006) 009, [ hep-th/0509016]

arXiv 2006

[8] [8]

Risager, A Direct proof of the CSW rules , JHEP 12 (2005) 003, [ hep-th/0508206]

K. Risager, A Direct proof of the CSW rules , JHEP 12 (2005) 003, [ hep-th/0508206]

arXiv 2005