Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

A world model that generates visuo-tactile rollouts improves contact-rich policies from 42.5% to 67.5% average success.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 04:23 UTC pith:HQYHQTBN

load-bearing objection Plausible and timely idea, but the headline result isn't isolated from manual data curation and extra data volume; the stats are too thin to support the strongest claim. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22530 v1 pith:HQYHQTBN submitted 2026-07-24 cs.RO

ViTacWorld: Scaling Visuo-Tactile World Models for Contact-Rich Robot Manipulation

Yunao Huang , Shiyu Sang , Haotao Lu , Suting Ni , Shijie Wu , Ziyang Guo , Ye Shi , Jingya Wang This is my paper
classification cs.RO
keywords world modeltactile sensingcontact-rich manipulationpolicy learningdata augmentationdiffusion transformerrobot manipulationvisuo-tactile data
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that an action-conditioned world model can learn to generate future frames for both cameras and tactile sensors from robot actions. These generated rollouts, when filtered and added to real demonstrations, improve real-robot policies on four contact-rich tasks. The authors also claim their model is the first to use a world model for visuo-tactile-action trajectory generation and policy evaluation. If correct, the approach offers a scalable way to obtain contact-rich training data without additional real-robot teleoperation.

Core claim

The central claim is that action-conditioned visuo-tactile world models can serve as data generators for downstream tactile policies. The model, after pretraining on large real and simulated visuo-tactile trajectories and finetuning on real policy rollouts, predicts aligned visual and tactile observations conditioned on robot actions. The paper shows that augmenting expert demonstrations with 200 selected generated successful rollouts improves average real-robot success from 42.5% to 67.5% for a tactile policy, and that a second round of generated data reaches 80%. The model also provides a lightweight policy evaluation by predicting success or failure from the same initial conditions, match

What carries the argument

The core object is a stream-aware diffusion transformer that treats the tactile sensor as an additional image view alongside a main camera and wrist camera. Each stream is encoded to latent tokens; stream identity embeddings condition generation, in-stream self-attention preserves modality integrity, and cross-view attention exchanges contact information between tactile and visual tokens. The model inherits a pretrained action-conditioned video prior, is pretrained on real and simulated visuo-tactile trajectories, then finetuned on real demonstrations and policy rollouts. This design lets the model generate temporally aligned visual and tactile frames from a shared action sequence.

Load-bearing premise

The measured gains rely on the assumption that the improvement comes from the world model's learned dynamics, but the selected generated rollouts are filtered by human judgment of success and plausibility (Sec. 3.4) and success rates are measured over only 10 trials per task with no error bars, so the effect could partly come from the filter or from trial noise.

What would settle it

Train the same downstream policies on an equal number of real policy rollouts or random replays instead of ViTacWorld-generated dreams; if success rates match or exceed 67.5%, the central claim is false. Also rerun the real-robot evaluations with many more trials and multiple random seeds; if the 42.5-to-67.5 gap shrinks or reverses, the difference may be noise.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Augmenting expert data with ViTacWorld rollouts improves success for a tactile policy from 42.5% to 67.5% across four tasks; a second round of generated data reaches 80% average success.
  • Gains appear for both vision-only and tactile policies, suggesting the generated data carries general task-level supervision.
  • The same world model can predict policy outcomes from the same initial states, offering a pre-deployment evaluation signal that matched real results on 9 of 10 U-block trials.
  • Pretraining with large real and task-aligned simulated data improves generative quality, with the largest perceptual gains on the tactile stream.
  • The approach can be iterated: using an improved policy to generate a new round of dream data leads to further improvement, at least until tasks approach saturation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves open whether the manual filter for selecting successful generated rollouts is the main driver of improvement; an automated or randomized-dream baseline could separate the generator's contribution from the filter's.
  • The transfer to a different image-based tactile sensor described in the appendix suggests the method may generalize across sensor hardware, but only a small fine-tuning experiment demonstrates it; more systematic sensor-agnostic training could strengthen this.
  • If the 'smaller sim-to-real gap for tactile signals' holds, this recipe could extend to other contact-rich domains such as dexterous hands or soft manipulation, where tactile simulators are less mature.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces ViTacWorld, an action-conditioned visuo-tactile world model that generates temporally aligned visual and tactile rollouts conditioned on robot action chunks. The model is initialized from a Cosmos-Predict2.5 video prior, pretrained on large-scale public visuo-tactile data (OmniViTac) and task-aligned Isaac Sim data, and then fine-tuned on real expert demonstrations and policy rollouts from a Franka Panda robot. The authors claim that augmenting expert demonstrations with ViTacWorld-generated, filtered 'dream' rollouts improves downstream tactile policies, and that the same model can serve as a lightweight policy evaluator by predicting task success from imagined rollouts. Experiments are conducted on four contact-rich manipulation tasks (charger plugging, cucumber peeling, U-block insertion, cuboid insertion) with 10 real-robot trials per condition. The main quantitative claim is an average success-rate improvement from 42.5% (expert-only) to 67.5% for the π0.5 + tactile policy when round-1 ViTacWorld rollouts are added, with a further improvement to 80.0% after round-2 rollouts. The paper also reports generation-quality ablations (PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS) in Table 2.

Significance. If the central claim is validated, ViTacWorld would be a useful contribution to contact-rich manipulation: it provides a concrete recipe for leveraging public tactile datasets and simulation to scale visuo-tactile data, and it extends action-conditioned video world models to include tactile streams as a first-class output. The paper's strengths include the use of a large pretraining corpus, task-aligned simulation, real-robot evaluation, matched initial-state evaluation in the appendix, and an honest limitations statement. The main empirical claim, however, is not yet isolated from confounds: the dream data are manually filtered, no control condition adds equivalent unfiltered or non-world-model data, and all success rates rest on 10 trials without confidence intervals or significance testing. Because the paper's contribution is specifically about the world model as a scalable data generator, these confounds directly affect the validity of the central conclusion.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.4, Sec. 4.2, Sec. 6] The central claim that ViTacWorld's learned dynamics cause the policy improvement in Table 1 is not isolated from two confounds: added data volume and manual curation. The dream data are filtered 'according to task success and visual-tactile plausibility' (Sec. 3.4), and Sec. 6 admits that selection 'still relies partly on manual inspection.' The paper provides no control condition that adds an equivalent number of (a) unfiltered ViTacWorld rollouts, (b) real-robot replay or random rollouts, or (c) additional expert demonstrations matched for dataset size. Without such a baseline, the observed 42.5% to 67.5% average improvement could be produced by the extra training data per se or by the human excluding implausible trajectories, rather than by the learned visuo-tactile dynamics. Since scalability is part of the contribution, a human-in-the-loop curation step weakens the mechanism. Pleas
  2. [Sec. 4.1, Table 1] All real-robot success rates are based on 10 trials per task with no confidence intervals, no repeated seeds, and no significance testing. Several reported improvements are one-trial changes; for example, U-Block π0.5 stays 60 in both conditions and Cuboid π0.5 stays 40, so the 'consistently improves' statement is not statistically supported. A difference of one trial (e.g., U-Block ACT+tactile from 30 to 40) is well within chance for n=10. Please report binomial confidence intervals, run more trials or seeds, or apply a paired significance test across the matched initial states; otherwise the headline improvement may reflect noise.
  3. [Sec. A.1, Table 3, Table 4] The policy-evaluation contribution is also under-validated. Success labels for imagined rollouts are assigned by the authors' judgment of whether the trajectory 'completes the task with plausible visual-tactile interaction' (Sec. A.1). Table 4 reports 90% agreement on a single task (U-Block), and Table 3 gives only per-task aggregate gaps without confidence intervals or an automated, pre-registered success criterion. This makes it difficult to distinguish a genuine evaluation signal from the human already knowing the real outcome. Please define an objective success-detection rule for generated rollouts, report agreement across all tasks and initial conditions, and compare against a chance-level or image-similarity baseline.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract, Sec. 2] The 'first framework' claim should be qualified. Refs. [15,16,17,31,32,33] already describe visuo-tactile world or world-action models that predict future tactile observations. The novelty appears to be specifically the use of such a model as a data generator for downstream policy learning, not visuo-tactile trajectory generation per se. Please phrase the claim to avoid overstatement.
  2. [Sec. 3.4] 'Visual-tactile plausibility' is never operationally defined. Please specify what criteria are used (e.g., contact consistency, end-effector motion, object permanence) and whether the filter is applied by the authors, a learned model, or a combination. This matters because the contribution depends on what the filter removes.
  3. [Appendix C.2] The OmniViTac-to-simulation sampling ratio of approximately 2:1 is presented without sensitivity analysis. Since simulated data are a key pretraining ingredient, a brief study varying this ratio (or at least reporting the loss curves) would strengthen the claim that the chosen balance is not arbitrary.
  4. [Table 2] The view-wise PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS numbers are reported without error bars, and the tactile-stream differences between variants are very small (e.g., PSNR 35.127 vs 35.225). Please report standard deviations over validation clips and note that pixel-level metrics may be dominated by static or non-contact frames.
  5. [Throughout] Minor formatting issues: 'V AE' in Sec. 3.2, 'VT-W AM' in Sec. 2, and the reference author list for [52] ('P. Intelligence') are nonstandard. Please normalize the author lists and spacing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the training and evaluation pipeline is empirically grounded with real-robot success rates and held-out validation clips.

full rationale

ViTacWorld is an empirical systems paper, not a derivation from first principles, so the circularity criteria must be applied to its actual claimed predictions. The world model is trained with a standard latent denoising objective (Eq. 4) on external public data, task-aligned simulation, and real policy rollouts; there is no equation-level identity between the model's outputs and the downstream policy improvements. The central claim that generated rollouts improve policy performance is tested by measuring real-robot success rates (Table 1) on trials separate from the dream data, so the outcome is not forced by the training objective. World-model generation quality is evaluated on held-out real-world validation clips (Table 2), and policy evaluation (Table 3) is compared against matched real-robot executions, providing external benchmarks. The self-citations ([20], [34]) appear only as related-work examples and are not load-bearing. The acknowledged manual filtering of dream data (Sec. 3.4 and Sec. 6) and the absence of a control for added data volume are experimental confounds and scalability limitations, not circular reductions; they should be weighed as correctness/robustness concerns rather than circularity. Overall, the paper's claimed predictions are not equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests mainly on unverified domain assumptions (tactile sim-to-real gap, transferability of the video prior, reliability of manual dream-data filtering) and hand-chosen data-selection choices. There are no fitted physical constants or invented entities; the architecture is a standard diffusion-transformer adaptation.

free parameters (2)
  • Dream-data budget and manual success filter = 200 selected rollouts (50 per task); 'task success and visual-tactile plausibility'
    The number of selected rollouts and the success/plausibility threshold are hand-chosen (Sec 3.4); the policy-improvement result is reported after this selection, so the improvement may depend on these choices.
  • OmniViTac-to-simulation sampling ratio = approx 2:1
    Appendix C.2 states simulated trajectories are upsampled with an approximate 2:1 sampling ratio between OmniViTac and simulated data; chosen by hand to balance sources.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Tactile signals exhibit a smaller simulation-to-real gap than purely visual observations
    Stated in Sec 1 and 3.3 as motivation for using simulated tactile data in pretraining; no measurement or prior citation supports this for the Xense sensor.
  • domain assumption The Cosmos-Predict2.5 action-conditioned checkpoint provides a transferable motion prior for visuo-tactile generation
    Sec 3.2 says ViTacWorld 'inherits strong motion priors and focuses its capacity on acquiring tactile dynamics'; the paper does not ablate the specific prior versus training from scratch, only whole pretraining.
  • ad hoc to paper Manually filtered dream rollouts are a reliable training signal for downstream policies
    Sec 3.4 filters by task success and visual-tactile plausibility; Sec 6 admits partial manual inspection. No automated or objective criterion is given, so the filter is a procedure invented for this paper.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 14239 in / 16102 out tokens · 151173 ms · 2026-08-01T04:23:46.244059+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Contact-rich robot manipulation requires physical interaction cues that are often invisible to cameras, making tactile sensing essential for robust control. However, scaling visuo-tactile robot learning remains difficult because real tactile interaction data are expensive to collect, hardware-dependent, and limited in task and scene diversity. We present ViTacWorld, an action-conditioned visuo-tactile world model for scalable contact-rich robot manipulation. ViTacWorld leverages public real tactile datasets and a constructed simulation environment to scale visuo-tactile-action data, exploiting the fact that tactile signals are directly grounded in physical contact and can exhibit a smaller simulation-to-real gap than purely visual observations. The model is first pretrained with large-scale real and simulated visuo-tactile trajectories, and then finetuned with real-world policy rollouts to better match downstream manipulation behaviors. Given robot actions, ViTacWorld predicts temporally aligned visual observations and tactile feedback, enabling visuo-tactile-action rollout generation. To the best of our knowledge, ViTacWorld is the first framework that uses a world model for robot visuo-tactile-action trajectory generation and policy evaluation. It serves two roles: synthesizing rollouts to improve downstream tactile policies, and evaluating policies by predicting action-conditioned visuo-tactile outcomes under controlled action sequences. Experiments on contact-rich manipulation tasks show that ViTacWorld generates physically meaningful rollouts, improves policy performance through scalable data augmentation, and enables action-conditioned policy evaluation. Project page: https://vitacworld.github.io/

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22530 by Haotao Lu, Jingya Wang, Shijie Wu, Shiyu Sang, Suting Ni, Ye Shi, Yunao Huang, Ziyang Guo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of ViTacWorld. Right side shows scaling training pipeline, where real visuo￾tactile data and task-aligned simulation data are used for pretraining, followed by real robot task data and policy rollout data for target-domain tuning. Left side illustrates the action-conditioned visuo-tactile world model and its rollout generation process. Visual and tactile streams are encoded into latent tokens and … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Qualitative comparison of real-robot rollouts using the same [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Qualitative world-model predictions on held-out validation clips. The model receives [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative example of ViTacWorld-based policy evaluation on U-Block insertion. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Additional qualitative comparisons of real-robot rollouts across contact-rich tasks. For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Supplementary tactile prediction visualization with GelSight Mini-style tactile observa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TacWAM: Anchor-Guided World Action Model with Mechanics-Aware Tactile Prediction

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Mechanics-aware future tactile prediction plus history and train-time isolation of future tokens raises real-robot contact-rich success from ~37.5% to 75% average.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 21 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S. Dong, W. Yuan, and E. H. Adelson. Improved gelsight tactile sensor for measuring geom- etry and slip. In2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 137–144, 2017

    2017

  2. [2]

    W. Yuan, S. Dong, and E. H. Adelson. Gelsight: High-resolution tactile sensors for perceiving physical properties.IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 24(3):66–77, 2017

    2017

  3. [3]

    Akinola, J

    I. Akinola, J. Xu, J. Carius, D. Fox, and Y . Narang. Tacsl: A library for visuotactile sensor simulation and learning.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    D. H. Nguyen, T. Schneider, G. Duret, A. Kshirsagar, B. Belousov, and J. Peters. Tacex: Gelsight tactile simulation in isaac sim–combining soft-body and visuotactile simulators.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04776, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    B. Chen, W. Wan, T. Chen, X. Guo, C. Xu, Y . Qi, H. Zhang, L. Wu, T. Xu, Z. Li, et al. Univtac: A unified simulation platform for visuo-tactile manipulation data generation, learning, and benchmarking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10093, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    C. Chi, Z. Xu, C. Pan, E. Cousineau, B. Burchfiel, S. Feng, R. Tedrake, and S. Song. Universal manipulation interface: In-the-wild robot teaching without in-the-wild robots. InRobotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Zhaxizhuoma, K

    Z. Zhaxizhuoma, K. Liu, C. Guan, Z. Jia, Z. Wu, X. Liu, T. Wang, S. Liang, et al. Fast- umi: A scalable and hardware-independent universal manipulation interface with dataset. In Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2025

    2025

  8. [8]

    L. Wu, C. Yu, J. Ren, L. Chen, Y . Jiang, R. Huang, G. Gu, and H. Li. Freetacman: Robot-free visuo-tactile data collection system for contact-rich manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01941, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Y . Xu, L. Wei, P. An, Q. Zhang, and Y .-L. Li. exumi: Extensible robot teaching system with action-aware task-agnostic tactile representation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.14688, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Blattmann, T

    A. Blattmann, T. Dockhorn, S. Kulal, D. Mendelevitch, M. Kilian, D. Lorenz, Y . Levi, Z. En- glish, V . V oleti, A. Letts, et al. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    X. Chi, P. Jia, C.-K. Fan, X. Ju, W. Mi, K. Zhang, Z. Qin, W. Tian, K. Ge, H. Li, et al. Wow: Towards a world omniscient world model through embodied interaction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.22642, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    T. Wan, A. Wang, B. Ai, B. Wen, C. Mao, C.-W. Xie, D. Chen, F. Yu, H. Zhao, J. Yang, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    A. Ali, J. Bai, M. Bala, Y . Balaji, A. Blakeman, T. Cai, J. Cao, T. Cao, E. Cha, Y .-W. Chao, et al. World simulation with video foundation models for physical ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.00062, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Huang, Q

    S. Huang, Q. Chen, X. Zhang, J. Sun, and M. Schwager. Particleformer: A 3d point cloud world model for multi-object, multi-material robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.23126, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Higuera, S

    C. Higuera, S. Arnaud, B. Boots, M. Mukadam, F. R. Hogan, and F. Meier. Visuo-tactile world models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.06001, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Zheng, S

    Y . Zheng, S. Gu, W. Li, Y . Zheng, Y . Zang, S. Tian, X. Li, C. Hao, C. Gao, S. Liu, et al. Omnivta: Visuo-tactile world modeling for contact-rich robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.19201, 2026. 10

    arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    H. Yuan, W. Yi, Z. Zhang, W. Chen, Y . Mo, J. Yin, X. Li, X. Zeng, C. Wen, C. Lu, et al. Vtam: Video-tactile-action models for complex physical interaction beyond vlas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.23481, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    C. Chi, Z. Xu, S. Feng, E. Cousineau, Y . Du, B. Burchfiel, R. Tedrake, and S. Song. Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion.The International Journal of Robotics Research, 44(10-11):1684–1704, 2025

    2025

  19. [19]

    Y . Ze, G. Zhang, K. Zhang, C. Hu, M. Wang, and H. Xu. 3d diffusion policy: Generalizable visuomotor policy learning via simple 3d representations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03954, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    S. Wu, Y . Zhu, Y . Huang, K. Zhu, J. Gu, J. Yu, Y . Shi, and J. Wang. Afforddp: Generalizable diffusion policy with transferable affordance. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 6971–6980, 2025

    2025

  21. [21]

    Huang, Y

    B. Huang, Y . Wang, X. Yang, Y . Luo, and Y . Li. 3d-vitac: Learning fine-grained manipulation with visuo-tactile sensing. InConference on Robot Learning, 2024

    2024

  22. [22]

    H. Xue, J. Ren, W. Chen, G. Zhang, Y . Fang, G. Gu, H. Xu, and C. Lu. Reactive diffusion policy: Slow-fast visual-tactile policy learning for contact-rich manipulation. InProceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2025

    2025

  23. [23]

    J. Zhao, N. Kuppuswamy, S. Feng, B. Burchfiel, and E. Adelson. Polytouch: A robust multi- modal tactile sensor for contact-rich manipulation using tactile-diffusion policies. In2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 104–110. IEEE, 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    J. Bi, K. Y . Ma, C. Hao, M. S. Zheng, and H. Soh. Vla-touch: Enhancing vision-language- action model with dual-level tactile feedback.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2026

    2026

  25. [25]

    Huang, S

    J. Huang, S. Wang, F. Lin, Y . Hu, C. Wen, and Y . Gao. Tactile-vla: unlocking vision- language-action model’s physical knowledge for tactile generalization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.09160, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    J. Yu, H. Liu, Q. Yu, J. Ren, C. Hao, H. Ding, G. Huang, G. Huang, Y . Song, P. Cai, et al. Forcevla: Enhancing vla models with a force-aware moe for contact-rich manipulation.Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38:93409–93439, 2026

    2026

  27. [27]

    Y . Li, H. Jiang, J. Xia, H. Zhang, J. Du, Y . Zhou, J. Zeng, C. Hao, J. Ren, Q. Yu, et al. Forcevla2: Unleashing hybrid force-position control with force awareness for contact-rich ma- nipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.15169, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    P. Hao, C. Zhang, D. Li, X. Cao, X. Hao, S. Cui, and S. Wang. Tla: Tactile-language-action model for contact-rich manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08548, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Morissette, A

    C. Morissette, A. Abyaneh, W.-D. Chang, A. Houssaini, D. Meger, H.-C. Lin, J. Tremblay, and G. Dudek. Tactile modality fusion for vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.14604, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Zhang, P

    C. Zhang, P. Hao, X. Cao, X. Hao, S. Cui, and S. Wang. Vtla: Vision-tactile-language- action model with preference learning for insertion manipulation.Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics, page 100333, 2026

    2026

  31. [31]

    G. Ye, Z. Zhang, X. Zhao, S. Wu, H. Lu, S. Lu, and H. Liu. Learning to feel the future: Dreamtacvla for contact-rich manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.23864, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    S. Tian, Y . Zheng, Y . Zheng, S. Gu, Y . Zang, Y . Qin, W. Li, H. Li, W. Ding, and D. Zhao. Vt-wam: Visual-tactile world action model for contact-rich manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.02503, 2026. 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Y . Zang, Y . Zheng, X. Nie, Y . Zheng, S. Tian, S. Gu, C. Gao, Z. Wang, S. Yan, and W. Ding. Tacforesight: Force-guided tactile world model for contact-rich manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.11184, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    S. Ni, H. Zhang, Z. Wei, G. Chen, C. Zhang, Y . Shi, and J. Wang. Tactidex: A real- world tactile-guided benchmark for human-like dexterous manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.09190, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Y . R. Song, J. Li, R. Fu, D. Murphy, K. Zhou, R. Shiv, Y . Li, H. Xiong, C. E. Owens, Y . Du, et al. Opentouch: Bringing full-hand touch to real-world interaction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16842, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    J. Zhou, F. Hong, Y . Li, Y . Zhao, Y . Cen, Z. Liu, J. Huang, Z. Chen, R. Zhang, W. Zhu, et al. Touchworld: A predictive and reactive tactile foundation model for dexterous manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.07287, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Khazatsky, K

    A. Khazatsky, K. Pertsch, S. Nair, A. Balakrishna, S. Dasari, S. Karamcheti, S. Nasiriany, M. K. Srirama, L. Y . Chen, K. Ellis, et al. Droid: A large-scale in-the-wild robot manipulation dataset. InRobotics: Science and Systems, 2024

    2024

  38. [38]

    K. Yu, Y . Han, Q. Wang, V . Saxena, D. Xu, and Y . Zhao. Mimictouch: Leveraging multi-modal human tactile demonstrations for contact-rich manipulation. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 4844–4865. PMLR, 2025

    2025

  39. [39]

    F. Liu, C. Li, Y . Qin, J. Xu, P. Abbeel, and R. Chen. Vitamin: Learning contact-rich tasks through robot-free visuo-tactile manipulation interface.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06156, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    M. Xu, H. Zhang, Y . Hou, Z. Xu, L. Fan, M. Veloso, and S. Song. Dexumi: Using human hand as the universal manipulation interface for dexterous manipulation. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 437–459. PMLR, 2025

    2025

  41. [41]

    Cheng, K

    T. Cheng, K. Chen, L. Chen, L. Zhang, Y . Zhang, Y . Ling, M. Hamad, Z. Bing, F. Wu, K. Sharma, et al. Tacumi: A multi-modal universal manipulation interface for contact-rich tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.14550, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    S. Wang, M. Lambeta, P.-W. Chou, and R. Calandra. Tacto: A fast, flexible, and open-source simulator for high-resolution vision-based tactile sensors.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(2):3930–3937, 2022

    2022

  43. [43]

    Si and W

    Z. Si and W. Yuan. Taxim: An example-based simulation model for gelsight tactile sensors. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(2):2361–2368, 2022

    2022

  44. [44]

    Z. Si, G. Zhang, Q. Ben, B. Romero, Z. Xian, C. Liu, and C. Gan. Difftactile: A physics- based differentiable tactile simulator for contact-rich robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08716, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Y . Li, W. Du, C. Yu, P. Li, Z. Zhao, T. Liu, C. Jiang, Y . Zhu, and S. Huang. Taccel: Scaling up vision-based tactile robotics via high-performance gpu simulation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38:94577–94604, 2026

    2026

  46. [46]

    Y . Guo, L. X. Shi, J. Chen, and C. Finn. Ctrl-world: A controllable generative world model for robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.10125, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Y . Guo, T. Lee, L. X. Shi, J. Chen, P. Liang, and C. Finn. Vlaw: Iterative co-improvement of vision-language-action policy and world model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12063, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    D. P. Kingma and M. Welling. Auto-encoding variational bayes.arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013. 12

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  49. [49]

    Peebles and S

    W. Peebles and S. Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 4195–4205, 2023

    2023

  50. [50]

    Perez, F

    E. Perez, F. Strub, H. De Vries, V . Dumoulin, and A. Courville. Film: Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 32, 2018

    2018

  51. [51]

    J. J. Liu, Y . Li, K. Shaw, T. Tao, R. Salakhutdinov, and D. Pathak. Factr: Force-attending curriculum training for contact-rich policy learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17432, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Intelligence, K

    P. Intelligence, K. Black, N. Brown, J. Darpinian, K. Dhabalia, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, et al.π 0.5: A vision-language-action model with open-world generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16054, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Round-1 rollouts

    T. Z. Zhao, V . Kumar, S. Levine, and C. Finn. Learning fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hardware.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13705, 2023. 13 Appendix Overview This appendix provides supplementary experiments, visualizations, and implementation details for ViTacWorld. Appendix A evaluates ViTacWorld as a policy evaluator and reports addition...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023