Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 55 references

Fermi-level mediated acceleration of flash sintering of oxide ceramics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Flash sintering works because a rising Fermi level turns neutral zirconium vacancies into a fast-moving charged state, cutting the cation migration barrier by about 2 eV.

desk verdict Solid DFT barrier reduction undercut by a missing vacancy-concentration factor in the diffusion-length estimate; the mechanism is plausible but the quantitative claim overreaches. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.23383 v2 pith:HPYO4YND submitted 2026-07-25 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Qin-Kun Li , Evgeni S. Penev , Boris I. Yakobson This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords flashsinteringyttria-stabilizedzirconiazirconiumvacancyFermileveldefectchemistrymigrationbarrierchargestatetransitionfirst-principles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Flash sintering densifies oxide ceramics in seconds, but the atomistic driver has been unclear. This paper argues that in yttria-stabilized zirconia the key is the Fermi level: during the flash, oxygen vacancies donate electrons, pushing the Fermi level upward, which converts neutral zirconium vacancies into a quadruply charged state. In that state the cation migration barrier drops by about 2 eV (from 5.10 to 2.98 eV), so zirconium ions can move fast enough to densify the material within seconds. The same charge-state switch is shown to lower barriers in other flash-sintered oxides, suggesting a general mechanism.

What carries the argument

The centerpiece is the charge-state transition of the zirconium vacancy, V_Zr^0 → V_Zr^−4, occurring at a Fermi level about 1.78 eV above the valence band. The Fermi level is computed self-consistently from defect formation energies and charge neutrality for an ensemble of point defects (Y_Zr, V_O, and their complexes) in equilibrium with an O2 gas reservoir. The key quantitative outputs are the charge-state-dependent migration barriers from nudged-elastic-band calculations, which show the −4 state migrates with a 2.12 eV lower barrier, and the temperature-dependent defect concentrations that place the Fermi level in the regime where V_Zr^−4 dominates during flash.

What would settle it

Measure the charge state of Zr vacancies in a YSZ sample during the flash event (for example, by operando X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy at the Zr K-edge or by electron energy-loss spectroscopy on quenched samples). If V_Zr remains predominantly neutral or in a state other than −4 at the flash temperature, or if the Fermi level stays below the (0/−4) transition, the proposed mechanism is refuted. Equally, direct tracer diffusion measurements showing no more than a 2 eV barrier drop at the flash onset would contradict the numbers.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using first-principles calculations, the paper demonstrates that charge compensation among point defects in YSZ sets the Fermi level, which rises dramatically during flash sintering. The rise is driven by the conversion of oxygen vacancies trapped in yttrium-containing complexes into free doubly charged donors as the sample heats and reduces. Once the Fermi level exceeds the (0/−4) charge transition level of the Zr vacancy, V_Zr becomes V_Zr^−4. The computed migration barrier for a Zr-vacancy swap is 5.10 eV for the neutral vacancy but only 2.98 eV for the −4 state, about a 40% reduction. With this barrier, the estimated onset temperature near 1200 K and diffusion lengths over one second mat

Load-bearing premise

The whole picture relies on flash sintering being describable as a sequence of equilibrium thermodynamic states, where the Fermi level and defect concentrations are set by charge neutrality and exchange with an oxygen reservoir, with the electric field acting only as a heat source; if field-driven non-equilibrium defects dominate, the V_Zr^−4 switch may not occur.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the mechanism holds, flash sintering in YSZ is controlled by the Fermi level crossing a defect charge-transition level; any doping or atmosphere that raises E_F should lower the flash temperature.
  • The computed barrier reduction predicts a measurable jump in cation self-diffusivity at the flash onset, which tracer or isotope diffusion experiments could confirm.
  • The generalization to TiO2 and monoclinic ZrO2 suggests the same charge-state switch could be used as a design rule for selecting materials that flash at lower temperatures.
  • The mechanism connects the observed electrical signature—p-type conduction before flash and n-type after—to the underlying defect chemistry.
  • It also rules out the 'polaronium' complex as the fast cation carrier in YSZ, since such a complex is found to be unbound (Eb ≈ −1 eV).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The equilibrium thermodynamic treatment is a simplification; under real flash conditions the electric field may drive defect populations out of equilibrium, so the predicted Fermi-level trajectory could be tested with in-situ spectroscopy during a flash event.
  • The same Fermi-level-mediated charge-state switch might be engineered deliberately: pre-reducing the ceramic or doping it with shallow donors could trigger the fast vacancy state at lower temperature, extending the mechanism beyond the specific system studied.
  • If the barrier reduction reflects the disappearance of hole polarons, then materials with small-polaron-forming cation vacancies are prime candidates for flash sintering, providing a screening criterion for new compositions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Fermi-level-mediated mechanism for accelerated cation migration during flash sintering of YSZ. Using PBE+U DFT and NEB calculations, the authors report a 2.12 eV reduction in the Zr-vacancy migration barrier when the vacancy charge state changes from V_Zr^0 (5.10 eV) to V_Zr^-4 (2.98 eV). They combine these barriers with a defect-equilibrium model in which E_F is determined by charge neutrality and equilibrium with an O2 gas reservoir, obtaining a nearly linear upward E_F(T) trajectory during flash. On this basis they argue that excess oxygen vacancies upshift E_F, converting V_Zr^0 to V_Zr^-4 and thereby enabling fast Zr transport; a diffusion length of 0.16 μm in 1 s at 1900 K is cited as evidence that this mechanism can explain densification in seconds. The mechanism is then generalized to monoclinic ZrO2 and rutile TiO2.

Significance. If the central barrier reduction is robust, it provides a concrete, atomistic explanation for the long-standing puzzle of accelerated cation transport in flash sintering and connects defect chemistry to the observed p-to-n conductivity crossover. The paper's strengths are its direct DFT/NEB calculation of the charge-state-dependent migration barrier, the self-consistent defect-equilibrium solution, and the falsifiable predictions regarding E_F position, carrier type, and ESR signatures. However, the quantitative transport conclusion is currently overstated: the paper equates a vacancy diffusion coefficient with a cation tracer diffusion coefficient and omits the vacancy site fraction, which is a load-bearing error for the claimed densification kinetics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 5 and Section "Defect equilibria and the Fermi level of YSZ in flash sintering"] The quantity D_VZr defined in the text is the vacancy diffusivity, but it is then used as a "cation diffusion length" via (D_VZr t)^{1/2} = 0.16 μm. For vacancy-mediated cation transport, the cation tracer diffusivity is D_Zr ≈ f·x_v·D_VZr, where x_v = [V_Zr]/[Zr_sites] and f is a correlation factor. Since V_Zr is a minority defect, x_v is small; even x_v ~ 10^-4 gives D_Zr ~ 10^-4 D_VZr and a diffusion length of only a few nanometers over 1 s. The manuscript does not multiply by x_v, so the claimed 0.16 μm Zr transport length is not supported. Please compute D_Zr from the [V_Zr] values already obtained in Fig. 4, or explicitly invoke a different mechanism (e.g., grain-boundary transport) and quantify it.
  2. [Eq. (3), Fig. 4, and Section "Defect equilibria and the Fermi level of YSZ in flash sintering"] The E_F trajectory is computed assuming full thermodynamic equilibrium with an O2 gas reservoir at ambient pressure, with the electric field entering only as Joule heating in Eq. (4). Flash sintering is strongly non-equilibrium: applied fields and high current densities can inject carriers, modify defect charge states, or create supersaturated vacancy populations. If the equilibrium assumption fails, the predicted switch to V_Zr^-4 may not occur. The authors should test this assumption, for example by comparing predicted E_F(T) with measured p-to-n transition temperatures or by estimating field-ionization/carrier-injection rates, and should state the regime of validity of the equilibrium treatment.
  3. [Fig. 3 and SI, Sections S1-S2] The central quantitative claim—a 2.12 eV barrier reduction between V_Zr^0 and V_Zr^-4—rests on PBE+U calculations, but no Hubbard-U sensitivity analysis or hybrid-functional benchmark is reported. The charge transition level ε(0/−4) and the barrier lowering depend on the position of occupied Zr-4d and O-2p states, which are sensitive to the U values. To establish robustness, the authors should report the U parameters used and show how the barrier difference and ε(0/−4) vary over a reasonable U range, or provide HSE calculations for at least the migration barriers.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (4)] The notation uses q both as a defect charge state and as a numerical charge in e^2 q^2; please clarify with a subscript or explicit values (e.g., q=+2 for V_O^{2+}).
  2. [Fig. 5 inset] The inset plots D_VZr versus E_F with color coding for temperature, but no color bar or temperature scale is shown. Please add a color legend.
  3. [Throughout] Minor typographical issues: "disapperance" should be "disappearance"; "spin-one deep donor" should likely be "spin-1" or "spin-one" is acceptable but nonstandard; the y-axis labels in Fig. 4 appear to have missing minus signs in exponent notation.
  4. [Fig. 5 text] The phrase "effective (mean) tracer diffusion coefficient of VZr" is misleading. A vacancy diffusion coefficient is not a tracer diffusion coefficient; consider renaming it "vacancy diffusivity" and reserving "tracer diffusivity" for the cation quantity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: central barrier reduction is direct DFT; self-citations are non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The 2.12 eV barrier difference between V_Zr^0 and V_Zr^-4 (Fig. 3a) is a direct DFT (PBE+U) result with no fitted parameters; the Fermi-level trajectory is obtained self-consistently from Eqs. (1)-(3) using ab initio formation energies. The fitted quantities (effective ε ≈ 0.63 eV for the O-vacancy lattice gas, ΔH_eff/ΔS_eff from Eq. S19) are smooth representations of already computed defect concentrations and E_F(T) points; they do not enter the barrier calculation. No equation in the paper reduces to its own output by construction. Self-citations refs. [53,54] (and contextual [2]) appear in the optional grain-boundary discussion, not in the central charge-transition or vacancy-diffusion derivation, so they are not load-bearing. The 0.16 μm 'cation diffusion length' statement conflates D_VZr with the Zr tracer diffusivity (omitting the vacancy site fraction x_v), which is a support/correctness concern rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on DFT+U approximations, a dilute/equilibrium defect model, and the assumed O2-reservoir electrochemical equilibrium. The externally tunable numbers are Hubbard U (values in SI) and two fits (ε and ΔH/ΔS) used to interpret the self-consistent E_F(T); none of these is an experimental fit to the target phenomenon.

free parameters (4)
  • Hubbard U parameters (PBE+U) = not stated in main text, SI Sec. S1
    The U correction is essential for polaron localization and charge-transition levels; the central barrier values (5.10/2.98 eV) and ε(0/−4)=1.78 eV are U-dependent.
  • Effective O-vacancy binding energy ε in lattice-gas model = ≈0.63 eV
    Fit to computed [V_O^+2](T) via Eq. (S16), Fig. 4b; used to describe V_O buffering/release that drives E_F.
  • Effective enthalpy/entropy of E_F(T) linear fit = ΔH_eff = 1.14 eV; ΔS_eff = −0.75 meV K⁻¹
    Linear regression to computed E_F(T) via Eq. (S19), Fig. 4c; used to phrase the upshift as a slope, but the underlying E_F points come from the self-consistent calculation.
  • Jump attempt frequency Γ0 = 10^13 s⁻¹
    Assumed phonon frequency for the T* onset estimate; not fitted to data, but a hand-assigned prefactor.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption PBE+U DFT adequately describes defect formation energies, polarons, and charge transition levels in YSZ
    Used throughout; U values are not shown in the main text; polaron localization and ε(q/q') are sensitive to the functional and U.
  • domain assumption The defect ensemble is dilute and non-interacting, so concentrations from mass-action/charge neutrality (Eqs. 2–3) are valid
    Stated in the 'Defect equilibria' section; neglects defect-defect interactions even though complexes are explicitly included.
  • ad hoc to paper The sample remains in equilibrium with O2 gas at ambient pressure during all FS stages, so E_F is set by charge neutrality; the electric field enters only as Joule heating (Eq. 4)
    Load-bearing assumption for the E_F trajectory; no non-equilibrium or field-ionization effects are modeled.
  • domain assumption The migrating Zr vacancy can be represented by fixed charge states 0 and −4, with barriers computed by NEB in a static lattice; charge relaxation during migration is captured by DFT
    Used for Fig. 3; no explicit electron-phonon or charge-capture kinetics are included in the barrier path.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fermi-level mediated acceleration of flash sintering of oxide ceramics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HPYO4YND

@misc{pith2026260723383,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fermi-level mediated acceleration of flash sintering of oxide ceramics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HPYO4YND}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23383}
}
abstract

The atomistic understanding of flash sintering (FS) remains speculative, despite its efficiency and versatility in materials processing. Employing first-principles calculations we demonstrate how charge compensation of a range of defects in the prototypical Y-stabilized cubic ZrO$_2$ (YSZ) shifts Fermi level E$_F$ up during FS, thereby accelerating cation migration for fast mass transport. The charge transition of Zr vacancy, V$_{Zr}^q$, reduces its bulk diffusion barrier in V$_{Zr}^{-4}$ during flash by 2 eV, relative to V$_{Zr}^0$ before flash, which is triggered by the charge equilibrium of nonstoichiometric defects. The substituent defect Y$_{Zr}$, released by annihilating O vacancy, V$_O$, in Y$_{Zr}$V$_O$Y$_{Zr}$ defect complex, acts as electron acceptor and favors V$_{Zr}^0$ before flash whereas excess V$_O$, as electron donor thermally generated at the FS onset, upshift E$_F$ and thus support V$_{Zr}^{-4}$. The proposed mechanism of Fermi-level mediated cation diffusion for YSZ is generalized to other flash-sintered ceramics and has considerable bearing on the general theory of FS techniques in oxide ceramics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23383 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Formation energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Projected density of states (DOS) (right: spin- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Potential energy profile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Diffusion coefficient of V [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references

  1. [1]

    C. Wang, W. Ping, Q. Bai, H. Cui, R. Hensleigh, R. Wang, A. H. Brozena, Z. Xu, J. Dai, Y. Pei, C. Zheng, G. Pastel, J. Gao, X. Wang, H. Wang, J.-C. Zhao, B. Yang, X. R. Zheng, J. Luo, Y. Mo, B. Dunn, and 7 L. Hu, A general method to synthesize and sinter bulk ceramics in seconds, Science368, 521–526 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    D. X. Luong, K. V. Bets, W. A. Algozeeb, M. G. Stan- ford, C. Kittrell, W. Chen, R. V. Salvatierra, M. Ren, E. A. McHugh, P. A. Advincula, Z. Wang, M. Bhatt, H. Guo, V. Mancevski, R. Shahsavari, B. I. Yakobson, and J. M. Tour, Gram-scale bottom-up flash graphene synthesis, Nature577, 647–651 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    Zheng, X

    X. Zheng, X. Gao, R. A. Vil´ a, Y. Jiang, J. Wang, R. Xu, R. Zhang, X. Xiao, P. Zhang, L. C. Greenburg, Y. Yang, H. L. Xin, X. Zheng, and Y. Cui, Hydrogen- substituted graphdiyne-assisted ultrafast sparking syn- thesis of metastable nanomaterials, Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 153–159 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    E. M. Rabinovich, Preparation of glass by sintering, J. Mater. Sci.20, 4259–4297 (1985)

    1985

  5. [5]

    Cologna, B

    M. Cologna, B. Rashkova, and R. Raj, Flash sintering of nanograin zirconia in<5 s at 850 ◦c, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93, 3556–3559 (2010)

    2010

  6. [6]

    Biesuz and V

    M. Biesuz and V. M. Sglavo, Flash sintering of ceramics, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.39, 115–143 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    O’Hayre, S.-W

    R. O’Hayre, S.-W. Cha, W. Colella, and F. B. Prinz, Fuel Cell Fundamentals (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016) Chap. Fuel Cell Charge Transport, pp. 117–166, 3rd ed

    2016

  8. [8]

    Yadav and R

    D. Yadav and R. Raj, Two unique measurements related to flash experiments with yttria-stabilized zirconia, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.100, 5374–5378 (2017)

    2017

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    R. Raj, M. Cologna, and J. S. C. Francis, Influence of externally imposed and internally generated electrical fields on grain growth, diffusional creep, sintering and related phenomena in ceramics, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.94, 1941–1965 (2011)

    1941

  2. [10]

    S. Jo, M. Kindelmann, D. Jennings, L. Balice, Y. J. Sohn, W. S. Scheld, M. Bram, O. Guillon, J. Mayer, and R. Raj, Flash-induced defects in single-crystal 8YSZ character- ized by TEM, XRD, and Raman spectroscopy, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.107, 5786–5800 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Freysoldt, B

    C. Freysoldt, B. Grabowski, T. Hickel, J. Neugebauer, G. Kresse, A. Janotti, and C. G. Van de Walle, First- principles calculations for point defects in solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 253–305 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    Zunger and O

    A. Zunger and O. I. Malyi, Understanding doping of quantum materials, Chem. Rev.121, 3031–3060 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    J. S. Park, S. Kim, Z. Xie, and A. Walsh, Point defect engineering in thin-film solar cells, Nat. Rev. Mater.3, 194–210 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Klein, K

    A. Klein, K. Albe, N. Bein, O. Clemens, K. A. Creutz, P. Erhart, M. Frericks, E. Ghorbani, J. P. Hofmann, B. Huang, B. Kaiser, U. Kolb, J. Koruza, C. K¨ ubel, K. N. S. Lohaus, J. R¨ odel, J. Rohrer, W. Rheinheimer, R. A. De Souza, V. Streibel, A. Weidenkaff, M. Widen- meyer, B...

    2023

  7. [15]

    Bonkowski, M

    A. Bonkowski, M. J. Wolf, J. Wu, S. C. Parker, A. Klein, and R. A. De Souza, A single model for the thermody- namics and kinetics of metal exsolution from perovskite oxides, J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 23012–23021 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    J. Wang, J. Yang, J. L. Wardini, I. Waluyo, A. Hunt, E. J. Crumlin, N. Fairley, W. J. Bowman, H. Y. Hwang, and B. Yildiz, Fermi level equilibration and charge transfer at the exsolved metal-oxide interface, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 2991–2997 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Majidi and K

    H. Majidi and K. van Benthem, Consolidation of partially stabilized ZrO2 in the presence of a noncontacting electric field, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 195503 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Vendrell and A

    X. Vendrell and A. R. West, Inducedp-type semiconduc- tivity in yttria-stabilized zirconia, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 102, 6100–6106 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Jo and R

    S. Jo and R. Raj, Transition to electronic conduction at the onset of flash in cubic zirconia, Scr. Mater.174, 29–32 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    J. S. C. Francis and R. Raj, Influence of the field and the current limit on flash sintering at isothermal furnace temperatures, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.96, 2754–2758 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    R. I. Todd, E. Zapata-Solvas, R. S. Bonilla, T. Sneddon, and P. R. Wilshaw, Electrical characteristics of flash sin- tering: thermal runaway of Joule heating, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.35, 1865–1877 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    H. Shin, A. Benali, Y. Luo, E. Crabb, A. Lopez-Bezanilla, L. E. Ratcliff, A. M. Jokisaari, and O. Heinonen, Zirconia and hafnia polymorphs: Ground-state structural proper- ties from diffusion Monte Carlo, Phys. Rev. Mater.2, 075001 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    Ma, S.-H

    J. Ma, S.-H. Wei, T. A. Gessert, and K. K. Chin, Carrier density and compensation in semiconductors with multi- ple dopants and multiple transition energy levels: Case of Cu impurities in CdTe, Phys. Rev. B83, 245207 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    Buckeridge, Equilibrium point defect and charge car- rier concentrations in a material determined through cal- culation of the self-consistent Fermi energy, Comput

    J. Buckeridge, Equilibrium point defect and charge car- rier concentrations in a material determined through cal- culation of the self-consistent Fermi energy, Comput. Phys. Commun.244, 329–342 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    S. B. Zhang and J. E. Northrup, Chemical potential de- pendence of defect formation energies in GaAs: Applica- tion to Ga self-diffusion, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 2339–2342 (1991)

    1991

  18. [26]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  19. [27]

    Cococcioni and S

    M. Cococcioni and S. de Gironcoli, Linear response ap- proach to the calculation of the effective interaction pa- rameters in the LDA+U method, Phys. Rev. B71, 035105 (2005)

    2005

  20. [28]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spec- tra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study, Phys. Rev. B57, 1505–1509 (1998)

    1998

  21. [29]

    Lany and A

    S. Lany and A. Zunger, Polaronic hole localization and multiple hole binding of acceptors in oxide wide-gap semi- conductors, Phys. Rev. B80, 085202 (2009)

    2009

  22. [30]

    Falletta and A

    S. Falletta and A. Pasquarello, Hubbarduthrough pola- ronic defect states, npj Comput. Mater.8, 263 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    M’Peko, J

    J.-C. M’Peko, J. S. C. Francis, and R. Raj, Impedance spectroscopy and dielectric properties of flash versus con- ventionally sintered yttria-doped zirconia electroceramics viewed at the microstructural level, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96, 3760–3767 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    Lebrun, C

    J.-M. Lebrun, C. S. Hellberg, S. K. Jha, W. M. Kriven, A. Steveson, K. C. Seymour, N. Bernstein, S. C. Erwin, and R. Raj, In-situ measurements of lattice expansion related to defect generation during flash sintering, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.100, 4965–4970 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Raj, Joule heating during flash-sintering, J

    R. Raj, Joule heating during flash-sintering, J. Eur. Ce- ram. Soc.32, 2293–2301 (2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    K. S. N. Vikrant, H. Wang, A. Jana, H. Wang, and R. E. Garc ´ ıa, Flash sintering incubation kinetics, npj Comput. Mater.6, 1–8 (2020). 8

    2020

  27. [35]

    A. S. Nowick, Defects in ceramic oxides, MRS Bull.16, 38–41 (1991)

    1991

  28. [36]

    Bogicevic, C

    A. Bogicevic, C. Wolverton, G. M. Crosbie, and E. B. Stechel, Defect ordering in aliovalently doped cubic zirco- nia from first principles, Phys. Rev. B64, 014106 (2001)

    2001

  29. [37]

    E. Lee, F. B. Prinz, and W. Cai, Enhancing ionic conduc- tivity of bulk single-crystal yttria-stabilized zirconia by tailoring dopant distribution, Phys. Rev. B83, 052301 (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    Guan, K.-X

    S.-H. Guan, K.-X. Zhang, C. Shang, and Z.-P. Liu, Sta- bility and anion diffusion kinetics of yttria-stabilized zir- conia resolved from machine learning global potential en- ergy surface exploration, J. Chem. Phys.152, 094703 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Z. Wang, Z. Q. Chen, J. Zhu, S. J. Wang, and X. Guo, Evidence of defect associates in yttrium-stabilized zirco- nia, Radiat. Phys. Chem.58, 697–701 (2000)

    2000

  32. [40]

    V. R. PaiVerneker, A. N. Petelin, F. J. Crowne, and D. C. Nagle, Color-center-induced band-gap shift in yttria- stabilized zirconia, Phys. Rev. B40, 8555–8557 (1989)

    1989

  33. [41]

    D. M. Smyth,The Defect Chemistry of Metal Oxides (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 2000)

    2000

  34. [42]

    K. P. McKenna, M. J. Wolf, A. L. Shluger, S. Lany, and A. Zunger, Two-dimensional polaronic behavior in the binary oxides m-HfO2 and m-ZrO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 116403 (2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    Osorio-Guill´ en, S

    J. Osorio-Guill´ en, S. Lany, S. V. Barabash, and A. Zunger, Nonstoichiometry as a source of magnetism in otherwise nonmagnetic oxides: Magnetically interacting cation vacancies and their percolation, Phys. Rev. B75, 184421 (2007)

    2007

  36. [44]

    Emanuelsson, P

    P. Emanuelsson, P. Omling, B. K. Meyer, M. Wienecke, and M. Schenk, Identification of the cadmium vacancy in CdTe by electron paramagnetic resonance, Phys. Rev. B 47, 15578–15580 (1993)

    1993

  37. [45]

    H. Peng, I. G. McKendry, R. Ding, A. C. Thenuwara, Q. Kang, S. L. Shumlas, D. R. Strongin, M. J. Zdilla, and J. P. Perdew, Redox properties of birnessite from a defect perspective, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.114, 9523–9528 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Souvatzis and S

    P. Souvatzis and S. P. Rudin, Dynamical stabilization of cubic ZrO 2 by phonon-phonon interactions: Ab initio calculations, Phys. Rev. B78, 184304 (2008)

    2008

  39. [47]

    Y. Dong, L. Qi, A. Alvarez, J. Li, and I.-W. Chen, En- hanced mobility of cations and anions in the redox state: The polaronium mechanism, Acta Mater.232, 117941 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Dong and I.-W

    Y. Dong and I.-W. Chen, Predicting the onset of flash sintering, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.98, 2333–2335 (2015)

    2015

  41. [49]

    Y. Dong, Y. Huang, D. Ding, W. Wu, X. Yao, and J. Li, Chemical and structural origin of hole states in yttria- stabilized zirconia, Acta Mater.203, 116487 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    Chang and W.-s

    S.-m. Chang and W.-s. Liu, Surface doping is more ben- eficial than bulk doping to the photocatalytic activity of vanadium-doped TiO 2, Appl. Catal. B Environ.101, 333–342 (2011)

    2011

  43. [51]

    Panepinto, A

    A. Panepinto, A. Krumpmann, D. Cornil, J. Cornil, and R. Snyders, Switching the electrical characteristics of TiO2 fromn-type top-type by ion implantation, Appl. Surf. Sci.563, 150274 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    Zhang, J

    Y. Zhang, J. Nie, and J. Luo, Effects of phase and dop- ing on flash sintering of TiO 2, J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn.124, 296–300 (2016)

    2016

  45. [53]

    X. Zou, M. Liu, and B. I. Yakobson, Electronic doping controlled migration of dislocations in polycrystalline 2D WS2, Small15, 1805145 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    X. Zou, M. Liu, Z. Shi, and B. I. Yakobson, Environment- controlled dislocation migration and superplasticity in monolayer MoS2, Nano Lett.15, 3495–3500 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    W. Xu, A. Maksymenko, S. Hasan, J. J. Mel´ endez, and E. Olevsky, Effect of external electric field on diffusivity and flash sintering of 8YSZ: A molecular dynamics study, Acta Mater.206, 116596 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.