Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Bayesian Multivariate Probability of Success Using Historical Data with Strict Control of Family-wise Error Rate

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.13774 v1 pith:HTX2HFO5 submitted 2020-10-26 stat.ME

Bayesian Multivariate Probability of Success Using Historical Data with Strict Control of Family-wise Error Rate

classification stat.ME
keywords bayesianendpointsmultipleapproachcontrolerrorfamily-wisemethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Given the cost and duration of phase III and phase IV clinical trials, the development of statistical methods for go/no-go decisions is vital. In this paper, we introduce a Bayesian methodology to compute the probability of success based on the current data of a treatment regimen for the multivariate linear model. Our approach utilizes a Bayesian seemingly unrelated regression model, which allows for multiple endpoints to be modeled jointly even if the covariates between the endpoints are different. Correlations between endpoints are explicitly modeled. This Bayesian joint modeling approach unifies single and multiple testing procedures under a single framework. We develop an approach to multiple testing that asymptotically guarantees strict family-wise error rate control, and is more powerful than frequentist approaches to multiplicity. The method effectively yields those of Ibrahim et al. and Chuang-Stein as special cases, and, to our knowledge, is the only method that allows for robust sample size determination for multiple endpoints and/or hypotheses and the only method that provides strict family-wise type I error control in the presence of multiplicity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.