REVIEW 2 cited by
Can Language Models be Instructed to Protect Personal Information?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large multimodal language models have proven transformative in numerous applications. However, these models have been shown to memorize and leak pre-training data, raising serious user privacy and information security concerns. While data leaks should be prevented, it is also crucial to examine the trade-off between the privacy protection and model utility of proposed approaches. In this paper, we introduce PrivQA -- a multimodal benchmark to assess this privacy/utility trade-off when a model is instructed to protect specific categories of personal information in a simulated scenario. We also propose a technique to iteratively self-moderate responses, which significantly improves privacy. However, through a series of red-teaming experiments, we find that adversaries can also easily circumvent these protections with simple jailbreaking methods through textual and/or image inputs. We believe PrivQA has the potential to support the development of new models with improved privacy protections, as well as the adversarial robustness of these protections. We release the entire PrivQA dataset at https://llm-access-control.github.io/.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Exploring User Security and Privacy Attitudes and Concerns Toward the Use of General-Purpose LLM Chatbots for Mental Health
Many users of general-purpose LLM chatbots for mental health misunderstand how their data is protected, conflating human-like empathy with accountability and undervaluing emotional disclosures as a privacy risk.
-
A Survey on Training-free Alignment of Large Language Models
A survey that catalogs and categorizes training-free LLM alignment methods into pre-decoding, in-decoding, and post-decoding, with a limited experimental comparison on one model.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.