Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 72 references

Every multipath echo collapses into one 3D reflection point.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A two-segment optimization maps per-path delays and angles to equivalent reflection points, yielding 3D object point clouds in 6.75 GHz multi-bounce ray-tracing simulations.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-04 challenge →

load-bearing objection Clean closed-form ERP mapping with honest limitations, but the multi-bounce imaging claim is only as strong as the untested equivalence — conditional accept. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2509.06672 v1 pith:HMB7JBLP submitted 2025-09-08 eess.SP

ISAC Imaging by Channel State Information using Ray Tracing for Next Generation 6G

Ahmad Bazzi , Mingjun Ying , Ojas Kanhere , Theodore S. Rappaport , Marwa Chafii This is my paper
classification eess.SP
keywords integrated sensing and communicationsequivalent reflection pointmultipath imagingchannel state informationray tracing6Gpoint cloud reconstruction6.75 GHz
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that the per-path channel state information already present in a wireless link—each path's angles, delay, and power—is enough to produce 3D images of objects in the environment, with no dedicated radar hardware. Its central claim is that every resolvable multipath component, including multi-bounce paths that bounce around inside or between objects, can be reduced to a single equivalent reflection point (ERP) on or near the reflecting surface. The reduction is carried by a two-segment optimization that splits the measured total path length into a transmitter-side and a receiver-side segment, solving for the closest pair of points along the two angle-defined lines in closed form, and taking their midpoint as the ERP. Aggregating such points across multiple transmitter-receiver positions yields dense point clouds that, in the paper's simulations, recover surfaces, edges, and curved features of a tree, cubes, plates, and a car model at 6.75 GHz. If the claim holds, ordinary communication links become environmental sensors for digital twins, blockage prediction, and beam management in 6G.

Core claim

For each measured path component, the departure and arrival angles define two rays in space, and the delay fixes the total distance the signal traveled. The paper shows that the point best reconciling these three pieces of information is the minimizer of the squared distance between the two rays under the constraint that the two segment lengths sum to the total path length. That minimizer has a closed-form expression: the transmitter-side length is α* = −(p_Tx − p_Rx + L d̂_R)ᵀ(d̂_T − d̂_R)/∥d̂_T − d̂_R∥², the receiver-side length is L − α*, and the ERP is the midpoint of the two segment endpoints. For multi-bounce paths this point is not an actual scatterer but an equivalent one: it collaps

What carries the argument

The two-segment reflection point optimization. For a path with departure direction d̂_T, arrival direction d̂_R, and total length L = cτ, it places a point P = p_Tx + α d̂_T on the departure ray and P = p_Rx − β d̂_R on the arrival ray, minimizing ∥(p_Tx + α d̂_T) − (p_Rx − β d̂_R)∥² under α + β = L. The minimizer is exact and closed-form (Eq. 21), and the equivalent reflection point (Eq. 22) is the average of the two closest points. This is the mechanism that abstracts multi-bounce interactions into a single surface point, enabling single-bounce geometry to be assumed even when the true trajectory is much more complex. The multi-vantage fusion step then aggregates these points across positi

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the per-path angle, delay, and gain values are known perfectly—the paper feeds the ray tracer's ground-truth paths directly into the imaging step, so any real-world channel-estimation noise or bandwidth limit that corrupts these parameters would displace every equivalent reflection point.

What would settle it

Run the same imaging pipeline on CSI whose per-path parameters carry realistic estimation errors—for example, add measurement noise to the ray-tracer angles and delays consistent with the bandwidth and SNR of the table, or use real measured CSI at 6.75 GHz—and compare the resulting point clouds to the known object geometry; if the Chamfer distance grows proportionally with the parameter errors or the surfaces and edges no longer register, the central reconstruction claim is falsified. A simpler check: displace a single angle by one standard deviation of a typical high-resolution estimator and

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Every resolvable path in a standard CSI snapshot becomes a 3D point, so imaging can ride on ordinary pilot signals without extra sensing hardware or spectrum.
  • Multi-bounce paths—historically the main obstacle to CSI-based imaging—are handled by the same closed-form formula, extending the method to foliage, vehicles, and other complex scatterers.
  • Per-path computation is O(1) and total work is linear in the number of TX-RX pairs, leaving room for real-time mapping in 6G beam management and blockage prediction.
  • Because the formula is frequency-agnostic, the same imaging pipeline transfers to other bands or to measured CSI, provided per-path delays and angles are available.
  • Chamfer distance falls steeply with added views—roughly to 2^-11 after six TX-RX pairs for flat or cubic objects—so a handful of vantage points can already close the surface.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The procedure effectively reframes inverse scattering as a per-path geometric fit; for strongly diffuse or penetrating materials, an uncertainty-weighted version (e.g., the power-weighted aggregate cost the paper notes as future work) would likely be needed to keep weak paths from corrupting the map.
  • The paper's own open-challenges section implies that angle/delay estimation error, hardware impairments, and limited bandwidth are the natural stress test; a sensitivity analysis displacing ERPs under realistic estimation noise would show how far the ideal-path results degrade.
  • The linear-scaling complexity and the observed convergence of Chamfer distance suggest a practical resource law: radial resolution set by bandwidth, angular resolution by array aperture, and coverage by the number of vantage points—an explicit relation the paper leaves open.
  • Extending the fusion to moving receivers or multiband FR3 spectrum (as the paper's SAR-inspired question suggests) could synthesize a larger effective aperture and sharpen the point cloud beyond a single snapshot.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 6G ISAC imaging pipeline that maps per-path multipath parameters (AoD, ZoD, AoA, ZoA, ToA, gain) from the NYURay ray tracer into 3D points called Equivalent Reflection Points (ERPs). For each path, the method solves a two-segment optimization problem: it estimates the transmitter-side distance alpha and receiver-side distance beta by minimizing the distance between the two corresponding lines subject to alpha+beta = c*tau (Eq. 9), yielding the closed-form solution in Eq. (21) and the ERP in Eq. (22). ERPs from multiple TX-RX positions are aggregated and filtered by a chord-length threshold gamma (Eq. 23) to produce dense point clouds. The method is demonstrated on six Blender-rendered objects (tree, cubes, triangle, circle, Tesla) at 6.75 GHz, with Chamfer distance evaluated versus number of TX-RX pairs. The paper claims the first demonstration of multi-bounce ISAC imaging using wireless ray tracing.

Significance. The closed-form ERP computation is clean, mathematically correct, and has O(1) complexity per path, giving a useful low-cost geometric fusion of angle and delay measurements for single-bounce-dominant scenarios. The simulation campaign covers diverse object geometries, and the MVF strategy is sensible. However, the paper's central claims are not yet fully supported: the validation bypasses actual CSI estimation, uses perfect path knowledge, and never isolates or validates the multi-bounce behavior that is the main claimed novelty. If the multi-bounce equivalence is rigorously tested and the sensitivity to estimation error is quantified, this could be a valuable step toward ray-tracing-based ISAC imaging. In its current form, the contribution is better described as an idealized geometric mapping algorithm than as a validated CSI-based ISAC imaging framework.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III-B, Eqs. (9) and (22); Section IV] The multi-bounce ERP claim is not validated. Problem (9) minimizes the distance between the TX and RX lines subject only to alpha+beta=L and box constraints; there is no constraint that the ERP lie on the object surface S. For a two-bounce path with internal segment length s, the true first/last bounce points satisfy alpha0+beta0=L-s, so enforcing alpha+beta=L can move the fitted point inside or outside the object. The gamma filter in Eq. (23) only bounds the chord between the two segment endpoints; it does not enforce proximity to the surface. The paper never compares ERPs to NYURay's ground-truth bounce locations or to the Blender mesh, nor does it report Chamfer distance separately for single-bounce and multi-bounce paths. The 'first demonstration of multi-bounce ISAC imaging' is therefore unsupported. Please provide a separate validation on multi-bounce-only paths, reporting ERP-to-t
  2. [Section II-A, Section II-B, Table I] The central reconstruction claim is made under perfect path knowledge. Section II-B states that 'ground truth paths generated in Procedure 2 are fed directly into Procedure 5, thereby assuming perfect path knowledge,' and Table I confirms 'Noise and Bandwidth Constraints: Not included (idealized CIR used).' Thus the experiments do not exercise the CSI estimation chain implied by the title. The impact of realistic angle/delay estimation errors on ERP positions and on the final Chamfer distance is not analyzed. Section V acknowledges the limitation, but the abstract and conclusion still claim that the framework 'accurately reconstructs object surfaces.' Please add a sensitivity analysis (e.g., perturb angles and delays with realistic error levels, or simulate a standard estimator such as matrix pencil) and show CD degradation; otherwise temper the claims to an idealized geometric mapping s
  3. [Section IV, Eq. (25), Fig. 12] The quantitative evaluation lacks a baseline and an adequately specified reference cloud. The Chamfer distance in Eq. (25) is computed against a 'reference cloud accurately describing the object image,' but the sampling of S from the Blender mesh is not described (density, surface coverage, whether edges are included). Without a baseline method (e.g., single-bounce ellipsoid intersection, backprojection, or a least-squares triangulation), the CD curves in Fig. 12 only show that the method improves with more views; they do not demonstrate that the reconstruction is accurate relative to existing approaches. Please specify the reference sampling and add at least one baseline under identical simulation conditions.
  4. [Section III-C and Table I] The geometric filter threshold gamma=10 is a free parameter, chosen as the longest edge-to-edge dimension of any target. For the 1 m cube, this permits ERPs whose incoming and outgoing segment endpoints are up to 10 m apart, which is far larger than the object; the filter may therefore admit many off-surface points. No sensitivity analysis with respect to gamma is reported, so it is unclear how much of the reconstruction quality depends on this arbitrary value. Please provide a gamma sweep, or derive the threshold from physical path-length statistics, and report CD or outlier fraction versus gamma.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IV] Several typos: 'metal triangular' should be 'metal triangle', 'vehicule' should be 'vehicle', 'silhouete' should be 'silhouette'. Also, 'Mx=My=1 isotropic antennas' is inconsistent with the steering-vector model in Eqs. (2)-(4); clarify that per-path angles are supplied by the ray tracer rather than estimated from a physical array.
  2. [Eq. (24)] The matrices defining Txpos and Rxpos have repeated rows (e.g., rows 3 and 4 of Txpos are identical). If this is intentional, say so; otherwise correct the listed TX-RX placements.
  3. [Fig. 12] The y-axis is labeled log(ChamferDistance) but the text says 'log2 scale' and later quotes reductions as '2^8.6'. Use consistent notation, preferably log2, and state units in the axis label.
  4. [Section II-B, Fig. 2] The text refers to 'Procedure 2' and 'Procedure 5', but Fig. 2 labels steps as numbered boxes. Renumber or cross-reference consistently to avoid confusion.
  5. [Abstract/Conclusion] The phrase 'first demonstration of multi-bounce ISAC imaging using wireless ray tracing' should be qualified as a simulation demonstration, since the paper uses synthetic ray-tracing output rather than over-the-air measurements.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Minor data-dependent threshold in validation; core ERP derivation is self-contained.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section IV, 'Simulation Results', after Table I and before Fig. 5; threshold used in Eq. (23)]
    "For geometric filtering, we have set γ= 10. We have pick γ= 10 because the longest straight-line, edge-to-edge dimension of any target in our data set, which exceeds that maximum internal chord."

    The reported point cloud S_γ (Eq. 23) is defined by keeping only ERPs whose transmitter-segment to receiver-segment separation ||a(α_opt)−b(β_opt)|| is below γ. The paper chooses γ from the known maximum chord of the ground-truth objects, then computes Chamfer distance (Eq. 25) against those same ground-truth objects. Thus the validation is performed on a cloud already filtered by a parameter derived from the target geometry. This is a mild form of fitting: it can only remove large-internal-chord outliers and cannot place points on the surface, so the central ERP localization (Eqs. 21–22) remains an independent geometric inversion. Nevertheless, the quantitative reconstruction quality is not fully independent of the known object sizes.

full rationale

The central derivative chain is not circular. The ERP is computed from per-path angles and delay via the closed-form solution in Eqs. (21)–(22), solving the least-squares problem (9) with the delay constraint α+β=L. The ground-truth object mesh is not used in this optimization; the inversion from angle/delay tuples to 3D points is a genuine geometric mapping. The validation uses NYURay rays generated from Blender models and compares ERPs to the same models via Chamfer distance, which is a standard closed-loop simulation test rather than a derivation that reduces to its inputs. The paper explicitly acknowledges key limitations: 'the ground truth paths generated in Procedure 2 are fed directly into Procedure 5, thereby assuming perfect path knowledge' (Section II-B) and Table I states 'Noise and Bandwidth Constraints: Not included (idealized CIR used)'. These weaken the external validity of the 'experimental validation' claim but are not circularity. The only mild circularity is the dataset-dependent γ threshold described above; it is a post-hoc filter, not the core estimator. The claim that multi-bounce ERPs lie on the object surface is asserted but not separately proven—that is a correctness risk, not a circularity. Self-citations to NYURay and prior calibration work are present but not load-bearing for the mathematical derivation, and NYURay's calibration is external evidence. Overall the central algorithmic claim is self-contained; the score reflects only the minor ground-truth-derived threshold used in the evaluation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on a small set of modeling choices: a discrete-path channel model, the abstraction of multi-bounce paths into equivalent reflection points, and the idealization of perfect knowledge of the six-tuple sensing parameters. The only numerical free parameter is the geometric filter threshold gamma, which is chosen based on the dimensions of the test objects.

free parameters (1)
  • gamma (geometric filter threshold) = 10
    Chosen in Section IV because the longest edge-to-edge dimension of any target in the dataset exceeds this value; it is tuned to the specific objects and would need re-tuning for other scenes.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Discrete multipath channel model in Eq. (1): the channel is a superposition of K_i resolvable paths with steering vectors and delays.
    Standard narrowband array model; invoked in Section II-A as the basis for all subsequent ERP computations.
  • ad hoc to paper Any multi-bounce path can be represented by a single equivalent reflection point that satisfies the single-bounce geometric model with total path length L = c*tau.
    Central modeling assumption in Section II-A: 'we abstract the entire sequence into a single ERP'; it is what makes the closed-form solution and the imaging pipeline possible.
  • domain assumption The six-tuple sensing parameters (AoD, ZoD, AoA, ZoA, ToA, path gain) are known perfectly.
    Stated in Section II-A and II-B; the simulation feeds ground-truth NYURay paths directly into the ERP computation, ignoring estimation error.
  • standard math KKT conditions apply to the quadratic program (9) with linear constraints, yielding the closed form in (21).
    Derivation in Section III-B, Eqs. (10)-(21); the convexity and constraint qualification are standard for this problem.
invented entities (1)
  • Equivalent Reflection Point (ERP) no independent evidence
    purpose: A single 3D point representing the effective reflection or scattering location of a multipath component, possibly multi-bounce, so that single-bounce geometry can be used for imaging.
    Introduced in Sections II-A and III as a best-fit abstraction. It is not directly observable; its validity is only demonstrated in simulation where rays are generated from the same object models, so there is no independent evidence outside the paper.

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ISAC Imaging by Channel State Information using Ray Tracing for Next Generation 6G." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HMB7JBLP

@misc{pith2026250906672,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ISAC Imaging by Channel State Information using Ray Tracing for Next Generation 6G},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HMB7JBLP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.06672}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Integrated sensing and communications (ISAC) is emerging as a cornerstone technology for sixth generation (6G) wireless systems, unifying connectivity and environmental mapping through shared hardware, spectrum, and waveforms. The following paper presents an ISAC imaging framework utilizing channel state information (CSI) per-path components, transmitter (TX) positions, and receiver (RX) positions obtained from the calibrated NYURay ray tracer at 6.75 GHz in the upper mid-band. Our work shows how each resolvable multipath component can be extracted from CSI estimation and cast into an equivalent three-dimensional reflection point by fusing its angle and delay information, which is useful and challenging for multi-bounce reflections. The primary contribution of the paper is the two-segment reflection point optimization algorithm, which independently estimates the path lengths from the TX position and RX position to an equivalent reflection point (ERP) on the object surface, thus enabling precise geometric reconstruction. Subsequently, we aggregate the ERPs derived from multiple pairs of TX and RX positions, generating dense three dimensional point clouds representing the objects in the channel. Experimental results validate that the proposed ISAC imaging framework accurately reconstructs object surfaces, edges, and curved features. To the best of our knowledge, this paper provides the first demonstration of multi bounce ISAC imaging using wireless ray tracing at 6.75 GHz.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.06672 by Ahmad Bazzi, Marwa Chafii, Mingjun Ying, Ojas Kanhere, Theodore S. Rappaport.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: RF imaging of a cubic structure, and modeling by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: NYURay-to-CSI imaging pipeline. simulation results by showing the resulting images produced by the proposed algorithm. Section V discusses open chal￾lenges regarding ISAC imaging. We conclude the paper in Section VI. Notation: Upper-case and lower-case boldface letters denote matrices and vectors, respectively. (.) T , (.) ∗ and (.) H repre￾sent the transpose, the conjugate and the transpose-conjugate oper… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Geometry of the (i, j)-th multipath component. The optimization problem in (9) solves for α (i,j) opt and β (i,j) opt , which aid in generating the ERP PERP i,j following (22). approximately aligns with the AoA/ZoA, (iii) the sum of the distances ∥pTxi − Pi,j∥ + ∥pRxi− Pi,j∥ is approximately corresponds to the propagation delay, and (iv) Pi,j lies on or very near the scattering surface S. Under an ideal si… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Six 3D models rendered in Blender and used as test objects in our imaging experiments. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Eight representative views of the standard tree scenario. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Eight representative views of the metal cube (1 m) scenario. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Eight representative views of the metal cube (4 m) scenario. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Eight representative views of the metal circle plate scenario. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Eight representative views of the metal triangle plate scenario. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Eight representative views of the Tesla scenario. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The reconstructed images after introducing noise floor of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Tradeoffs between Chamfer distance and number of Tx-Rx pairs for various objects. plications requiring ultra-reliable low-latency connections [15], [20]. It is worth mentioning that in contrast to purely image based ray tracers, NYURay’s hybrid shooting bouncing rays combined with image-based ray tracing reduces the computational overhead in comparison to image-based ray tracing [32]. In addition, the com… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Twelve Scientific Challenges for 6G: Rethinking the Foundations of Communications Theory,

    M. Chafii, L. Bariah, S. Muhaidat, and M. Debbah, “Twelve Scientific Challenges for 6G: Rethinking the Foundations of Communications Theory,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 868–904, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    On Outage-Based Beamforming Design for Dual-Functional Radar-Communication 6G Systems,

    A. Bazzi and M. Chafii, “On Outage-Based Beamforming Design for Dual-Functional Radar-Communication 6G Systems,”IEEE Transac- tions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 5598–5612, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Reconfig- urable Intelligent Surfaces in 6G Radio Localization: A Survey of Recent Developments, Opportunities, and Challenges,

    A. Umer, I. M ¨u¨ursepp, M. M. Alam, and H. Wymeersch, “Reconfig- urable Intelligent Surfaces in 6G Radio Localization: A Survey of Recent Developments, Opportunities, and Challenges,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Beyond ISAC: Toward Integrated Heterogeneous Service Provisioning via Elastic Multi-Dimensional Mul- tiple Access,

    J. Chen, X. Wang, and D. Niyato, “Beyond ISAC: Toward Integrated Heterogeneous Service Provisioning via Elastic Multi-Dimensional Mul- tiple Access,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11692, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Toward Throughput Maximization of Integrated Sensing and Communications Enabled Predictive Beamforming for 6G,

    Y . Zhang, Q. Li, J. Wang, J. Wang, J. Chen, and Z. Han, “Toward Throughput Maximization of Integrated Sensing and Communications Enabled Predictive Beamforming for 6G,”IEEE Network, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 292–300, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Power-Efficient Transceiver Design for Full-Duplex Dual-Function Radar Communication Systems,

    M. Anjum, D. Mishra, and A. Seneviratne, “Power-Efficient Transceiver Design for Full-Duplex Dual-Function Radar Communication Systems,” in2024 IEEE 25th International Workshop on Signal Processing Ad- vances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), 2024, pp. 11–15

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    On Integrated Sensing and Communication Waveforms With Tunable PAPR,

    A. Bazzi and M. Chafii, “On Integrated Sensing and Communication Waveforms With Tunable PAPR,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Com- munications, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 7345–7360, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Mutual Information Based Pilot Design for ISAC,

    ——, “Mutual Information Based Pilot Design for ISAC,”IEEE Trans- actions on Communications, pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Robust Waveform Design for Integrated Sensing and Communication,

    S. Wang, W. Dai, H. Wang, and G. Y . Li, “Robust Waveform Design for Integrated Sensing and Communication,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 72, pp. 3122–3138, 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    MIMO-OFDM ISAC Waveform Design for Range-Doppler Sidelobe Suppression,

    P. Li, M. Li, R. Liu, Q. Liu, and A. Lee Swindlehurst, “MIMO-OFDM ISAC Waveform Design for Range-Doppler Sidelobe Suppression,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1001–1015, 2025

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Waveform Design for Integrated Sensing and Communications With PAPR Con- straint,

    H. Liu, L. Zhong, C. Tellambura, Y . Li, and W. Cheng, “Waveform Design for Integrated Sensing and Communications With PAPR Con- straint,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Intelligent Waveform Design for Integrated Sensing and Communication,

    J. Zhang, S. Guo, S. Gong, C. Xing, N. Zhao, D. W. Kwan Ng, and D. Niyato, “Intelligent Waveform Design for Integrated Sensing and Communication,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 166–173, 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Waveform Designs for Integrated Sensing and Communication with Low Probability of In- tercept Based on the Cyclic Spectrum,

    Q. Shi, Y . Wang, Z. Zhou, X. Liu, I. Lee, and P. Fan, “Waveform Designs for Integrated Sensing and Communication with Low Probability of In- tercept Based on the Cyclic Spectrum,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, pp. 1–15, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Joint Design of Receiving Filters and Complementary set of Sequences for ISAC With Sidelobe Level Suppression,

    K. Zhang, J. Wu, F. Dong, S. Lu, X. Li, and W. Yuan, “Joint Design of Receiving Filters and Complementary set of Sequences for ISAC With Sidelobe Level Suppression,”IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Sensors, vol. 1, pp. 211–223, 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Cooperative ISAC Networks: Opportunities and Challenges,

    K. Meng, C. Masouros, A. P. Petropulu, and L. Hanzo, “Cooperative ISAC Networks: Opportunities and Challenges,”IEEE Wireless Com- munications, pp. 1–8, 2024

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Multi-static target detection and power allo- cation for integrated sensing and communication in cell-free massive mimo,

    Behdad, Zinat and Demir, ¨Ozlem Tu˘gfe and Sung, Ki Won and Bj¨ornson, Emil and Cavdar, Cicek, “Multi-static target detection and power allo- cation for integrated sensing and communication in cell-free massive mimo,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11 580–11 596, 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Energy Efficiency Optimization in Secure Full-Duplex ISAC Systems,

    X. Zhang, W. Jiao, W. Liu, and C. Qi, “Energy Efficiency Optimization in Secure Full-Duplex ISAC Systems,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 220–224, 2025

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Energy Efficiency in Open RAN: RF Channel Reconfiguration Use Case,

    M. Hoffmann and M. Dryja ´nski, “Energy Efficiency in Open RAN: RF Channel Reconfiguration Use Case,”IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 118 493– 118 501, 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Uncovering the Iceberg in the Sea: Fundamentals of Pulse Shaping and Modulation Design for Random ISAC Signals

    F. Liu, Y . Xiong, S. Lu, S. Li, W. Yuan, C. Masouros, S. Jin, and G. Caire, “Uncovering the Iceberg in the Sea: Fundamentals of Pulse Shaping and Modulation Design for Random ISAC Signals,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01721, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Joint Sensing, Communication, and AI: A Trifecta for Resilient THz User Experi- ences,

    C. Chaccour, W. Saad, M. Debbah, and H. V . Poor, “Joint Sensing, Communication, and AI: A Trifecta for Resilient THz User Experi- ences,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11 444–11 460, 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    6G: vi- sion, applications, and challenges,

    D. B. da Costa, Q. Zhao, M. Chafii, F. Bader, and M. Debbah, “6G: vi- sion, applications, and challenges,”Fundamentals of 6g communications and networking, pp. 15–69, 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Hypothesis Testing on FMCW and OFDM for Joint Communication and Radar in IEEE 802.11bd,

    S. Ehsanfar, A. Bazzi, K. M ¨oßner, and M. Chafii, “Hypothesis Testing on FMCW and OFDM for Joint Communication and Radar in IEEE 802.11bd,” in2023 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), 2023, pp. 464–469

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Frame Structure and Protocol Design for Sensing-Assisted NR-V2X Communications,

    Y . Li, F. Liu, Z. Du, W. Yuan, Q. Shi, and C. Masouros, “Frame Structure and Protocol Design for Sensing-Assisted NR-V2X Communications,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 11 045– 11 060, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Gesture Classification Based On Channel State Information,

    M. Chimwere, Q. Liang, and Z. Kun, “Gesture Classification Based On Channel State Information,” inProceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Machine Learning, 2024, pp. 289– 295

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    A survey on human behavior recognition using channel state information,

    Z. Wang, K. Jiang, Y . Hou, W. Dou, C. Zhang, Z. Huang, and Y . Guo, “A survey on human behavior recognition using channel state information,” Ieee Access, vol. 7, pp. 155 986–156 024, 2019

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Channel charting: Locating users within the radio environment using channel state information,

    C. Studer, S. Medjkouh, E. Gonultas ¸, T. Goldstein, and O. Tirkkonen, “Channel charting: Locating users within the radio environment using channel state information,”IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 47 682–47 698, 2018

    2018

  27. [27]

    Location estimates from channel state information via binary programming,

    M. T. Rahman and S. Valaee, “Location estimates from channel state information via binary programming,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 70, pp. 5265–5278, 2022

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Performance analysis of Wi-Fi indoor localization with channel state information,

    X. Tian, S. Zhu, S. Xiong, B. Jiang, Y . Yang, and X. Wang, “Performance analysis of Wi-Fi indoor localization with channel state information,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1870–1884, 2018

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Map-Assisted Millimeter Wave and Terahertz Position Location and Sensing,

    O. Kanhere and T. S. Rappaport, “Map-Assisted Millimeter Wave and Terahertz Position Location and Sensing,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 5323–5336, 2025

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Map-Assisted Millimeter Wave Localization for Accurate Position Location,

    O. Kanhere, S. Ju, Y . Xing, and T. S. Rappaport, “Map-Assisted Millimeter Wave Localization for Accurate Position Location,” in2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2019, pp. 1– 6

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Wireless Communications and Applications Above 100 GHz: Opportunities and Challenges for 6G and Beyond,

    T. S. Rappaport, Y . Xing, O. Kanhere, S. Ju, A. Madanayake, S. Mandal, A. Alkhateeb, and G. C. Trichopoulos, “Wireless Communications and Applications Above 100 GHz: Opportunities and Challenges for 6G and Beyond,”IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 78 729–78 757, 2019

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Calibration of NYURay for Ray Tracing Using 28, 73, and 142 GHz Channel Measurements Conducted in Indoor, Outdoor, and Factory Scenarios,

    O. Kanhere, H. Poddar, and T. S. Rappaport, “Calibration of NYURay for Ray Tracing Using 28, 73, and 142 GHz Channel Measurements Conducted in Indoor, Outdoor, and Factory Scenarios,”IEEE Transac- tions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 405–420, 2025

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Calibration of NYURay, a 3D mmWave and Sub-THz Ray Tracer Using Indoor, Outdoor, and Factory Channel Measurements,

    O. Kanhere and T. S. Rappaport, “Calibration of NYURay, a 3D mmWave and Sub-THz Ray Tracer Using Indoor, Outdoor, and Factory Channel Measurements,” inICC 2023 - IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2023, pp. 5054–5059

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Radio Propagation Measurements and Statistical Channel Models for Outdoor Urban Microcells in Open Squares and Streets at 142, 73, and 28 GHz,

    D. Shakya, S. Ju, O. Kanhere, H. Poddar, Y . Xing, and T. S. Rappaport, “Radio Propagation Measurements and Statistical Channel Models for Outdoor Urban Microcells in Open Squares and Streets at 142, 73, and 28 GHz,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 3580–3595, 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Site-Specific Propagation Predictions of the Radio Channel in Different Environments Using NYURay Based on Measurements and Ray-Tracing at Upper Mid-Band Frequencies,

    M. Ying, “Site-Specific Propagation Predictions of the Radio Channel in Different Environments Using NYURay Based on Measurements and Ray-Tracing at Upper Mid-Band Frequencies,” Master’s thesis, New York University, 2025

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Multi-Stage Loca- tion Optimization Through Power-Delay Profiles Alignment using Site- Specific Ray Tracing,

    M. Ying, P. Ma, D. Shakya, and T. S. Rappaport, “Multi-Stage Loca- tion Optimization Through Power-Delay Profiles Alignment using Site- Specific Ray Tracing,” accepted to IEEE GLOBECOM 2025, pp. 1–6, 2025

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    The Evolution of Applications, Hardware Design, and Channel Modeling for Terahertz (THz) Band Communications and Sensing: Ready for 6G?

    J. M. Jornet, V . Petrov, H. Wang, Z. Popovi ´c, D. Shakya, J. V . Siles, and T. S. Rappaport, “The Evolution of Applications, Hardware Design, and Channel Modeling for Terahertz (THz) Band Communications and Sensing: Ready for 6G?”Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 1–32, 2024

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Carrier Aggregation Enabled MIMO-OFDM Integrated Sensing and Communication,

    H. Liu, Z. Wei, J. Piao, H. Wu, X. Li, and Z. Feng, “Carrier Aggregation Enabled MIMO-OFDM Integrated Sensing and Communication,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    A Tutorial on NYUSIM: Sub-Terahertz and Millimeter-Wave Channel Simulator for 5G, 6G, and Beyond,

    H. Poddar, S. Ju, D. Shakya, and T. S. Rappaport, “A Tutorial on NYUSIM: Sub-Terahertz and Millimeter-Wave Channel Simulator for 5G, 6G, and Beyond,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 824–857, 2024

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    A novel millimeter- wave channel simulator and applications for 5G wireless communi- cations,

    S. Sun, G. R. MacCartney, and T. S. Rappaport, “A novel millimeter- wave channel simulator and applications for 5G wireless communi- cations,” in2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2017, pp. 1–7

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Comprehensive FR1(C) and FR3 Lower and Upper Mid-Band Propagation and Material Penetration Loss Measurements and Channel Models in Indoor Environment for 5G and 6G,

    D. Shakya, M. Ying, T. S. Rappaport, H. Poddar, P. Ma, Y . Wang, and I. Al-Wazani, “Comprehensive FR1(C) and FR3 Lower and Upper Mid-Band Propagation and Material Penetration Loss Measurements and Channel Models in Indoor Environment for 5G and 6G,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 5, pp. 5192–5218, 2024

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Upper Mid-Band Channel Measurements and Characterization at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 in an Indoor Factory Scenario,

    M. Ying, D. Shakya, T. S. Rappaport, P. Ma, Y . Wang, I. Al-Wazani, Y . Wu, and H. Poddar, “Upper Mid-Band Channel Measurements and Characterization at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 in an Indoor Factory Scenario,” inIEEE International Conference on Communica- tions (ICC), Montreal, Canada, Jun. 2025, pp. 1–6, (accepted)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    914 MHz path loss prediction models for indoor wireless communications in multifloored buildings,

    S. Y . Seidel and T. S. Rappaport, “914 MHz path loss prediction models for indoor wireless communications in multifloored buildings,”IEEE transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 207–217, 1992

    work page 1992

  44. [44]

    Propagation models for microcellular environments using a building database,

    K. Schaubach, N. Davis, and T. S. Rappaport, “Propagation models for microcellular environments using a building database,” inposter presented at First Virginia Tech. Symp. on Wireless Personal Commun., Blacksburg, VA, 1991

    work page 1991

  45. [45]

    Site-specific propagation prediction for wireless in-building personal communication system design,

    S. Y . Seidel and T. S. Rappaport, “Site-specific propagation prediction for wireless in-building personal communication system design,”IEEE transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 879–891, 1994

    work page 1994

  46. [46]

    Site-Specific Propagation Prediction for Wireless In- Building Personal Communication System Design,

    S. Y . Seidel, “Site-Specific Propagation Prediction for Wireless In- Building Personal Communication System Design,” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1993, ph.D. disser- tation. Advisor: Theodore S. Rappaport

    work page 1993

  47. [47]

    Method and system for a building database manipulator,

    T. S. Rappaport and R. Skidmore, “Method and system for a building database manipulator,” U.S. Patent 6,721,769, issued April 13, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/ US20050131619A1

    work page 2004

  48. [48]

    System and method for ray tracing using reception surfaces,

    ——, “System and method for ray tracing using reception surfaces,” U.S. Patent Application 10/830,445, Dec. 23, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20040259554A1/

    work page 2004

  49. [49]

    A parametric formulation of the UTD diffraction coefficient for real-time propagation prediction modeling,

    H. Wang and T. S. Rappaport, “A parametric formulation of the UTD diffraction coefficient for real-time propagation prediction modeling,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 4, pp. 253–257, 2005

    work page 2005

  50. [50]

    Scattering Mechanisms and Modeling for Terahertz Wireless Communications,

    S. Ju, S. H. A. Shah, M. A. Javed, J. Li, G. Palteru, J. Robin, Y . Xing, O. Kanhere, and T. S. Rappaport, “Scattering Mechanisms and Modeling for Terahertz Wireless Communications,” inICC 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2019, pp. 1–7

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Research in site-specific propagation modeling for PCS system design,

    S. Seidel, K. Schaubach, T. Tran, and T. S. Rappaport, “Research in site-specific propagation modeling for PCS system design,” inIEEE 43rd Vehicular Technology Conference, 1993, pp. 261–264

    work page 1993

  52. [52]

    A ray tracing method for predicting path loss and delay spread in microcellular environments,

    K. Schaubach, N. Davis, and T. S. Rappaport, “A ray tracing method for predicting path loss and delay spread in microcellular environments,” in [1992 Proceedings] Vehicular Technology Society 42nd VTS Conference - Frontiers of Technology, 1992, pp. 932–935 vol.2

    work page 1992

  53. [53]

    E-UTRA; Physical channels and modulation (Release 12),

    3GPP, “E-UTRA; Physical channels and modulation (Release 12),” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Technical Specification TS 36.211 V12.9.0, Apr. 2017, apr. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi ts/136200 136299/136211/ 12.09.00 60/ts 136211v120900p.pdf

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    NR; Physical channels and modulation (Release 16),

    ——, “NR; Physical channels and modulation (Release 16),” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Technical Specification TS 38.211 V16.2.0, Jul. 2020, jul. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi ts/138200 138299/138211/ 16.02.00 60/ts 138211v160200p.pdf

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    Channel Estimation for OFDM,

    Y . Liu, Z. Tan, H. Hu, L. J. Cimini, and G. Y . Li, “Channel Estimation for OFDM,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1891–1908, 2014

    work page 1908

  56. [56]

    Single snapshot joint estimation of angles and times of arrival: A 2D Matrix Pencil approach,

    A. Bazzi, D. T. M. Slock, and L. Meilhac, “Single snapshot joint estimation of angles and times of arrival: A 2D Matrix Pencil approach,” in2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2016, pp. 1–6

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    Complex Neural Network Based Joint AoA and AoD Estimation for Bistatic ISAC,

    S. Naoumi, A. Bazzi, R. Bomfin, and M. Chafii, “Complex Neural Network Based Joint AoA and AoD Estimation for Bistatic ISAC,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 842– 856, 2024

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Blender,

    Blender Foundation, “Blender,” https://www.blender.org/, Mar. 2025, open-source 3D creation suite. GNU General Public License v2 or later

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Effects of Building Materials and Structures on Radiowave Propagation Above About 100 MHz,

    “Effects of Building Materials and Structures on Radiowave Propagation Above About 100 MHz,” Online, International Telecommunication Union, Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R), Geneva, ITU-R Recommendation P.2040-3 P.2040-3, Aug. 2023, accessed 24 June

    work page 2040

  60. [60]

    Point Data for Site- Specific Mid-band Radio Propagation Channel Statistics in the Indoor Hotspot (InH) Environment for 3GPP and Next Generation Alliance (NGA) Channel Modeling,

    T. S. Rappaport, D. Shakya, and M. Ying, “Point Data for Site- Specific Mid-band Radio Propagation Channel Statistics in the Indoor Hotspot (InH) Environment for 3GPP and Next Generation Alliance (NGA) Channel Modeling,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Montreal, Canada, June 2025, pp. 1–6

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Angular Spread Statistics for 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 Mid-Band Frequencies in an Indoor Hotspot Environment,

    D. Shakya, M. Ying, and T. S. Rappaport, “Angular Spread Statistics for 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 Mid-Band Frequencies in an Indoor Hotspot Environment,” in2025 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2025, pp. 1–6

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Propagation measurements and channel models in Indoor Environment at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 Upper-mid band Spectrum for 5G and 6G,

    D. Shakya, M. Ying, T. S. Rappaport, H. Poddar, P. Ma, Y . Wang, and I. Al-Wazani, “Propagation measurements and channel models in Indoor Environment at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 Upper-mid band Spectrum for 5G and 6G,” inGLOBECOM 2024 - 2024 IEEE Global Communications Conference, 2024, pp. 998–1003

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Urban Outdoor Propagation Measurements and Channel Models at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 Upper Mid-band Spectrum for 5G and 6G,

    D. Shakya, M. Ying, T. S. Rappaport, P. Ma, I. Al-Wazani, Y . Wu, Y . Wang, D. Calin, H. Poddar, A. Bazzi, M. Chafii, Y . Xing, and A. Ghosh, “Urban Outdoor Propagation Measurements and Channel Models at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 Upper Mid-band Spectrum for 5G and 6G,” inIEEE International Conference on Com- munications (ICC), Montreal, Canada, Ju...

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Upper Mid-Band Channel Measurements and Characterization at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 in an Indoor Factory Scenario,

    D. Shakya, M. Ying, T. S. Rappaport, P. Ma, Y . Wang, I. Al-Wazani, Y . Wu, and H. Poddar, “Upper Mid-Band Channel Measurements and Characterization at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 in an Indoor Factory Scenario,” inIEEE International Conference on Communica- tions (ICC), Montreal, Canada, Jun. 2025, pp. 1–6

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    Upper mid-band spectrum for 6G: Vision, opportunity and challenges,

    A. Bazzi, R. Bomfin, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, T. S. Rappaport, and M. Chafii, “Upper mid-band spectrum for 6G: Vision, opportunity and challenges,”IEEE Communications Magazine (accepted), 2025

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Balanced chamfer distance as a comprehensive metric for point cloud comple- tion,

    T. Wu, L. Pan, J. Zhang, T. Wang, Z. Liu, and D. Lin, “Balanced chamfer distance as a comprehensive metric for point cloud comple- tion,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 29 088–29 100, 2021

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Improved 3D ray launching method for wireless propagation prediction,

    G. Durgin, N. Patwari, and T. S. Rappaport, “Improved 3D ray launching method for wireless propagation prediction,”Electronics Letters, vol. 33, no. 16, pp. 1412–1413, doi: 10.1049/el:19970928

    work page doi:10.1049/el:19970928

  68. [68]

    A new approach to 3-D ray tracing for propagation prediction in cities,

    G. Liang and H. Bertoni, “A new approach to 3-D ray tracing for propagation prediction in cities,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 853–863, 1998

    work page 1998

  69. [69]

    Synthetic wideband range profiling method for moving targets based on phase-derived velocity measurement,

    W. Li, H. Fan, L. Ren, and E. Mao, “Synthetic wideband range profiling method for moving targets based on phase-derived velocity measurement,”IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 441– 455, 2021

    work page 2021

  70. [70]

    Chen,Computational methods for electromagnetic inverse scattering

    X. Chen,Computational methods for electromagnetic inverse scattering. John Wiley & Sons, 2018

    work page 2018

  71. [71]

    A phaseless extended Rytov approximation for strongly scattering low-loss media and its application to indoor imaging,

    A. Dubey, S. Deshmukh, L. Pan, X. Chen, and R. Murch, “A phaseless extended Rytov approximation for strongly scattering low-loss media and its application to indoor imaging,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1–17, 2022

    work page 2022

  72. [2025]

    Available: https://www.itu.int/dms pubrec/itu-r/rec/p/ R-REC-P.2040-1-201507-S!!PDF-E.pdf

    [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/dms pubrec/itu-r/rec/p/ R-REC-P.2040-1-201507-S!!PDF-E.pdf

    work page 2040

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.