Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Alternatives for Testing of Context-Aware Contemporary Software Systems in industrial settings: Results from a Rapid review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.01343 v2 pith:HXB2WV4A submitted 2021-04-03 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords contexttestingcacssresultsvariationsoftwaresystemstest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Context: Context-aware contemporary software systems (CACSS) are mainstream. Furthermore, they present challenges for current engineering practices. These challenges are distinctively present when testing CACSS, as the variation of context deepens the limitations of available software testing practices and technologies. Objective: To understand how the industry deals with the variation of context when testing CACSS. Method: A Rapid Review was commissioned to uncover the necessary evidence to achieve the objectives. Results: Our results show that current research initiatives aim to generate or improve Test Suites that can deal with the variation of context and the sheer volume of test input possibilities. To achieve this, they mostly rely on modelling the systems' dynamic behavior and increasing computing resources to generate test inputs. We found no evidence of research results aiming at managing context variation through the testing lifecycle process. Conclusions: We discuss how the identified solutions are not ready for mainstream adoption. They are all domain-specific, and while the ideas and approaches can be reproduced in different settings, the technologies noon to be re-engineered and tailor to the specific CACSS.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools