Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Models as Approximations I: Consequences Illustrated with Linear Regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1404.1578 v4 pith:HWLZ7QQH submitted 2014-04-06 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords model-robustslopestandardarbitraryconsequenceserrorsestimatorinference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In the early 1980s Halbert White inaugurated a "model-robust'' form of statistical inference based on the "sandwich estimator'' of standard error. This estimator is known to be "heteroskedasticity-consistent", but it is less well-known to be "nonlinearity-consistent'' as well. Nonlinearity, however, raises fundamental issues because in its presence regressors are not ancillary, hence can't be treated as fixed. The consequences are deep: (1)~population slopes need to be re-interpreted as statistical functionals obtained from OLS fits to largely arbitrary joint $\xy$~distributions; (2)~the meaning of slope parameters needs to be rethought; (3)~the regressor distribution affects the slope parameters; (4)~randomness of the regressors becomes a source of sampling variability in slope estimates; (5)~inference needs to be based on model-robust standard errors, including sandwich estimators or the $\xy$~bootstrap. In theory, model-robust and model-trusting standard errors can deviate by arbitrary magnitudes either way. In practice, significant deviations between them can be detected with a diagnostic test.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gaussian comparison above the median

    math.ST 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A centered Gaussian with smaller covariance assigns at least as much probability as one with larger covariance to any closed convex set with reference probability at least 1/2.

  2. Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis for Matched Observational Studies

    stat.ME 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Stochastic sensitivity analysis for matched studies finds worst-case conditional laws for hidden confounders instead of worst-case realizations, controlled by a sensitivity parameter that permits imperfect alignment w...

  3. Semiparametric Expectile Regression for High-dimensional Heavy-tailed and Heterogeneous Data

    math.ST 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A regularized expectile regression for partially linear additive models recovers sparse linear effects and smooth nonlinear effects when errors have only finite moments.

Pith tools