Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Leveraging Machine Learning Techniques for Windows Ransomware Network Traffic Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.10440 v1 pith:HSVYFVAH submitted 2018-07-27 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords ransomwaredetectionlearningmachinenetworktrafficbecomecompanies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Ransomware has become a significant global threat with the ransomware-as-a-service model enabling easy availability and deployment, and the potential for high revenues creating a viable criminal business model. Individuals, private companies or public service providers e.g. healthcare or utilities companies can all become victims of ransomware attacks and consequently suffer severe disruption and financial loss. Although machine learning algorithms are already being used to detect ransomware, variants are being developed to specifically evade detection when using dynamic machine learning techniques. In this paper, we introduce NetConverse, a machine learning analysis of Windows ransomware network traffic to achieve a high, consistent detection rate. Using a dataset created from conversation-based network traffic features we achieved a true positive detection rate of 97.1% using the Decision Tree (J48) classifier.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Integrating Explainable AI for Effective Malware Detection in Encrypted Network Traffic

    cs.CR 2025-01 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    An application of standard ensemble classifiers and SHAP to a private dataset reports >99% detection accuracy, but the evaluation may be leaky and no baselines are given.

Pith tools