pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15887 · v1 · pith:HY5UOOXMnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 💻 cs.LG

Practical Validity Conditions for Byzantine-Tolerant Federated Learning

M\'elanie Cambus , Darya Melnyk , Tijana Milentijevi\'c , Stefan Schmid This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 20:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG
keywords Byzantine-tolerant federated learningrobust aggregationminimum enclosing ballvalidity conditionsgeometric guaranteesfederated learning securityByzantine resilience
0
0 comments X

The pith

Relaxed minimum-enclosing-ball validity for aggregation holds in Byzantine federated learning when a majority of clients are honest.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces minimum enclosing ball validity as a geometric guarantee for the output of robust aggregation rules in federated learning. Exact MEB validity still faces limited resilience against Byzantine clients, but its multiplicative relaxation, c-MEB validity, becomes achievable whenever honest clients form a strict majority. The authors supply an optimal MinMax-MEB aggregation rule that meets the bound c less than square root of two and derive explicit c guarantees for several standard rules including minimum-diameter averaging, medoid, and geometric median. They also map MEB validity onto earlier convex, relaxed-convex, and box conditions to show how it bridges distributed-computing and machine-learning approaches to robustness.

Core claim

Relaxed c-MEB validity, requiring the aggregate to lie inside a ball whose radius is at most c times the radius of the minimum enclosing ball of the honest vectors, is achievable for n greater than 2t; the MinMax-MEB rule attains c less than square root of two, and standard aggregators satisfy explicit finite-c bounds under the same majority-honest assumption.

What carries the argument

The minimum enclosing ball (MEB) of honest client vectors together with its multiplicative c-relaxation, which replaces the strict convex-hull guarantee with a ball-radius bound that is dimension-independent.

Load-bearing premise

A strict majority of clients must be honest, that is n greater than 2t.

What would settle it

An explicit attack with n less than or equal to 2t in which every aggregation rule produces an output whose distance from the honest MEB exceeds any fixed finite c.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15887 by Darya Melnyk, M\'elanie Cambus, Stefan Schmid, Tijana Milentijevi\'c.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An example of the lower bound construction for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Robust aggregation is the core operation in Byzantine-tolerant federated learning. To ensure the quality of aggregation independently of data distribution or attacks, validity conditions are needed. They provide geometric guarantees of where the output of the aggregation must lie. The widespread convex validity requires the output to lie in the convex hull of the honest vectors. Although this guarantee is strong in theory, it is poorly suited to modern federated learning systems, as it has dimension-dependent resilience and excludes many practical aggregation rules. We introduce the minimum enclosing ball (MEB) validity condition for robust aggregation, as well as its multiplicative relaxation, $c$-MEB validity, where $c$ is a constant. We show that exact MEB validity still suffers from limited resilience, while relaxed $c$-MEB validity is achievable if a majority of clients is honest, i.e. $n>2t$. We give an optimal MinMax-MEB rule for the relaxed condition with the bound $c<\sqrt{2}$ and prove explicit relaxed-MEB guarantees for standard aggregators including minimum-diameter averaging, medoid and geometric median. Finally, we relate MEB validity to convex, relaxed-convex and box validity studied in prior literature, thus providing a systematic map of geometric validity conditions for Byzantine-robust aggregation. Our results show that relaxed MEB validity connects validity conditions in distributed computing and Byzantine-tolerant aggregation rules, and offers a practical alternative to convex validity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the minimum enclosing ball (MEB) validity condition and its multiplicative relaxation (c-MEB validity) as geometric guarantees for the output of robust aggregation rules in Byzantine-tolerant federated learning. It shows that exact MEB validity has limited resilience, while relaxed c-MEB validity is achievable under the standard honest-majority assumption n > 2t. The authors present an optimal MinMax-MEB aggregation rule attaining c < √2 and derive explicit relaxed-MEB guarantees for standard aggregators including minimum-diameter averaging, medoid, and geometric median. They also provide a systematic mapping relating MEB validity to prior notions such as convex validity, relaxed-convex validity, and box validity.

Significance. If the stated bounds and achievability results hold, the work supplies a practical geometric validity condition that avoids the dimension-dependent resilience limitations of convex validity while remaining compatible with many existing aggregation rules. The explicit guarantees for standard aggregators and the systematic map connecting distributed-computing validity notions to federated-learning aggregation constitute clear strengths; these elements could facilitate more reliable Byzantine-tolerant methods whose guarantees are independent of data distribution.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that proofs exist for achievability under n > 2t and for explicit guarantees on standard aggregators; adding a short roadmap sentence or table that lists the relevant theorem numbers and the precise assumptions used in each proof would improve traceability for readers.
  2. [Introduction or Preliminaries] Notation for the relaxation parameter c and the MinMax-MEB rule is introduced without an immediate forward reference to the section containing the optimality proof; a parenthetical cross-reference would reduce reader effort.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and constructive summary of the manuscript, which accurately captures the main contributions regarding MEB and c-MEB validity conditions for Byzantine-robust aggregation. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision and will incorporate any editorial improvements in the next version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper introduces MEB and c-MEB validity as independent geometric constructions based on minimum enclosing balls, proves limited resilience for exact MEB and achievability of relaxed c-MEB under the external standard assumption n > 2t drawn from distributed computing literature, supplies explicit bounds such as c < √2 for the MinMax-MEB rule, and derives guarantees for aggregators like geometric median via direct geometric arguments. These steps do not reduce to self-definitions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations; the central claims remain self-contained against external benchmarks and prior validity notions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on geometric definitions of validity and the standard Byzantine fault model assumption of honest majority; no free parameters are fitted to data and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A majority of clients are honest (n > 2t)
    Invoked to prove that relaxed c-MEB validity is achievable for the MinMax-MEB rule and other aggregators.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5797 in / 1516 out tokens · 100240 ms · 2026-05-20T20:18:16.416973+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data

    Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Aguera y Arcas. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. InArtificial intelligence and statistics, pages 1273–1282. Pmlr, 2017

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    The byzantine generals problem

    Leslie Lamport, Robert Shostak, and Marshall Pease. The byzantine generals problem. In Concurrency: the works of leslie lamport, pages 203–226. 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Byzantine-robust distributed learning: Towards optimal statistical rates

    Dong Yin, Yudong Chen, Ramchandran Kannan, and Peter Bartlett. Byzantine-robust distributed learning: Towards optimal statistical rates. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 5650–5659. Pmlr, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Advances and open problems in federated learning

    Peter Kairouz and H Brendan McMahan. Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and trends in machine learning, 14(1-2):1–210, 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Byzantine machine learning: A primer

    Rachid Guerraoui, Nirupam Gupta, and Rafael Pinot. Byzantine machine learning: A primer. ACM Comput. Surv., 56(7), April 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Towards trustworthy federated learning with untrusted participants

    Youssef Allouah, Rachid Guerraoui, and John Stephan. Towards trustworthy federated learning with untrusted participants. InProceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’25. JMLR.org, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Adaptive gradient clipping for robust federated learning

    Youssef Allouah, Rachid Guerraoui, Nirupam Gupta, Ahmed Jellouli, Geovani Rizk, and John Stephan. Adaptive gradient clipping for robust federated learning. InThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025. 13

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Federated learning for smart healthcare: A survey

    Dinh C Nguyen, Quoc-Viet Pham, Pubudu N Pathirana, Ming Ding, Aruna Seneviratne, Zihuai Lin, Octavia Dobre, and Won-Joo Hwang. Federated learning for smart healthcare: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (Csur), 55(3):1–37, 2022

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Federated learning for open banking

    Guodong Long, Yue Tan, Jing Jiang, and Chengqi Zhang. Federated learning for open banking. InFederated learning: privacy and incentive, pages 240–254. Springer, 2020

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Machine learning with adversaries: byzantine tolerant gradient descent

    Peva Blanchard, El Mahdi El Mhamdi, Rachid Guerraoui, and Julien Stainer. Machine learning with adversaries: byzantine tolerant gradient descent. InProceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’17, page 118–128, Red Hook, NY , USA, 2017. Curran Associates Inc

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    The hidden vulnerability of distributed learning in Byzantium

    El Mahdi El Mhamdi, Rachid Guerraoui, and Sébastien Rouault. The hidden vulnerability of distributed learning in Byzantium. InProceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 80 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 3521–3530. PMLR, 10–15 Jul 2018

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Byzantine-robust distributed learning: Towards optimal statistical rates

    Dong Yin, Yudong Chen, Ramchandran Kannan, and Peter Bartlett. Byzantine-robust distributed learning: Towards optimal statistical rates. In Jennifer Dy and Andreas Krause, editors,Pro- ceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 80 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 5650–5659. PMLR, 10–15 Jul 2018

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Collaborative learning in the jungle (decentralized, byzantine, heterogeneous, asynchronous and nonconvex learning)

    El-Mahdi El-Mhamdi, Sadegh Farhadkhani, Rachid Guerraoui, Arsany Guirguis, Lê-Nguyên Hoang, and Sébastien Rouault. Collaborative learning in the jungle (decentralized, byzantine, heterogeneous, asynchronous and nonconvex learning). InProceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS ’21, 2021

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Kakade, and Zaid Harchaoui

    Krishna Pillutla, Sham M. Kakade, and Zaid Harchaoui. Robust aggregation for federated learning.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 70:1142–1154, 2022

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Approximate agreement algorithms for byzantine collaborative learning

    Mélanie Cambus, Darya Melnyk, Tijana Milentijevi ´c, and Stefan Schmid. Approximate agreement algorithms for byzantine collaborative learning. InProceedings of the 37th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures, SPAA ’25, page 89–100, New York, NY , USA, 2025. Association for Computing Machinery

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Resilient multi-agent reinforcement learning using medoid and soft-medoid based aggregation

    Chandreyee Bhowmick, Mudassir Shabbir, Waseem Abbas, and Xenofon Koutsoukos. Resilient multi-agent reinforcement learning using medoid and soft-medoid based aggregation. In2022 IEEE International Conference on Assured Autonomy (ICAA), pages 36–45. IEEE, 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Generalized Byzantine-tolerant SGD

    Cong Xie, Oluwasanmi Koyejo, and Indranil Gupta. Generalized byzantine-tolerant sgd.arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.10116, 2018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Federated learning framework based on trimmed mean aggregation rules.Expert Systems with Applications, 270:126354, 2025

    Tianxiang Wang, Zhonglong Zheng, and Feilong Lin. Federated learning framework based on trimmed mean aggregation rules.Expert Systems with Applications, 270:126354, 2025

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Coordinate-wise median in byzantine federated learning

    Melanie Cambus, Darya Melnyk, Tijana Milentijevic, and Stefan Schmid. Coordinate-wise median in byzantine federated learning. InProceedings of the International Workshop on Secure and Efficient Federated Learning, FL-AsiaCCS ’25, New York, NY , USA, 2025. Association for Computing Machinery

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Multidimensional Approximate Agreement in Byzantine Asynchronous Systems

    Hammurabi Mendes and Maurice Herlihy. Multidimensional Approximate Agreement in Byzantine Asynchronous Systems. InProceedings of the Forty-fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC, 2013

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    Vaidya and Vijay K

    Nitin H. Vaidya and Vijay K. Garg. Byzantine Vector Consensus in Complete Graphs. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC, 2013

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    Multidimensional agreement in byzantine systems.Distributed Computing, 28(6):423–441, 2015

    Hammurabi Mendes, Maurice Herlihy, Nitin Vaidya, and Vijay K Garg. Multidimensional agreement in byzantine systems.Distributed Computing, 28(6):423–441, 2015

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    Zhuolun Xiang and Nitin H. Vaidya. Relaxed Byzantine Vector Consensus. In20th Interna- tional Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2016), volume 70 ofLeibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 26:1–26:15, 2017. 14

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Centroid approximation with multidimensional approxi- mate agreement protocols

    Mélanie Cambus and Darya Melnyk. Centroid approximation with multidimensional approxi- mate agreement protocols. InStabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems, pages 93–110, 2026

    work page 2026

  25. [25]

    Shuo Liu, Nirupam Gupta, and Nitin H. Vaidya. Approximate byzantine fault-tolerance in distributed optimization. InProceedings of the 2021 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC’21, page 379–389, 2021

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Fixing by mixing: A recipe for optimal byzantine ml under heterogeneity

    Youssef Allouah, Sadegh Farhadkhani, Rachid Guerraoui, Nirupam Gupta, Rafael Pinot, and John Stephan. Fixing by mixing: A recipe for optimal byzantine ml under heterogeneity. In Francisco Ruiz, Jennifer Dy, and Jan-Willem van de Meent, editors,Proceedings of The 26th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, volume 206 ofProceedi...

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Reliable graph neural networks via robust aggregation.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:13272–13284, 2020

    Simon Geisler, Daniel Zügner, and Stephan Günnemann. Reliable graph neural networks via robust aggregation.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:13272–13284, 2020

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Decentralized learning using hashgraph consensus

    Robert Canady, Chandreyee Bhowmick, and Xenofon Koutsoukos. Decentralized learning using hashgraph consensus. In2025 IEEE 49th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), pages 1027–1032, 2025

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Asynchronous byzantine agreement protocols.Inf

    Gabriel Bracha. Asynchronous byzantine agreement protocols.Inf. Comput., 75(2):130–143, November 1987

    work page 1987

  30. [30]

    Another advantage of free choice (extended abstract): Completely asyn- chronous agreement protocols

    Michael Ben-Or. Another advantage of free choice (extended abstract): Completely asyn- chronous agreement protocols. InProceedings of the Second Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC ’83, page 27–30, 1983

    work page 1983

  31. [31]

    Pease, R

    M. Pease, R. Shostak, and L. Lamport. Reaching agreement in the presence of faults.J. ACM, 27(2):228–234, April 1980

    work page 1980

  32. [32]

    Roberto De Prisco, Dahlia Malkhi, and Michael K. Reiter. On k-set consensus problems in asynchronous systems. InProceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC ’99, 1999

    work page 1999

  33. [33]

    Polygraph: Accountable byzantine agreement

    Pierre Civit, Seth Gilbert, and Vincent Gramoli. Polygraph: Accountable byzantine agreement. In2021 IEEE 41st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), 2021

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Reiter, Guy Golan Gueta, and Ittai Abraham

    Maofan Yin, Dahlia Malkhi, Michael K. Reiter, Guy Golan Gueta, and Ittai Abraham. Hotstuff: Bft consensus with linearity and responsiveness. InProceedings of the 2019 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC ’19, 2019

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Matthias Fitzi and Juan A. Garay. Efficient player-optimal protocols for strong and differential consensus. InProceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC ’03, page 211–220, 2003

    work page 2003

  36. [36]

    Reaching strong consensus in the presence of mixed failure types.Information Sciences, 108(1):157–180, 1998

    Hin-Sing Siu, Yeh-Hao Chin, and Wei-Pang Yang. Reaching strong consensus in the presence of mixed failure types.Information Sciences, 108(1):157–180, 1998

    work page 1998

  37. [37]

    Lynch, Shlomit S

    Danny Dolev, Nancy A. Lynch, Shlomit S. Pinter, Eugene W. Stark, and William E. Weihl. Reaching approximate agreement in the presence of faults.J. ACM, 33(3):499–516, May 1986

    work page 1986

  38. [38]

    Byzantine Agreement with Median Validity

    David Stolz and Roger Wattenhofer. Byzantine Agreement with Median Validity. In19th International Conference on Priniciples of Distributed Systems, OPODIS, 2015

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Byzantine agreement with interval validity

    Darya Melnyk and Roger Wattenhofer. Byzantine agreement with interval validity. In2018 IEEE 37th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS), 2018

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    On the validity of consensus

    Pierre Civit, Seth Gilbert, Rachid Guerraoui, Jovan Komatovic, and Manuel Vidigueira. On the validity of consensus. InProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC ’23, page 332–343, 2023

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Elzinga and Donald Hearn

    D. Elzinga and Donald Hearn. The minimum covering sphere problem.Management Science, 19:96–104, 09 1972. 15

    work page 1972

  42. [42]

    Smallest enclosing disks (balls and ellipsoids)

    Emo Welzl. Smallest enclosing disks (balls and ellipsoids). In Hermann Maurer, editor,New Results and New Trends in Computer Science, pages 359–370, 1991

    work page 1991

  43. [43]

    Helly’s theorem and its relatives 1

    Ludwig Danzer, Branko Grünbaum, and Victor Klee. Helly’s theorem and its relatives 1. In Convexity: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium in Pure Mathematics of the American Mathematical Society, volume 7, page 101. American Mathematical Soc., 1963

    work page 1963

  44. [44]

    The kiss precise.Nature, 137(3477):1021, 1936

    Frederick Soddy. The kiss precise.Nature, 137(3477):1021, 1936

    work page 1936

  45. [45]

    The kiss precise.Nature, 139(62), 1937

    work page 1937

  46. [46]

    Om et punkts beliggenhed i forhold til visse regulÆre punktsÆt.Nordisk Matematisk Tidskrift, 8(4):155–169, 1960

    DA VID FOG. Om et punkts beliggenhed i forhold til visse regulÆre punktsÆt.Nordisk Matematisk Tidskrift, 8(4):155–169, 1960

    work page 1960

  47. [47]

    Loxodromic sequences of tangent spheres.aequationes mathematicae, 1(1):104– 121, 1968

    HSM Coxeter. Loxodromic sequences of tangent spheres.aequationes mathematicae, 1(1):104– 121, 1968

    work page 1968

  48. [48]

    Cohen, Yin Tat Lee, Gary Miller, Jakub Pachocki, and Aaron Sidford

    Michael B. Cohen, Yin Tat Lee, Gary Miller, Jakub Pachocki, and Aaron Sidford. Geometric median in nearly linear time. InProceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’16, page 9–21, New York, NY , USA, 2016. Association for Computing Machinery

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    Private geometric median

    Mahdi Haghifam, Thomas Steinke, and Jonathan Ullman. Private geometric median. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS ’24, Red Hook, NY , USA, 2024. Curran Associates Inc. 16

    work page 2024