Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Dosimetric impact of physician style variations in contouring CTV for post-operative prostate cancer: A deep learning-based simulation study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.01006 v3 pith:HXGCWSSS submitted 2021-02-01 physics.med-ph cs.AI

classification physics.med-phcs.AI
keywords dosephysiciandeeppatientstyleclinicaldifferentvariations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Inter-observer variation is a significant problem in clinical target volume(CTV) segmentation in postoperative settings, where there is no gross tumor present. In this scenario, the CTV is not an anatomically established structure, but one determined by the physician based on the clinical guideline used, the preferred tradeoff between tumor control and toxicity, their experience and training background, and other factors. This results in high inter-observer variability between physicians. This variability has been considered an issue, but the absence of multiple physician CTV contours for each patient and the significant amount of time required for dose planning have made it impractical to study its dosimetric consequences. In this study, we analyze the impact that variations in physician style have on dose to organs-at-risk(OAR) by simulating the clinical workflow via deep learning. For a given patient previously treated by one physician, we use deep learning-based tools to simulate how other physicians would contour the CTV and how the corresponding dose distributions would look for this patient. To simulate multiple physician styles, we use a previously developed in-house CTV segmentation model that can produce physician style-aware segmentations. The corresponding dose distribution is predicted using another in-house deep learning tool, which, can predict dose within 3% of the prescription dose, on average, on the test data. For every test patient, four different physician style CTVs are considered, and four different dose distributions are analyzed. OAR dose metrics are compared, showing that even though physician style variations result in organs getting different doses, all the important dose metrics except Maximum Dose point are within the clinically acceptable limit.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools