Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 47 references

Virasoro Constraints for Drinfeld-Sokolov hierarchies and equations of Painlev\'{e} type

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that the Virasoro constraints of any Drinfeld-Sokolov hierarchy select distinguished tau functions; the similarity constraint turns the hierarchy into Painlevé-type ODEs, and for the principal gradation these ODEs carry…

desk verdict A substantial and mostly careful unification of Virasoro constraints and Painleve-type reductions for Drinfeld-Sokolov hierarchies, but with two load-bearing proof gaps that a referee should push on before acceptance. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06707 v3 pith:HPMPZ4GJ submitted 2019-08-19 nlin.SI math-phmath.MP

Si-Qi Liu , Chao-Zhong Wu , Youjin Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.SImath-phmath.MP MSC 34M5537K1017B6737K60
keywords Drinfeld-SokolovhierarchytaufunctionVirasoroconstraintsPainlevéequationsaffineWeylgroupBacklundtransformationsKac-Moodyalgebrasimilarityreduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a single construction that, starting from any affine Kac-Moody algebra and a compatible gradation, produces an integrable Drinfeld-Sokolov hierarchy, a tau cover for it, and a family of Virasoro symmetries acting on the tau function. Imposing Virasoro constraints selects distinguished solutions: string-equation constraints give topological Witten-Kontsevich-type tau functions, while similarity-equation constraints give Brezin-Gross-Witten-type solutions and, for higher exponents, solutions governed by ODEs of Painlevé type. For the principal gradation, those ODEs admit rational Bäcklund transformations that generate the affine Weyl group of the original affine Kac-Moody algebra. The upshot is that one Lie-algebraic framework organizes hierarchies, constraints, reductions, and discrete symmetries into a single package.

What carries the argument

The central object is the tau cover reformulated as the system (1.3), whose unknown $V$ lies in the negative part of the affine Kac-Moody algebra with respect to the gradation $s$, together with the Virasoro symmetry flows (1.5) built from the Kac-Moody-Virasoro derivations $d^s_k$. This reformulation replaces a Kac-Moody group-valued dressing operator by Lie-algebra data, which is what makes the Virasoro symmetries local and expressible through the tau function. The index restrictions on the Virasoro flows (case I: $k\ge -1$ for untwisted $g$ with $s$ equivalent to the homogeneous gradation; case II: $k\ge 0$ otherwise) are designed so that the bracket $[(e^{\mathrm{ad}V}\Lambda_j)_{\ge0},d^s_k]_{<0}$ vanishes, which is the condition making the Virasoro flows commute with the hierarchy flows.

What would settle it

Check the bracket condition that the Virasoro symmetries rely on: for a twisted affine algebra such as $A_2^{(2)}$ with the homogeneous gradation, compute the bracket $[(e^{\mathrm{ad}V}\Lambda_j)_{\ge0},d^s_k]_{<0}$ for $k=-1$ and verify it vanishes. If it does not vanish, the Virasoro symmetry flows do not commute with the hierarchy, invalidating the construction and the subsequent Painlevé-type reductions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the tau cover of the Drinfeld-Sokolov hierarchy associated with $(g,s,\mathbf{1})$ is equivalent to a system of dressing-flow equations for a function $V$ taking values in the negative part $g_{<0}[s]$ of $g$: $\sum_{m\ge0}\frac{1}{(m+1)!}(\mathrm{ad}V)^m\partial V/\partial t_j=(e^{\mathrm{ad}V}\Lambda_j)_{<0}$, where the $\Lambda_j$ generate the principal Heisenberg subalgebra. This reformulation makes the Virasoro symmetries of the hierarchy local differential polynomials in the tau-data. Imposing the string equation or the similarity equation $\sum_{p\in J_+}b_p\,\partial\log\tau^s/\partial t_p=\partial\log\tau^s/\partial\beta_0$ yields Virasoro constraints of two types. For the principal gradation $s=\mathbf{1}$, solutions constrained by the similarity equation satisfy the system $\phi_i'+\theta_i\phi_i+\chi_i=0$, and rational Bäcklund transformations $R_j$ act on the variables by $R_j(\chi_i)=\chi_i-a_{ij}\chi_j$, $R_j(\theta_i)=\theta_i+a_{ji}\chi_j/\phi_j$, generating the affine Weyl group of the affine Cartan matrix. Thus, for every affine Kac-Moody algebra, the same construction yields a Painlevé-type system carrying the corresponding affine Weyl group symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The construction of the Virasoro symmetries relies on the vanishing of a specific bracket in the affine Kac-Moody algebra for the chosen range of indices; if that bracket fails for some twisted algebra or non-homogeneous gradation, the symmetries and the resulting Painlevé-type equations would not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every affine Kac-Moody algebra, the Drinfeld-Sokolov hierarchy has a well-defined tau cover and local Virasoro symmetries, so the same constraints can be imposed uniformly beyond the classical $A_1^{(1)}$ KdV case.
  • Imposing the similarity equation with $b_p=\delta_{p,1}$ determines the tau function up to $\ell-1$ constants and reproduces Brezin-Gross-Witten-type solutions, including explicit examples for $A_1^{(1)}$ and $A_2^{(2)}$.
  • When $s=\mathbf{1}$, the system (1.11) admits rational Bäcklund transformations realizing the affine Weyl group of $g$, unifying and extending known affine-Weyl symmetry constructions for Painlevé equations.
  • Choosing $b_p=\delta_{p,j}$ with $j>1$ yields Painlevé-type ODEs: for $A_1^{(1)}$, $b_3$ gives the second Painlevé equation for $s=\mathbf{1}$ and the thirty-fourth Painlevé equation for $s=s_0$; for $A_2^{(1)}$, $b_2$ gives a system related to the fourth Painlevé equation; for $A_2^{(2)}$, $b_7$ gives a sixth-order ODE that passes the Painlevé test.
  • The construction gives an algorithm for formal power series solutions of the Cauchy problem, so each special solution selected by Virasoro constraints admits an explicit tau-function expansion that can be checked directly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The inclusion of twisted affine algebras in case (II) points toward a family of higher-order Painlevé-type equations indexed by twisted types; the $A_2^{(2)}$ example with seven free parameters suggests several of these are new and computable.
  • The proof of the Weyl-group relations passes through a nilpotent Poisson algebra structure, which suggests that the Bäcklund transformations may respect a Poisson bracket, opening the door to quantization-type deformations for every affine type.
  • The folding remarks in the concluding section imply that diagram automorphisms relate the Painlevé systems of a folded algebra to invariant subsystems of the unfolded one; verifying this systematically would produce symmetry reductions and new discrete symmetries.
  • Because case (II) has no $(-1)$-th Virasoro constraint, the similarity equation may serve as the correct replacement for the string equation in selecting distinguished tau functions for twisted algebras, especially if a geometric or cohomological interpretation of those tau functions is found.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper studies generalized Drinfeld-Sokolov (DS) hierarchies associated to an arbitrary affine Kac-Moody algebra with two gradations s ≤ 1. It constructs a tau cover of the DS hierarchy, reformulates it as a system (3.18) for a Lie-algebra-valued function V, and derives Virasoro symmetries of the tau cover. Imposing Virasoro constraints selects solutions of Witten-Kontsevich and Brezin-Gross-Witten type, and a similarity equation leads to systems of ODEs of Painlevé type. For s = 1 the paper proves that these ODEs admit rational Bäcklund transformations realizing the affine Weyl group of the underlying affine Kac-Moody algebra, generalizing results of Noumi–Yamada and others. The paper includes explicit computations for A1(1), A2(1), A2(2), A3(1), C2(1), and D4(1).

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a substantial and useful unification: it places Virasoro symmetries and constraints for DS hierarchies on a common footing for all affine Kac-Moody algebras, including twisted cases, and it gives a uniform mechanism for producing higher-order Painlevé-type equations with affine Weyl group symmetries. The paper is also valuable for its explicit calculations, including formal power series tau functions, concrete Lax pairs for P2 and P34, and the detailed examples in Section 5.4. These strengths make the paper worth publishing, provided the proof gaps identified below are closed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.1, Lemma 4.2] The proof of Lemma 4.2 uses the identity [(A_j)_{≥0}, d^s_k]_{<0} = 0 as the essential justification for the allowed ranges of k in Cases (I) and (II), but the promised explanation is not provided. The text before (4.4) states that the reason for these ranges 'will be explained in the proof of Lemma 4.2', yet the proof only says that the identity holds 'when k takes values specified in Cases (I) and (II)'. This identity is load-bearing: it is exactly what makes the flows ∂/∂β_k commute with the hierarchy flows, and hence what makes (4.10)–(4.12) Virasoro symmetries and (4.20) a Virasoro constraint. The authors should supply the missing degree bookkeeping with respect to the s-gradation: for k ≥ 0 the s-degree shift of d^s_k is r h_s k, while for k = -1 in Case (I) one needs the vanishing of the relevant degree-zero component. Without this, the central construction of the Virasoro symmetries is incomplete.
  2. [Section 4.2, Eq. (4.21)] The proof of the Virasoro constraints of the first type (4.21) is omitted: the text says they are proved in [47] for s = s0 and a_p = δ_{p1}, and that for the general case 'the proof is almost the same, so we omit it here'. Since (4.21) is stated as a theorem for general s and a_p, and since the present paper works with a tau cover that is not identical to the one in [47] when s is not s0, this omission is a genuine gap. The authors should either give the adapted proof or spell out the precise changes required to reduce the general case to [47]. This is not the main load-bearing point for Theorem 1.2, but it is a stated main result of Section 4 and should be supported.
  3. [Section 5.3, Proposition 5.6] The proof that the Bäcklund transformations R_j satisfy the affine Weyl group relations is delegated to the Noumi–Yamada construction [41], with the identification (5.43) asserted without a full verification. The explicit check for A_l(1) in Example 5.7 is reassuring, but the general claim in Theorem 1.2(ii) requires that the transformations defined by (5.20)–(5.21) are exactly the ones obtained from the nilpotent Poisson algebra of [41]. The authors should include the missing computation showing that φ_i(X) = (f_i|X) and λ_i = -χ_i/ν reproduce the R_j defined in Theorem 5.5, or at least state and prove the identification as a lemma. This point is load-bearing because the affine Weyl group action is one of the two main conclusions of Theorem 1.2.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (3.25)] The displayed equation (3.25) contains an unbalanced bracket and an apparent typo: the last line reads '[[(Ai)<0, (Aj )<0],A k] + [(Aj )<0, (Ai)<0],A k]] = 0' and should be corrected to a properly bracketed expression. This is in the proof of Lemma 3.8 and should be fixed for readability.
  2. [Section 4.1] The phrase 'The reason that we take such values of the indices k will be explained in the proof of Lemma 4.2' appears in the text before (4.4). Since the proof does not in fact supply the explanation, this sentence should either be removed or replaced by a concrete pointer to the missing computation that the authors will add.
  3. [Section 5.4, Examples 5.8–5.10] The examples in Section 5.4 are valuable but a reader would benefit from a sentence explaining the origin of the expressions for φ_i in (5.50) and (5.51), especially whether they follow from a general formula or from direct computation for each type. This would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Virasoro symmetries and Painlevé-type reductions are derived from external Drinfeld-Sokolov and Noumi-Yamada inputs, with only omitted technical justifications flagged.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The tau cover (3.16) and its reformulation (3.18) are defined from the Drinfeld-Sokolov hierarchy and proved directly in Section 3.3 using the external dressing lemma and internal Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff computations; Theorem 1.1 is not assumed from [34] but proved. The Virasoro symmetries (4.10)-(4.12) are constructed from the Kac-Moody-Virasoro algebra via equations (4.4), and the Virasoro commutation relations (4.13) are computed from (4.5)-(4.7), not imported from the conclusion. The index restriction in Lemma 4.2 is flagged in the text ('The reason that we take such values of the indices k will be explained in the proof of Lemma 4.2') and used in the proof as the vanishing of [(A_j)_{>=0}, d^s_k]_{<0}; the promised degree bookkeeping is not supplied, but this is an omitted technical justification, not a reduction of the conclusion to its input. The affine Weyl group action in Theorem 5.5 and Proposition 5.6 is obtained by identifying the constructed R_j with the Noumi-Yamada automorphisms [41], an external algebraic benchmark, and the A^(1)_l example is checked directly. Self-citations [34] and [47] supply the tau-function setup and one special-case proof (Theorem 4.7, first series), but the central claims—Virasoro symmetries for arbitrary (g,s,1), the similarity constraints (4.22), and the Lax/ODE characterization (5.1)/(5.5)—are derived in this paper from those inputs; the citations are not the only support for the conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivations are pure algebraic manipulations over known affine Kac-Moody algebras. No new entities are introduced, and no data-dependent free parameters appear. The main inputs are standard structure theory plus the prior Noumi-Yamada result for the Weyl group relations.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Structure theory of affine Kac-Moody algebras, including root space decomposition, Serre relations, and principal Heisenberg subalgebra
    Used throughout Section 2 to define the Drinfeld-Sokolov hierarchies and tau functions.
  • standard math Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula for Lie algebra exponentiation
    Applied in Lemma 3.12 and Lemma 3.14 to relate V, N, and U(Q_V).
  • domain assumption For s <= 1, the decomposition g<0 = N + g<0 holds and the component-wise recursive solution of (3.18) is well-defined
    Assumed in Section 3.2 to prove the equivalence in Theorem 1.1.
  • domain assumption Existence and choice of a subspace V satisfying B = ad(Λ_1)N + V
    Fixing V is necessary for the normal form (3.7) and the functions u_i; the paper treats it as fixed throughout.
  • domain assumption Noumi-Yamada's nilpotent Poisson algebra construction, as presented in [41], yields the affine Weyl group relations
    Used in Proposition 5.6 to establish the relations (5.37) for the Backlund transformations R_j.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Virasoro Constraints for Drinfeld-Sokolov hierarchies and equations of Painlev\'{e} type." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HPMPZ4GJ

@misc{pith2026190806707,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Virasoro Constraints for Drinfeld-Sokolov hierarchies and equations of Painlev\'e type},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HPMPZ4GJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06707}
}
abstract

We construct a tau cover of the generalized Drinfeld-Sokolov hierarchy associated to an arbitrary affine Kac-Moody algebra with gradations $\mathrm{s}\le\mathds{1}$ and derive its Virasoro symmetries. By imposing the Virasoro constraints we obtain solutions of the Drinfeld-Sokolov hierarchy of Witten-Kontsevich and of Brezin-Gross-Witten types, and of those characterized by certain ordinary differential equations of Painlev\'{e} type. We also show the existence of affine Weyl group actions on solutions of such Painlev\'e type equations, which generalizes the theory of Noumi and Yamada on affine Weyl group symmetries of the Painlev\'{e} type equations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [47]

    C.-Z. Wu. ‘Tau functions and Virasoro symmetries for Dr infeld-Sokolov hierarchies’, Adv. Math. 306 (2017) 603–652. 51

    work page 2017

  2. [41]

    Noumi & Y

    M. Noumi & Y. Yamada. ‘Birational Weyl group action aris ing from a nilpotent Poisson algebra’, Physics and combinatorics 1999 (Nagoya) 287–319 (World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ, 2001)

    work page 1999

  3. [1]

    V. E. Adler. ‘Nonlinear chains and Painlev´ e equations’, Phys. D 73 (1994) 335–351. 48

    work page 1994

  4. [2]

    Alexandrov

    A. Alexandrov. ‘Cut-and-join description of generaliz ed Brezin-Gross-Witten model’, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 22 (2018) 1347–1399

    work page 2018

  5. [3]

    Bertola & G

    M. Bertola & G. Ruzza. ‘Brezin-Gross-Witten tau functio n and isomonodromic deformations’, Commun. Number Theory Phys. 13 (2019) 827–883

    work page 2019

  6. [4]

    Brezin & D

    E. Brezin & D. J. Gross. ‘The external field problem in the l arge N limit of QCD’, Physics Letters B 97 (1980) 120–124

    work page 1980

  7. [5]

    N. J. Burroughs, M. F. de Groot, T. J. Hollowood & J. L. Mira montes. ‘Generalized Drinfeld- Sokolov hierarchies. II. The Hamiltonian structures’, Comm. Math. Phys. 153 (1993) 187–215

    work page 1993

  8. [6]

    Cafasso & C.-Z

    M. Cafasso & C.-Z. Wu. ‘Borodin-Okounkov formula, strin g equation and topological solutions of Drinfeld-Sokolov hierarchies’, Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019) 2681–2722

    work page 2019

Show all 47 references
  1. [7]

    P. A. Clarkson & M. D. Kruskal. ‘New similarity reduction s of the Boussinesq equation’, J. Math. Phys. 30 (1989) 2201–2213

    1989

  2. [8]

    Conte & M

    R. Conte & M. Musette. The Painlev´ e Handbook(Springer, Dordrecht, 2008)

    2008

  3. [9]

    V. G. Drinfeld & V. V. Sokolov. ‘Lie algebras and equation s of Korteweg-de Vries type’, Current problems in mathematics 24, Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki, pages 81–180. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Vsesoyuz. Inst. Nauchn. i Tekhn. Inform., Moscow, 1984

    1984

  4. [10]

    Dubrovin, D

    B. Dubrovin, D. Yang & D. Zagier. ‘On tau-functions for t he KdV hierarchy’, Preprint arXiv: 1812.08488

    arXiv

  5. [11]

    Dubrovin & Y

    B. Dubrovin & Y. Zhang. ‘Normal forms of hierarchies of i ntegrable PDEs, Frobenius manifolds and Gromov-Witten invariants’, Preprint arXiv: 0108160

  6. [12]

    Enriquez & E

    B. Enriquez & E. Frenkel. ‘Equivalence of two approache s to integrable hierarchies of KdV type’, Comm. Math. Phys. 185 (1997) 211–230

    1997

  7. [13]

    H. Fan, T. Jarvis & Y. Ruan. ‘The Witten equation, mirror symmetry, and quantum singu- larity theory’, Ann. of Math. 2 (2013) 1–106

    2013

  8. [14]

    Feher, J

    L. Feher, J. Harnad & I. Marshall. ‘Generalized Drinfel d-Sokolov reductions and KdV type hierarchies’,Comm. Math. Phys. 154 (1993) 181–214

    1993

  9. [15]

    Feigin & E

    B. Feigin & E. Frenkel. ‘Quantization of the Drinfeld-S okolov reduction’, Phys. Lett. B 246 (1990) 75–81

    1990

  10. [16]

    Feigin & E

    B. Feigin & E. Frenkel. ‘Affine Kac-Moody algebras at the c ritical level and Gelfand-Dikii algebras’, Infinite analysis, Part A, B (Kyoto, 1991), 197–215, Adv. Ser. Math. Phys., 16, World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ, 1992

    1991

  11. [17]

    Frenkel & D

    E. Frenkel & D. Ben-Zvi. Vertex algebras and algebraic curves. Second edition. Math ematical Surveys and Monographs 88 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004)

    2004

  12. [18]

    Fuji & T

    K. Fuji & T. Suzuki. ‘The sixth Painlev´ e equation arisi ng from D(1) 4 hierarchy’,J. Phys. A 39 (2006) 12073–12082. 49

    2006

  13. [19]

    Fuji & T

    K. Fuji & T. Suzuki. ‘Higher order Painlev´ e system of ty pe D(1) 2n+2 arising from integrable hierarchy’,Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2008, no. 1, Art. ID rnm 129, 21 pp

    2008

  14. [20]

    Fuji & T

    K. Fuji & T. Suzuki. ‘Coupled Painlev´ e VI system with E(1) 6 -symmetry’,J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 145205, 11 pp

    2009

  15. [21]

    Fuji & T

    K. Fuji & T. Suzuki. ‘Drinfeld-Sokolov hierarchies of t ype A and fourth order Painlev´ e sys- tems’, Funkcial. Ekvac. 53 (2010) 143–167

    2010

  16. [22]

    P. G. Grinevich & A. Y. Orlov. ‘Virasoro Action on Rieman n Surfaces, Grassmannians, det ∂J and Segal-Wilson τ -Function’,Problems of Modern Quantum Field Theory (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989) 86-106

    1989

  17. [23]

    M. F. de Groot, T. J. Hollowood & J. L. Miramontes. ‘Gener alized Drinfeld-Sokolov hierar- chies’,Comm. Math. Phys. 145 (1992) 57–84

    1992

  18. [24]

    D. J. Gross & E. Witten. ‘Possible third order phase tran sition in the large N lattice gauge theory’, Phys. Rev., D 21 (1980) 446–453

    1980

  19. [25]

    Hollowood, T. J. Hollowood & J. L. Miramontes. ‘Tau-fun ctions and generalized integrable hierarchies’,Comm. Math. Phys. 157 (1993) 99–117

    1993

  20. [26]

    Hollowood, J

    T. Hollowood, J. L. Miramontes & J. S. Guill´ en. ‘Additi onal symmetries of generalized inte- grable hierarchies’, J. Phys. A 27 (1994) 4629–4644

    1994

  21. [27]

    Jacobson

    N. Jacobson. Lie Algebras. Republication of the 1962 original (Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1979)

    1962

  22. [28]

    V. G. Kac. Infinite-dimensional Lie Algebras. Third edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990, RI, 1989)

    1990

  23. [29]

    V. G. Kac & M. Wakimoto. ‘Exceptional hierarchies of sol iton equations’, Theta functions– Bowdoin 1987, Part 1 (Brunswick, ME, 1987), 191–237, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., 4 9, Part 1, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1989

    1987

  24. [30]

    Kakei & T

    S. Kakei & T. Kikuchi. ‘Affine Lie group approach to a deriv ative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation and its similarity reduction’, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2004 (2004) 4181–4209

    2004

  25. [31]

    Kontsevich

    M. Kontsevich. ‘Intersection theory on the moduli spac e of curves and the matrix Airy func- tion’, Comm. Math. Phys. 147 (1992) 1–23

    1992

  26. [32]

    S. Kumar. ‘Kac-Moody groups, their flag varieties and re presentation theory’, Progress in Mathematics 204 (Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2002)

    2002

  27. [33]

    S.-Q. Liu, Y. Ruan & Y. Zhang. ‘BCFG Drinfeld-Sokolov hi erarchies and FJR W-theory’, Invent. Math. 201 (2015) 711–772

    2015

  28. [34]

    Liu, C.-Z

    S.-Q. Liu, C.-Z. Wu, Y. Zhang & X. Zhou. ‘Drinfeld-Sokol ov hierarchies and diagram auto- morphisms of affine Kac-Moody algebras’, Comm. Math. Phys. 375 (2020) 785–832

    2020

  29. [35]

    J. L. Miramontes. ‘Tau-functions generating the conse rvation laws for generalized integrable hierarchies of KdV and affine Toda type’, Nuclear Phys. B 547 (1999) 623–663. 50

    1999

  30. [36]

    H. Nagoya. ‘Quantization of differential systems with th e affine Weyl group symmetries of type C (1) N ’, J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 15 (2008) 493–519

    2008

  31. [37]

    P. Norbury. ‘A new cohomology class on the moduli space o f curves’, Preprint arXiv: 1712.03662

    arXiv

  32. [38]

    M. Noumi. ‘Affine Weyl group approach to Painlev´ e equati ons’, Proceedings of the Interna- tional Congress of Mathematicians Vol. III Beijing (2002), 497–509

    2002

  33. [39]

    Noumi & Y

    M. Noumi & Y. Yamada. ‘Affine Weyl group symmetries in Pain lev´ e type equations’,Toward the exact WKB analysis of differential equations, linear or n on-linear (Kyoto, 1998), 204, 245–259, Kyoto Univ. Press, Kyoto, 2000

    1998

  34. [40]

    Noumi & Y

    M. Noumi & Y. Yamada. ‘Affine Weyl groups, discrete dynami cal systems and Painlev´ e equa- tions’, Comm. Math. Phys. 199 (1998) 281–295

    1998

  35. [42]

    Sawada & T

    K. Sawada & T. Kotera. ‘A method for finding N -soliton solutions of the K.d.V. equation and K.d.V.-like equation’, Progr. Theoret. Phys. 51 (1974) 1355–1367

    1974

  36. [43]

    A. Sen, A. N. W. Hone & P. A. Clarkson. ‘On the Lax pairs of t he symmetric Painlev´ e equations’, Stud. Appl. Math. 117 (2006) 299–319

    2006

  37. [44]

    A. P. Veselov & A. B. Shabat. ‘A dressing chain and the spe ctral theory of Schr¨ odinger operator’, Funct. Anal. Appl. 27 (1993) 81–96

    1993

  38. [45]

    Wakimoto

    M. Wakimoto. ‘Affine Lie algebras and the Virasoro algebr a. I’, Japan. J. Math. (N.S.) 12 (1986) 379–400

    1986

  39. [46]

    E. Witten. ‘Two-dimensional gauge theories revisited ’, J. Geom. Phys. 9 (1992) 303–368

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.