pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12874 · v1 · pith:HS35KTLHnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

A simple solution to the monopole problem: SU(5) GUT with symmetry breaking into special subgroup

Yu Hamada , Naoki Yamatsu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 06:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords monopole problemSU(5) GUTcosmic stringsphase transitiongravitational wavesLangacker-Pi mechanismsymmetry breaking
0
0 comments X

The pith

An intermediate breaking of the Standard Model gauge group to SO(3)_C × SO(2)_L lets monopoles annihilate via cosmic strings in an SU(5) GUT.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that monopoles overproduced at the GUT scale can be eliminated without post-breaking inflation. After the adjoint scalar breaks SU(5) to the Standard Model group, a further stage breaks the group to SO(3)_C × SO(2)_L. Monopoles and antimonopoles are then joined by cosmic strings that pull them together for rapid pair annihilation. The symmetry is restored afterward, and the restoration can be first-order, generating gravitational waves.

Core claim

In an SU(5) model extended by a symmetric tensor scalar, a singlet scalar, and singlet fermions, the breaking chain SU(5) → SU(3)_C × SU(2)_L × U(1)_Y → SO(3)_C × SO(2)_L → SU(3)_C × SU(2)_L × U(1)_Y causes monopoles formed at the first transition to be connected by strings during the intermediate phase, enhancing their annihilation rate to cosmologically safe levels.

What carries the argument

The intermediate symmetry breaking to SO(3)_C × SO(2)_L realized by the vacuum expectation value of a symmetric tensor scalar, which attaches cosmic strings between monopoles and antimonopoles.

If this is right

  • Monopole abundance falls below current bounds through string-mediated annihilation during the intermediate phase.
  • A first-order restoration transition produces a stochastic gravitational-wave signal that can reach the sensitivity of planned detectors for some parameter choices.
  • The model requires the listed extra scalars and fermions to produce the intermediate subgroup and the required vacuum expectation values.
  • The final restoration can be first-order or second-order according to the choice of parameters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same string-connection mechanism could be applied to other grand unified groups that admit a similar special subgroup after the Standard Model stage.
  • Detection of the predicted gravitational waves would indicate that an intermediate non-Standard-Model phase existed in the early universe.
  • The additional scalars and fermions needed for the chain may produce new collider signatures or affect proton decay rates.
  • The approach removes the requirement that inflation must occur after GUT breaking to dilute monopoles.

Load-bearing premise

The extra symmetric tensor scalar, singlet scalar, and multiple singlet fermions can be added so that the desired breaking chain occurs with stable vacuum expectation values that satisfy all other constraints.

What would settle it

A measured monopole density much higher than the model's prediction, or the complete absence of a stochastic gravitational-wave background from a first-order restoration transition, would falsify the mechanism.

read the original abstract

Grand unified theories (GUTs) predict the overproduction of magnetic monopoles, leading to the so-called monopole problem, which is often addressed by cosmological inflation that dilutes their abundance. However, if inflation occurs before the GUT symmetry breaking, monopoles are produced afterwards and the problem persists. This motivates the exploration of alternative mechanisms. We propose a simple solution based on the Langacker--Pi mechanism within an $SU(5)$ GUT framework with symmetry breaking into its special subgroup. In particular, after the gauge symmetry is broken to the Standard Model (SM) gauge group $SU(3)_C\times SU(2)_L\times U(1)_Y$ by the vacuum expectation value of an adjoint scalar, it is further broken to $SO(3)_C\times SO(2)_L$. This structure is naturally realized by introducing a symmetric tensor scalar, a singlet scalar, and multiple singlet fermions. During this intermediate phase, the monopoles become connected to antimonopoles by cosmic strings, which enhances their pair annihilation and reduces their abundance. Subsequently, the symmetry is restored to the SM gauge group. The restoration transition can be either first-order or second-order, depending on the model parameters. In the case of a first-order phase transition, a stochastic gravitational-wave (GW) signal is generated. For a certain region of the parameter space, the resulting signal can lie within the sensitivity of future GW experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a solution to the magnetic monopole problem in SU(5) GUTs by realizing an intermediate symmetry-breaking phase to SO(3)_C × SO(2)_L after the initial breaking to the SM gauge group SU(3)_C × SU(2)_L × U(1)_Y. This is achieved by introducing a symmetric tensor scalar, a singlet scalar, and multiple singlet fermions; monopoles form string networks in the intermediate phase that enhance pair annihilation, after which the symmetry is restored to the SM (via either first- or second-order transition), with a possible stochastic GW signal from a first-order transition.

Significance. If the proposed breaking chain can be realized, the work would provide a concrete, non-inflationary alternative to dilution mechanisms for the GUT monopole problem within the standard SU(5) framework, together with a potential observational signature in future GW experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / model construction] Abstract and model-construction discussion: the assertion that the desired sequence SU(5) → SM → SO(3)_C × SO(2)_L → SM is 'naturally realized' by the listed fields rests on the existence of a scalar potential admitting exactly those successive minima; no explicit potential, minimization, or vacuum-stability analysis is supplied, leaving the intermediate phase (and consequent string formation) unverified.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that monopole abundance is reduced by enhanced annihilation in the string network is stated without any calculation of network evolution, annihilation rate, or final relic density, so the quantitative solution to the monopole problem remains unestablished.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The precise role of the singlet fermions (anomaly cancellation, flat directions, or otherwise) is not specified and should be stated explicitly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / model construction] Abstract and model-construction discussion: the assertion that the desired sequence SU(5) → SM → SO(3)_C × SO(2)_L → SM is 'naturally realized' by the listed fields rests on the existence of a scalar potential admitting exactly those successive minima; no explicit potential, minimization, or vacuum-stability analysis is supplied, leaving the intermediate phase (and consequent string formation) unverified.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit scalar potential and minimization analysis would make the construction more rigorous. The claim of natural realization follows from the representation content of the adjoint, symmetric tensor, and singlet scalars, which permit the required successive vevs. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection outlining a sample potential (including the necessary quartic and cubic terms) that realizes the SU(5) → SM → SO(3)_C × SO(2)_L → SM chain, together with a brief discussion of the conditions for the successive minima. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that monopole abundance is reduced by enhanced annihilation in the string network is stated without any calculation of network evolution, annihilation rate, or final relic density, so the quantitative solution to the monopole problem remains unestablished.

    Authors: The manuscript presents a symmetry-breaking chain that enables the standard Langacker–Pi mechanism, in which cosmic strings connect monopoles to antimonopoles and thereby accelerate their annihilation. This qualitative enhancement is a well-established result in the existing literature on the mechanism. The paper does not claim to deliver a new quantitative relic-density computation; such an analysis would require dedicated numerical simulations of the string-monopole network, which lies outside the scope of the present conceptual proposal. We therefore maintain that the work establishes a viable non-inflationary pathway within SU(5) while leaving detailed network evolution for future study. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model construction supplies independent content for the intermediate phase

full rationale

The paper constructs an explicit field content (adjoint scalar for SU(5)→SM, plus symmetric tensor scalar, singlet scalar and singlet fermions for the subsequent SM→SO(3)_C×SO(2)_L→SM chain) whose vacuum expectation values are chosen to produce the desired breaking pattern. The monopole-string network and consequent annihilation then follow from the standard Langacker–Pi dynamics once that phase exists; the abundance reduction is not redefined by the choice of fields or by any self-citation. No equation equates a fitted parameter to a “prediction,” no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors’ prior work, and the central claim retains independent physical content outside the model-building assumptions. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The proposal rests on the existence of additional scalar and fermion fields whose vacuum expectation values are tuned to produce the intermediate symmetry; no independent evidence for these fields is supplied beyond the requirement that they realize the desired breaking chain.

free parameters (2)
  • VEVs of symmetric tensor and singlet scalars
    Chosen to produce the intermediate SO(3)_C × SO(2)_L phase; their magnitudes control the string tension and the duration of the phase.
  • Masses and couplings of singlet fermions
    Introduced to stabilize the potential or cancel anomalies; values are not derived from data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Langacker-Pi mechanism applies once cosmic strings form between monopoles and antimonopoles.
    Invoked to conclude that pair annihilation is enhanced; standard in the literature but not re-derived here.
  • ad hoc to paper The scalar potential admits the required sequence of minima without fine-tuning beyond the listed fields.
    Stated as naturally realized but no explicit potential is shown in the abstract.
invented entities (2)
  • Symmetric tensor scalar no independent evidence
    purpose: To drive the breaking from SM gauge group to SO(3)_C × SO(2)_L
    New field introduced to realize the intermediate phase; no independent evidence given.
  • Singlet scalar and multiple singlet fermions no independent evidence
    purpose: To complete the model and allow the desired symmetry breaking pattern
    Postulated to make the breaking chain work; no collider or cosmological signature derived outside the mechanism itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5795 in / 1903 out tokens · 24640 ms · 2026-06-27T06:49:55.839337+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 24 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Georgi and S

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow,Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces,Phys. Rev. Lett.32 (1974) 438

    1974

  2. [2]

    Fritzsch and P

    H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski,Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons,Annals Phys.93 (1975) 193

    1975

  3. [3]

    Gursey, P

    F. Gursey, P. Ramond and P. Sikivie,A Universal Gauge Theory Model Based on E6,Phys. Lett. B60(1976) 177

    1976

  4. [4]

    Inoue, A

    K. Inoue, A. Kakuto and Y. Nakano,Unification of the Lepton-Quark World by the Gauge Group SU(6),Prog. Theor. Phys.58(1977) 630

    1977

  5. [5]

    M. Ida, Y. Kayama and T. Kitazoe,Inclusion of Generations in SO(14),Prog. Theor. Phys.64 (1980) 1745

    1980

  6. [6]

    Fujimoto,SO(18) Unification,Phys

    Y. Fujimoto,SO(18) Unification,Phys. Rev. D26(1982) 3183

    1982

  7. [7]

    ’t Hooft,Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories,Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft,Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories,Nucl. Phys. B79(1974) 276

    1974

  8. [8]

    A. M. Polyakov,Particle Spectrum in Quantum Field Theory,JETP Lett.20(1974) 194

    1974

  9. [9]

    T. W. B. Kibble,Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings,J. Phys. A9(1976) 1387

    1976

  10. [10]

    W. H. Zurek,Cosmological Experiments in Superfluid Helium?,Nature317(1985) 505

    1985

  11. [11]

    Preskill,Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles,Phys

    J. Preskill,Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles,Phys. Rev. Lett.43 (1979) 1365

    1979

  12. [12]

    A. H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

    1981

  13. [13]

    A. D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys. Lett. B108(1982) 389

    1982

  14. [14]

    J. C. Pati and A. Salam,Lepton Number as the Fourth Color,Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 275

    1974

  15. [15]

    N. G. Deshpande, E. Keith and P. B. Pal,Implications of LEP results for SO(10) grand unification,Phys. Rev. D46(1993) 2261

    1993

  16. [16]

    N. G. Deshpande, E. Keith and P. B. Pal,Implications of LEP results for SO(10) grand unification with two intermediate stages,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 2892 [hep-ph/9211232]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  17. [17]

    Bertolini, L

    S. Bertolini, L. Di Luzio and M. Malinsky,Intermediate mass scales in the non-supersymmetric SO(10) grand unification: A Reappraisal,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 015013 [0903.4049]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  18. [18]

    Altarelli and D

    G. Altarelli and D. Meloni,A non supersymmetric SO(10) grand unified model for all the physics belowM GU T,JHEP08(2013) 021 [1305.1001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  19. [19]

    Ferrari, T

    S. Ferrari, T. Hambye, J. Heeck and M. H. G. Tytgat,SO(10) paths to dark matter,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 055032 [1811.07910]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Chakrabortty, R

    J. Chakrabortty, R. Maji and S. F. King,Unification, Proton Decay and Topological Defects in non-SUSY GUTs with Thresholds,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 095008 [1901.05867]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Y. Abe, T. Toma, K. Tsumura and N. Yamatsu,Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter model inspired by grand unification,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 035011 [2104.13523]. – 28 –

    arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Okada, D

    N. Okada, D. Raut, Q. Shafi and A. Thapa,Pseudo-Goldstone dark matter in SO(10),Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 095002 [2105.03419]

    arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Langacker and S.-Y

    P. Langacker and S.-Y. Pi,Magnetic Monopoles in Grand Unified Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.45 (1980) 1

    1980

  24. [24]

    Vilenkin and E

    A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard,Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects. Cambridge University Press, 7, 2000

    2000

  25. [25]

    G. R. Dvali, H. Liu and T. Vachaspati,Sweeping away the monopole problem,Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(1998) 2281 [hep-ph/9710301]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  26. [26]

    Bachmaier, G

    M. Bachmaier, G. Dvali and J. S. Valbuena-Berm´ udez,Radiation emission during the erasure of magnetic monopoles,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 103501 [2306.12958]

    arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    T. H. Farris, T. W. Kephart, T. J. Weiler and T. C. Yuan,The Minimal electroweak model for monopole annihilation,Phys. Rev. Lett.68(1992) 564

    1992

  28. [28]

    Holman, T

    R. Holman, T. W. B. Kibble and S.-J. Rey,How efficient is the Langacker-Pi mechanism of monopole annihilation?,Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 241 [hep-ph/9203209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  29. [29]

    Gates, L

    E. Gates, L. M. Krauss and J. Terning,Monopole annihilation at the electroweak scale - not!, Phys. Lett. B284(1992) 309 [hep-ph/9203208]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  30. [30]

    Dynkin,Maximal Subgroups of the Classical Groups,Amer

    E. Dynkin,Maximal Subgroups of the Classical Groups,Amer. Math. Soc. Transl.6(1957) 245

    1957

  31. [31]

    Dynkin,Semisimple Subalgebras of Semisimple Lie Algebras,Amer

    E. Dynkin,Semisimple Subalgebras of Semisimple Lie Algebras,Amer. Math. Soc. Transl.6 (1957) 111

    1957

  32. [32]

    Slansky,Group Theory for Unified Model Building,Phys

    R. Slansky,Group Theory for Unified Model Building,Phys. Rept.79(1981) 1

    1981

  33. [33]

    Cahn,Semi-Simple Lie Algebras and Their Representations

    R. Cahn,Semi-Simple Lie Algebras and Their Representations. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Company, 1984

    1984

  34. [34]

    Yamatsu,Finite-Dimensional Lie Algebras and Their Representations for Unified Model Building,1511.08771

    N. Yamatsu,Finite-Dimensional Lie Algebras and Their Representations for Unified Model Building,1511.08771

    arXiv

  35. [35]

    J. C. Pati, A. Salam and J. A. Strathdee,On Fermion number and its conservation,Nuovo Cim. A26(1975) 72

    1975

  36. [36]

    J. C. Pati, A. Salam and J. A. Strathdee,Probings Through Proton Decay andn¯nOscillations, Nucl. Phys. B185(1981) 445

    1981

  37. [37]

    Yamatsu,Special Grand Unification,PTEP2017(2017) 061B01 [1704.08827]

    N. Yamatsu,Special Grand Unification,PTEP2017(2017) 061B01 [1704.08827]

    arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Yamatsu,String-Inspired Special Grand Unification,PTEP2017(2017) 101B01 [1708.02078]

    N. Yamatsu,String-Inspired Special Grand Unification,PTEP2017(2017) 101B01 [1708.02078]

    arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Yamatsu,Family Unification in Special Grand Unification,PTEP2018(2018) 091B01 [1807.10855]

    N. Yamatsu,Family Unification in Special Grand Unification,PTEP2018(2018) 091B01 [1807.10855]

    arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Kugo and N

    T. Kugo and N. Yamatsu,Is Symmetry Breaking into Special Subgroup Special?,PTEP2019 (2019) 073B06 [1904.06857]

    arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Kugo and N

    T. Kugo and N. Yamatsu,Dynamical breaking to special or regular subgroups in theSO(N) Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model,PTEP2020(2020) 023B09 [1911.09834]

    arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    M. S. Turner and F. Wilczek,Relic gravitational waves and extended inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett. 65(1990) 3080. – 29 –

    1990

  43. [43]

    Kosowsky, M

    A. Kosowsky, M. S. Turner and R. Watkins,Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 4514

    1992

  44. [44]

    Kosowsky, M

    A. Kosowsky, M. S. Turner and R. Watkins,Gravitational waves from first order cosmological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 2026

    1992

  45. [45]

    Kosowsky and M

    A. Kosowsky and M. S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles: envelope approximation to many bubble collisions,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 4372 [astro-ph/9211004]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  46. [46]

    Kamionkowski, A

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and M. S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 2837 [astro-ph/9310044]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  47. [47]

    Li,Group Theory of the Spontaneously Broken Gauge Symmetries,Phys

    L.-F. Li,Group Theory of the Spontaneously Broken Gauge Symmetries,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 1723

    1974

  48. [48]

    S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg,Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 1888

    1973

  49. [49]

    Dolan and R

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw,Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3320

    1974

  50. [50]

    Quir´ os,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp

    M. Quir´ os,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 187–259, 1999,hep-ph/9901312

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  51. [51]

    Chitose, M

    A. Chitose, M. Ibe, S. Neda and S. Shirai,Do Cosmic String Segments Emit Gravitational Waves?,2507.12386

    arXiv

  52. [52]

    E. J. Weinberg, D. London and J. L. Rosner,Magnetic Monopoles WithZ(n) Charges,Nucl. Phys. B236(1984) 90

    1984

  53. [53]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir,Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 041301 [1304.2433]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  54. [54]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir,Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition,Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 123009 [1504.03291]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA

    C. Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions,JCAP04(2016) 001 [1512.06239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  56. [56]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir,Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 103520 [1704.05871]

    arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Lewicki and J. M. No,On the Maximal Strength of a First-Order Electroweak Phase Transition and its Gravitational Wave Signal,JCAP04(2019) 003 [1809.08242]

    arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,JCAP03(2020) 024 [1910.13125]

    C. Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,JCAP03(2020) 024 [1910.13125]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    P. B. Arnold and O. Espinosa,The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 3546 [hep-ph/9212235]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  60. [60]

    R. R. Parwani,Resummation in a hot scalar field theory,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 4695 [hep-ph/9204216]. – 30 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  61. [61]

    S. R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2929

    1977

  62. [62]

    A. D. Linde,Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature,Nucl. Phys. B216(1983) 421

    1983

  63. [63]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Lewicki and J. M. No,Gravitational waves from first-order cosmological phase transitions: lifetime of the sound wave source,JCAP07(2020) 050 [2003.07360]

    arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    G. D. Moore and T. Prokopec,Bubble Wall Velocity at the Electroweak Phase Transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 777 [hep-ph/9503296]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  65. [65]

    G. D. Moore and T. Prokopec,How fast can the wall move? A study of the electroweak phase transition dynamics,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 7182 [hep-ph/9506475]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  66. [66]

    Laurent and J

    B. Laurent and J. M. Cline,Fluid equations for fast-moving electroweak bubble walls,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 063516 [2007.10935]

    arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    G. C. Dorsch, S. J. Huber and T. Konstandin,A sonic boom in bubble wall friction,JCAP04 (2022) 010 [2112.12548]

    arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    Laurent and J

    B. Laurent and J. M. Cline,First principles determination of bubble wall velocity,Phys. Rev. D 106(2022) 023501 [2204.13120]

    arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    De Curtis, L

    S. De Curtis, L. Delle Rose, A. Guiggiani, A. Gil Muyor and G. Panico,Bubble wall dynamics at the electroweak phase transition,JHEP03(2022) 163 [2201.08220]

    arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    G. C. Dorsch and D. A. Pinto,Bubble wall velocities with an extended fluid Ansatz,JCAP04 (2024) 027 [2312.02354]

    arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Ekstedt, O

    A. Ekstedt, O. Gould, J. Hirvonen, B. Laurent, L. Niemi, P. Schicho et al.,How fast does the WallGo? A package for computing wall velocities in first-order phase transitions,JHEP04 (2025) 101 [2411.04970]

    arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    G. C. Dorsch, T. Konstandin, E. Perboni and D. A. Pinto,Non-singular solutions to the Boltzmann equation with a fluid Ansatz,JCAP04(2025) 033 [2412.09266]

    arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    J. R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J. M. No and G. Servant,Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions,JCAP06(2010) 028 [1004.4187]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  74. [74]

    Hindmarsh,Sound shell model for acoustic gravitational wave production at a first-order phase transition in the early Universe,Phys

    M. Hindmarsh,Sound shell model for acoustic gravitational wave production at a first-order phase transition in the early Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 071301 [1608.04735]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [75]

    Hindmarsh and M

    M. Hindmarsh and M. Hijazi,Gravitational waves from first order cosmological phase transitions in the sound shell model,JCAP12(2019) 062 [1909.10040]

    arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    Roper Pol, S

    A. Roper Pol, S. Procacci and C. Caprini,Characterization of the gravitational wave spectrum from sound waves within the sound shell model,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 063531 [2308.12943]

    arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    H.-k. Guo, F. Hajkarim, K. Sinha, G. White and Y. Xiao,A precise fitting formula for gravitational wave spectra from phase transitions,2407.02580

    arXiv

  78. [78]

    Amaro-Seoane et al.,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,1702.00786

    P. Amaro-Seoane et al.,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,1702.00786

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [79]

    N. Seto, S. Kawamura and T. Nakamura,Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1 Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space, Physical Review Letters87(2001) 221103 [astro-ph/0108011]. – 31 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  80. [80]

    Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Classical and Quantum Gravity27(2010) 194002

    M. Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Classical and Quantum Gravity27(2010) 194002

    2010

Showing first 80 references.