Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Short Answer Grading Using One-shot Prompting and Text Similarity Scoring Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.18638 v1 pith:HV7NX3GJ submitted 2023-05-29 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelscoresanswerdatasetshorttextanalyticasag
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this study, we developed an automated short answer grading (ASAG) model that provided both analytic scores and final holistic scores. Short answer items typically consist of multiple sub-questions, and providing an analytic score and the text span relevant to each sub-question can increase the interpretability of the automated scores. Furthermore, they can be used to generate actionable feedback for students. Despite these advantages, most studies have focused on predicting only holistic scores due to the difficulty in constructing dataset with manual annotations. To address this difficulty, we used large language model (LLM)-based one-shot prompting and a text similarity scoring model with domain adaptation using small manually annotated dataset. The accuracy and quadratic weighted kappa of our model were 0.67 and 0.71 on a subset of the publicly available ASAG dataset. The model achieved a substantial improvement over the majority baseline.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fine-tuning for Better Few Shot Prompting: An Empirical Comparison for Short Answer Grading

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning GPT-4o-mini on about 150 examples raised short-answer grading F1 from 0.68 to 0.73; QLoRA fine-tuning of Llama 3.1 8B only reached 0.65 after adding synthetic data.

Pith tools