pith. sign in

arxiv: 1206.5556 · v3 · pith:HXAFY4FOnew · submitted 2012-06-25 · 🧮 math.RA

An alternative perspective on projectivity of modules

classification 🧮 math.RA
keywords modulesmodulesubprojectivitypoordomainprojectivityrightarrowalternative
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Similar to the idea of relative projectivity, we introduce the notion of relative subprojectivity, which is an alternative way to measure the projectivity of a module. Given modules $M$ and $N$, $M$ is said to be {\em $N$-subprojective} if for every epimorphism $g:B \rightarrow N$ and homomorphism $f:M \rightarrow N$, then there exists a homomorphism $h:M \rightarrow B$ such that $gh=f$. For a module $M$, the {\em subprojectivity domain of $M$} is defined to be the collection of all modules $N$ such that $M$ is $N$-subprojective. A module is projective if and only if its subprojectivity domain consists of all modules. Opposite to this idea, a module $M$ is said to be {\em subprojectively poor}, or {\em $sp$-poor} if its subprojectivity domain is as small as conceivably possible, that is, consisting of exactly the projective modules. Properties of subprojectivity domains and $sp$-poor modules are studied. In particular, the existence of an $sp$-poor module is attained for artinian serial rings.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.