Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 101 references

An Adaptive ALE Scheme for Non-Ideal Compressible-Fluid Dynamics over Dynamic Unstructured Meshes

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A conservative interpolation-free ALE scheme applies unsteady mesh adaptation to non-ideal compressible-fluid dynamics, reproducing dense-gas and non-classical wave behavior in moving-piston tests.

desk verdict A solid assessment of the authors' interpolation-free ALE scheme in the NICFD regime, with good shock validation but an oscillation-free claim that lacks a direct control. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03547 v1 pith:HX2ANP5A submitted 2019-08-09 physics.comp-ph cs.NAmath.NAphysics.flu-dyn

Barbara Re , Alberto Guardone This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.comp-phcs.NAmath.NAphysics.flu-dyn MSC 76M1276N1565M50 PACS 47.40.-x47.11.-j
keywords Non-IdealCompressibleFluidDynamicsmeshadaptationArbitraryLagrangian-EulerianPeng-RobinsonequationofstatefundamentalderivativegasdynamicspistonproblemrarefactionshocksiloxaneMD4M
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that unsteady mesh adaptation, previously risky in the non-ideal compressible-fluid-dynamics (NICFD) regime because solution interpolation can push thermodynamic states below the vapor-liquid equilibrium curve, can be made safe with an interpolation-free scheme. In the scheme, every local grid change—node insertion, deletion, or edge swap—is treated as a fictitious continuous deformation of the finite volumes inside an Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) discretization. Because no solution is ever interpolated onto the new grid, conservation holds by construction and spurious oscillations are avoided. The authors demonstrate the method on piston-in-tube problems filled with the siloxane MD4M, reporting correct compression and expansion waves, shock formation and reflections, and non-classical rarefaction behavior where the fundamental derivative Γ is negative. If the method is right, it supplies a reliable engineering tool for unsteady dense-gas flows with moving boundaries, including the design of organic Rankine cycle and supercritical CO2 components.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the three-step fictitious deformation that converts a mesh-adaptation operation into an ALE motion. At fictitious time 0 < τ < 0.5 all elements involved in a local grid modification collapse to a point; at τ = 0.5 the connectivity is changed while volumes are null, so no interface sweeps volume and no flux is exchanged; for 0.5 < τ < 1 the surviving elements expand to the final configuration. The volumes swept during collapse and expansion determine the interface velocities through the discrete geometric conservation law, so the conservative properties of the fixed-connectivity scheme carry over to adaptive grids. Around this core, the method uses a node-centered edge-based finite-volume discretization, a Roe-type flux with a non-ideal-gas average, and metric-based adaptation driven by the Hessian of the Mach number.

What would settle it

Repeat the harmonic-piston tests of Section 6.4 using a multiparameter Helmholtz equation of state for MD4M calibrated to the most accurate critical-region data, and compare where rarefaction-shock-like structures form. If the Γ < 0 region from the accurate model lies somewhere other than where the Peng-Robinson model places it—or disappears—then the non-classical results are model-dependent. Alternatively, a direct measurement of the fundamental derivative Γ from sound-speed experiments in near-critical MD4M vapor would settle the same question.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a conservative, interpolation-free ALE finite-volume scheme can track unsteady NICFD flow features over dynamically adapted unstructured meshes without contaminating the solution. Connectivity changes are encoded as collapse-and-expansion deformations of the involved volumes, all occurring within a single time step, with the connectivity change occurring at the instant of null volume so no flux is exchanged; the resulting swept volumes feed a geometry-conservation-law-compliant computation of interface velocities. On piston-driven flows of MD4M, the method reproduces the expected qualitative behavior of dense vapors: steepening compressive waves, spreading rarefactions, shock-wall and shock-piston reflections, supercritical excursions, and acoustic-impedance extrema at Γ = 0 in the non-classical region. The authors state that this is the first application of unsteady mesh adaptation to NICFD problems.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the polytropic Peng-Robinson equation of state, with constant dilute-gas heat capacity and a correlation-based acentric factor, represents MD4M well enough that the predicted location and width of the Γ < 0 (non-classical) region match the real fluid; if the model misplaces that region, the reported non-classical wave behavior is an artifact of the thermodynamic model rather than a property of the fluid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Unsteady NICFD simulations with moving boundaries can now follow shocks, rarefactions, and contact discontinuities with meshes that refine and coarsen automatically, at Courant numbers up to about 3 or 4 in the tests.
  • Large boundary displacements—more than 40 percent of the tube length in the impulsive-start test—can be accommodated without remapping the solution.
  • The absence of interpolation keeps thermodynamic states away from the two-phase region, making the scheme usable for fluids whose non-ideal region sits close to the vapor-liquid equilibrium curve.
  • The same solver toolchain can be applied to design dense-gas piston-tube experiments and to improve component simulation in organic Rankine and supercritical CO2 power cycles.
  • Because the 2D and 3D results agree on one-dimensional flow physics, the method is ready for multidimensional geometries with genuinely three-dimensional wave patterns.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the polytropic Peng-Robinson model misplaces the Γ < 0 region—its critical volume is about 15 percent too high—the specific non-classical wave patterns in Section 6.4 may not occur for real MD4M; testing with a multiparameter Helmholtz equation of state would settle this.
  • The interpolation-free property should matter most for equations of state with a narrow single-phase stability domain; the same adaptation machinery could be combined with tabulated or multiparameter thermodynamics.
  • The metric built from the Hessian of the Mach number appears preferable to density-based indicators in the NICFD regime because Mach number varies non-monotonically with density; extending this to viscous and turbulent dense-gas flows is a natural next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper applies an interpolation-free arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) finite-volume scheme with dynamic unstructured mesh adaptation to the non-ideal compressible fluid dynamics (NICFD) regime. The governing equations are the unsteady Euler equations closed by a polytropic Peng-Robinson equation of state. The method is first exercised on steady oblique and conical shock problems in an unsteady frame, and then on a series of 2D and 3D piston-in-tube problems for the siloxane MD4M, covering dilute, NICFD, and nominally non-classical (Gamma<0) regimes. The central claims are that the scheme detects the expected NICFD phenomena, introduces no spurious oscillations attributable to mesh adaptation, and is robust for unsteady moving-boundary dense-gas flows; the paper also claims to be the first application of unsteady mesh adaptation to NICFD problems.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the paper would provide a useful tool for unsteady dense-gas and organic-vapor flows with moving boundaries, and would extend the rather small body of NICFD numerical validation to adaptive unstructured meshes. The paper has real strengths: the oblique-shock validation in Sec. 5.1 reproduces the analytical post-shock state across three refinement levels and three Courant numbers; the 3D conical-shock test recovers cylindrical symmetry despite an unstructured grid; and the piston tests demonstrate that the adaptive metric tracks traveling waves, including shock formation and wall reflections. The interpolation-free ALE construction, inherited from the authors' earlier work [35-37], is conservative and GCL-compliant, and this prior derivation is cited appropriately. The main limitation is that the paper's differentiating claim, that the absence of solution interpolation prevents spurious oscillations, is not verified by any controlled comparison; and the thermodynamic model's fidelity in the non-classical region is acknowledged but not quantified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 6.1 (concluding paragraph) and Sec. 7] The assertion that the method detects all expected NICFD phenomena "without introducing spurious oscillations due to mesh adaptation" is not supported by a comparative experiment. Every piston simulation in the paper uses the interpolation-free adaptive scheme; there is no run with an interpolation-based remap after remeshing and no fixed fine-mesh reference at matched resolution, so the absence of visible oscillations in Figs. 12-13 and 21-22 cannot be attributed to the interpolation-free mechanism. Since the ALE adaptation machinery is taken from Refs. [35,36,37], the paper's incremental contribution is the NICFD assessment; as written, the central robustness claim is an absence-of-failure observation. The small symmetry disturbances in Figs. 10-11 are acknowledged but dismissed without quantitative analysis against any baseline. I request either a control computation that isolates the remap step, or a reformulation of the claim as a limitation.
  2. [Sec. 2.1, Table 3, Fig. 9] The non-classical and NICFD results are obtained with the polytropic Peng-Robinson model using the Edmister acentric factor and a constant dilute-gas cv. The paper itself notes that v_c^PR/v_c = 1.149 (Fig. 9 caption), and TestNC starts at Gamma0 = -0.0064, i.e., only marginally inside the Gamma<0 region. The location and width of the Gamma<0 region are therefore model-dependent, so the rarefaction-related behavior reported in Sec. 6.4 could be an artifact of the equation of state rather than a property of MD4M. The authors should either add a sensitivity study (for example, varying the acentric factor or comparing with the multi-parameter EoS of Ref. [99]) or explicitly restrict the conclusions to the PPR model.
  3. [Sec. 6.3, Fig. 19] The quantitative validation of the impulsive-piston test is substantially weaker than the oblique-shock validation. The comparison with the analytical post-shock pressure is described only as "fairly good", the deviation visibly grows after the second reflection, and no error metric or resolution study is provided for the piston problems beyond the NT sweep reported in Sec. 6.1. Because the paper's overall claim is that the adaptive scheme is robust for unsteady NICFD flows, a quantitative convergence statement (for example, an L1 error versus hmin or NT for the one-dimensional piston configuration) would materially strengthen the argument.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5.2] The conical-shock validation has no analytical solution and is checked only through steady/unsteady consistency and azimuthal symmetry; this is a clear and honest limitation, but it should be stated explicitly in the main text rather than left implicit in the description of Fig. 7.
  2. [Fig. 9 caption] The caption contains a typo, "Peng-robinson" should be "Peng-Robinson".
  3. [Sec. 6.1] The phrase "the previous analysis" in the concluding paragraph is vague; it would be clearer to refer to the specific figures and quantitative comparisons that support the claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the imported ALE machinery is cited from prior work, but the NICFD assessment is self-contained against analytical shock relations and is not forced by fitted inputs.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the paper does not derive a new ALE scheme from the NICFD equations; it imports the interpolation-free ALE machinery from Refs. [35,36,37] and applies it to NICFD piston problems. The NICFD-specific content is the thermodynamic closure (polytropic Peng-Robinson with constant cv_infinity and the Edmister acentric factor) and the piston test suite. The thermodynamic model parameters come from REFPROP and standard literature, not from fitting to the wave phenomena that are then reported; no parameter is calibrated on the target predictions. The oblique and conical shock validations compare against analytical shock relations, and the impulsively-started piston is checked against the analytical shock pressure, so the core numerical results have external anchors. The non-classical TestNC starts from a state defined by the same EoS (Gamma0 = -0.0064) and the solver reproduces wave behavior consistent with that Gamma; this is a model-consistency check, not a construction in which the output is definitionally equal to the input. The 'no spurious oscillations' claim is supported only by the observed scatter plots and lacks an interpolation-based control, but that is a validation-strength weakness, not circularity: the absence of a control does not make the conclusion equivalent to the inputs. Similarly, the acknowledged limitations, such as the Peng-Robinson critical-volume mismatch (v_c^PR/v_c = 1.149) and the noted small symmetry disturbances, concern model fidelity and verification depth, not circular reasoning. Self-citations for the ALE collapse/expansion treatment are methodological references; the paper's NICFD assessment does not reduce to those references, and no load-bearing step is shown to be equivalent to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard inviscid flow assumptions and on a cubic equation of state whose non-classical region is not experimentally confirmed. The numerical adaptation machinery is taken from the authors' prior papers; user-chosen tolerances and mesh sizes control the reported accuracy, and no code or data is released.

free parameters (3)
  • Metric tolerance epsilon (anisotropic adaptation) = 1e-7 to 1e-6
    User-defined threshold governing the maximum acceptable error in metric construction; controls refinement intensity; not fitted to physics but chosen by hand (Section 4.1).
  • Minimum edge size hmin = 0.0008, 0.0004, 0.0002 for shock tests; 0.008 for impulsive piston
    Prescribed refinement level in each test; results depend on it (Sections 5.1 and 6.3).
  • Steps per period NT = 200, after convergence checks among {100, 200, 300}
    Time-step resolution chosen by comparing pressure profiles; affects accuracy (Section 6.1).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Inviscid Euler equations with no viscous or thermal transport are adequate for the piston and shock tests.
    The governing equations (7) omit viscosity and heat conduction; valid for high-speed inviscid flows but unexamined for the piston boundary layers.
  • domain assumption Polytropic Peng-Robinson EoS with constant cv_infinity and Edmister acentric factor represents MD4M accurately enough in NICFD and non-classical states.
    Section 2.1 and Table 3; the paper notes the critical volume mismatch (v_c^PR / v_c = 1.149), so the Gamma < 0 region is model-dependent.
  • domain assumption The three-step collapse/connectivity/expansion procedure is exactly conservative and GCL-compliant for all local mesh modifications.
    Section 3.2.1; established in Refs. [35,36,37] for ideal gases, assumed to transfer unchanged to NICFD flows with aggressive coarsening.
  • domain assumption The simplified Roe averaging of Cinnella gives adequate numerical fluxes for non-ideal thermodynamics.
    Section 3.1.1; relies on prior studies [71,75,76,77] showing insensitivity of results to the Roe-average variant.
  • domain assumption Non-classical phenomena with Gamma < 0 are physically possible for MD4M under the Peng-Robinson model.
    Section 2 and Section 6.4; no experimental evidence of rarefaction shocks exists, so the non-classical tests are model predictions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Adaptive ALE Scheme for Non-Ideal Compressible-Fluid Dynamics over Dynamic Unstructured Meshes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HX2ANP5A

@misc{pith2026190803547,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Adaptive ALE Scheme for Non-Ideal Compressible-Fluid Dynamics over Dynamic Unstructured Meshes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HX2ANP5A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03547}
}
abstract

This paper investigates the application of mesh adaptation techniques in the Non-Ideal Compressible Fluid Dynamic (NICFD) regime, a region near the vapor-liquid saturation curve where the flow behavior significantly departs from the ideal gas model, as indicated by a value of the fundamental derivative of gasdynamics less than one. A recent interpolation-free finite-volume adaptive scheme is exploited to modify the grid connectivity in a conservative way, and the governing equations for compressible inviscid flows are solved within the Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian framework by including special fictitious fluxes representing volume modifications due to mesh adaptation.The absence of interpolation of the solution to the new grid prevents spurious oscillations that may make the solution of the flow field in the NICFD regime more difficult and less robust.Non-ideal gas effects are taken into account by adopting the polytropic Peng-Robinson thermodynamic model. The numerical results focus on the problem of a piston moving in a tube filled with siloxane $\mathrm{MD_4M}$, a simple configuration which can be the core of experimental research activities aiming at investigating the thermodynamic behavior of NICFD flows. Several numerical tests involving different piston movements and initial states in 2D and 3D assess the capability of the proposed adaption technique to correctly capture compression and expansion waves, as well as the generation and propagation of shock waves, in the NICFD and in the non-classical regime.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [99]

    Fluid Phase Equilibr

    Colonna, P., Nannan, N.R., Guardone, A., Lemmon, E.W.: Mul- tiparameter equations of state for selected siloxanes. Fluid Phase Equilibr. 244(2), 193–211 (2006). DOI 10.1016/j.fluid.2006.04. 015

    doi:10.1016/j 2006

  2. [1]

    In: Proceedings of 24 Barbara Re, Alberto Guardone 22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 2760, pp

    Vitale, S., Gori, G., Pini, M., Guardone, A., Economon, T.D., Palacios, F., Alonso, J.J., Colonna, P.: Extension of theSU2open source CFD code to the simulation of turbulent flows of fuids modelled with complex thermophysical laws. In: Proceedings of 24 Barbara Re, Alberto Guardone 22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 2760, pp. 1–22. Dallas, ...

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2015-2760 2015

  3. [2]

    Gori, G., Vimercati, D., Guardone, A.: Non-ideal compressible- fluid effects in oblique shock waves. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 821(1), 012,003 –1–10 (2017). DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/821/1/012003

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/821/1/012003 2017

  4. [3]

    Pini, M., Vitale, S., Colonna, P., Gori, G., Guardone, A., Economon, T., Alonso, J., Palacios, F.: SU2: the Open-Source Software for Non-ideal Compressible Flows. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 821(1), 012,013 (2017). DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/821/1/012013

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/821/1/012013 2017

  5. [4]

    Energy Procedia 129, 1117– 1124 (2017)

    Ameli, A., Uusitalo, A., Turunen-Saaresti, T., Backman, J.: Nu- merical Sensitivity Analysis for Supercritical CO2 Radial Tur- bine Performance and Flow Field. Energy Procedia 129, 1117– 1124 (2017). DOI 10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2017.09.233

    work page doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.233 2017

  6. [5]

    Energy Procedia 129, 256–263 (2017)

    Gori, G., Zocca, M., Cammi, G., Spinelli, A., Guardone, A.: Ex- perimental assessment of the open-source SU2 CFD suite for ORC applications. Energy Procedia 129, 256–263 (2017). DOI 10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2017.09.151

    work page doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.151 2017

  7. [6]

    Energy Pro- cedia 129, 240–247 (2017)

    Head, A., Iyer, S., de Servi, C., Pini, M.: Towards the Validation of a CFD Solver for Non-ideal Compressible Flows. Energy Pro- cedia 129, 240–247 (2017). DOI 10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2017.09. 149

    work page doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09 2017

  8. [7]

    Energy Procedia 129, 1071–1077 (2017)

    Keep, J.A., Vitale, S., Pini, M., Burigana, M.: Preliminary ver- ification of the open-source CFD solver SU2 for radial-inflow turbine applications. Energy Procedia 129, 1071–1077 (2017). DOI 10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2017.09.130

    work page doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.130 2017

Show all 101 references
  1. [8]

    Colonna, P., Guardone, A.: Molecular Interpretation of nonclas- sical gasdynamics of dense vapors under the van der Waals model. Phys. Fluids 18(5), 56,101–1–14 (2006). DOI 10.1063/ 1.2196095

    2006

  2. [9]

    Harinck, J., Guardone, A., Colonna, P.: The influence of molec- ular complexity on expanding flows of ideal and dense gases. Phys. Fluids 21, 086,101–1–14 (2009). DOI 10.1063/1.3194308

    2009 doi

  3. [10]

    Nannan, N.R., Guardone, A., Colonna, P.: Critical point anoma- lies include expansion shock waves. Phys. Fluids 26, 021,701– 1–7 (2014). DOI 10.1063/1.4863555

    2014 doi

  4. [11]

    Colonna, P., Rebay, S.: Numerical simulation of dense gas flows on unstructured grids with an implicit high resolution upwind Euler solver. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 46(7), 735–765 (2004). DOI 10.1002/fld.762

    2004

  5. [12]

    Vinokur, M., Montagn ´e, J.L.: Generalized flux-vector splitting and Roe average for an equilibrium real gas. J. Comput. Phys. 89(2), 276–300 (1990). DOI 10.1016/0021-9991(90)90145-Q

    1990 doi

  6. [13]

    Abgrall, R.: An extension of Roe’s upwind scheme to algebraic equilibrium real gas models. Comput. Fluids 19(2), 171–182 (1991). DOI 10.1016/0045-7930(91)90032-D

    1991 doi

  7. [14]

    Arabi, S., Tr ´epanier, J.Y ., Camarero, R.: A simple extension of Roe’s scheme for real gases. J. Comput. Phys.329, 16–28 (2017). DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.10.067

    2017 doi

  8. [15]

    Colonna, P., Silva, P.: Dense Gas Thermodynamic Properties of Single and Multicomponent Fluids for Fluid Dynamics Simu- lations. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 125(3), 414–427 (2003). DOI 10.1115/1.1567306

    2003 doi

  9. [16]

    In: Proceedings of 42nd AIAA Thermo- physics Conference, 3947, pp

    Cinnella, P., Hercus, S.: Efficient Implementation of Short Fun- damental Equations of State for the Numerical Simulation of Dense Gas Flows. In: Proceedings of 42nd AIAA Thermo- physics Conference, 3947, pp. 1–27. Hawaii, USA (2011). DOI 10.2514/6.2011-3947

    2011 doi

  10. [17]

    Pantano, C., Saurel, R., Schmitt, T.: An oscillation free shock- capturing method for compressible van der Waals supercritical fluid flows. J. Comput. Phys. 335, 780–811 (2017). DOI 10. 1016/j.jcp.2017.01.057

    2017

  11. [18]

    Passmann, M., aus der Wiesche, S., Joos, F.: A one-dimensional analytical calculation method for obtaining normal shock losses in supersonic real gas flows. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.821(1), 012,004– 1–10 (2017). DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/821/1/012004

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    Sciacovelli, L., Cinnella, P., Gloerfelt, X.: Direct numerical sim- ulations of supersonic turbulent channel flows of dense gases. J. Fluid Mech. 821, 153–199 (2017). DOI 10.1017/jfm.2017.237

    2017 doi

  13. [21]

    Dwight, R.P.: Goal-oriented mesh adaptation for finite volume methods using a dissipation-based error indicator. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 56(8), 1193–1200 (2008). DOI 10.1002/fld.1582

    2008

  14. [22]

    AIAA Journal 49(4), 673–694 (2011)

    Fidkowski, K.J., Darmofal, D.L.: Review of Output-Based Er- ror Estimation and Mesh Adaptation in Computational Fluid Dy- namics. AIAA Journal 49(4), 673–694 (2011). DOI 10.2514/1. J050073

    2011 doi

  15. [23]

    Formaggia, L., Perotto, S.: Anisotropic error estimates for elliptic problems. Numer. Math. 94(1), 67–92 (2003). DOI 10.1007/ s00211-002-0415-z

    2003

  16. [24]

    Coupez, T.: Metric construction by length distribution tensor and edge based error for anisotropic adaptive meshing. J. Comput. Phys. 230(7), 2391–2405 (2011). DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.11. 041

    2011 doi

  17. [25]

    AIAA journal 27(1), 37–43 (1989)

    Kallinderis, Y ., Baron, J.: Adaptation methods for a new Navier- Stokes algorithm. AIAA journal 27(1), 37–43 (1989). DOI 10.2514/3.10091

    1989 doi

  18. [26]

    AIAA paper 1060, 1–33 (2004)

    Choi, S., Alonso, J.J., van der Weide, E.: Numerical and mesh resolution requirements for accurate sonic boom prediction of complete aircraft configurations. AIAA paper 1060, 1–33 (2004). DOI 10.2514/1.34367

    2004 doi

  19. [27]

    Kallinderis, Y ., Lymperopoulou, E.M., Antonellis, P.: Flow fea- ture detection for grid adaptation and flow visualization. J. Com- put. Phys. 341, 182–207 (2017). DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.04.001

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    Huang, W., Russell, R.D.: Adaptive Moving Mesh Meth- ods, vol. 174. Springer New York (2011). DOI 10.1007/ 978-1-4419-7916-2

    2011

  21. [29]

    Freitag, L.A., Ollivier-Gooch, C.: Tetrahedral mesh improvement using swapping and smoothing. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.40(21), 3979–4002 (1997). DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19971115) 40:21⟨3979::AID-NME251⟩3.0.CO;2-9

    1997 doi

  22. [30]

    Mavriplis, D.: Adaptive meshing techniques for viscous flow calculations on mixed element unstructured meshes. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 34(2), 93–111 (2000). DOI 10.1002/ 1097-0363(20000930)34:2⟨93::AID-FLD48⟩3.0.CO;2-3

    2000

  23. [31]

    Dapogny, C., Dobrzynski, C., Frey, P.: Three-dimensional adap- tive domain remeshing, implicit domain meshing, and applica- tions to free and moving boundary problems. J. Comput. Phys. 262, 358–378 (2014). DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.01.005

    2014 doi

  24. [32]

    SIAM Rev

    Babu ˇska, I., Suri, M.: The p and h-p versions of the finite element method, basic principles and properties. SIAM Rev. 36(4), 578– 632 (1994). DOI 10.1137/1036141

    1994 doi

  25. [33]

    Dolej ˇs´ı, V .: Anisotropic hp-adaptive method based on interpo- lation error estimates in the H1-seminorm. Appl. Math. 60(6), 597–616 (2015). DOI 10.1007/s10492-015-0113-7

    2015 doi

  26. [34]

    URL https://home.aero.polimi.it/flowmesh/

    Guardone, A., Isola, D., Quaranta, G., Re, B.: Flowmesh. URL https://home.aero.polimi.it/flowmesh/

  27. [35]

    Guardone, A., Isola, D., Quaranta, G.: Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian formulation for two-dimensional flows using dynamic meshes with edge swapping. J. Comput. Phys. 230(20), 7706– 7722 (2011). DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.06.026

    2011 doi

  28. [36]

    Isola, D., Guardone, A., Quaranta, G.: Finite-volume solution of two-dimensional compressible flows over dynamic adaptive grids. J. Comput. Phys. 285, 1–23 (2015). DOI 10.1016/j.jcp. 2015.01.007

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    Re, B., Dobrzynski, C., Guardone, A.: An interpolation-free ALE scheme for unsteady inviscid flows computations with large boundary displacements over three-dimensional adaptive grids. J. Comput. Phys. 340, 26–54 (2017). DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2017. 03.034 An Adaptive ALE Scheme for...

    2017 doi

  30. [38]

    URL http://www.asimptote.nl/software/fluidprop

    Colonna, P., der Stelt, T.P.: FluidProp: A program for the es- timation of thermophysical properties of fluids (2005). URL http://www.asimptote.nl/software/fluidprop

    2005

  31. [39]

    der Waals, J.: On the Continuity of the Gas and Liquid State. Ph.D. thesis, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands (1873)

  32. [40]

    Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 15(1), 59–64 (1976)

    Peng, D.Y ., Robinson, D.B.: A New Two-Constant Equation of State. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 15(1), 59–64 (1976). DOI 10.1021/i160057a011

    1976 doi

  33. [41]

    AIChE Journal 1(2), 142–151 (1955)

    Martin, J.J., Hou, Y .C.: Development of an equation of state for gases. AIChE Journal 1(2), 142–151 (1955). DOI 10.1002/aic. 690010203

    1955 doi

  34. [42]

    Fugacities of gaseous solutions

    Redlich, O., Kwong, J.N.S.: On thermodynamics of solutions V: an equation of state. Fugacities of gaseous solutions. Chem. Rev. 44(1), 233–244 (1949). DOI 10.1021/cr60137a013

    1949 doi

  35. [43]

    Soave, G.: Equilibrium constants from a modified Redlich- Kwong equation of state. Chem. Eng. Sci. 27(6), 1197–1203 (1972). DOI 10.1016/0009-2509(72)80096-4

    1972 doi

  36. [44]

    URL www.mmgtools.org

    Dobrzynski, C., Dapogny, C., Frey, P., Froehly, A.: Mmg PLAT- FORM. URL www.mmgtools.org

  37. [45]

    AIAA Journal 3(1), 183–184 (1965)

    Bryson, A.E., Greif, R.: Measurements in a free piston shock tube. AIAA Journal 3(1), 183–184 (1965). DOI 10.2514/3.2828

    1965 doi

  38. [46]

    Aeronautical Quar- terly 17(4), 351–370 (1966)

    Stalker, R.J.: The Free-Piston Shock Tube. Aeronautical Quar- terly 17(4), 351–370 (1966). DOI 10.1017/S0001925900003966

    1966 doi

  39. [47]

    Kewley, D.J., Hornung, H.G.: Free-piston shock-tube study of nitrogen dissociation. Chem. Phys. Lett. 25(4), 531–536 (1974). DOI 10.1016/0009-2614(74)85360-1

    1974 doi

  40. [48]

    Hannemann, K., Itoh, K., Mee, D.J., Hornung, H.G.: Free Piston Shock Tunnels HEG, HIEST, T4 and T5, pp. 181–

  41. [49]

    Re, B., Dobrzynski, C., Guardone, A.: Assessment of grid adap- tation criteria for steady, two-dimensional, inviscid flows in non- ideal compressible fluids. Appl. Math. Comput. (2017). DOI 10.1016/j.amc.2017.03.049

    2017 doi

  42. [50]

    Thompson, P.A.: A Fundamental Derivative in Gasdynamics. Phys. Fluids 14(9), 1843–1849 (1971). DOI 10.1063/1.1693693

    1971 doi

  43. [51]

    Cramer, M.S., Best, L.M.: Steady, isentropic flows of dense gases. Phys. Fluids A-Fluid 3(1), 219–226 (1991). DOI 10.1063/1.857855

    1991 doi

  44. [52]

    Kluwick, A.: Transonic nozzle flow of dense gases. J. Fluid Mech. 247, 661–688 (1993). DOI 10.1017/S0022112093000618

    1993 doi

  45. [53]

    Cramer, M.S., Kluwick, A.: On the propagation of waves exhibit- ing both positive and negative nonlinearity. J. Fluid Mech. 142, 9–37 (1984). DOI 10.1017/S0022112084000975

    1984 doi

  46. [54]

    Menikoff, R., Plohr, B.J.: The Riemann problem for fluid flow of real materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 75–130 (1989). DOI 10.1103/RevModPhys.61.75

    1989 doi

  47. [55]

    Nannan, N.R., Sirianni, C., Mathijssen, T., Guardone, A., Colonna, P.: The admissibility domain of rarefaction shock waves in the near-critical vapour–liquid equilibrium region of pure typical fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 795, 241–261 (2016). DOI 10.1017/jfm.2016.197

    2016 doi

  48. [56]

    Guardone, A., Argrow, B.M.: Nonclassical gasdynamic region of selected fluorocarbons. Phys. Fluids 17(11), 116,102 (2005). DOI 10.1063/1.2131922

    2005 doi

  49. [57]

    Wiley (1985)

    Callen, H.B.: Thermodynamics and an introduction to thermo- statistics, Second edn. Wiley (1985)

    1985

  50. [58]

    Span, R., Wagner, W.: Equations of State for Technical Appli- cations. I. Simultaneously Optimized Functional Forms for Non- polar and Polar Fluids. Int. J. Thermophys. 24(1), 1–39 (2003). DOI 10.1023/A:1022390430888

    2003 doi

  51. [59]

    Lemmon, E.W., Span, R.: Short fundamental equations of state for 20 industrial fluids. J. Chem. Eng. Data 51(3), 785–850 (2006). DOI 10.1021/je050186n

    2006 doi

  52. [60]

    Rinaldi, E., Pecnik, R., Colonna, P.: Exact jacobians for implicit Navier–Stokes simulations of equilibrium real gas flows. J. Com- put. Phys. 270, 459–477 (2014). DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.03.058

    2014 doi

  53. [61]

    Com- put

    Pini, M., Spinelli, A., Persico, G., Rebay, S.: Consistent look-up table interpolation method for real-gas flow simulations. Com- put. Fluids 107, 178–188 (2015). DOI 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014. 11.001

    2015 doi

  54. [62]

    In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2017, 63148, pp

    Moraga, F., Hofer, D., Saxena, S., Mallina, R.: Numerical Ap- proach for Real Gas Simulations: Part I—Tabular Fluid Proper- ties for Real Gas Analysis. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2017, 63148, pp. 1–8 (2017). DOI 10.1115/GT2017-63148

    2017 doi

  55. [63]

    Poling, B.E., Prausnitz, J.M., O’connell, J.P., et al.: The proper- ties of gases and liquids, vol. 5. Mcgraw-hill New York (2001)

    2001

  56. [64]

    Birkh¨auser, Basel (1992)

    LeVeque, R.J.: Numerical methods for conservation laws. Birkh¨auser, Basel (1992)

    1992

  57. [65]

    Re, B.: An adaptive interpolation-free conservative scheme for the three-dimensional Euler equations on dynamic meshes for aeronautical applications. Ph.D. thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Department of Aerospace Science and Technology (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    Koren, B.: Defect correction and multigrid for an efficient and accurate computation of airfoil flows. J. Comput. Phys. 77(1), 183–206 (1988). DOI 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90162-3

    1988 doi

  59. [67]

    Isola, D.: An Interpolation-Free Two-Dimensional Conservative ALE Scheme over Adaptive Unstructured Grids for Rotorcraft Aerodynamics. Ph.D. thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Department of Aerospace Engineering (2012)

    2012

  60. [68]

    Carpentieri, G.: An Adjoint-Based Shape-Optimization Method for Aerodynamic Design. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, Netherlands (2009)

    2009

  61. [69]

    Harten, A.: High Resolution Schemes for Hyperbolic Conser- vation Laws. J. Comput. Phys. 135, 260–278 (1997). DOI 10.1016/0021-9991(83)90136-5

    1997 doi

  62. [70]

    Roe, P.: Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 43(2), 357–372 (1981). DOI 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5

    1981 doi

  63. [71]

    Guardone, A., Vigevano, L.: Roe Linearization for the van der Waals Gas. J. Comput. Phys. 175, 50–78 (2002). DOI 10.1006/ jcph.2001.6915

    2002

  64. [72]

    Glaister, P.: An approximate linearised riemann solver for the Eu- ler equations for real gases. J. Comput. Phys. 74(2), 382–408 (1988). DOI 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90084-8

    1988 doi

  65. [73]

    AIAA journal 32(3), 519–527 (1994)

    Cox, C.F., Cinnella, P.: General solution procedure for flows in local chemical equilibrium. AIAA journal 32(3), 519–527 (1994). URL 10.2514/3.12016

    1994 doi

  66. [74]

    Toumi, I.: A weak formulation of roe’s approximate riemann solver. J. Comput. Phys. 102(2), 360–373 (1992). DOI 10.1016/0021-9991(92)90378-C

    1992 doi

  67. [75]

    Guardone, A.: Three-dimensional shock tube flows for dense gases. J. Fluid Mech. 583, 423–442 (2007). DOI 10.1017/ S0022112007006313

    2007

  68. [76]

    Mottura, L., Vigevano, L., Zaccanti, M.: An Evaluation of Roe’s Scheme Generalizations for Equilibrium Real Gas Flows. J. Comput. Phys. 138(2), 354–399 (1997). DOI 10.1006/jcph.1997. 5838

    1997 doi

  69. [77]

    Cinnella, P.: Roe-type schemes for dense gas flow computa- tions. Comput. Fluids 35(10), 1264–1281 (2006). DOI 10.1016/ j.compfluid.2005.04.007

    2006

  70. [78]

    Selmin, V .: The node-centred finite volume approach: bridge be- tween finite differences and finite elements,. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. pp. 107–138

  71. [79]

    AIAA journal 28(8), 1381–1388 (1990)

    Batina, J.T.: Unsteady Euler airfoil solutions using unstructured dynamic meshes. AIAA journal 28(8), 1381–1388 (1990). DOI 10.2514/3.25229

    1990 doi

  72. [80]

    Venkatakrishnan, V ., Mavriplis, D.: Implicit Method for the Computation of Unsteady Flows on Unstructured Grids. J. Com- put. Phys. 127(2), 380–397 (1996). DOI 10.1006/jcph.1996.0182

    1996

  73. [81]

    Degand, C., Farhat, C.: A three-dimensional torsional spring analogy method for unstructured dynamic meshes. Comput. Struct. 80(3-4), 305–316 (2002). DOI 10.1016/S0045-7949(02) 00002-0 26 Barbara Re, Alberto Guardone

    2002 doi

  74. [82]

    Hirt, C., Amsden, A.A., Cook, J.: An arbitrary Lagrangian- Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds. J. Comput. Phys. 14(3), 227–253 (1974). DOI doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(74) 90051-5

    1974 doi

  75. [83]

    Donea, J., Giuliani, S., Halleux, J.: An arbitrary lagrangian- eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid- structure interactions. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 33(1), 689–723 (1982). DOI 10.1016/0045-7825(82)90128-1

    1982 doi

  76. [84]

    Formaggia, L., Nobile, F.: Stability analysis of second-order time accurate schemes for ALE–FEM. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 193(39-41), 4097–4116 (2004). DOI http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.cma.2003.09.028

    2004

  77. [85]

    Mavriplis, D.J., Yang, Z.: Construction of the discrete geometric conservation law for high-order time-accurate simulations on dy- namic meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 213(2), 557–573 (2006). DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.08.018

    2006 doi

  78. [86]

    ´Etienne, S., Garon, A., Pelletier, D.: Perspective on the geomet- ric conservation law and finite element methods for ALE simu- lations of incompressible flow. J. Comput. Phys. 228(7), 2313– 2333 (2009). DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.11.032

    2009 doi

  79. [87]

    Lesoinne, M., Farhat, C.: Geometric conservation laws for flow problems with moving boundaries and deformable meshes, and their impact on aeroelastic computations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 134(1–2), 71–90 (1996). DOI 10.1016/ 0045-7825(96)01028-6

    1996

  80. [88]

    Johnson, A.A., Tezduyar, T.E.: Advanced mesh generation and update methods for 3D flow simulations. Comput. Mech. 23(2), 130–143 (1999). DOI 10.1007/s004660050393

    1999 doi

  81. [89]

    Hassan, O., Probert, E., Morgan, K., Weatherill, N.: Unsteady flow simulation using unstructured meshes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 189(4), 1247–1275 (2000). DOI 10.1016/ S0045-7825(99)00376-X

    2000

  82. [90]

    Borouchaki, H., George, P.L., Hecht, F., Laug, P., Saltel, E.: De- launay mesh generation governed by metric specifications. Part I. Algorithms. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 25(1–2), 61–83 (1997). DOI 10.1016/S0168-874X(96)00057-1

    1997 doi

  83. [91]

    Dolej ˇs´ı, V .: Anisotropic mesh adaptation for finite volume and finite element methods on triangular meshes. Comput. Visual. Sci. 1(3), 165–178 (1998). DOI 10.1007/s007910050015

    1998 doi

  84. [92]

    Del Pino, S.: Metric-based mesh adaptation for 2D Lagrangian compressible flows. J. Comput. Phys.230(5), 1793–1821 (2011). DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.11.030

    2011 doi

  85. [93]

    Frey, P., Alauzet, F.: Anisotropic mesh adaptation for CFD com- putations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 194(48–49), 5068–5082 (2005). DOI 10.1016/j.cma.2004.11.025

    2005 doi

  86. [94]

    In: Proceedings of 2017 AIAA SciTech Forum, 2017-1945

    Re, B., Guardone, A., Dobrzynski, C.: An Adaptive conserva- tive ALE approach to Deal with Large Boundary Displacements in Three-Dimensional Inviscid Simulations. In: Proceedings of 2017 AIAA SciTech Forum, 2017-1945. Grapevine, Texas (2017). DOI 10.2514/6.2017-1945

    2017 doi

  87. [95]

    In: E.O.n

    Re, B., Guardone, A., Dobrzynski, C.: Numerical simulation of shock-tube piston problems with adaptive, anisotropic meshes. In: E.O.n. M. Papadrakakis, B. Schrefler (eds.) Proceedings of Coupled Problems in Science and Engineering VII, pp. 1227–

  88. [96]

    In: Proceedings of the 17th Interna- tional Meshing Roundtable, pp

    Dobrzynski, C., Frey, P.: Anisotropic Delaunay mesh adaptation for unsteady simulations. In: Proceedings of the 17th Interna- tional Meshing Roundtable, pp. 177–194. Springer (2008)

    2008

  89. [97]

    Borouchaki, H., Hecht, F., Frey, P.: Mesh gradation con- trol. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 43(6), 1143–1165 (1998). DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19981130)43:6 ⟨1143:: AID-NME470⟩3.0.CO;2-I

    1998 doi

  90. [98]

    National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Col- orado (2013)

    Lemmon, E.W., Huber, M.L., McLinden, M.O.: NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties – REFPROP. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Col- orado (2013). DOI 10.18434/T4JS3C. URL www.nist.gov/ srd/refprop

    2013 doi

  91. [100]

    McGraw-Hill Inc

    Thompson, P.A.: Compressible-Fluid Dynamics. McGraw-Hill Inc. (1972)

    1972

  92. [264]

    DOI 10.1007/ 978-3-319-23745-9\textunderscore7

    Springer International Publishing (2016). DOI 10.1007/ 978-3-319-23745-9\textunderscore7

    2016

  93. [1238]

    Rhodes Island, Greece (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.