Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

How to detect outliers in data envelopment analysis by Kourosh and Arash method

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1503.02548 v1 pith:HXTIYY65 submitted 2015-03-09 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords outliersdetectableadditionalanalysisarashcomplexitiescomputational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

One of the concerns about using non-parametric estimators such as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), is the presence of outliers. There are a good number of studies that mention this assessment in the literature of DEA, however, there is no clear definition to identify what outliers are in DEA. Moreover, most of the studies have used additional procedures which have high computational complexities. This paper proposes a suitable definition to identify outliers as well as a simple methodology to illustrate how DEA, by using Kourosh and Arash Method (KAM), is easily able to detect outliers without using additional technologies and their computational complexities. The methodology of detecting outliers by KAM is represented with an example which was used in previous research to depict DEA's weakness of detecting outliers. The results clearly reject this claim that DEA is not able to detect outliers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cognitive and non-cognitive efficiency gaps between private and public schools in the Latin America region-a hybrid DEA and machine learning approach based on PISA 2022

    econ.GN 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using DEA and SHAP on PISA 2022, the study finds a cognitive efficiency gap of about 0.10 and a non-cognitive gap of 0.045 favoring private schools across nine Latin American countries, with public schools showing mor...

Pith tools