REVIEW 1 cited by
Constraints on the scalar-field potential in warm inflation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We quantify the degree of fine tuning required to achieve an observationally viable period of inflation in the strongly dissipative regime of warm inflation. The ``fine-tuning'' parameter $\lambda$ is taken to be the ratio of the change in the height of the potential $\Delta V$ to the change in the scalar field $(\Delta \phi)^{4}$, i.e. the width of the potential, and therefore measures the requisite degree of flatness in the potential. The best motivated warm inflationary scenarios involve a dissipation rate of the kind $\Gamma\propto T^c$ with $c\geq 0$, and for all such cases, the bounds on $\lambda$ are tighter than those for standard cold inflation by at least 3 orders of magnitude. In other words, these models require an even flatter potential than standard inflation. On the other hand for the case of warm inflation with $c< 0$, we find that in a strongly dissipative regime the bound on $\lambda$ can significantly weaken with respect to cold inflation. Thus, if a warm inflation model can be constructed in a strongly dissipative, negatively temperature-dependent regime, it accommodates steeper potentials otherwise ruled out in standard inflation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CMB constraints on $U(1)$ axion warm inflation
Axion-driven warm inflation with U(1) gauge fields is constrained with CMB data and remains viable for sub-Planckian decay constants, but requires large Chern-Simons couplings.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.