Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Extracting Cloud-based Model with Prior Knowledge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.04192 v4 pith:HWRB4DAH submitted 2023-06-07 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords modelknowledgepriorrecognitionqueryattackattacksexamples
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Machine Learning-as-a-Service, a pay-as-you-go business pattern, is widely accepted by third-party users and developers. However, the open inference APIs may be utilized by malicious customers to conduct model extraction attacks, i.e., attackers can replicate a cloud-based black-box model merely via querying malicious examples. Existing model extraction attacks mainly depend on the posterior knowledge (i.e., predictions of query samples) from Oracle. Thus, they either require high query overhead to simulate the decision boundary, or suffer from generalization errors and overfitting problems due to query budget limitations. To mitigate it, this work proposes an efficient model extraction attack based on prior knowledge for the first time. The insight is that prior knowledge of unlabeled proxy datasets is conducive to the search for the decision boundary (e.g., informative samples). Specifically, we leverage self-supervised learning including autoencoder and contrastive learning to pre-compile the prior knowledge of the proxy dataset into the feature extractor of the substitute model. Then we adopt entropy to measure and sample the most informative examples to query the target model. Our design leverages both prior and posterior knowledge to extract the model and thus eliminates generalizability errors and overfitting problems. We conduct extensive experiments on open APIs like Traffic Recognition, Flower Recognition, Moderation Recognition, and NSFW Recognition from real-world platforms, Azure and Clarifai. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our attack. For example, our attack achieves 95.1% fidelity with merely 1.8K queries (cost 2.16$) on the NSFW Recognition API. Also, the adversarial examples generated with our substitute model have better transferability than others, which reveals that our scheme is more conducive to downstream attacks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. I Stolenly Swear That I Am Up to (No) Good: Design and Evaluation of Model Stealing Attacks

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematization of 47 model stealing papers that introduces a threat model, a comparison framework, and evaluation best practices for substitute-model attacks.

  2. LLM4MEA: Data-free Model Extraction Attacks on Sequential Recommenders via Large Language Models

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-driven agent generates synthetic interaction sequences that, when queried against a target sequential recommender, produce surrogate models with higher agreement to the target than random or autoregressive data...

  3. HoneypotNet: Backdoor Attacks Against Model Extraction

    cs.CR 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A defender can inject a backdoor into a stolen copy of a model by poisoning the output probabilities of the original model, without retraining it or adding triggers to user-visible images.

Pith tools