Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

The bunkbed conjecture still holds for cactus graphs and for graphs with certain biconnected components

As of 20 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 3 of 3 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2506.09264.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2506.09264 v1

Coverage vector

measured 3 of 3 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T05:11:38.091562Z

measured 3 of 3 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

3 of 3 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact2
  • verified fuzzy1
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation ad71e7ea-4a75-4705-9719-6122823c9970 · outbound

This paper cites The complexity of some edge deletion problems.

The bunkbed conjecture still holds for cactus graphs and for graphs with certain biconnected components The complexity of some edge deletion problems

Reference 1

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-07T05:11:38.182516Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T05:11:38.080248Z digest=sha256:ad810b8add9d91c7d0012aa0e2e084ad38374148000b3dcc9f4822f4c12a76c8

Observation 4a0dd5ce-fc7d-467e-a5e6-b1d4f4b7d4aa · outbound

This paper cites The bunkbed conjecture is not robust to generalisation.

The bunkbed conjecture still holds for cactus graphs and for graphs with certain biconnected components The bunkbed conjecture is not robust to generalisation

Reference 3

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-07T05:11:38.137475Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T05:11:38.091562Z digest=sha256:9dc9b4ddd87a4ae76c92f8c8bc80f6d75cbb98ef217f6ceb473df430530d1301

Observation 140adf9c-2ab2-4bf5-9035-f11d4fe3d864 · outbound

This paper cites The bunkbed conjecture is false.

The bunkbed conjecture still holds for cactus graphs and for graphs with certain biconnected components The bunkbed conjecture is false

Reference 362

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-07T05:11:38.165273Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T05:11:38.086114Z digest=sha256:98e567933afa46a352832ba63080f440dfe827ad000fabbd15ffcdfc507fe5f0

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.