Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 77 references

Strong pair-density-wave fluctuations in an exactly solvable doped Mott insulator

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adding a pairing interaction to the exactly solvable Hatsugai-Kohmoto model produces a finite-temperature pair-density-wave instability at center-of-mass momentum $Q=(\pi,\pi)$ that beats uniform superconductivity at low doping and…

desk verdict A solid extension of the HK model to finite-momentum pairing, with a plausible PDW-vs-SC phase diagram that hinges on an untested constant-DOS approximation. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.18864 v1 pith:HXDHRBFR submitted 2024-12-25 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con

Igor de M. Froldi , Carlos Eduardo S. P. Corsino , Hermann Freire This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords Hatsugai-Kohmotomodelpair-densitywavedopedMottinsulatorexactlysolvablepairsusceptibilitysuperconductivitynon-Fermiliquidcupratesuperconductors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the Hatsugai-Kohmoto model on a square lattice—an exactly solvable model that is a Mott insulator at half-filling and a non-Fermi liquid when doped—augmented by a BCS-like pairing interaction. It claims that, at low doping up to a critical value around $x_c\approx 0.25$ and for intermediate interaction strength $U$, the static pair susceptibility at center-of-mass momentum $Q=(\pi,\pi)$ diverges at a finite critical temperature, signaling strong pair-density-wave (PDW) fluctuations. In that doping window the PDW channel beats the ordinary $q=0$ superconducting channel; further doping favors uniform superconductivity instead. The interest is that the HK model's Mott transition has been argued to lie in the same universality class as the Hubbard model's, so this exact result offers a potential picture of PDW fluctuations on doping a Mott insulator, a scenario proposed for underdoped cuprates.

What carries the argument

The central object is the static pair susceptibility $\chi_0(0,q)$ of the HK model with a pairing interaction $V_q$, whose divergence condition $\chi_0(0,q)=1/V_q$ locates the superconducting ($q=0$) and PDW ($q=Q=(\pi,\pi)$) instabilities. The machinery is the exact two-band structure of the HK Green's function, the constant density of states $\rho(\omega)=1/W$ (taken for simplicity), and the identity $\xi_{k+Q}=-\xi_k-2\mu$, which makes the PDW pair-energy denominator independent of $k$ and renders the susceptibility integrals exact.

What would settle it

Repeat the same exact susceptibility calculation using the actual square-lattice density of states (or a momentum-resolved numerical method) and check whether $\chi_0(0,Q)$ still diverges at finite $T$ and still exceeds $\chi_0(0,0)$ for $x\lesssim 0.25$ and intermediate $U$; if it does not, the PDW-dominated phase diagram is an artifact of the constant-DOS approximation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working with the exact Green's function of the HK model and a Dyson equation for the pair susceptibility, the authors show that the $Q=(\pi,\pi)$ pairing channel has a Cooper-like bound state with negative pair-binding energy $\varepsilon'$ for low doping and intermediate $U$, and that the corresponding static susceptibility $\chi_0(0,Q)$ diverges at a finite $T_c^{\mathrm{PDW}}$ once the pairing strength $V'$ exceeds a small threshold. Because $\xi_{k+Q}=-\xi_k-2\mu$, the two-particle energy denominators in the PDW susceptibility become $k$-independent, so the momentum integrals can be done exactly. The result is a phase diagram in which PDW fluctuations dominate over $q=0$ superconductivity in an underdoped, intermediate-$U$ region, while uniform SC takes over at higher doping; for $V'\to 0$ the PDW susceptibility is enhanced but does not diverge at finite $T$, so the model realizes a fluctuating PDW regime rather than long-range PDW order in that limit.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes a flat, featureless density of states in place of the real square-lattice one, and the values of the pair-binding energies, critical temperatures, and the critical doping $x_c\approx 0.25$ depend on that choice; with the true band structure the PDW-versus-SC competition could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At finite pairing strength $V'$ and low doping up to $x_c\approx 0.25$ with intermediate $U$, the static pair susceptibility at $Q=(\pi,\pi)$ diverges at a finite $T_c^{\mathrm{PDW}}$, establishing a genuine finite-temperature PDW instability in the HK-SC model.
  • In this underdoped window the PDW channel dominates the $q=0$ SC channel; at higher doping the uniform superconducting instability becomes the leading one.
  • For $V'\to 0$ the $Q=(\pi,\pi)$ susceptibility is strongly enhanced as $T$ drops but does not diverge at finite temperature, so the model describes a fluctuating PDW regime rather than true long-range PDW order.
  • Increasing $U$ up to the bandwidth strengthens PDW pair binding while weakening uniform SC, which is why intermediate correlation strength favors PDW; $U>W$ suppresses both phases.
  • If the HK model's Mott transition indeed shares a universality class with the Hubbard model, the exact PDW-fluctuation phase diagram becomes a candidate qualitative explanation for fluctuating-PDW behavior in doped Mott insulators such as underdoped cuprates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test would repeat the exact susceptibility integrals with the actual square-lattice density of states (including van Hove singularities) instead of $\rho(\omega)=1/W$; if the PDW-dominated window survives, the phase diagram becomes a quantitative benchmark for approximate methods in the Hubbard model.
  • Because the $Q=(\pi,\pi)$ PDW here is tied to $\eta$-pairing, one could probe the fluctuating PDW regime through dynamical charge correlations or spectral functions of the HK model, looking for signatures that could be compared with finite-size numerics.
  • The exact $T_c^{\mathrm{PDW}}$ formulas could be used as a controlled starting point to study how $k$-dependent pairing interactions, disorder, or the orbital-HK extension shift the PDW-versus-SC competition.
  • If the fluctuating-PDW regime is the relevant 'mother state' for underdoped cuprates, a testable next step is to check whether the model reproduces pseudogap-like spectral features, such as Fermi arcs, in the same doping and interaction window.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the Hatsugai-Kohmoto (HK) model on a square lattice with an added finite-momentum pairing interaction (the HK-SC model). It derives Cooper-pair binding energies and static pair susceptibilities in the zero-center-of-mass (SC) and Q=(π,π) (PDW) channels. The central claim is that, for intermediate U and low doping up to a critical doping of order x_c≈0.25, the PDW susceptibility diverges at a finite temperature and dominates the SC channel, while at larger doping SC wins. The authors compute closed-form expressions for the pair-binding energies, critical temperatures, and chemical potentials using a constant density of states, and interpret the resulting phase diagram as evidence that PDW fluctuations emerge generically on doping a Mott insulator, with possible relevance to underdoped cuprates.

Significance. If the central claim survives scrutiny, this would be a valuable addition to the field: it provides an analytically tractable two-dimensional model in which PDW fluctuations compete with uniform superconductivity, and it connects the exactly solvable HK model to a currently active experimental and theoretical topic. The paper is constructive rather than phenomenological: it contains no parameter fitting, the susceptibility calculation is transparently built from previously established HK Green's functions, and the analytic expressions are sufficiently detailed to be checked and reused. The significance is somewhat conditional, however, because the quantitative phase diagram is obtained from an approximate density of states, and because the treatment of the pairing-perturbed model is not literally exact.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Eq. (19); Sec. IV, Eqs. (27), (30)-(32)] The central quantitative claim that PDW fluctuations dominate in a low-doping, intermediate-U window rests on the replacement of the square-lattice density of states by a constant, ρ(ω)=1/W, introduced in Sec. III immediately after Eq. (15) and used in Eq. (19), Eq. (27), Eqs. (30)-(32), and the chemical-potential relations (33)-(34). The real square-lattice DOS has van Hove singularities and sharp band edges, which change the relative weight of the Ω0, Ω1, and Ω2 energy regions and also shift μ(T,x,u) at fixed doping. Since the q=0 and q=Q susceptibilities probe different energy ranges, the ratio χ0(0,Q)/χ0(0,0) could change substantially when the true DOS replaces the flat one. The paper provides no numerical k-sum test, no comparison with the actual square-lattice DOS, and no error estimate showing that the PDW-dominated window and the quoted critical doping x_c≈0.25 survive. Because this approximation enters every equation that produces the phase diagram in Fig. 4, this is a load-bearing point that needs to be addressed before the central claim can be accepted.
  2. [Eq. (14)] Equation (14) appears to contain an error in the Ω1 terms: the factors (1−n^q_0(k)) should presumably be (1−n^q_1(k)), since those terms involve β_k with k∈Ω1 and since the variational equation (15) for the same channel uses (1−n^q_1(k)) and n^q_1(k)+1/2. As written, Eq. (14) is inconsistent with Eq. (15) and with the derivation of the pair-binding energy. The authors should correct this expression and re-verify that the self-consistent equation (15) follows from the corrected variational calculation.
  3. [Sec. IV, Eq. (22), and title/abstract] The claim of exactness is overstated for the HK-SC model. The bare HK model is exactly solvable because it is diagonal in momentum, but once the pairing term V_q is added the Hamiltonian is no longer k-diagonal. Equation (22) is a Dyson/RPA-type resummation for the pairing susceptibility, and the subsequent calculation explicitly assumes T≪U,W and the constant-DOS approximation. The text at the start of Sec. IV says 'We will perform here an exact calculation of Eq. (21)', and the title and abstract describe the doped Mott insulator as 'exactly solvable'. I recommend either proving that Eq. (22) is exact for the HK-SC model or clearly labeling the susceptibility computation as an approximate controlled treatment. This distinction matters because the critical temperatures T_c^SC and T_c^PDW are inferred from the pole condition of Eq. (23) within this approximation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II] The sentence 'In Appendix V, we show some expressions of μ(T,x,U)' appears to be a typo; there is no appendix labeled V in the manuscript, only the unnumbered 'APPENDIX: RESULTS FOR T_c^PDW AND μ(T)'.
  2. [Appendix, Eq. (32)] The expression for χ0(0,Q) in Eq. (32) contains ambiguous notation, including 'tanh^{-1}(βU/2)', unbalanced parentheses, and line breaks that make the formula difficult or impossible to verify. Please provide a cleaner closed form, or include a supplementary notebook or code snippet that generates the plotted curves.
  3. [Appendix, Eqs. (31)-(34)] The notation μ'_c appears in the Appendix without being defined in the main text, and the sentence 'We note that μ′c in Eqs. (31) and (34)' seems to refer to a quantity in Eq. (34) that is not denoted μ'_c. Please make the notation for the chemical potential at the critical temperature consistent throughout Eqs. (31)-(34).
  4. [Fig. 4] Figure 4 is labeled 'schematic phase diagram' with a dashed guide line. Since the precise location of the PDW/SC boundary is a central quantitative result, it would be helpful to either show computed boundary curves for the parameter values used in the paper, or explicitly state that the drawn boundary is only illustrative and not extracted from the calculations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the PDW and SC instabilities are derived from the HK-SC Hamiltonian without fitting a target result.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a derived consequence of the HK-SC Hamiltonian, not an input. The pairing instability is obtained by solving the Cooper-pair binding-energy equation (Eq. 19) and the bare pair susceptibilities (Eqs. 27 and 30), with the critical-temperature conditions (Eqs. 24 and 25) following from the Dyson equation (Eq. 22). The only external input is the exact HK Green's function (Eq. 4), quoted from Ref. [42], whose authors do not overlap with the present authors; this is independent support, not a self-citation. The Q=(π,π) momentum choice is motivated by the band identity ξ_{k+Q} = -ξ_k - 2μ, which makes the PDW susceptibility exactly integrable, and by external literature on PDW competition; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in from the present authors' prior work. The constant-density-of-states replacement ρ(ω)=1/W in Sec. III is an approximation that may affect quantitative values such as x_c, but it is not a parameter fitted to the PDW conclusion and does not make the derivation circular; it is a correctness/robustness concern, not a circularity concern. Self-citations such as Refs. [22,24,72,74-77] appear only in the introduction or outlook as background and are not load-bearing for the derivation. No step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on prior HK results, a constant DOS approximation, and a ladder treatment of the pairing interaction. None of these are fitted to a target result, but the constant DOS and the ladder approximation limit the exactness of the quantitative phase diagram.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The exact retarded Green's function of the HK model (Eq. 4) from Ref. [42] is taken as the starting point for the susceptibility calculation.
    The Green's function is a known result for the HK model without pairing; the paper relies on it without re-derivation.
  • domain assumption The single-occupied region Ω1 is not spin polarized, see footnote 2 citing Ref. [47].
    The occupancies in Eq. (2) assume n_{k↑}=n_{k↓}; a spin-polarized Ω1 would change the pair-binding equations.
  • domain assumption A constant density of states ρ(ω)=1/W is used for the square lattice.
    This is an approximation introduced 'for simplicity' after Eq. (15); the true square-lattice DOS is not constant, and the quantitative phase boundaries depend on it.
  • domain assumption The pairing susceptibility obeys the ladder Dyson equation χ = χ0 + V χ0 χ (Eq. 22).
    This is a mean-field or BCS treatment of the pairing interaction; it is not an exact solution of the full HK-SC model for arbitrarily strong V.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strong pair-density-wave fluctuations in an exactly solvable doped Mott insulator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HXDHRBFR

@misc{pith2026241218864,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strong pair-density-wave fluctuations in an exactly solvable doped Mott insulator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HXDHRBFR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.18864}
}
abstract

We investigate the Hatsugai-Kohmoto (HK) model on a square lattice, which describes both a Mott insulator at half-filling and a non-Fermi liquid phase on doping. Through the solution of this exactly solvable model with the inclusion of pairing interactions, we demonstrate the emergence of strong pair-density-wave (PDW) fluctuations associated with center-of-mass momentum $\mathbf{Q}=(\pi,\pi)$ at finite temperatures for low dopings up to a critical doping and intermediate $U$ interaction. Furthermore, we also confirm that a superconducting instability appears in the model within a wide regime of interaction $U$ and doping parameter $x$. In view of the fact that it has been recently put forward that the metal-insulator transition of the HK model belongs to the same universality class as the Mott transition of the paradigmatic Hubbard model [Huang \emph{et al.}, Nat. Phys. \textbf{18}, 511 (2022)], our work may thus shed light on an interesting scenario regarding the emergence of a fluctuating PDW phase on doping a Mott insulator, which has been argued to be relevant for understanding the physics of the cuprate superconductors in the underdoped regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.18864 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the band dispersions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Cooper pair binding energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Critical temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic phase diagram displaying the leading pairing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. F. Agterberg, J. S. Davis, S. D. Edkins, E. Fradkin, D. J. Van Harlingen, S. A. Kivelson, P. A. Lee, L. Radz- ihovsky, J. M. Tranquada, and Y. Wang, The Physics of Pair-Density Waves: Cuprate Superconductors and Be- yond, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 11, 231 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    H. Chen, H. Yang, B. Hu, Z. Zhao, J. Yuan, Y. Xing, G. Qian, Z. Huang, G. Li, Y. Ye, S. Ma, S. Ni, H. Zhang, Q. Yin, C. Gong, Z. Tu, H. Lei, H. Tan, S. Zhou, C. Shen, X. Dong, B. Yan, Z. Wang, and H.-J. Gao, Roton pair density wave in a strong-coupling kagome superconductor, Nature 599, 222 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    J. Ge, P. Wang, Y. Xing, Q. Yin, A. Wang, J. Shen, H. Lei, Z. Wang, and J. Wang, Charge-4 e and Charge- 6e Flux Quantization and Higher Charge Superconductiv- ity in Kagome Superconductor Ring Devices, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021025 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    L. Jiao, S. Howard, S. Ran, Z. Wang, J. O. Rodriguez, M. Sigrist, Z. Wang, N. P. Butch, and V. Madhavan, Chi- ral superconductivity in heavy-fermion metal UTe2, Nature 579, 523 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Q. Gu, J. P. Carroll, S. Wang, S. Ran, C. Broyles, H. Sid- diquee, N. P. Butch, S. R. Saha, J. Paglione, J. C. S. Davis, and X. Liu, Detection of a pair density wave state in UTe2, Nature 618, 921 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Y. Liu, T. Wei, G. He, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, and J. Wang, Pair density wave state in a monolayer high-Tc iron-based superconductor, Nature 618, 934 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    H. Zhao, R. Blackwell, M. Thinel, T. Handa, S. Ishida, X. Zhu, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, A. N. Pasupathy, and K. Fu- jita, Smectic pair-density-wave order in EuRbFe 4As4, Na- ture 618, 940 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    P. A. Lee, Amperean Pairing and the Pseudogap Phase of Cuprate Superconductors, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031017 (2014)

    2014

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, E.-A. Kim, S. A. Kivelson, V. Oganesyan, J. M. Tranquada, and S. C. Zhang, Dy- namical Layer Decoupling in a Stripe-Ordered High- Tc Su- perconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 127003 (2007)

    2007

  2. [10]

    Q. Li, M. H¨ ucker, G. D. Gu, A. M. Tsvelik, and J. M. Tran- quada, Two-Dimensional Superconducting Fluctuations in Stripe-Ordered La 1.875Ba0.125CuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 067001 (2007)

    2007

  3. [11]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and J. M. Tranquada, Striped superconductors: how spin, charge and supercon- ducting orders intertwine in the cuprates, New Journal of Physics 11, 115004 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    P. M. Lozano, T. Ren, G. D. Gu, A. M. Tsvelik, J. M. Tranquada, and Q. Li, Testing for pair density wave order in La1.875Ba0.125CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174510 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    M. H. Hamidian, S. D. Edkins, S. H. Joo, A. Kostin, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, M. J. Lawler, E.-A. Kim, A. P. Mackenzie, K. Fujita, J. Lee, and J. C. S. Davis, Detec- tion of a Cooper-pair density wave in Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+x, Nature 532, 343?347 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Z. Du, H. Li, S. H. Joo, E. P. Donoway, J. Lee, J. C. S. Davis, G. Gu, P. D. Johnson, and K. Fujita, Imaging the energy gap modulations of the cuprate pair-density-wave state, Nature 580, 65–70 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Pair-Density- Wave Correlations in the Kondo-Heisenberg Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 146403 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    Jiang, Pair density wave in the doped three-band hub- bard model on two-leg square cylinders, Phys

    H.-C. Jiang, Pair density wave in the doped three-band hub- bard model on two-leg square cylinders, Phys. Rev. B 107, 214504 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Zhang and A

    Y.-H. Zhang and A. Vishwanath, Pair-density-wave super- conductor from doping Haldane chain and rung-singlet lad- der, Phys. Rev. B 106, 045103 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Charge-4e su- perconductivity from pair-density-wave order in certain high-temperature superconductors, Nature Physics 5, 830 (2009)

    2009

  11. [19]

    Loder, A

    F. Loder, A. P. Kampf, and T. Kopp, Superconducting state with a finite-momentum pairing mechanism in zero external magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 81, 020511 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    Soto-Garrido and E

    R. Soto-Garrido and E. Fradkin, Pair-density-wave su- perconducting states and electronic liquid-crystal phases, Phys. Rev. B 89, 165126 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    Y. Wang, D. F. Agterberg, and A. Chubukov, Coexis- tence of Charge-Density-Wave and Pair-Density-Wave Or- ders in Underdoped Cuprates, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 197001 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Freire, V

    H. Freire, V. S. de Carvalho, and C. P´ epin, Renormal- ization group analysis of the pair-density-wave and charge order within the fermionic hot-spot model for cuprate su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. B 92, 045132 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    W ˚ ardh and M

    J. W ˚ ardh and M. Granath, Effective model for a super- current in a pair-density wave, Phys. Rev. B 96, 224503 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    V. S. de Carvalho, R. M. P. Teixeira, H. Freire, and E. Miranda, Odd-frequency pair density wave in the Kitaev- Kondo lattice model, Phys. Rev. B 103, 174512 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Y.-M. Wu, P. A. Nosov, A. A. Patel, and S. Raghu, Pair Density Wave Order from Electron Repulsion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 026001 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Shaffer and L

    D. Shaffer and L. H. Santos, Triplet pair density wave su- perconductivity on the π-flux square lattice, Phys. Rev. B 108, 035135 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Setty, L

    C. Setty, L. Fanfarillo, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Mechanism for fluctuating pair density wave, Nature Communications 14 (2023), 10.1038/s41467-023-38956-x

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    Coleman, A

    P. Coleman, A. Panigrahi, and A. Tsvelik, Solvable 3D Kondo Lattice Exhibiting Pair Density Wave, Odd- Frequency Pairing, and Order Fractionalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 177601 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Setty, J

    C. Setty, J. Zhao, L. Fanfarillo, E. W. Huang, P. J. Hirschfeld, P. W. Phillips, and K. Yang, Exact solution for finite center-of-mass momentum Cooper pairing, Phys. Rev. B 108, 174506 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Corboz, T

    P. Corboz, T. M. Rice, and M. Troyer, Competing States in the t-J Model: Uniform d-Wave State versus Stripe State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 046402 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Jiang, Z.-Y

    H.-C. Jiang, Z.-Y. Weng, and S. A. Kivelson, Supercon- ductivity in the doped t − J model: Results for four-leg cylinders, Phys. Rev. B 98, 140505 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    X. Y. Xu, K. T. Law, and P. A. Lee, Pair Density Wave in the Doped t−J Model with Ring Exchange on a Triangular Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 167001 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Jiang and T

    H.-C. Jiang and T. P. Devereaux, Pair density wave and superconductivity in a kinetically frustrated doped Emery model on a square lattice, (2023), arXiv:2309.11786 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Liu, X.-X

    F. Liu, X.-X. Huang, E. W. Huang, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Enhanced Pair-Density-Wave Vertices in a Bi- layer Hubbard Model at Half Filling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 156503 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    X. Zhu, J. Sun, S.-S. Gong, W. Huang, S. Feng, R. T. Scalettar, and H. Guo, Exact Demonstration of pair- density-wave superconductivity in the σz-Hubbard model, 10 (2024), arXiv:2404.11043 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    J. Wang, W. Sun, H.-X. Wang, Z. Han, S. A. Kivelson, and H. Yao, Pair density waves in the strong-coupling two- dimensional Holstein-Hubbard model: a variational Monte Carlo study, (2024), arXiv:2404.11950 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024

  29. [37]

    Hatsugai and M

    Y. Hatsugai and M. Kohmoto, Exactly Solvable Model of Correlated Lattice Electrons in Any Dimensions, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 61, 2056 (1992)

    1992

  30. [38]

    Baskaran, An exactly solvable fermion model: Spinons, holons and a non-Fermi liquid phase, Modern Physics Let- ters B 05, 643 (1991)

    G. Baskaran, An exactly solvable fermion model: Spinons, holons and a non-Fermi liquid phase, Modern Physics Let- ters B 05, 643 (1991)

    1991

  31. [39]

    M. A. Continentino and M. D. Coutinho-Filho, Scaling close to a Mott transition in an exactly soluble model, Solid State Communications 90, 619 (1994)

    1994

  32. [40]

    Vitoriano, L

    C. Vitoriano, L. B. Bejan, A. M. S. Macˆ edo, and M. D. Coutinho-Filho, Metal-insulator transition with infinite- range Coulomb coupling: Fractional statistics and quantum critical properties, Phys. Rev. B 61, 7941 (2000)

    2000

  33. [41]

    Yeo and P

    L. Yeo and P. W. Phillips, Local entropies across the Mott transition in an exactly solvable model, Phys. Rev. D 99, 094030 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    P. W. Phillips, L. Yeo, and E. W. Huang, Exact theory for superconductivity in a doped Mott insulator, Nature Physics 16, 1175 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    Sachdev and J

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993)

    1993

  36. [44]

    Chowdhury, A

    D. Chowdhury, A. Georges, O. Parcollet, and S. Sachdev, Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models and beyond: Window into non- Fermi liquids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 035004 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    Setty, Pairing instability on a Luttinger surface: A non- Fermi liquid to superconductor transition and its Sachdev- Ye-Kitaev dual, Phys

    C. Setty, Pairing instability on a Luttinger surface: A non- Fermi liquid to superconductor transition and its Sachdev- Ye-Kitaev dual, Phys. Rev. B 101, 184506 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006)

    2006

  39. [47]

    Y. Li, V. Mishra, Y. Zhou, and F.-C. Zhang, Two-stage superconductivity in the Hatsugai-Kohomoto-BCS model, New Journal of Physics 24, 103019 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Zhu and Q

    H.-S. Zhu and Q. Han, Effects of electron correlation on su- perconductivity in the Hatsugai-Kohmoto model, Chinese Physics B 30, 107401 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Yang, Exactly solvable model of Fermi arcs and pseudo- gap, Phys

    K. Yang, Exactly solvable model of Fermi arcs and pseudo- gap, Phys. Rev. B 103, 024529 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    J. Zhao, L. Yeo, E. W. Huang, and P. W. Phillips, Ther- modynamics of an exactly solvable model for superconduc- tivity in a doped Mott insulator, Phys. Rev. B 105, 184509 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    H.-S. Zhu, Z. Li, Q. Han, and Z. D. Wang, Topological s- wave superconductors driven by electron correlation, Phys. Rev. B 103, 024514 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    Manning-Coe and B

    D. Manning-Coe and B. Bradlyn, Ground state stability, symmetry, and degeneracy in Mott insulators with long- range interactions, Phys. Rev. B 108, 165136 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    J. Zhao, P. Mai, B. Bradlyn, and P. Phillips, Failure of Topological Invariants in Strongly Correlated Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 106601 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Setty, F

    C. Setty, F. Xie, S. Sur, L. Chen, M. G. Vergniory, and Q. Si, Electronic properties, correlated topology, and Green’s function zeros, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033235 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    P. Mai, B. E. Feldman, and P. W. Phillips, Topological Mott insulator at quarter filling in the interacting Haldane model, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013162 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Jab lonowski, J

    K. Jab lonowski, J. Skolimowski, W. Brzezicki, K. Byczuk, and M. M. Wysoki´ nski, Topological Mott insulator in the odd-integer filled Anderson lattice model with Hatsugai- Kohmoto interactions, Phys. Rev. B 108, 195145 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    M. M. Wysoki´ nski and W. Brzezicki, Quantum anomalous Hall insulator in ionic Rashba lattice of correlated electrons, Phys. Rev. B 108, 035121 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    K.-Y. Yang, T. M. Rice, and F.-C. Zhang, Phenomenologi- cal theory of the pseudogap state, Phys. Rev. B 73, 174501 (2006)

    2006

  51. [59]

    E. W. Huang, G. L. Nave, and P. W. Phillips, Discrete symmetry breaking defines the Mott quartic fixed point, Nature Physics 18, 511 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    L. M. Roth, Electron Correlation in Narrow Energy Bands. I. The Two-Pole Approximation in a NarrowS Band, Phys. Rev. 184, 451 (1969)

    1969

  53. [61]

    Haurie, M

    L. Haurie, M. Grandadam, E. Pangburn, A. Banerjee, S. Burdin, and C. P´ epin, Bands renormalization and super- conductivity in the strongly correlated Hubbard model us- ing composite operators method, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter 36, 255601 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    L. N. Cooper, Bound Electron Pairs in a Degenerate Fermi Gas, Phys. Rev. 104, 1189 (1956)

    1956

  55. [63]

    Bardeen, L

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957)

    1957

  56. [64]

    Yue, Z.-T

    Z.-Y. Yue, Z.-T. Xu, S. Yang, and Z.-C. Gu, Pseu- dogap phase as fluctuating pair density wave, (2024), arXiv:2404.16770 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    C. N. Yang, η pairing and off-diagonal long-range order in a Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2144 (1989)

    1989

  58. [66]

    P. Mai, J. Zhao, G. Tenkila, N. A. Hackner, D. Kush, D. Pan, and P. W. Phillips, New Approach to Strong Correlation: Twisting Hubbard into the Orbital Hatsugai- Kohmoto Model, (2024), arXiv:2401.08746 [cond-mat.str- el]

    2024

  59. [67]

    Tenkila, J

    G. Tenkila, J. Zhao, and P. W. Phillips, Dynamical Spec- tral Weight Transfer in the Orbital HK Model, (2024), arXiv:2406.17846 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Guerci, G

    D. Guerci, G. Sangiovanni, A. J. Millis, and M. Fab- rizio, Electrical Transport in the Hatsugai-Kohmoto Model, (2024), arXiv:2407.00156 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Forster, Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symmetry, and correlation functions , Advanced Books Classics (CRC Press, 1995)

    D. Forster, Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symmetry, and correlation functions , Advanced Books Classics (CRC Press, 1995)

    1995

  62. [70]

    A. A. Patel and S. Sachdev, dc resistivity at the onset of spin density wave order in two-dimensional metals, Phys. Rev. B 90, 165146 (2014)

    2014

  63. [71]

    S. A. Hartnoll, R. Mahajan, M. Punk, and S. Sachdev, Transport near the Ising-nematic quantum critical point of metals in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 89, 155130 (2014)

    2014

  64. [72]

    Freire, Memory matrix theory of the dc resistivity of a disordered antiferromagnetic metal with an effective com- posite operator, Annals of Physics 384, 142 (2017)

    H. Freire, Memory matrix theory of the dc resistivity of a disordered antiferromagnetic metal with an effective com- posite operator, Annals of Physics 384, 142 (2017)

    2017

  65. [73]

    Wang and E

    X. Wang and E. Berg, Scattering mechanisms and electri- cal transport near an Ising nematic quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B 99, 235136 (2019)

    2019

  66. [74]

    L. E. Vieira, V. S. de Carvalho, and H. Freire, DC re- sistivity near a nematic quantum critical point: Effects of weak disorder and acoustic phonons, Annals of Physics419, 168230 (2020)

    2020

  67. [75]

    Mandal and H

    I. Mandal and H. Freire, Transport in the non-Fermi liquid phase of isotropic Luttinger semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 103, 195116 (2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    Pangburn, A

    E. Pangburn, A. Banerjee, H. Freire, and C. P´ epin, Inco- herent transport in a model for the strange metal phase: Memory-matrix formalism, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245109 (2023)

    2023

  69. [77]

    Mandal and H

    I. Mandal and H. Freire, Transport properties in non-Fermi liquid phases of nodal-point semimetals, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 36, 443002 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.