Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 68 references

Meson thermalization with a hot medium in the open Schwinger model

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In the 1+1D open Schwinger model, meson-like flux strings thermalize more slowly when the environment dissipates more strongly, is hotter, carries a larger background electric field, or has heavier fermions.

desk verdict Worth engaging with: a genuine extension of the open Schwinger model program with real new elements, though the thermalization-time proxy needs a sensitivity check before the abstract's ordering claims are fully pinned down. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13675 v2 pith:HSBSSXNX submitted 2025-01-23 hep-lat quant-ph

Takis Angelides , Yibin Guo , Karl Jansen , Stefan Kühn , Giuseppe Magnifico This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-latquant-ph PACS 11.15.Ha12.38.Mh03.65.Yz
keywords openquantumsystemslatticeSchwingermodelLindbladmasterequationtensornetworksthermalizationquark-gluonplasmamatrixproductstatesmesondynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how meson-like states settle toward thermal equilibrium when a quantum field theory is coupled to a hot environment. Using the lattice Schwinger model, a 1+1 dimensional analog of QCD with confinement, the authors couple the system to a thermal scalar bath through a Lindblad master equation and evolve the reduced density matrix with tensor networks. They define a thermalization time from the decay of the subtracted electric field on the middle link and find that it increases with all four knobs they vary: dissipation strength, environment temperature, background electric field, and fermion mass. The exercise matters because quarkonia, the bound heavy-quark states traversing the quark-gluon plasma at heavy-ion colliders, are the same kind of system, a confined bound state in a hot, dissipative medium. If the pattern carries over, heavier and more strongly coupled quarkonia should thermalize more slowly in the plasma.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Lindblad master equation for the reduced density matrix of the lattice Schwinger model in the Markovian quantum Brownian motion limit, with jump operators derived from a Yukawa coupling to a thermal $\phi^4$ bath. The density matrix is vectorized into a matrix product state and evolved with an adaptive time-dependent DMRG using a second-order Trotterization in which the Liouvillian is split into even, odd, and Taylor groups of terms. The observable carrying the argument is the subtracted electric field $\Delta F(n)$, the difference between the electric field expectation value of the string state and that of the Dirac vacuum; because this field decays monotonically to zero on every link, the time $T$ at which the middle link reaches 30 percent of its initial value serves as a relative thermalization time. The reflection symmetry of $\Delta F(n)$ about the middle link provides a quantitative accuracy check on the evolution, and the locality of the dissipator $D(n-k)=D\delta_{n,k}$ is what guarantees that symmetry.

What would settle it

Find a parameter pair, for instance two fermion masses at fixed $D$, $l_0$, and $T$, for which the subtracted electric field decay curves $\Delta F(n=5)(t)$ cross before reaching zero; then the 30 percent threshold times would rank the two cases differently from a 10 percent threshold, directly contradicting the claimed monotonic ordering. A simpler version is to recompute the existing $N=12$ and $N=24$ time series with a 10 percent threshold and check whether every reported inequality among $D$, $l_0$, $m$, and $T$ values survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central result is that in the open lattice Schwinger model with local dissipation $D(n-k)=D\delta_{n,k}$, the time it takes a string of electric flux, a meson analogue, to thermalize grows monotonically with the dissipator strength $D$, the environment temperature $T$, the background electric field $l_0$, and the fermion mass $m$. The same $D$-dependence is confirmed for the Schwinger boson, the theory's stable meson, and the temperature dependence is captured by a fit of the form $f(T)=a/(b+c/T)^2$. The authors also show that the subtracted mutual information between the two halves of the flux string decays more slowly when thermalization is slower, and that the tensor-network evolution preserves the reflection symmetry of the electric field to order $10^{-4}$ at $N=100$, with thermalization times stable between $N=12$ and $N=24$.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's ordering of thermalization times rests on the assumption that the electric-field signal on the middle lattice link falls smoothly to zero without any crossing between different parameter choices, so that the time to reach 30 percent of its starting value gives the same ranking as any other threshold would.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, the ordering of thermalization times by $D$, $T$, $l_0$, and $m$ is a genuine feature of this open lattice gauge theory, stable under doubling the lattice from $N=12$ to $N=24$.
  • The temperature dependence follows the functional form $f(T)=a/(b+c/T)^2$, so the model predicts a fast rise of the thermalization time at low bath temperatures and a linear rise at high temperatures.
  • Because the Schwinger boson shows the same dependence on dissipator strength, the effect is not special to the artificially prepared flux string but applies to the theory's stable meson.
  • For quarkonia phenomenology, the model supports the picture that heavier bound states such as bottomonium thermalize and dissociate more slowly than lighter ones such as charmonium in a quark-gluon-plasma-like bath.
  • The demonstrated preservation of electric-field parity to about $10^{-4}$ at $N=100$ indicates the tensor-network scheme is scalable enough for finite-size checks on open-system thermalization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension not pursued in the paper is to replace the local dissipator $D\delta_{n,k}$ with a nonlocal bath correlator; the parity symmetry and the temperature fit both rely on locality, and a nonlocal environment could change or even reverse the reported ordering of thermalization times.
  • The 30 percent threshold used to define $T$ is a proxy; since the full time series are available, a reader could rerun the analysis at a 10 percent threshold for the same parameter grid and check whether every reported inequality survives.
  • The authors' mechanistic explanation, that slower thermalization tracks a more spatially localized charge pair, suggests a direct diagnostic: measure the width of the subtracted charge distribution at a fixed time across parameters and test whether it anticorrelates with $T$.
  • If the pattern extends to higher dimensions, quarkonium suppression in heavy-ion collisions would be sensitive not only to temperature but also to local dissipation strength and background chromo-electric fields, which are currently absent from most phenomenological treatments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies meson thermalization in the open lattice Schwinger model, described by a Lindblad master equation obtained in the Markovian quantum-Brownian-motion limit with a local dissipator D(n-k)=D delta_{n,k}. The authors use tensor-network time evolution of the density matrix, represent it as a matrix product state, and track the subtracted electric field (SEF) of an initial flux string and of a Schwinger-boson state. The central results are that the thermalization time, defined as the time for the middle-link SEF to fall to 30% of its initial value, increases with dissipator strength D, background electric field l0, fermion mass m, and environment temperature T, and that a mutual-information analysis is consistent with these trends. The paper also reports simulations up to N=100 and a symmetry-preservation accuracy of about 1e-4 for the electric-field parity symmetry.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a useful step in simulating open lattice gauge theories with tensor networks: the paper shows that the open Schwinger model can be evolved as a Lindbladian system for up to 100 sites while maintaining the reflection symmetry of the electric field, and it provides a concrete numerical study of thermalization-time trends in a QCD-like toy model. Strengths of the paper are that the qualitative dependencies are direct simulation outputs, that the N=12 results are cross-checked at N=24 in Table 1, and that the N=100 symmetry check is a concrete algorithmic demonstration. The paper does not ship machine-checked proofs, code, or data, so reproducibility rests on the parameter values and method description. The main numerical claims are plausible but are tied to a threshold-based definition of the thermalization time whose ordering robustness is not demonstrated, and the temperature-dependence explanation in Sec. 4.3 relies on an unreported fit.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Fig. 2] The thermalization time T is defined as the time for the middle-link SEF to reach 30% of its initial value, and the paper justifies this choice as 'without loss of generality' by the monotonic decay of the SEF. Monotonicity of each curve individually does not exclude crossings between curves for different parameters; if two decay curves cross, the ordering of their crossing times at p=0.30 can differ from the ordering at, say, p=0.10 or p=0.70. Since every headline statement—T increases with D, l0, m, and T_env—is a comparison of these threshold-crossing times, the central claim is not fully pinned down by the presented evidence. The same caveat applies to the statement that the middle link 'consistently exhibits the largest thermalization time.' The authors should demonstrate threshold invariance explicitly, for example by plotting the crossing time t_p as a function of the threshold fraction p for the parameter families of Figs. 3 and 7, or by providing the full SEF curves for all parameter sets and showing an absence of crossings.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Eq. (4.3)] The statement that the temperature dependence of T is 'directly explained' by the functional form f(T)=a/(b+c/T)^2 rests on a fit whose parameters are not reported: no values of a, b, c, no residuals, no chi-squared, and no number of fitted points are given. With three free parameters per data set, the apparent agreement in Fig. 7 is a curve fit, not a quantitative test of the explanation. Please report the fitted coefficients with uncertainties and a goodness-of-fit measure, and state whether the parameters are the same across the different (D,l0,m) families or are floated independently for each curve. Without this information, the explanatory claim in Sec. 4.3 cannot be assessed.
  3. [Secs. 3 and 4.4] No bond-dimension or truncation-error convergence study is reported for the thermalization times. The error estimate of O(0.1) in Sec. 4.4 is inferred from the difference between N=12 and N=24, not from variations of the MPS and Trotter parameters epsilon, epsilon1, epsilon2, kappa, tau, or the bond dimension. Since T is a threshold-crossing time, small systematic errors in the SEF curves could shift T by more than the quoted 0.1 and could change the ordering of nearby parameter values, for example the small-D region of Fig. 4(a) at m=1.0. The authors should show for at least a few representative parameter sets that T is stable under reducing the truncation cutoffs and increasing the bond dimension.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.3] The symbol T is used both for the thermalization time and for the environment temperature, leading to confusing expressions such as 'T as a function of T' in Fig. 7; a distinct notation such as tau_therm and T_env would improve readability.
  2. [Sec. 4.3] There are missing references in the sentence about the heavy quark diffusion coefficient: the text contains '[9?]' and '[?]' after the claim that D(k) scales as T^3 in QCD; these citations should be completed.
  3. [Fig. 2] The inset axis label 'x10^-5 + 9.999 x 10^-1' is unconventional and difficult to read; a standard shifted-axis labeling would be clearer.
  4. [Secs. 4.3 and 4.4] The symbol P is used both for the particle number in Eq. (4.4) and for the parity-asymmetry observable in Sec. 4.4; renaming one of them would avoid confusion.
  5. [General] The paper does not include a data availability or code availability statement; for a numerical study of this type, providing the code or a data repository would substantially improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the thermalization-time trends are direct simulation observations; the only fit (Eq. 4.3) is descriptive, and the load-bearing cited prior work is not by the present authors.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—that the cutoff-defined thermalization time T increases with dissipator strength D, background field l0, mass m, and environment temperature T—are read off the simulated subtracted-electric-field curves (Figs. 3, 4, 7), not produced by fitting a parameter to data and then relabeling it as a prediction. The only fitted expression, Eq. (4.3), f(T)=a/(b+c/T)^2, is explicitly fitted to the same data in Fig. 7 and used descriptively ('The fitted function accurately reproduces the observed functional behavior'); it does not generate a new independent result, so it is curve fitting rather than circular derivation. The 30% threshold used to define T in Sec. 4.1 is a measurement convention; whether the asserted monotonic behavior is sufficient to guarantee threshold-independent ordering is a numerical robustness question about possible curve crossings, not a circularity, since the trends are not derived from the threshold. The environment model, Lindblad dissipator, and relaxation-rate structure come from external works [44,45,46] whose authors do not overlap with the present paper; the only self-citations ([34], [50]) supply standard Hamiltonian and mass-shift conventions and are not load-bearing for the thermalization trends. None of the paper's conclusions is equivalent by construction to an input, so I find no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a Lindblad model whose dissipator is chosen rather than derived, a hand-picked 30 percent threshold, and an unreported three-parameter fit. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated; the electric flux string and Schwinger boson are existing objects in the theory.

free parameters (6)
  • Thermalization threshold 0.30 = 0.3
    Ad hoc choice for defining T; called 'without loss of generality' because of monotonicity, but the paper does not prove the parameter ordering is independent of the threshold.
  • Fit coefficients a, b, c in Eq (4.3) = not reported
    Three-parameter fit to the thermalization-time versus temperature curves in Fig 7; values and uncertainties are not given.
  • Dissipation strength D = 2.0 to 5.0; 0.15 for N=100
    Hand-chosen scan parameter; the central claim that thermalization time increases with D depends on this coupling and on the chosen range.
  • Background electric field l0 = 0 to 0.5
    Hand-chosen scan parameter used to avoid boundary effects and Bragg reflections; the central claim that T increases with l0 depends on this range.
  • Fermion mass m = 0.1 to 1.0; 0 for the Schwinger boson study
    Hand-chosen scan parameter; heavier mass slows the charges and lengthens the thermalization time.
  • Environment temperature T = 7 to 100
    Hand-chosen scan parameter; the quantum Brownian motion limit requires T to be much larger than the system gap, which the authors verify numerically.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Markovian and quantum Brownian motion limits justify the Lindblad master equation.
    Sec 2, Eqs (2.9) and (2.10): the environment is assumed to stay in a Gibbs state and the system to relax slowly relative to the environment correlation time.
  • ad hoc to paper The environment correlation is local, D(n-k) = D delta_{n,k}.
    Sec 3 and Sec 4.1: this local dissipator is fixed for all results and is justified by a small correlation length 1/T, but it is a modeling choice rather than a derived consequence of the phi^4 environment.
  • domain assumption The jump operators J(n) = O(n) - (1/(4T))[H_S, O(n)] correctly encode temperature in this regime.
    Sec 2, Eqs (2.12) and (2.13); the temperature dependence of all thermalization results enters through this imported formula.
  • standard math Gauge fields can be eliminated exactly using Gauss law under open boundary conditions.
    Sec 2, Eqs (2.4) and (2.5); this is the standard way to remove gauge degrees of freedom without truncation in the lattice Schwinger model.
  • ad hoc to paper The MPS density matrix remains a valid positive state throughout the evolution.
    Sec 5: the authors acknowledge positivity is not guaranteed and is exponentially difficult to check; negative eigenvalues in the ansatz could bias observables.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Meson thermalization with a hot medium in the open Schwinger model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HSBSSXNX

@misc{pith2026250113675,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Meson thermalization with a hot medium in the open Schwinger model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HSBSSXNX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13675}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum field theories treated as open quantum systems provide a crucial framework for studying realistic experimental scenarios, such as quarkonia traversing the quark-gluon plasma produced at the Large Hadron Collider. In such cases, capturing the complex thermalization process requires a detailed understanding of how particles evolve and interact with a hot medium. Considering the open lattice Schwinger model and using tensor network algorithms, we investigate the thermalization dynamics of mesonic particles in a hot medium, such as the Schwinger boson or the electric flux string. We simulate systems with up to 100 lattice sites, achieving accurate preservation of the electric field parity symmetry, demonstrating the algorithm's robustness and scalability. Our results reveal that the thermalization time increases with stronger dissipation from the environment, increasing environment temperature, higher background electric field and heavier fermion masses. Further, we study the quantum mutual information between the two halves of the flux string connecting a meson's constituent particles and analyze its relation to relevant dynamical observables.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems , Oxford University Press (2007), 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001

    arXiv 2007

  2. [2]

    Minganti and A

    F. Minganti and A. Biella, Open quantum systems – A brief introduction , arXiv (2024) [2407.16855]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, Irreversible Quantum Dynamics , Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2003), 10.1007/3-540-44874-8 4

    doi:10.1007/3-540-44874-8 2003

  4. [4]

    Takahashi, Cold atom realization of dissipative Hubbard model as open quantum system emulation, Academic Press (2024), 10.1016/B978-0-323-90800-9.00271-7

    Y. Takahashi, Cold atom realization of dissipative Hubbard model as open quantum system emulation, Academic Press (2024), 10.1016/B978-0-323-90800-9.00271-7

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-90800-9.00271-7 2024

  5. [5]

    Sambasivam, Open Quantum Systems in High Energy Physics , Ph.D

    B. Sambasivam, Open Quantum Systems in High Energy Physics , Ph.D. thesis, Syracuse University, 2024. – 26 – Figure 16 : Schematic drawing example of the even group (bottom green boxes), Taylor group (middle red boxes) and odd group (top blue box) for L in Eq. (3.3) at N = 4. These groups are applied to the MPS at the very bottom representing ρS as requir...

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model , Cambridge University Press (3, 2014)

    M.D. Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model , Cambridge University Press (3, 2014)

    2014

  7. [7]

    Takafumi Niida, Signatures of QGP at RHIC and the LHC , AAPPS Bulletin 31 (2021) 12

    Y.M. Takafumi Niida, Signatures of QGP at RHIC and the LHC , AAPPS Bulletin 31 (2021) 12

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    R. Rapp, D. Blaschke and P. Crochet, Charmonium and bottomonium in heavy-ion collisions, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 65 (2010) 209

    work page 2010

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Yao, Open quantum systems for quarkonia , International Journal of Modern Physics A 36 (2021) 2130010

    X. Yao, Open quantum systems for quarkonia , International Journal of Modern Physics A 36 (2021) 2130010

    2021

  2. [10]

    259 (2022) 12004

    McKibben Lofnes, Ingrid and for the ALICE Collaboration, Quarkonia as probes of the QGP and of the initial stages of the heavy-ion collision with ALICE , EPJ Web Conf. 259 (2022) 12004

    2022

  3. [11]

    M. He, H. van Hees and R. Rapp, Heavy-quark diffusion in the quark-gluon plasma , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 130 (2023) 104020

    2023

  4. [12]

    M´ ocsy, P

    ´A. M´ ocsy, P. Petreczky and M. Strickland,Quarkonia in the quark gluon plasma , International Journal of Modern Physics A 28 (2013) 1340012

    2013

  5. [13]

    Coleman, R

    S. Coleman, R. Jackiw and L. Susskind, Charge shielding and quark confinement in the massive Schwinger model , Annals of Physics 93 (1975) 267

    1975

  6. [14]

    Matsui and H

    T. Matsui and H. Satz, J/ψ suppression by quark-gluon plasma formation , Physics Letters B 178 (1986) 416

    1986

  7. [15]

    Andronic, P.B

    A. Andronic, P.B. Gossiaux, P. Petreczky, R. Rapp, M. Strickland, J.P. Blaizot et al., – 27 – Comparative study of quarkonium transport in hot qcd matter , The European Physical Journal A 60 (2024) 88

    2024

  8. [16]

    Blaizot, D

    J.-P. Blaizot, D. De Boni, P. Faccioli and G. Garberoglio, Heavy quark bound states in a quark–gluon plasma: Dissociation and recombination , Nuclear Physics A 946 (2016) 49–88

    2016

  9. [17]

    Scheihing-Hitschfeld and X

    B. Scheihing-Hitschfeld and X. Yao, Real time quarkonium transport coefficients in open quantum systems from euclidean qcd , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 054024

    2023

  10. [18]

    Miura, Y

    T. Miura, Y. Akamatsu, M. Asakawa and A. Rothkopf, Quantum brownian motion of a heavy quark pair in the quark-gluon plasma , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 034011

    2020

  11. [19]

    Sharma and A

    R. Sharma and A. Tiwari, Quantum evolution of quarkonia with correlated and uncorrelated noise, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 074004

    2020

  12. [20]

    Manton, The Schwinger model and its axial anomaly , Annals of Physics 159 (1985) 220

    N.S. Manton, The Schwinger model and its axial anomaly , Annals of Physics 159 (1985) 220

    1985

  13. [21]

    Or´ us,Tensor networks for complex quantum systems , Nature Reviews Physics 1 (2019) 538

    R. Or´ us,Tensor networks for complex quantum systems , Nature Reviews Physics 1 (2019) 538

    2019

  14. [22]

    Ba˜ nuls,Tensor network algorithms: A route map , Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 14 (2023) 173

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls,Tensor network algorithms: A route map , Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 14 (2023) 173

    2023

  15. [23]

    Silvi, E

    P. Silvi, E. Rico, T. Calarco and S. Montangero, Lattice gauge tensor networks , New Journal of Physics 16 (2014) 103015

    2014

  16. [24]

    Ba˜ nuls, K

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, J.I. Cirac, K. Jansen and S. K¨ uhn,Tensor Networks and their use for Lattice Gauge Theories , PoS LA TTICE2018(2019) 022

    2019

  17. [25]

    Ba˜ nuls and K

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls and K. Cichy,Review on novel methods for lattice gauge theories , Reports on Progress in Physics 83 (2020) 024401

    2020

  18. [26]

    Buyens, J

    B. Buyens, J. Haegeman, K. Van Acoleyen, H. Verschelde and F. Verstraete, Matrix Product States for Gauge Field Theories , Physical Review Letters 113 (2014) 091601

    2014

  19. [27]

    E. Rico, T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, P. Zoller and S. Montangero, Tensor Networks for Lattice Gauge Theories and Atomic Quantum Simulation , Physical Review Letters 112 (2014) 201601

    2014

  20. [28]

    Pichler, M

    T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Zoller and S. Montangero, Real-time dynamics in U (1) lattice gauge theories with tensor networks , Phys. Rev. X 6 (2016) 011023

    2016

  21. [29]

    Ba˜ nuls, K

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls, K. Cichy, J.I. Cirac, K. Jansen and S. K¨ uhn,Density induced phase transitions in the Schwinger model: A study with matrix product states , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 071601

    2017

  22. [30]

    Ercolessi, P

    E. Ercolessi, P. Facchi, G. Magnifico, S. Pascazio and F.V. Pepe, Phase transitions in Zn gauge models: Towards quantum simulations of the schwinger-weyl qed , Physical Review D 98 (2018) 074503

    2018

  23. [31]

    Magnifico, M

    G. Magnifico, M. Dalmonte, P. Facchi, S. Pascazio, F.V. Pepe and E. Ercolessi, Real Time Dynamics and Confinement in the Zn Schwinger-Weyl lattice model for 1+1 QED , Quantum 4 (2020) 281

    2020

  24. [32]

    Funcke, K

    L. Funcke, K. Jansen and S. K¨ uhn,Topological vacuum structure of the Schwinger model with matrix product states , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 054507

    2020

  25. [33]

    Rigobello, S

    M. Rigobello, S. Notarnicola, G. Magnifico and S. Montangero, Entanglement generation in (1 + 1)D qed scattering processes, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 114501. – 28 –

    2021

  26. [34]

    Angelides, L

    T. Angelides, L. Funcke, K. Jansen and S. K¨ uhn, Computing the mass shift of Wilson and staggered fermions in the lattice Schwinger model with matrix product states , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 014516

    2023

  27. [35]

    Funcke, K

    L. Funcke, K. Jansen and S. K¨ uhn,Exploring the CP -violating dashen phase in the Schwinger model with tensor networks , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 014504

    2023

  28. [36]

    Osborne, I.P

    J. Osborne, I.P. McCulloch and J.C. Halimeh, Probing confinement through dynamical quantum phase transitions: From quantum spin models to lattice gauge theories , arXiv (2023) [ 2310.12210]

    2023

  29. [37]

    Belyansky, S

    R. Belyansky, S. Whitsitt, N. Mueller, A. Fahimniya, E.R. Bennewitz, Z. Davoudi et al., High-energy collision of quarks and mesons in the Schwinger model: From tensor networks to circuit qed, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 091903

    2024

  30. [38]

    Papaefstathiou, J

    I. Papaefstathiou, J. Knolle and M.C. Ba˜ nuls, Real-time scattering in the lattice Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 014504

    2025

  31. [39]

    Jeyaretnam, T

    J. Jeyaretnam, T. Bhore, J.J. Osborne, J.C. Halimeh and Z. Papi´ c, Hilbert space fragmentation at the origin of disorder-free localization in the lattice Schwinger model , arXiv (2024) [ 2409.08320]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Y. Guo, T. Angelides, K. Jansen and S. K¨ uhn, Concurrent VQE for simulating excited states of the Schwinger model , arXiv (2024) [ 2407.15629]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    137 (2017) 04001

    Ba˜ nuls, Mari Carmen, Cichy, Krzysztof, Ignacio Cirac, J., Jansen, Karl, K¨ uhn, Stefan and Saito, Hana, Towards overcoming the monte carlo sign problem with tensor networks , EPJ Web Conf. 137 (2017) 04001

    2017

  34. [42]

    Xiang, Density Matrix and Tensor Network Renormalization , Cambridge University Press (2023)

    T. Xiang, Density Matrix and Tensor Network Renormalization , Cambridge University Press (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Nielsen and I.L

    M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information , Cambridge University Press (2000)

    2000

  36. [44]

    de Jong, K

    W.A. de Jong, K. Lee, J. Mulligan, M. P losko´ n, F. Ringer and X. Yao, Quantum simulation of nonequilibrium dynamics and thermalization in the Schwinger model , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 054508

    2022

  37. [45]

    K. Lee, J. Mulligan, F. Ringer and X. Yao, Liouvillian dynamics of the open Schwinger model: String breaking and kinetic dissipation in a thermal medium , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 094518

    2023

  38. [46]

    J. Lin, D. Luo, X. Yao and P.E. Shanahan, Real-time dynamics of the Schwinger model as an open quantum system with neural density operators , Journal of High Energy Physics 2024 (2024) 211

    2024

  39. [47]

    Coleman, More About the Massive Schwinger Model , Annals Phys

    S.R. Coleman, More About the Massive Schwinger Model , Annals Phys. 101 (1976) 239

    1976

  40. [48]

    Adam, General bound-state structure of the massive Schwinger model , Physics Letters B 382 (1996) 111

    C. Adam, General bound-state structure of the massive Schwinger model , Physics Letters B 382 (1996) 111

    1996

  41. [49]

    Rivas and S.F

    A. Rivas and S.F. Huelga, Open Quantum Systems , SpringerBriefs in Physics, Springer (2012), 10.1007/978-3-642-23354-8

    2012 doi

  42. [50]

    Angelides, P

    T. Angelides, P. Naredi, A. Crippa, K. Jansen, S. K¨ uhn, I. Tavernelli et al., First-order phase transition of the Schwinger model with a quantum computer , npj Quantum Information 11 (2025) 6. – 29 –

    2025

  43. [51]

    Nielsen and M

    H. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, A no-go theorem for regularizing chiral fermions , Physics Letters B 105 (1981) 219

    1981

  44. [52]

    Gattringer and C.B

    C. Gattringer and C.B. Lang, Quantum chromodynamics on the lattice , vol. 788, Springer, Berlin (2010), 10.1007/978-3-642-01850-3

    2010 doi

  45. [53]

    Kogut and L

    J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson ’s lattice gauge theories , Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 395

    1975

  46. [54]

    Hamer, Z

    C.J. Hamer, Z. Weihong and J. Oitmaa, Series expansions for the massive Schwinger model in Hamiltonian lattice theory , Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 55

    1997

  47. [55]

    Jordan and E.P

    P. Jordan and E.P. Wigner, About the Pauli exclusion principle , Z. Phys. 47 (1928) 631

    1928

  48. [56]

    Adam, Massive Schwinger model within mass perturbation theory , Ann

    C. Adam, Massive Schwinger model within mass perturbation theory , Ann. Phys. 259 (1997) 1

    1997

  49. [57]

    Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations , Physical Review Letters 91 (2004) 147902

    G. Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations , Physical Review Letters 91 (2004) 147902

    2004

  50. [58]

    Orus, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states , Annals of Physics 349 (2014) 117

    R. Orus, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states , Annals of Physics 349 (2014) 117

    2014

  51. [59]

    Vidal, Entanglement renormalization, Physical Review Letters 99 (2007) 220405

    G. Vidal, Entanglement renormalization, Physical Review Letters 99 (2007) 220405

    2007

  52. [60]

    Fishman, S.R

    M. Fishman, S.R. White and E.M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor software library for tensor network calculations, SciPost Phys. Codebases (2022) 4

    2022

  53. [61]

    G.-X. Su, J.J. Osborne and J.C. Halimeh, Cold-atom particle collider , PRX Quantum 5 (2024) 040310

    2024

  54. [62]

    Akamatsu, Quarkonium in quark–gluon plasma: Open quantum system approaches re-examined, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 123 (2022) 103932

    Y. Akamatsu, Quarkonium in quark–gluon plasma: Open quantum system approaches re-examined, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 123 (2022) 103932

    2022

  55. [63]

    Zhao and M

    S. Zhao and M. He, Second-order dissociation and transition of heavy quarkonia in the quark-gluon plasma , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 074040

    2024

  56. [64]

    Werner, D

    A.H. Werner, D. Jaschke, P. Silvi, M. Kliesch, T. Calarco, J. Eisert et al., Positive tensor network approach for simulating open quantum many-body systems , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 237201

    2016

  57. [65]

    Kliesch, D

    M. Kliesch, D. Gross and J. Eisert, Matrix-product operators and states: NP-hardness and undecidability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 160503

    2014

  58. [66]

    Cui, J.I

    J. Cui, J.I. Cirac and M.C. Ba˜ nuls, Variational matrix product operators for the steady state of dissipative quantum systems , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 220601

    2015

  59. [67]

    Felser, P

    T. Felser, P. Silvi, M. Collura and S. Montangero, Two-dimensional quantum-link lattice quantum electrodynamics at finite density , Phys. Rev. X 10 (2020) 041040

    2020

  60. [68]

    Schollw¨ ock,The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states , Annals of Physics 326 (2011) 96

    U. Schollw¨ ock,The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states , Annals of Physics 326 (2011) 96. – 30 –

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.