Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 44 references

York's Cavity Formalism and Quantum Modified Thermodynamics of (2+1)D Black Holes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Fractal entropy reshapes BTZ black hole thermodynamics

desk verdict The paper's specific-heat formula is correct, but its central free-energy and phase-transition claims are artifacts of a missing extrinsic-curvature term in the Brown-York energy. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09086 v2 pith:HRYWV27M submitted 2025-06-10 gr-qc

Prince A Ganai , Nadeem Ul Islam , Nazir A Ganaie This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords BTZblackholeBarrowentropyfractalhorizonYorkcavityformalismquasilocalthermodynamicsspecificheatcanonicalensemble(2+1)-dimensionalgravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether quantum corrections that change only the entropy of a black hole, leaving the spacetime geometry untouched, can alter its thermodynamic behavior. The answer, worked out for the non-rotating BTZ black hole enclosed in a finite cavity, is yes: with Barrow's fractal-horizon entropy in place of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, the Helmholtz free energy falls more steeply with horizon size and its zero crossing moves to smaller radii, so smaller black holes become thermodynamically favored. The fixed-radius specific heat stays positive but develops peaks whose height and location depend on the Barrow deformation parameter, marking a specific horizon scale of maximal thermal response. The result matters because it suggests horizon microstructure alone, without geometric backreaction, can leave observable thermodynamic imprints in lower-dimensional gravity, and it extends York's cavity formalism to a modified-entropy setting.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Barrow entropy deformation, $S(r_+) = (\pi r_+/2)^{1+\Delta/2}$ with $\Delta\in[0,1]$, inserted into York's fixed-cavity canonical ensemble. The Brown-York energy and Tolman redshifted temperature are computed from the unmodified BTZ metric, so the entropy is the only new ingredient; the specific-heat identity $C_R = T(R)\, (dS/dr_+)/(dT/dr_+)$ then converts the entropy's changed scaling into a reshaped, peaked heat-capacity profile. The thermodynamic action of the paper is to isolate the entropy channel from the geometric channel.

What would settle it

Compute the first-order backreaction on the BTZ metric sourced by the Barrow entropy deformation, using an effective stress-energy tensor for the fractal horizon; if the resulting correction to the redshifted temperature $T(R)$ is of order $\Delta$ and shifts the specific-heat peak away from Eq. (3.9), the central claim fails. An observational or numerical bound on $\Delta$ that contradicts the predicted peak shift would serve the same purpose.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that substituting the Barrow entropy $S(r_+) = (\pi r_+/2)^{1+\Delta/2}$ for the BTZ entropy $S = \pi r_+/2$ in the canonical ensemble at a fixed cavity radius $R$, while keeping the metric, the Brown-York quasilocal energy, and the Tolman redshifted temperature unchanged, produces a modified Helmholtz free energy $F(R) = \frac{R}{4l}\left(\frac{R}{\sqrt{R^2-r_+^2}}-1\right) - \frac{r_+}{2\pi l \sqrt{R^2-r_+^2}}\left(\frac{\pi r_+}{2}\right)^{1+\Delta/2}$ and a specific heat $C_R = (1+\Delta/2)(\pi/2)^{1+\Delta/2} r_+^{1+\Delta/2}(R^2-r_+^2)/R^2$. The free energy drops faster as $r_+$ grows, and its zero crossing shifts to smaller horizon radii as the deformation parameter $\Delta$ increases. The specific heat is positive for all $0<r_+<R$, peaks at an intermediate horizon radius, and the peak moves to larger radii and grows with $\Delta$. In the limit $\Delta\to 0$, both expressions reduce to the classical BTZ results.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the fractal-horizon entropy deformation changes only the entropy, leaving the BTZ spacetime geometry, and with it the cavity energy and redshifted temperature, exactly as they are classically.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every $\Delta$ in the allowed range, the BTZ black hole inside the cavity remains locally thermodynamically stable, since $C_R>0$ for all $0<r_+<R$.
  • The free-energy zero crossing moves to smaller $r_+$ as $\Delta$ grows, so quantum-deformed black holes become thermodynamically preferred at smaller sizes than the classical one.
  • The specific heat develops a peak at an intermediate horizon radius, and the peak grows and shifts to larger radii with increasing $\Delta$, marking the scale of maximal thermal response.
  • All modified quantities reduce to the classical BTZ results in the limit $\Delta\to 0$, so the entropy deformation is a consistent semiclassical extension.
  • Because the geometry is unchanged, the effects described are attributed entirely to horizon microstructure, not to modified field equations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The explicit peak formula for $C_R$ could be inverted: a measurement of the peak radius of the specific heat would give a direct estimate of $\Delta$, something the paper does not discuss.
  • The same entropy-only substitution could be applied to the rotating BTZ black hole or to charged black holes inside York cavities; the extra conserved charges would likely make the phase structure and peak response considerably richer than in the static, uncharged case.
  • In the maximal-roughness limit $\Delta\to 1$, the entropy scales as $r_+^{3/2}$, resembling other non-extensive entropy proposals; the paper does not explore this connection, but it suggests the results may extend beyond Barrow's specific model.
  • If the enhanced thermal responsiveness translates into faster entropy variation under temperature changes, it could affect evaporation rates of small BTZ black holes, although the paper stays within equilibrium thermodynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies York's finite-cavity (Brown-York) formalism to the non-rotating BTZ black hole in 2+1 dimensions and replaces the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy with the Barrow entropy S(r+)=(pi r+/2)^(1+Delta/2). It derives analytic expressions for the redshifted temperature T(R), the quasilocal energy E(R), the Helmholtz free energy F=E-TS, and the heat capacity C_R at a cavity wall r=R, and argues that increasing Delta makes the free energy drop faster, moves the peak of the specific heat to larger horizon radii, and shifts the onset of black-hole dominance to smaller sizes. The paper concludes that entropy deformation alone, without modifying the BTZ geometry, can produce meaningful thermodynamic effects in lower-dimensional gravity.

Significance. If correct, the paper would provide a simple analytic illustration of how a generalized entropy affects canonical black hole thermodynamics inside a cavity, and Eq. (3.9) for C_R is a clean closed-form result with a smooth Delta->0 limit. The authors are transparent about the fixed-geometry assumption and about the lack of observational constraints on Delta. However, the quasilocal energy is computed with an incomplete extrinsic-curvature trace, and the claimed free-energy zero crossing is not present even in the authors' own formula; these issues undermine the paper's main claims about the free-energy landscape and the phase-transition shift. The specific-heat calculation is internally consistent, but the broader conclusions are not supported as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Eq. (2.7)] In (2+1) dimensions the boundary r=R is the two-dimensional surface S^1 x time, so the trace of the extrinsic curvature of the spacelike normal n^r=sqrt(f(R)) is k(R)=f'(R)/(2 sqrt(f(R))) + sqrt(f(R))/R, not f'(R)/(2 sqrt(f(R))) as written in Eq. (2.7). The omitted angular contribution is nonzero even in flat space (f=1), where the formula in Eq. (2.7) gives k=0 although a circle of radius R has extrinsic curvature 1/R. Because Eq. (2.9) defines the Brown-York energy E(R) with this k, and because the free energy in Eqs. (2.12) and (3.5) inherits E(R), the quasilocal energy and all free-energy results derived from it are not the quantities the paper claims them to be.
  2. [§3, Eq. (3.5) and §4, Fig. 1 discussion] Even if Eq. (2.9) were accepted, inserting Delta=0 into Eq. (3.5) gives F(R)=(sqrt(R^2-r_+^2)-R)/(4l), which is strictly negative for all 0<r_+<R and approaches -R/(4l) as r_+->R. The free energy therefore has no zero crossing, so the statement in Section 4 that 'the point where F(R) crosses zero shifts toward smaller r_+' is not supported by the paper's own formula. If a different reference such as a thermal-AdS subtraction is intended, it must be defined and implemented explicitly before any conclusion about a shift in the onset of black-hole dominance can be drawn.
  3. [§3, Eq. (3.1) and §4] The central results are obtained by inserting the assumed power-law entropy S(r_+)=(pi r_+/2)^(1+Delta/2) into the classical BTZ geometry; the paper does not derive this entropy from a microscopic model, and the deformation parameter Delta is left unconstrained. Eq. (3.9) would produce a peak in C_R for any positive power a in S proportional to r_+^a, so the qualitative peak structure is not a specific prediction of Barrow entropy, and the Delta->0 limit is only a consistency check. The claims about 'quantum corrections' and 'rich thermodynamic behaviour' should be framed explicitly as consequences of the assumed entropy form, not as an independent test of the model.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2, Eq. (2.6)] The factor A(R)=2*pi*R is the circumference of the S^1 boundary, not the full induced area measure of the S^1 x time boundary; the authors should derive the quasilocal energy from the 2+1-dimensional boundary action and explain the normalization, since the present expression is not justified.
  2. [§2, text after Eq. (2.6)] The phrase 'We consider following the spacelike unit normal' should be clarified: a timelike boundary has a spacelike unit normal, and the index placement and coordinate expression for n^mu should be stated consistently with the metric signature.
  3. [§2, Eq. (2.3)] The sentence 'By Tolman's law, the redshifted temperature is defined as follows T(R)=...' is grammatically broken, and the displayed expression for the Hawking temperature is typeset incorrectly; these should be fixed.
  4. [References] Reference [7] lists the authors as 'Yun-Haung and Jie Tao'; the names should be corrected and the reference completed with accurate publication details.
  5. [§4, Figure 2 discussion] Since the classical Delta=0 curve already exhibits a peak in C_R, the statement that Barrow deformation 'introduces a new thermodynamic structure' should be softened to indicate that it shifts and enhances the existing peak rather than creating a qualitatively new feature.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper explicitly adopts Barrow entropy as an input and derives free energy and specific heat as mathematical consequences, without fitting parameters or importing load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a straightforward consistency calculation: it adopts the Barrow entropy ansatz S(r_+) = (π r_+/2)^(1+Δ/2) in Eq. (3.1), keeps the classical BTZ geometry and York-cavity temperature and energy, and then computes the Helmholtz free energy F = E − T S and specific heat C_R = T (∂S/∂T)_R. All claimed effects, such as the faster drop of F and the peaks in C_R, are direct algebraic consequences of the assumed entropy function and the standard thermodynamic definitions. The paper does not present Barrow entropy as a derived result, does not fit Δ to any data, and explicitly states that observational constraints on Δ are not yet established. No load-bearing argument relies on the present authors' own prior work, no uniqueness theorem is invoked, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The possible omission of the angular term in the extrinsic-curvature trace in Eq. (2.7) would be a correctness or validity concern, not a circularity, and therefore does not affect this score.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central results rest on the unproven Barrow entropy postulate, the assumption of a frozen classical geometry, and an incorrect extrinsic curvature computation. Δ and A0 are free parameters, while R is a boundary condition.

free parameters (3)
  • Barrow deformation parameter Δ = not fitted; varied over [0,1]
    Imported from Barrow's entropy model; the paper's results are parameterized by it and no observational constraint is applied.
  • Cavity radius R = arbitrary, R > r+
    A physical boundary parameter chosen by hand; all thermodynamic quantities depend on it.
  • Entropy normalization A0 = implicitly set to 4
    To recover S = π r+/2 at Δ=0, the area constant A0 is fixed to 4, which creates a dimensional inconsistency for Δ>0; the paper does not discuss this.
assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper Barrow entropy formula S_B = (π r+/2)^(1+Δ/2) applies to the BTZ horizon
    Postulated in Eq. (3.1) without derivation from quantum gravity; the paper restricts to semiclassical Δ values.
  • domain assumption Spacetime geometry remains the classical BTZ metric; no backreaction from the entropy deformation
    Stated in Section 3: 'the metric function f(r) and consequently the redshifted temperature T(R) may receive higher order corrections... beyond the scope of this work.'
  • ad hoc to paper Brown-York quasilocal energy expression E(R) = (1/8π)(k - k0)A with k = f'/(2√f) is correct
    Used in Eq. (2.7); the omitted √f/R term in ∇_μ n^μ makes this assumption false for a two-dimensional boundary in 2+1 dimensions.
invented entities (1)
  • Fractal horizon microstructure (Barrow entropy)
    purpose: Provides the modified entropy-area relation S_B = (A/A0)^(1+Δ/2)
    Imported from Barrow's model; no independent observational handle is provided in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of York's Cavity Formalism and Quantum Modified Thermodynamics of (2+1)D Black Holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HRYWV27M

@misc{pith2026250609086,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: York's Cavity Formalism and Quantum Modified Thermodynamics of (2+1)D Black Holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HRYWV27M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09086}
}
read the original abstract

We explore the canonical thermodynamics of the non-rotating BTZ black hole within a finite cavity by incorporating quantum corrections using Barrow entropy. We derive analytic expressions for temperature, quasilocal energy, free energy, and specific heat, all evaluated at the cavity boundary by using York's formalism. While the redshifted temperature and energy stay the same despite the entropy changes, the altered entropy affects the thermodynamic landscape. Specifically, we see that the Helmholtz free energy drops faster as the horizon size increases. The specific heat shows clear peaks, and their position and height depend on the Barrow parameter. These features signal enhanced thermal responsiveness and a shift in the onset of black hole dominance. Our results demonstrate that quantum entropy corrections alone, without modifying the geometry, can yield rich thermodynamic behaviour in lower-dimensional gravity and highlight the effectiveness of York's framework in capturing such effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.09086 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Helmholtz free energy FB(R) versus horizon radius r+ for various Barrow deformation parameters ∆. The classical case ∆ = 0 is shown as a dotted black curve. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Specific heat CR as a function of horizon radius r+ for several Barrow deformation parameters ∆. The classical BTZ case (∆ = 0) is shown as a dotted black line. The increase in CR with ∆ indicates enhanced thermodynamic stability due to quantum corrections. The Helmholtz free energy F(R), shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    E. A. Martinez, Fundamental thermodynamical equation of a self-gravitating system, Phys. Rev. D 53, 7062 (1996)

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    C. S. Peça and J. P. S. Lemos, Thermodynamics of Reissner-Nordström-anti-de Sitter black holes in the grand canonical ensemble, Phys. Rev. D 59, 124007 (1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Andre and J

    R. Andre and J. P. S. Lemos, Thermodynamics of five-dimensional Schwarzschild black holes in the canonical ensemble, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024006 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Andre and J

    R. Andre and J. P. S. Lemos, Thermodynamics of d-dimensional Schwarzschild black holes in the canonical ensemble, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064069 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Black Holes and Entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973)

    work page 1973

  6. [6]

    S. W. Hawking, Black holes and thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 13, 191 (1976)

    1976

  7. [7]

    J. W. York, Black hole thermodynamics and the Euclidean Einstein action, Phys. Rev. D 33, 2092 (1986)

    work page 1986

  8. [8]

    H. W. Braden, J. D. Brown, B. F. Whiting, and J. W. York, Charged black hole in a grand canonical ensemble, Phys. Rev. D 42, 3376 (1990)

    work page 1990

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    J. I. Gregory and S. F. Ross, Stability and the negative mode for a Schwarzschild black hole in a finite cavity, Phys. Rev. D 64, 124006 (2001)

    2001

  2. [10]

    Ba\ nados, C

    M. Ba\ nados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, Black hole in three-dimensional spacetime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1849 (1992)

    1992

  3. [11]

    Ba\ nados, M

    M. Ba\ nados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, Geometry of the (2+1) black hole, Phys. Rev. D 48, 1506 (1993); [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 88, 069902 (2013)]

    1993

  4. [12]

    Huang and J

    Y. Huang and J. Tao, Thermodynamics and phase transition of BTZ black hole in a cavity, Nucl. Phys. B 982, 115881 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    R. B. Mann and T. C. Ralph, (2+1)-Dimensional Black Holes in Thermal Cavities: Holographic Heat Engines , Phys. Rev. D 110, 024017 (2024), arXiv:2502.04567

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    J. D. Barrow, The Area of a Rough Black Hole, Phys. Lett. B 808, 135643 (2020), arXiv:2004.09444 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Capozziello and M

    S. Capozziello and M. Shokri, Barrow entropies in black hole thermodynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 13860 (2025), arXiv:2501.12987

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Ladghami et al

    Y. Ladghami et al. , Barrow Entropy and Extended Black Hole Thermodynamics, arXiv:2411.06271

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Zafar, K

    U. Zafar, K. Bamba, T. Rasheed, and K. Bhattacharya, Thermodynamic analysis of black holes with cloud of strings and quintessence via Barrow entropy, Phys. Lett. B 846, 139446 (2025), arXiv:2504.00416

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Ladghami et al

    Y. Ladghami et al. , Barrow entropy and AdS black holes in RPS thermodynamics, Phys. Dark Univ. 44, 101470 (2024), arXiv:2403.08991

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Biswas, S

    R. Biswas, S. Pal Maxwell Scalar Black Hole: Thermodynamic Properties with Barrow Entropy, arXiv:2505.17172 (May 2025)

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Belhaj et al., Cavity Approach for Rotating BTZ Black Holes: Phase Transitions and Quantum Corrections , Phys

    A. Belhaj et al., Cavity Approach for Rotating BTZ Black Holes: Phase Transitions and Quantum Corrections , Phys. Rev. D 109, 084061 (2024), arXiv:2403.11789

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Ghosh and S

    K. Ghosh and S. Sarkar, Barrow Entropy in Holographic Framework: Implications for AdS _3 /CFT _2 , JHEP 05, 102 (2025), arXiv:2501.04440

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Rizwan and A

    M. Rizwan and A. Naveena Kumara, Thermodynamic Geometry of BTZ Black Holes with Fractal Horizons , Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 112 (2024), arXiv:2402.15617

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    J. York Jr. and L. Susskind, Infrared Divergences Revisited: Modern Perspectives on Cavity Formalisms , Class. Quant. Grav. 41, 155001 (2024), arXiv:2405.08822

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Das et al., Quantum Fluctuations and Barrow Entropy: Lattice Field Theory Approach , Phys

    S. Das et al., Quantum Fluctuations and Barrow Entropy: Lattice Field Theory Approach , Phys. Lett. B 852, 138628 (2024), arXiv:2406.00345

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Gim and W

    Y. Gim and W. Kim, Extended Phase Space Thermodynamics of Cavity-Enclosed Black Holes with Variable Cosmological Constant , Nucl. Phys. B 1001, 116462 (2024), arXiv:2407.11230

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Channuie et al., Barrow Entropy as Emergent Phenomenon from Quantum Spacetime , Phys

    P. Channuie et al., Barrow Entropy as Emergent Phenomenon from Quantum Spacetime , Phys. Dark Univ. 45, 101530 (2024), arXiv:2408.09901

    2024

  19. [27]

    L. T. Santana et al., Generalized Uncertainty Principle Corrections to Barrow Entropy in Lower Dimensions , JCAP 08, 044 (2025), arXiv:2503.11876

    2025

  20. [28]

    E. N. Saridakis et al., Dynamical Barrow Parameter: Cosmological and Black Hole Implications , Phys. Rev. D 109, 126018 (2024), arXiv:2504.20031

    2024

  21. [29]

    A. M. Frassino and D. Kubizňák, Multicritical Phenomena in Cavity-Enclosed BTZ Black Holes with Modified Entropies , Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 101501 (2025), arXiv:2505.03366

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    S. H. Hendi and A. Dehghani, Barrow Entropy Corrections to Joule-Thomson Expansion of AdS Black Holes , Phys. Lett. B 854, 138715 (2025), arXiv:2506.17222

    2025

  23. [31]

    J. P. S. Lemos and G. M. Quinta, Exact Solutions for Quantum-Corrected Black Holes in Cavities: Beyond Semiclassical Approximation , Phys. Rev. D 110, 044038 (2024), arXiv:2507.00845

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    K. A. Meissner et al., Microstate Counting for Fractal Horizons: String Theory Perspective , JHEP 09, 187 (2024), arXiv:2508.19991

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Faraoni and A

    V. Faraoni and A. Giusti, Thermodynamics of Horizons: From Bekenstein-Hawking to Barrow and Beyond , Found. Phys. 54, 51 (2024), arXiv:2509.10033

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Black hole chemistry

    D. Kubizňák and R. B. Mann, "Black hole chemistry" , Can. J. Phys. 93 , 999 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Black hole thermodynamics in canonical gravity

    D. Birmingham and S. Carlip, "Black hole thermodynamics in canonical gravity" , Contemp. Phys. 59, 271 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Thermodynamic volume in 3D gravity

    M.-I. Park, "Thermodynamic volume in 3D gravity" , Phys. Lett. B 796, 7 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Quantum geometry and horizon entropy

    A. Ashtekar et al., t"Quantum geometry and horizon entropy", Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 904 (1998)

    1998

  30. [38]

    Joule-Thomson expansion in AdS

    O. Okçu and T. Aygün, "Joule-Thomson expansion in AdS" , Phys. Lett. B 773, 83 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    JT expansion in cavity-enclosed AdS

    B. Liang et al., "JT expansion in cavity-enclosed AdS" , Phys. Rev. D 106, 024024 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Barrow entropy in holographic complexity

    S. H. Hendi et al., "Barrow entropy in holographic complexity" , Phys. Lett. B 829, 137040 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, Path-integral derivation of black-hole radiance, Phys. Rev. D 13, 2188 (1976)

    1976

  34. [42]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2752 (1977)

    1977

  35. [43]

    S. W. Hawking, The path-integral approach to quantum gravity, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey , edited by S. W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1979), p. 746

    1979

  36. [44]

    Allen, Euclidean Schwarzschild negative mode, Phys

    B. Allen, Euclidean Schwarzschild negative mode, Phys. Rev. D 30, 1153 (1984)

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.