REVIEW 2 cited by
Short Answer Grading Using One-shot Prompting and Text Similarity Scoring Model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this study, we developed an automated short answer grading (ASAG) model that provided both analytic scores and final holistic scores. Short answer items typically consist of multiple sub-questions, and providing an analytic score and the text span relevant to each sub-question can increase the interpretability of the automated scores. Furthermore, they can be used to generate actionable feedback for students. Despite these advantages, most studies have focused on predicting only holistic scores due to the difficulty in constructing dataset with manual annotations. To address this difficulty, we used large language model (LLM)-based one-shot prompting and a text similarity scoring model with domain adaptation using small manually annotated dataset. The accuracy and quadratic weighted kappa of our model were 0.67 and 0.71 on a subset of the publicly available ASAG dataset. The model achieved a substantial improvement over the majority baseline.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Veln(ia)s is in the Details: Evaluating LLM Judgment on Latvian and Lithuanian Short Answer Matching
Open-source LLMs mostly detect fine-grained matched versus non-matched short answers in Latvian and Lithuanian, with 70b-class models near-perfect and smaller models showing variable, model-specific weaknesses.
-
Fine-tuning for Better Few Shot Prompting: An Empirical Comparison for Short Answer Grading
Fine-tuning GPT-4o-mini on about 150 examples raised short-answer grading F1 from 0.68 to 0.73; QLoRA fine-tuning of Llama 3.1 8B only reached 0.65 after adding synthetic data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.