A Sterile Neutrino Search at compact materials irradiation facility

Emilio Ciuffoli; Fen Fu; Han-Jie Cai; Jarah Evslin; Lei Yang; Liangwen Chen; Sheng Zhang; Wenlong Zhan; Xurong Chen

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 79 references

A Sterile Neutrino Search at compact materials irradiation facility

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes a sterile neutrino search at a compact deuteron-beryllium irradiation facility whose high-energy antineutrinos would cover, at 95% confidence, the entire sterile anomaly region for mass splittings between 5 and 20 eV².

desk verdict A genuinely new idea for a sterile-neutrino search at CMIF, but the sensitivity claim is not credible because beam-related fast neutrons are never estimated. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09787 v2 pith:HXR4ZZ4I submitted 2019-08-26 physics.ins-det hep-exhep-ph

Liangwen Chen , Han-Jie Cai , Emilio Ciuffoli , Jarah Evslin , Fen Fu , Sheng Zhang , Xurong Chen , Lei Yang

show 1 more author

Wenlong Zhan

This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.ins-dethep-exhep-ph PACS 14.60.Pq29.40.Mc25.45.-z

keywords sterileneutrinoshortbaselineIsoDARdecayatrestelectronantineutrinodisappearanceinversebetaliquidscintillatordeuteron-beryllium

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a sterile neutrino search that would not build a new accelerator or target. The compact materials irradiation facility (CMIF), a deuteron-beryllium neutron source planned in China, produces electron antineutrinos as a by-product of lithium-8 and lithium-9 beta decay in its target. Pairing that source with 80 t of liquid scintillator, the authors calculate that a five-year run at a 20 m overburden would cover, at 95% confidence, the entire sterile neutrino parameter region suggested by reactor and calibration-source anomalies for mass splittings between 5 and 20 eV². The key advantage is the high neutrino energy, 6–14 MeV, compared with reactor antineutrinos, which raises the mass-splitting reach. If the projections hold, the experiment offers a competitive and relatively cheap test that requires no modification to the planned facility.

What carries the argument

The central object is the decay-at-rest neutrino source formed directly in the beryllium target: a 50 MeV, 10 mA deuteron beam produces lithium-8 and lithium-9 through (d,x) reactions, and their $\beta$ decays emit a compact, intense flux of electron antineutrinos, up to $2.0\times 10^{19}$ per day above the inverse $\beta$ decay threshold and $8.2\times 10^{18}$ per day in the 6–14 MeV window. The mechanism that gives the experiment its high mass-splitting reach is the scaling of the oscillation length with energy: since $L = 4\pi E/\Delta m^2$, the higher-energy neutrinos from this source are sensitive to $\Delta m^2$ values two to three times larger than reactor experiments at the same baseline. The analysis uses a $\chi^2$ with nuisance parameters for the flux and each background, with energy bins of 0.2 MeV and distance bins of 0.25 m matched to a 9% energy resolution and 15 cm position resolution.

What would settle it

Measure the fast-neutron and lithium-9 backgrounds in the 6–14 MeV range at the CMIF site with a 20 m overburden; if the fast-neutron rate exceeds about 83 events per day per 20 t detector (or the lithium-9 rate exceeds about 8 per day), the paper's 95% exclusion curve for 5–20 eV² would not cover the full allowed region.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that antineutrinos produced in the decay of lithium-8 and lithium-9 in the deuteron-beryllium target of CMIF can serve as a short-baseline probe of sterile neutrino oscillations. With a 4 m baseline, four 20 t liquid scintillator detectors, and a 20 m overburden, the expected rate of 23.6 inverse $\beta$ decay events per detector per day in the 6–14 MeV window would, after five years at 90% duty factor, rule out at 95% confidence the entire 3+1 sterile parameter region preferred by the reactor, gallium, and MiniBooNE anomalies for mass splittings between 5 and 20 eV². The experiment is most sensitive near $\Delta m^2 \approx 10\,\text{eV}^2$ because the average neutrino energy is two to three times higher than that of reactor antineutrinos, so the oscillation length matches the compact source and 4 m baseline at larger splittings. After the planned CMIF upgrade to 250 MeV, the same setup would extend coverage up to about 50 eV², according to the paper's estimates.

Load-bearing premise

The sensitivity projections assume that the fast-neutron and lithium-9 backgrounds measured at another short-baseline experiment will hold at the CMIF site; if those backgrounds are higher there, the claimed 95% coverage of the sterile anomaly region shrinks.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the projection is correct, a sterile neutrino with mass splitting between 5 and 20 eV² would be either discovered or excluded at 95% confidence by a five-year CMIF run, with no change to the accelerator or target.
The experiment would cover the high-$\Delta m^2$ region where reactor-based short-baseline experiments lose sensitivity, making it complementary to searches such as DANSS, SoLid, and KATRIN.
A planned upgrade of CMIF to 250 MeV would extend the exclusion region up to about 50 eV², covering the entire parameter region of interest at 95% confidence.
The fast-neutron background, about four times the signal rate at 20 m overburden, is the main limitation; if its spectrum or rate deviates from the assumed values, the sensitivity would change accordingly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The flux-validation method the paper describes—identifying lithium-8 and lithium-9 by their characteristic beta-alpha decay chains—could be used during CMIF commissioning to measure the neutrino source intensity directly, which would quickly confirm or correct the assumed 20% flux uncertainty.
Because the sensitivity argument depends mainly on neutrino energy and source compactness, the same approach could be applied to other intense deuteron-beryllium or spallation neutron sources, provided their backgrounds are measured with a dedicated overburden.
The paper does not explore a variable baseline; a movable detector or multiple baselines would provide an oscillation pattern rather than a rate-only signal, which could distinguish sterile oscillations from background mis-modeling more cleanly.
If the fast-neutron background at the site is higher than the value taken from the external thesis, a modest increase in overburden (from 20 to 30 m) might recover much of the lost sensitivity, since the paper's Table 1 shows the fast-neutron rate nearly halves between those depths.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

The one thing to know: this paper proposes a genuinely new configuration—using the CMIF deuteron–beryllium target itself as a decay-at-rest antineutrino source, avoiding the expensive 7Li converter in the IsoDAR design. That is a real idea, and the flux calculation is carefully done: the GEANT4/INCL++ production rates are cross-checked against TENDL-2017, and the IBD treatment is standard. The sensitivity analysis is internally consistent, so as a pure "what-if" exercise it holds together.

The problem is that the central claim—competitive sensitivity to high-Δm² sterile neutrinos—rests on a background model that ignores the facility's primary purpose. CMIF is a 50 MeV, 10 mA deuteron–beryllium neutron source. The detector is placed 4 m away. The paper's background list includes muon-induced fast neutrons (taken from a doctoral thesis, not from CMIF), reactor antineutrinos, and 9Li. There is no estimate, anywhere, of the fast-neutron and gamma flux produced by the beam itself. At 4 m from a 10 mA source, that flux is not a small correction; it is likely to be orders of magnitude above the quoted muon-induced rate of 83 events/day per detector. The paper never describes shielding between target and detector. The overburden (5–30 m) suppresses cosmics, not beam neutrons. So the sensitivity curves in Figs. 5–7 are conditioned on an unstated assumption that beam neutrons can be made negligible. That is a load-bearing gap, not a minor detail.

There are lesser issues. The dominant background is taken from a non-public Ph.D. thesis, so the numbers are not reproducible. No shape uncertainties are propagated. No code or data are deposited. But these are addressable. The beam-neutron issue is the one that determines whether the experiment as proposed has any chance of working. It might be salvageable with a serious shielding design and a beam-neutron simulation, but the paper does not do that work.

Who is this for? Anyone considering decay-at-rest sterile neutrino searches or planning experiments at intense neutron facilities. The idea of using the target's own 8Li is worth recording. But as a feasibility study, it is incomplete in exactly the place that matters most.

Recommendation: send it to peer review, but with a clear expectation that the authors must either quantify and mitigate the beam-related backgrounds or substantially soften the sensitivity claims. Without that, the paper is a proposal with an unverified premise.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a sterile neutrino search at the Compact Materials Irradiation Facility (CMIF), a planned 50 MeV, 10 mA deuteron-beryllium neutron source. The authors note that the beam-target interaction produces 8Li and 9Li whose beta decays yield electron antineutrinos, and they evaluate the resulting flux using GEANT4 with the INCL++ model, cross-checked against TENDL-2017. Pairing this source with four Daya Bay-like liquid scintillator detectors at a 4 m baseline, they compute the IBD event rate in the 6-14 MeV neutrino energy window and perform a chi-square sensitivity analysis with nuisance parameters for flux and background normalizations. Their central claim is that a five-year run at 20 m overburden would provide competitive 95% C.L. exclusion limits for sterile neutrino oscillations, especially for mass splittings above 10 eV^2, covering the allowed region from the reactor and calibration-source anomalies for Δm^2 between 5 and 20 eV^2. They also sketch the improved sensitivity of a future upgrade, CMIF-U.

Significance. If the background assessment were complete, this proposal would be a valuable and clever reuse of an existing facility: it avoids the expensive 7Li converter of the original IsoDAR design, uses a compact source, and probes a higher Δm^2 region than reactor experiments. The paper's strengths include the explicit GEANT4/INCL++ simulation cross-checked with TENDL-2017, the use of a standard IBD cross-section, and a transparent chi-square treatment with nuisance parameters. However, the projected sensitivity depends critically on background rates that are imported from a different experiment and on the silent assumption that beam-related neutrons from the 10 mA deuteron beam can be suppressed to negligible levels. As written, the numerical sensitivity curves are not yet supported by the analysis presented.

major comments (3)

[Sect. 4 (Table 1) and Sect. 1] The background analysis includes only cosmogenic muon-induced fast neutrons, 9Li, and reactor antineutrinos; it does not estimate the fast-neutron and gamma flux produced by the 50 MeV, 10 mA deuteron beam striking the beryllium target. Since CMIF is explicitly designed as a high-flux neutron source and the detector is placed only 4 m from the target, the beam-related neutron flux will far exceed the quoted muon-induced fast-neutron rate of 83.2 events/day per detector at 20 m overburden. Without a quantitative description of the shielding between target and detector and a simulation of the beam-neutron background, the sensitivity curves in Figs. 5-7 are not established.
[Sect. 4, background rates from Ref. [71]] The fast-neutron and 9Li background rates and spectra are adopted entirely from Ref. [71], a doctoral thesis on muon-induced backgrounds for a different short-baseline experiment. The manuscript provides no validation that these rates apply to the CMIF site, no comparison with the CMIF neutron environment, and no systematic uncertainty that encompasses site-to-site variation. Because the fast-neutron background is approximately four times the signal rate at the chosen overburden (Table 1), even a factor-of-two uncertainty in this background would substantially alter the exclusion contours; the current treatment therefore does not support the quantitative sensitivity claims.
[Sect. 2, flux estimation] The 8Li and 9Li production cross sections are taken from INCL++ and compared with TENDL-2017, but the comparison for 8Li is only shown above 35 MeV, and the authors state that more than 70% of 8Li is produced by deuterons above this energy. For 9Li, the INCL++ result is acknowledged to be higher than TENDL-2017 by tens of percent. The paper adopts a 20% flux uncertainty, but it does not demonstrate that this uncertainty covers the spread between the two models for the full deuteron energy range, nor does it quantify the effect of the 9Li cross-section discrepancy on the antineutrino flux above the 6 MeV threshold; this should be addressed for the sensitivity projection to be robust.

minor comments (5)

[Fig. 1 caption] The word 'Comparsion' in the caption should be 'Comparison'.
[Sect. 3, IBD description] The sentence 'a positron and a neutron is producted' contains a grammatical error; it should read 'a positron and a neutron are produced'.
[Data Availability Statement] The statement says the manuscript 'has no associated data or the data will not be deposited' but then says the data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request; this is internally inconsistent and should be clarified.
[Sect. 5, reactor background] The reactor antineutrino background is estimated by assuming the same average thermal power as the Daya Bay reactor experiment for all 14 reactors in Guangdong; given the varied distances and power levels, a more site-specific estimate would strengthen the analysis, even though this background is subdominant.
[Sect. 5, CMIF-U] The CMIF-U sensitivity curve in Fig. 7 is based on an assumed flux of 8e19 per day, but no simulation or reference is given for the 250 MeV upgrade; a brief justification or citation would improve the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the sterile neutrino sensitivity is a forecast whose inputs (GEANT4 flux, external background rates) are not derived from the target result.

full rationale

The paper is a sensitivity projection, not a measurement. The observed data in the chi-square (Eq. 6) are defined as the no-oscillation hypothesis, and the sterile neutrino parameters (sin^2 2theta, Delta m^2) are scanned as free parameters, so there is no fitted input being renamed as a prediction. The antineutrino flux is obtained from a GEANT4 INCL++ simulation and cross-checked against the TENDL-2017 library (Fig. 1); this is an independent calculation, and the paper explicitly assigns a 20% flux uncertainty rather than claiming precision. The background rates and spectra are taken from external sources (Refs. [63], [69], [71]), including a doctoral thesis measurement of muon-induced backgrounds; these are input assumptions for the forecast, not outputs of the sterile neutrino analysis. The paper does cite the authors' own prior work (Refs. [47], [52], [67]), but these citations are used for context or as validation of the simulation tools and the low-energy veto; the central exclusion curves in Figs. 5-7 do not reduce to those cited results. No equation in the paper defines the signal in terms of the sterile parameters by construction: Eq. (5) places the oscillation probability Pee as a multiplicative factor in the event rate, and the sensitivity is obtained by scanning that factor. A possible correctness concern, namely the omission of beam-related fast-neutron backgrounds from the D-Be target, is a limitation of the background model rather than circular reasoning. For these reasons the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central sensitivity projection rests on simulated source fluxes, assumed background rates (mostly from an external thesis), and a set of design choices (baseline, overburden, energy window). These are all reasonable for a feasibility study, but they are inputs the experiment would need to measure in a real run. No parameters are fitted to the sterile neutrino signal.

free parameters (6)

Flux normalization uncertainty = 20% (assumed)
Adopted in Section 2 for the simulated neutrino flux; enters the chi-squared in Eq. (6) as a nuisance parameter. The sensitivity limits depend on this assumption.
Overburden = 20 m
Selected in Section 5 as the baseline design; Table 1 lists background rates at 5, 10, 20, and 30 m, and the final sensitivity curves use 20 m.
Source-detector baseline = 4 m
Set in Section 3 from the compact source and detector geometry; used in Eq. (5) and in the oscillation probability in Fig. 3.
Neutrino energy window = 6-14 MeV
Chosen in Sections 2 and 3 to remove 6He events and most backgrounds; the signal and background rates are all evaluated in this window.
Background normalization uncertainties = reactor 1%, 9Li 10%, fast neutron 10%
Assumed in Section 5 and included in Eq. (6); the sensitivity is mildly sensitive to these priors.
Running time and duty factor = 5 years, 90% duty factor
Assumed in Section 5 for all sensitivity curves; scaling the runtime changes the statistical power.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption The GEANT4 INCL++ model predicts the 8Li and 9Li production yields in the 50 MeV deuteron-beryllium reaction.
Invoked in Section 2; cross-checked against TENDL-2017 in Fig. 1, but no measured production data at CMIF are available.
domain assumption The 3+1 sterile neutrino oscillation probability in Eq. (1) describes the disappearance signal.
This is the hypothesis under test; the parametrization is standard and used throughout the sensitivity scan.
domain assumption The fast-neutron and 9Li background rates and spectra from Ref. [71] transfer to the CMIF site, detector, and overburden.
Used in Section 4 and Table 1; the fast-neutron background dominates, so this is the most fragile input.
domain assumption The reactor antineutrino background from the Taiping Ling cluster is modeled using Daya Bay average thermal power and published reactor spectra.
Used in Section 4; this background is small above 6 MeV but contributes to the total rate.
domain assumption The neutrino source can be treated as a point source relative to the 4 m baseline.
Stated in Section 4; finite source size is neglected, which matters if the source size is comparable to the oscillation length at high Δm².
standard math The IBD cross-section parameterization of Strumia and Vissani (Eq. 3) is valid in the 6-14 MeV range.
Standard published cross-section, used in Eq. (5).
domain assumption The four Daya Bay-style detectors have the same energy resolution, position resolution, and proton number as quoted in Ref. [63].
Used in Section 3 and Eq. (5); the sensitivity depends on these resolutions.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Sterile Neutrino Search at compact materials irradiation facility." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HXR4ZZ4I

@misc{pith2026190809787,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Sterile Neutrino Search at compact materials irradiation facility},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HXR4ZZ4I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09787}
}

abstract

The compact material irradiation facility (CMIF) is a current project in China that will provide a compact deuteron-beryllium neutron source. The target of this facility will be an intense and compact Isotope Decay-At-Rest (IsoDAR) neutrino source. In this paper, we propose to test the sterile neutrino hypothesis using CMIF as the neutrino source. At CMIF platform, the electron antineutrino production rate can be up to $2.0\times 10^{19}$ per day. When paired with an 80 t liquid scintillator detector to study short baseline electron antineutrino disappearance, the inverse beta decay (IBD) event rate is large enough to investigate the parameter ranges of interest for neutrino anomalies. Our sensitivity analysis shows that a short baseline experiment at this platform will provide a very competitive sterile neutrino search, especially in the high-$\Delta m^2$ region ($\Delta m^2 >10\,\text{eV}^2$).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

[71]

Qiang, Cosmic-ray muon induced backgrounds in the short base- line neutrino oscillation experiment

F. Qiang, Cosmic-ray muon induced backgrounds in the short base- line neutrino oscillation experiment. Ph.D. thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (2019)

work page 2019
[1]

Fukuda et al., Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos

Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, Y . Fukuda et al., Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562– 1567 (1998)

work page 1998
[2]

Ahmad et al., Measurement of the rate of νe + d → p + p + e− interactions produced by 8 B solar neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

SNO Collaboration, Q.R. Ahmad et al., Measurement of the rate of νe + d → p + p + e− interactions produced by 8 B solar neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 071301 (2001)

work page 2001
[3]

Eguchi et al., First results from Kam- LAND: evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance

KamLAND Collaboration, K. Eguchi et al., First results from Kam- LAND: evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 021802 (2003)

work page 2003
[4]

Ahn et al., Measurement of neutrino oscillation by the K2K experiment

K2K Collaboration, M.H. Ahn et al., Measurement of neutrino oscillation by the K2K experiment. Phys. Rev. D74, 072003 (2006)

work page 2006
[5]

Michael et al., Observation of muon neutrino disappearance with the MINOS detectors and the NuMI neutrino beam

MINOS Collaboration, D.G. Michael et al., Observation of muon neutrino disappearance with the MINOS detectors and the NuMI neutrino beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 191801 (2006)

work page 2006
[6]

Adamson et al., A study of muon neutrino disappearance using the Fermilab main injector neutrino beam

MINOS Collaboration, P. Adamson et al., A study of muon neutrino disappearance using the Fermilab main injector neutrino beam. Phys. Rev. D 77, 072002 (2008)

work page 2008
[7]

Adamson et al., Measurement of neutrino oscillations with the MINOS detectors in the NuMI beam

MINOS Collaboration, P. Adamson et al., Measurement of neutrino oscillations with the MINOS detectors in the NuMI beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 131802 (2008)

work page 2008

Show all 79 references

[8]

Adamson et al., Measurement of the neu- trino mass splitting and ﬂavor mixing by MINOS

MINOS Collaboration, P. Adamson et al., Measurement of the neu- trino mass splitting and ﬂavor mixing by MINOS. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 181801 (2011)

2011
[9]

Adamson et al., First direct observation of muon antineutrino disappearance

MINOS Collaboration, P. Adamson et al., First direct observation of muon antineutrino disappearance. Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 021801 (2011)

2011
[10]

Athanassopoulos et al., Evidence for anti-muon-neutrino → anti-electron-neutrino oscillations from the LSND experiment at LAMPF

LSND Collaboration, C. Athanassopoulos et al., Evidence for anti-muon-neutrino → anti-electron-neutrino oscillations from the LSND experiment at LAMPF. Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3082 (1996)

1996
[11]

Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Evidence for neu- trino oscillations from the observation of anti-neutrino(electron) appearance in a anti-neutrino(muon) beam

LSND Collaboration, A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Evidence for neu- trino oscillations from the observation of anti-neutrino(electron) appearance in a anti-neutrino(muon) beam. Phys. Rev. D 64, 112007 (2001)

2001
[12]

Aguilar-Arevalo et al., A search for electron neutrino appearance at the /Delta1m 2 ∼ 1eV 2 scale

MiniBooNE Collaboration, A.A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., A search for electron neutrino appearance at the /Delta1m 2 ∼ 1eV 2 scale. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 231801 (2007)

2007
[13]

Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Event excess in the MiniBooNE search for ¯νμ →¯νe oscillations

MiniBooNE Collaboration, A.A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Event excess in the MiniBooNE search for ¯νμ →¯νe oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 181801 (2010)

2010
[14]

Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Improved search for ¯νμ →¯νe oscillations in the MiniBooNE experiment

MiniBooNE Collaboration, A.A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Improved search for ¯νμ →¯νe oscillations in the MiniBooNE experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 161801 (2013)

2013
[15]

Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Obser- vation of a signiﬁcant excess of electron-like events in the MiniBooNE short-baseline neutrino experiment

MiniBooNE Collaboration, A.A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Obser- vation of a signiﬁcant excess of electron-like events in the MiniBooNE short-baseline neutrino experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(22), 221801 (2018)

2018
[16]

Mention, M

G. Mention, M. Fechner, T. Lasserre, T.A. Mueller, D. Lhuillier, M. Cribier, A. Letourneau, The reactor antineutrino anomaly. Phys. Rev. D 83, 073006 (2011)

2011
[17]

Hampel et al., GALLEX solar neu- trino observations: results for GALLEX IV

GALLEX Collaboration, W. Hampel et al., GALLEX solar neu- trino observations: results for GALLEX IV . Phys. Lett. B447, 127 (1999)

1999
[18]

Abdurashitov et al., Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal

SAGE Collaboration, J.N. Abdurashitov et al., Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal. III: results for the 2002–2007 data-taking period. Phys. Rev. C 80, 015807 (2009)

2009
[19]

An et al., Improved search for a light sterile neutrino with the full conﬁguration of the Daya Bay exper- iment

Daya Bay Collaboration, F.P. An et al., Improved search for a light sterile neutrino with the full conﬁguration of the Daya Bay exper- iment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(15), 151802 (2016)

2016
[20]

Ko et al., Sterile neutrino search at the NEOS experiment

NEOS Collaboration, Y .J. Ko et al., Sterile neutrino search at the NEOS experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(12), 121802 (2017)

2017
[21]

Armbruster et al., Upper limits for neutrino oscillations muon-anti-neutrino —> electron-anti- neutrino from muon decay at rest

KARMEN Collaboration, B. Armbruster et al., Upper limits for neutrino oscillations muon-anti-neutrino —> electron-anti- neutrino from muon decay at rest. Phys. Rev. D65, 112001 (2002)

2002
[22]

Abe et al., Limits on sterile neutrino mixing using atmospheric neutrinos in super- Kamiokande

Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, K. Abe et al., Limits on sterile neutrino mixing using atmospheric neutrinos in super- Kamiokande. Phys. Rev. D 91, 052019 (2015)

2015
[23]

Adamson et al., Active to sterile neutrino mixing limits from neutral-current interactions in MINOS

MINOS Collaboration, P. Adamson et al., Active to sterile neutrino mixing limits from neutral-current interactions in MINOS. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 011802 (2011)

2011
[24]

Cheng et al., Dual baseline search for muon antineutrino disappearance at 0.1eV 2</Delta1m2<100eV2

MiniBooNE and SciBooNE Collaborations, G. Cheng et al., Dual baseline search for muon antineutrino disappearance at 0.1eV 2</Delta1m2<100eV2. Phys. Rev. D 86, 052009 (2012)

2012
[25]

Alekseev et al., DANSS: detector of the reactor AntiNeu- trino based on solid scintillator

I. Alekseev et al., DANSS: detector of the reactor AntiNeu- trino based on solid scintillator. JINST 11, P11011 (2016). arXiv:1606.02896

2016 arXiv
[26]

An et al., Evolution of the reac- tor antineutrino ﬂux and spectrum at Daya Bay

Daya Bay Collaboration, F.P. An et al., Evolution of the reac- tor antineutrino ﬂux and spectrum at Daya Bay. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(25), 251801 (2017)

2017
[27]

Abe et al., Measurement of θ13 in double Chooz using neutron captures on hydrogen with novel background rejection techniques

Double Chooz Collaboration, Y . Abe et al., Measurement of θ13 in double Chooz using neutron captures on hydrogen with novel background rejection techniques. JHEP 1601, 163 (2016)

2016
[28]

Choi et al., Observation of energy and baseline dependent reactor antineutrino disappearance in the RENO experiment

RENO Collaboration, J.H. Choi et al., Observation of energy and baseline dependent reactor antineutrino disappearance in the RENO experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(21), 211801 (2016)

2016
[29]

An et al., Measurement of the reactor antineutrino ﬂux and spectrum at Daya Bay

Daya Bay Collaboration, F.P. An et al., Measurement of the reactor antineutrino ﬂux and spectrum at Daya Bay. Phys. Rev. Lett.116(6), 061801 (2016) (erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(9), 099902, 2017)

2016
[30]

Huber, NEOS data and the origin of the 5 MeV bump in the reac- tor antineutrino spectrum

P. Huber, NEOS data and the origin of the 5 MeV bump in the reac- tor antineutrino spectrum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(4), 042502 (2017)

2017
[31]

Dentler, Á

M. Dentler, Á. Hernández-Cabezudo, J. Kopp, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, Sterile neutrinos or ﬂux uncertainties?—status of the reactor anti-neutrino anomaly. JHEP 1711, 099 (2017)

2017
[32]

Alonso et al., IsoDAR@KamLAND: a conceptual design report for the conventional facilities

IsoDAR Collaboration, J.R. Alonso et al., IsoDAR@KamLAND: a conceptual design report for the conventional facilities. arXiv:1710.09325

arXiv
[33]

V olkas, Introduction to sterile neutrinos

R.R. V olkas, Introduction to sterile neutrinos. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 48, 161 (2002)

2002
[34]

Mohapatra, A.Y

R.N. Mohapatra, A.Y . Smirnov, Neutrino mass and new physics. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56, 569 (2006)

2006
[35]

Diaferio, G.W

A. Diaferio, G.W. Angus, The Acceleration Scale, Modiﬁed New- tonian Dynamics, and Sterile Neutrinos. arXiv:1206.6231

arXiv
[36]

Riemer-Sorensen, D

S. Riemer-Sorensen, D. Parkinson, T.M. Davis, What is half a neu- trino? Reviewing cosmological constraints on neutrinos and dark radiation. Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 30, e029 (2013)

2013
[37]

Archidiacono, E

M. Archidiacono, E. Giusarma, S. Hannestad, O. Mena, Cosmic dark radiation and neutrinos. Adv. High Energy Phys.2013, 191047 (2013)

2013
[38]

Bungau et al., Proposal for an electron antineutrino disappear- ance search using high-rate 8Li production and decay

A. Bungau et al., Proposal for an electron antineutrino disappear- ance search using high-rate 8Li production and decay. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 141802 (2012)

2012
[39]

Cribier et al., A proposed search for a fourth neutrino with a PBq antineutrino source

M. Cribier et al., A proposed search for a fourth neutrino with a PBq antineutrino source. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 201801 (2011)

2011
[40]

Dwyer, K.M

D.A. Dwyer, K.M. Heeger, B.R. Littlejohn, P. V ogel, Search for sterile neutrinos with a radioactive source at Daya Bay. Phys. Rev. D 87(9), 093002 (2013)

2013
[41]

Heeger, B.R

K.M. Heeger, B.R. Littlejohn, H.P. Mumm, M.N. Tobin, Exper- imental parameters for a reactor antineutrino experiment at very short baselines. Phys. Rev. D 87, 073008 (2013)

2013
[42]

Shin, M.K

J.W. Shin, M.K. Cheoun, T. Kajino, T. Hayakawa, Short-baseline electron antineutrino disappearance study by using neutrino sources from 13C+ 9Be reaction. JCAP 1704(04), 044 (2017) 123 Eur. Phys. J. C (2020) 80:146 Page 9 of 9 146

2017
[43]

Shin, M.K

J.W. Shin, M.K. Cheoun, T. Kajino, T. Hayakawa, A new scheme for short baseline electron antineutrino disappearance study, J. Phys. G 44(9), 09LT01 (2017) (erratum: J. Phys. G 45(2), 029501, 2018)

2017
[44]

Y . Gao, D. Marfatia, Meter-baseline tests of sterile neutrinos at Daya Bay. Phys. Lett. B 723, 164 (2013)

2013
[45]

Ashenfelter et al., The PROSPECT physics program

PROSPECT Collaboration, J. Ashenfelter et al., The PROSPECT physics program. J. Phys. G 43(11), 113001 (2016)

2016
[46]

Bravo-Berguño et al., SOX: short distance neutrino oscillations with Borexino

SOX Collaboration, D. Bravo-Berguño et al., SOX: short distance neutrino oscillations with Borexino. Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 273– 275, 1760 (2016)

2016
[47]

Ciuffoli, H

E. Ciuffoli, H. Mohammed, J. Evslin, F. Zhao, M. Deliyergiyev, Getting the most neutrinos out of IsoDAR. Eur. Phys. J. C77(12), 864 (2017)

2017
[48]

Abs et al., IsoDAR@KamLAND: a conceptual design report for the technical facility

M. Abs et al., IsoDAR@KamLAND: a conceptual design report for the technical facility. arXiv:1511.05130

arXiv
[49]

Lyashuk, Y .S

V .I. Lyashuk, Y .S. Lutostansky, Intensive neutrino source on the base of lithium converter. arXiv:1503.01280

arXiv
[50]

Lyutostansky, V .I

Y .S. Lyutostansky, V .I. Lyashuk, The lithium converter of the reac- tor neutrons to anti-neutrino. 3: The converter on the basis of lithium–deuterium solutions and compounds (in Russian). Moscow Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics—ITEF-89-147 (89, rec. Dec.)
[51]

Zhan, et al., Accelerator driven sustainable ﬁssion energy

W.-L. Zhan, et al., Accelerator driven sustainable ﬁssion energy. In: Proceedings of 7th International Particle Accelerator Conference, Kyoto, 2016, ICR, Busan, 2016, 2016, p. 4217. https://doi.org/10. 18429/JACoWIPAC2016-FRY AA03(2016)

2016
[52]

Tao, Y .L

K.W. Tao, Y .L. Zhang, H.J. Cai et al., Simulation studies of the granular ﬂow beryllium target for the compact materials irradiation facility. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A942, 162401 (2019)

2019
[53]

C. Li, Y . He, X. Xianbo et al., RF structure design of the China material irradiation facility RFQ. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 869, 38–45 (2017)

2017
[54]

C. Li, Y . He, F. Wang et al., Radio frequency measurements and tun- ing of the China Material Irradiation Facility RFQ. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 890, 43–50 (2018)

2018
[55]

Dou, W.-L

W. Dou, W.-L. Chen, F. Wang et al., Beam dynamics and com- missioning of CW RFQ for a compact deuteron-beryllium neutron source. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 903, 85–90 (2018)

2018
[56]

Winn, The reaction 9 Be(d,3 He)8 Li

M.M. Winn, The reaction 9 Be(d,3 He)8 Li . Proc. Phys. Soc. A67, 946 (1954)

1954
[57]

Allison et al., Recent developments in Geant4

J. Allison et al., Recent developments in Geant4. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 835, 186 (2016)

2016
[58]

Boudard, J

A. Boudard, J. Cugnon, J.C. David, S. Leray, D. Mancusi, New potentialities of the Liège intranuclear cascade model for reactions induced by nucleons and light charged particles. Phys. Rev. C87(1), 014606 (2013)

2013
[59]

Mancusi, A

D. Mancusi, A. Boudard, J. Cugnon, J.C. David, P. Kaitaniemi, S. Leray, Extension of the Liège intranuclear-cascade model to reac- tions induced by light nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 90(5), 054602 (2014)

2014
[60]

Koning et al., TENDL-2017: TALYS-based evaluated nuclear data library

A.J. Koning et al., TENDL-2017: TALYS-based evaluated nuclear data library. https://tendl.web.psi.ch/tendl_2017/tendl2017.html (2017)

2017
[61]

Sale, T.F

K.E. Sale, T.F. Wang, R.N. Boyd et al., Measurement of the half-life of 8Li. Phys. Rev. C 41, 2418 (1990)

1990
[62]

de Kerret et al., Yields and production rates of cosmogenic 9Li and 8He measured with the double Chooz near and far detectors

H. de Kerret et al., Yields and production rates of cosmogenic 9Li and 8He measured with the double Chooz near and far detectors. JHEP 1811, 053 (2018)

2018
[63]

An et al., New measurement of θ13 via neutron capture on hydrogen at Daya Bay

Daya Bay Collaboration, F.P. An et al., New measurement of θ13 via neutron capture on hydrogen at Daya Bay. Phys. Rev. D93(7), 072011 (2016)

2016
[64]

Danilov, Sensitivity of DANSS detector to short range neutrino oscillations

DANSS Collaboration, M. Danilov, Sensitivity of DANSS detector to short range neutrino oscillations. arXiv:1412.0817

arXiv
[65]

Ryder, First results of the deployment of a SoLid detector module at the SCK-CEN BR2 reactor

SoLid Collaboration, N. Ryder, First results of the deployment of a SoLid detector module at the SCK-CEN BR2 reactor. arXiv:1510.07835

arXiv
[66]

Giunti, C.W

C. Giunti, C.W. Kim, J.A. Lee, U.W. Lee, On the treatment of neutrino oscillations without resort to weak eigenstates. Phys. Rev. D 48, 4310 (1993)

1993
[67]

Ciuffoli, J

E. Ciuffoli, J. Evslin, F. Zhao, Neutrino physics with accelerator driven subcritical reactors. JHEP 1601, 004 (2016)

2016
[68]

Strumia, F

A. Strumia, F. Vissani, Precise quasielastic neutrino/nucleon cross- section. Phys. Lett. B 564, 42 (2003)

2003
[69]

Guo et al., A precision measurement of the neutrino mixing angle θ 13 using reactor antineutrinos at Daya- Bay

Daya Bay Collaboration, X. Guo et al., A precision measurement of the neutrino mixing angle θ 13 using reactor antineutrinos at Daya- Bay. arXiv:hep-ex/0701029

arXiv
[70]

An et al., Measurement of electron antineutrino oscillation based on 1230 days of operation of the Daya Bay experiment

Daya Bay Collaboration, F.P. An et al., Measurement of electron antineutrino oscillation based on 1230 days of operation of the Daya Bay experiment. Phys. Rev. D 95(7), 072006 (2017)

2017
[72]

Giunti, Light sterile neutrinos: status and perspectives

C. Giunti, Light sterile neutrinos: status and perspectives. Nucl. Phys. B 908, 336 (2016)

2016
[73]

Farzan, O.L.G

Y . Farzan, O.L.G. Peres, A.Y . Smirnov, Neutrino mass spectrum and future beta decay experiments. Nucl. Phys. B 612, 59 (2001)

2001
[74]

Osipowicz et al., KATRIN: a next gen- eration tritium beta decay experiment with sub-eV sensitivity for the electron neutrino mass

KATRIN Collaboration, A. Osipowicz et al., KATRIN: a next gen- eration tritium beta decay experiment with sub-eV sensitivity for the electron neutrino mass. Letter of intent.arXiv:hep-ex/0109033

arXiv
[75]

Gastaldo et al., The electron capture 163Ho experiment ECHo: an overview

L. Gastaldo et al., The electron capture 163Ho experiment ECHo: an overview. J. Low Temp. Phys.176(5–6), 876 (2014)

2014
[76]

A.S. Riis, S. Hannestad, Detecting sterile neutrinos with KATRIN like experiments. JCAP 1102, 011 (2011)

2011
[77]

Gastaldo, C

L. Gastaldo, C. Giunti, E.M. Zavanin, Light sterile neutrino sensi- tivity of 163Ho experiments. JHEP 1606, 061 (2016)

2016
[78]

Esmaili, O.L.G

A. Esmaili, O.L.G. Peres, KATRIN sensitivity to sterile neutrino mass in the shadow of lightest neutrino mass. Phys. Rev. D 85, 117301 (2012)

2012
[79]

Mertens, Absolute neutrino mass measurements

S. Mertens, Absolute neutrino mass measurements. In: TAUP 2015, 7–11 Sept 2015, Torino (2015) 123

2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [71]

Qiang, Cosmic-ray muon induced backgrounds in the short base- line neutrino oscillation experiment

F. Qiang, Cosmic-ray muon induced backgrounds in the short base- line neutrino oscillation experiment. Ph.D. thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (2019)

work page 2019

[2] [1]

Fukuda et al., Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos

Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, Y . Fukuda et al., Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562– 1567 (1998)

work page 1998

[3] [2]

Ahmad et al., Measurement of the rate of νe + d → p + p + e− interactions produced by 8 B solar neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

SNO Collaboration, Q.R. Ahmad et al., Measurement of the rate of νe + d → p + p + e− interactions produced by 8 B solar neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 071301 (2001)

work page 2001

[4] [3]

Eguchi et al., First results from Kam- LAND: evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance

KamLAND Collaboration, K. Eguchi et al., First results from Kam- LAND: evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 021802 (2003)

work page 2003

[5] [4]

Ahn et al., Measurement of neutrino oscillation by the K2K experiment

K2K Collaboration, M.H. Ahn et al., Measurement of neutrino oscillation by the K2K experiment. Phys. Rev. D74, 072003 (2006)

work page 2006

[6] [5]

Michael et al., Observation of muon neutrino disappearance with the MINOS detectors and the NuMI neutrino beam

MINOS Collaboration, D.G. Michael et al., Observation of muon neutrino disappearance with the MINOS detectors and the NuMI neutrino beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 191801 (2006)

work page 2006

[7] [6]

Adamson et al., A study of muon neutrino disappearance using the Fermilab main injector neutrino beam

MINOS Collaboration, P. Adamson et al., A study of muon neutrino disappearance using the Fermilab main injector neutrino beam. Phys. Rev. D 77, 072002 (2008)

work page 2008

[8] [7]

Adamson et al., Measurement of neutrino oscillations with the MINOS detectors in the NuMI beam

MINOS Collaboration, P. Adamson et al., Measurement of neutrino oscillations with the MINOS detectors in the NuMI beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 131802 (2008)

work page 2008