REVIEW 3 cited by
Probabilistic measures afford fair comparisons of AIWP and NWP model output
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Probabilistic measures afford fair comparisons of AIWP and NWP model output
read the original abstract
We introduce a new measure for fair and meaningful comparisons of single-valued output from artificial intelligence based weather prediction (AIWP) and numerical weather prediction (NWP) models, called potential continuous ranked probability score (PC). In a nutshell, we subject the deterministic backbone of physics-based and data-driven models post hoc to the same statistical postprocessing technique, namely, isotonic distributional regression (IDR). Then we find PC as the mean continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) of the postprocessed probabilistic forecasts. The nonnegative PC measure quantifies potential predictive performance and is invariant under strictly increasing transformations of the model output. PC attains its most desirable value of zero if, and only if, the weather outcome Y is a fixed, non-decreasing function of the model output X. The PC measure is recorded in the unit of the outcome, has an upper bound of one half times the mean absolute difference between outcomes, and serves as a proxy for the mean CRPS of real-time, operational probabilistic products. When applied to WeatherBench 2 data, our approach demonstrates that the data-driven GraphCast model outperforms the leading, physics-based European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) high-resolution (HRES) model. Furthermore, the PC measure for the HRES model aligns exceptionally well with the mean CRPS of the operational ECMWF ensemble. Across application domains, our approach affords comparisons of single-valued forecasts in settings where the pre-specification of a loss function -- which is the usual, and principally superior, procedure in forecast contests, administrative, and benchmarks settings -- places competitors on unequal footings.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
"What is a realistic forecast?" Assessing data-driven weather forecasts, a journey from verification to falsification
Forecast realism is decomposed into functional, structural, and physical kinds, with falsification against scientific knowledge proposed as a third evaluation step for AI weather models.
-
Evaluating Extreme Precipitation Forecasts: A Threshold-Weighted, Spatial Verification Approach for Comparing an AI Weather Prediction Model Against a High-Resolution NWP Model
Combining HiRA neighborhood verification with threshold-weighted CRPS shows that AI-vs-NWP rankings for extreme precipitation depend strongly on neighborhood size.
-
Assessing Monotone Dependence: Area Under the Curve Meets Rank Correlation
A new asymmetric rank-based measure, CMA, unifies AUC and Spearman's rho for all linearly ordered outcomes, with CLTs and a DeLong-type test.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.