Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Calamari - A High-Performance Tensorflow-based Deep Learning Package for Optical Character Recognition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.02004 v3 pith:HQXRZYBQ submitted 2018-07-05 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords calamaricharacterrecognitionreuldatasetdeephistoricalnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) on contemporary and historical data is still in the focus of many researchers. Especially historical prints require book specific trained OCR models to achieve applicable results (Springmann and L\"udeling, 2016, Reul et al., 2017a). To reduce the human effort for manually annotating ground truth (GT) various techniques such as voting and pretraining have shown to be very efficient (Reul et al., 2018a, Reul et al., 2018b). Calamari is a new open source OCR line recognition software that both uses state-of-the art Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) implemented in Tensorflow and giving native support for techniques such as pretraining and voting. The customizable network architectures constructed of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNS) and Long-ShortTerm-Memory (LSTM) layers are trained by the so-called Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) algorithm of Graves et al. (2006). Optional usage of a GPU drastically reduces the computation times for both training and prediction. We use two different datasets to compare the performance of Calamari to OCRopy, OCRopus3, and Tesseract 4. Calamari reaches a Character Error Rate (CER) of 0.11% on the UW3 dataset written in modern English and 0.18% on the DTA19 dataset written in German Fraktur, which considerably outperforms the results of the existing softwares.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scaling Mobile Chaos Testing with AI-Driven Test Execution

    cs.SE 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An integrated LLM-based mobile testing system and service-level fault injector ran 180,000+ chaos tests at Uber, finding 23 resilience defects that manual and backend-only testing missed.

  2. NER4all or Context is All You Need: Using LLMs for low-effort, high-performance NER on historical texts. A humanities informed approach

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    With context-rich prompts and persona modeling, ChatGPT-4o outperformed off-the-shelf spaCy and flair on named entity recognition for a 1921 German travel guide.

Pith tools