Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

StyleStudio: Text-Driven Style Transfer with Selective Control of Style Elements

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read StyleStudio: three fine-tuning-free mechanisms make text-driven style transfer follow the prompt while keeping the reference style.

desk verdict Incremental but clean adapter paper; the SCFG centerpiece is interesting but underspecified and unquantified. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08503 v2 pith:HYAIYQAY submitted 2024-12-11 cs.CV

Mingkun Lei , Xue Song , Beier Zhu , Hao Wang , Chi Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords text-drivenstyletransferdiffusionmodelsclassifier-freeguidanceadaptiveinstancenormalizationoverfittinglayoutstabilityattentionsharingfine-tuning-free
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that three plug-in mechanisms can fix the main failures of text-driven style transfer: overfitting to the reference style, weak alignment with the text prompt, and layout artifacts such as checkerboard patterns. It proposes a cross-modal AdaIN that merges text and style features through statistics rather than weighted addition, a Style-Based Classifier-Free Guidance that subtracts a negative style image to isolate the wanted style element, and a teacher model that shares its self-attention maps during early denoising steps to stabilize layouts. The result is a fine-tuning-free recipe that can be dropped into existing adapter-based style transfer systems. On a 1,000-image benchmark it reports the best text-alignment score among the compared methods, and its user study favors it on text alignment.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is threefold. Cross-Modal AdaIN applies Adaptive Instance Normalization between the text-queried feature map and the style-queried feature map, so the text features are re-centered and re-scaled by the style statistics before being added back into the U-Net features. Style-Based CFG extends classifier-free guidance by using a ControlNet-generated negative style image as the negative condition in the noise-prediction difference. The teacher model runs the original text-to-image model in parallel and replaces the style-transfer model's self-attention maps with the teacher's during the first denoising timesteps, with a cutoff so that style details are not diluted.

What would settle it

Generate a style image containing two clearly separable elements, for example cartoon rendering plus night lighting, and construct a negative style image that removes only one. If applying SCFG with that negative target also weakens or removes the other element, or changes the object's structure, then the method is not selectively controlling the style element as claimed. A quantitative version is to compare CLIP text-alignment and style-similarity scores under different negative-image constructions and show that the choice of the negative image determines which style elements survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the conflict between a text prompt and a style reference can be reduced without retraining by replacing additive fusion of text and image conditions with an AdaIN-style statistical fusion and by steering generation with a style-level negative example. The central discovery is that a style image can be treated like a conditioning signal for classifier-free guidance: if a layout-controlled model produces a negative image that keeps the reference structure but drops the target style element, then taking a weighted difference between the positive and negative style-conditioned noise predictions isolates exactly the desired style. The paper further shows that sharing the teacher's self-attention maps only in the early denoising steps preserves layout and suppresses artifacts without washing out the transferred style, and that both mechanisms improve text alignment over the baseline from 0.216 to 0.235 in CLIP similarity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the ControlNet-produced negative style image keeps the reference image's structure while excluding exactly the target style element, so subtracting it in SCFG isolates the desired style; the paper's own limitations note that producing this image requires expertise and manual effort.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any adapter-based style transfer method that fuses text and image cross-attention by weighted summation can swap in cross-modal AdaIN without fine-tuning and improve prompt adherence.
  • SCFG gives users a knob for selecting which style element to transfer, provided they can supply a negative style image lacking that element.
  • Limiting the teacher-model attention sharing to early timesteps stabilizes layout and reduces artifacts while preserving style; full-timestep replacement would wash the style out.
  • Because all components are training-free at inference, the recipe generalizes across style transfer frameworks, demonstrated in the paper for InstantStyle and StyleCrafter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves the production of the negative style image underspecified; automating that step is the most direct path to making SCFG usable outside expert hands.
  • If SCFG behaves as claimed, the same negative-image trick could be applied to other conditions, such as negative content images, giving a general way to subtract unwanted visual attributes in diffusion generation.
  • The early-only teacher sharing suggests that layout is largely determined in the first denoising steps; this could be tested in other diffusion tasks as a cheap artifact-prevention recipe.
  • Cross-modal AdaIN replacing the weighted-sum hyperparameter implies that fusion weights become unnecessary, which could simplify adapter design in other multimodal conditioning settings.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes StyleStudio, a training-free augmentation for text-driven style transfer built on the CSGO adapter. It introduces three mechanisms: cross-modal AdaIN to replace the weighted-sum fusion of text and style features in cross-attention; Style-Based Classifier-Free Guidance (SCFG), which uses a ControlNet-generated 'negative style image' to guide generation away from unwanted style elements; and a teacher model that shares self-attention maps from the original text-to-image model during early denoising steps to stabilize layout. The paper evaluates text alignment using CLIP cosine similarity on a 1000-image benchmark, reports a user study, and provides extensive qualitative comparisons. The main quantitative claim is a text-alignment score of 0.235 versus 0.229 for CSGO and 0.221 for IP-Adapter.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper would make a pragmatic contribution: a plug-in, training-free set of mechanisms that can be applied to existing adapter-based style transfer models. The modularity is a strength: cross-modal AdaIN and teacher-model attention sharing are each simple to implement, and the appendix shows qualitative generalization to InstantStyle and StyleCrafter. The paper also provides a useful qualitative analysis of style overfitting and layout artifacts. However, the central claim of selective style control via SCFG is not quantitatively established, and the numerical evaluation lacks statistical rigor. The value of the paper therefore depends on the authors closing these gaps in a revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.4, Eq. (7), Table 1, Table 2, Limitations] SCFG, which is the basis for the claimed selective control in the title, is not included in the quantitative evaluation: Appendix A states that only the Teacher Model and cross-modal AdaIN were used for quantitative experiments, and Table 2's ablation includes no SCFG term. The construction of the negative style image is also unspecified: the paper does not state which ControlNet configuration, conditioning prompt, or denoising schedule is used to produce z_neg^t, and the Limitations section concedes that generating it "requires expertise and manual effort." As a result, Eq. (7) is not reproducible, and the paper's central claim that SCFG enables selective control is supported only by qualitative figures (Figs. 7 and 15). Please specify the full recipe for the negative image, include SCFG in the ablations, and report its contribution in the main quantitative comparison.
  2. [Table 1] The text-alignment comparison reports a single CLIP score per method on 1000 images with one fixed seed. The gap between the proposed method (0.235) and CSGO (0.229) is 0.006, which is small relative to likely evaluation noise, yet no error bars, multiple seeds, or significance tests are reported. Moreover, hyperparameters such as the teacher-model timestep cutoff (20) and the guidance scale (5) appear to be selected on the same benchmark, which can inflate the reported advantage. Please provide variance estimates, significance tests, and a separation of validation and test sets for any hyperparameter choices.
  3. [Section 3.3 and Appendix C] The teacher-model participation timestep t_cutoff is a critical hyperparameter, and the paper's own Fig. 19 shows that the optimal value varies across styles (e.g., rows 5 and 6). The main results fix t_cutoff=20 for all styles and prompts, but no quantitative sensitivity analysis is provided. Please report the text-alignment metric as a function of t_cutoff on the benchmark and justify the chosen value.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (5)] Please define gamma_style and beta_style explicitly as the channel-wise mean and standard deviation of f_style; currently they are introduced only by reference to "the style image feature map."
  2. [Section 3.4, Eq. (7)] Please clarify the roles of y_text_neg and y_style_neg, including how a negative text prompt is combined with the negative style image and whether both are used in all SCFG experiments.
  3. [Table 1] The column grouping is difficult to read because "Ours" is not clearly labeled under a model family; please format the table headers to make the comparison groups explicit.
  4. [Section 4.1 and References] The text refers to "StyleAdapter [36]" but the reference list entry [36] is StyleAlign; please ensure the citation and naming are consistent.
  5. [Section 4.1, User Study] The user study reports raw vote percentages without confidence intervals or inter-rater agreement; please provide at least a bootstrapped confidence interval to support the strength of the preference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No definitional circularity: the three components are architectural or guidance modifications benchmarked against external baselines; the mild issues are fixed hyperparameters chosen on the same style set and an underspecified SCFG negative image, neither of which makes a central prediction reduce to a fitted input.

full rationale

I walked the claimed derivation chain for each of the three contributions. Cross-Modal AdaIN (Eq. 5) is a defined feature transform that replaces the weighted-sum fusion of CSGO/IP-Adapter; its benefit is measured on CLIP text-alignment and a user study, and no parameter of Eq. (5) is fitted to that metric. The Teacher Model (Algorithm 1) is an attention-map replacement schedule with a cutoff timestep; the appendix shows a qualitative sensitivity study for the cutoff, and the main evaluation fixes it at 20 steps, which is hyperparameter selection rather than a fitted quantity renamed as a prediction. Style-Based CFG (Eq. 7) is the standard positive-minus-negative CFG linear combination applied to style images; the claimed selective control is demonstrated qualitatively in Figs. 7 and 15 rather than derived from an equation whose outputs are numerically forced. The negative style image is admittedly hard to produce ('generating negative-style image requires expertise and manual effort', Limitations), and its construction via ControlNet is unspecified; that is an underspecification/falsifiability weakness of the central contribution, not a definitional equivalence, because the paper does not claim to predict the negative image from the target style nor fit it to the reported numbers. The only self-citation is [31] (Xue Song et al.) in the related-work enumeration for text-based image editing; it is not load-bearing for any experimental claim. The quantitative headline (0.235 text alignment) is an external CLIP comparison on 1,000 images, so the central results are self-contained against external benchmarks. Minor evaluation-circularity risk remains because the guidance scale (5) and teacher cutoff (20) were fixed from observations on the same style/prompt settings later used for the headline comparison, but this is test-set tuning, not constructional circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new physical or architectural entities; it combines existing components (AdaIN, self-attention sharing, CFG, ControlNet) with hand-tuned hyperparameters. The main load-bearing assumptions are that attention-feature statistics behave like style, that teacher self-attention maps transfer layout without style leakage, and that the manually constructed negative style image isolates the unwanted style.

free parameters (3)
  • Teacher model participation timestep (t_cutoff) = 20 of 50 denoising steps
    Chosen by qualitative inspection (Fig. 9 and Appendix C); the optimal value varies across styles, and the same benchmark is then used for the reported headline numbers.
  • SCFG guidance weight w = 5 to 8 in appendix; excluded from main quantitative results
    Tuned by hand with no automatic selection; SCFG is not used in Table 1 or Table 2, so this parameter is not included in the quantitative comparison.
  • Guidance scale = 5 (uniform)
    Set uniformly across all methods, a reasonable but still arbitrary choice that can affect relative performance.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption AdaIN statistics of style cross-attention features transfer style without destroying text content structure
    Eq. (5) is the core of Cross-Modal AdaIN; there is no proof that attention-feature statistics behave like style statistics in the intended way, and the claim is supported only by empirical examples.
  • domain assumption Self-attention maps from an unmodified SD model encode layout that can be injected into the stylized model without leaking style
    Algorithm 1 in Section 3.3 relies on this transfer, borrowing from prior image-editing work; the paper assumes it generalizes to style transfer.
  • domain assumption ControlNet-generated negative style image preserves structure while omitting the target style
    Section 3.4 depends on this premise for SCFG, but the negative image construction is not specified, and the limitations section says it requires expertise and manual effort.
  • domain assumption CLIP image-text cosine similarity is a valid proxy for text alignment in style transfer
    Section 4.1 uses CLIP as the headline metric; the paper itself notes in Fig. 14 that standard metrics fail to capture style, but it does not validate CLIP text alignment against human judgment beyond the small user study.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of StyleStudio: Text-Driven Style Transfer with Selective Control of Style Elements." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HYAIYQAY

@misc{pith2026241208503,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: StyleStudio: Text-Driven Style Transfer with Selective Control of Style Elements},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HYAIYQAY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08503}
}
read the original abstract

Text-driven style transfer aims to merge the style of a reference image with content described by a text prompt. Recent advancements in text-to-image models have improved the nuance of style transformations, yet significant challenges remain, particularly with overfitting to reference styles, limiting stylistic control, and misaligning with textual content. In this paper, we propose three complementary strategies to address these issues. First, we introduce a cross-modal Adaptive Instance Normalization (AdaIN) mechanism for better integration of style and text features, enhancing alignment. Second, we develop a Style-based Classifier-Free Guidance (SCFG) approach that enables selective control over stylistic elements, reducing irrelevant influences. Finally, we incorporate a teacher model during early generation stages to stabilize spatial layouts and mitigate artifacts. Our extensive evaluations demonstrate significant improvements in style transfer quality and alignment with textual prompts. Furthermore, our approach can be integrated into existing style transfer frameworks without fine-tuning.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08503 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Results of our text-driven style transfer model. Given a style reference image, our method effectively reduces style overfitting, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of overfitting issues in text-to-image genera [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of the checkerboard artifact encountered in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (23 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The illustration of our proposed Cross-Modal AdaIN, Teacher Model, Style-Based CFG. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualization of the Cross-Attention Map for the word [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparison with state-of-the-art methods. Our approach effectively preserves image style while accurately adhering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Impact of Style-Based CFG. The proposed Style-Based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Visualization of cross-attention maps for the word “ap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Impact of Teacher Model on Style Image Generation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Details of the Test Set. The prompts used in the quan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Details of the Test Set. The style images used in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: We observed that existing metrics generally fail to capture adherence to style. They tend to favor higher semantic similarity to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: More results of Style-Based CFG. DEADiff [24] struggles with accurately capturing the style, and although StyleShot [9] performs reasonably well in cap￾turing style, it still encounters issues such as content leak￾age. Content leakage can indeed be seen as a form of o…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The questionnaire format for the user study. Each option represents the generation result of a method under a given style and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Qualitative results of the ablation study. cross-modal AdaIN enhances text alignment while preserving style similarity, address [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Implementation of the Teacher Model: Comparison of substituting the Self-Attention Map and Cross-Attention Map. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Impact of Teacher Model on Style Image Generation. The term “timestep” refers to the number of denoising steps during [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Compared to the image-based style transfer(I2I) provided by CSGO [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Qualitative results of using cross-modal AdaIN in InstantStyle [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Impact of Teacher Model on InstantStyle [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Impact of Teacher Model on StyleCrafter [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Qualitative comparison with state-of-the-art methods. Our approach effectively preserves image style while accurately adhering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_24.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Qualitative comparison with state-of-the-art methods. Our approach effectively preserves image style while accurately adhering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_25.png]
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Qualitative comparison with state-of-the-art methods. Our approach effectively maintain layout consistency across different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_26.png]
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: More results of our text-driven style transfer model. Given a style reference image, our method effectively reduces style [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_27.png]
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: More results of our text-driven style transfer model. Given a style reference image, our method effectively reduces style [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_28.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Detail++: Training-Free Detail Enhancer for T2I Diffusion Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Detail++ uses progressive multi-branch prompt injection and test-time attention optimization to improve attribute binding in text-to-image generation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Improving image generation with better captions

    James Betker, Gabriel Goh, Li Jing, Tim Brooks, Jianfeng Wang, Linjie Li, Long Ouyang, Juntang Zhuang, Joyce Lee, Yufei Guo, et al. Improving image generation with better captions. Computer Science. https://cdn. openai. com/papers/dall-e-3. pdf, 2(3):8, 2023. 2

    2023

  2. [2]

    Style injec- tion in diffusion: A training-free approach for adapting large- scale diffusion models for style transfer

    Jiwoo Chung, Sangeek Hyun, and Jae-Pil Heo. Style injec- tion in diffusion: A training-free approach for adapting large- scale diffusion models for style transfer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8795–8805, 2024. 3

    2024

  3. [3]

    Emu: Enhanc- ing image generation models using photogenic needles in a haystack

    Xiaoliang Dai, Ji Hou, Chih-Yao Ma, Sam Tsai, Jialiang Wang, Rui Wang, Peizhao Zhang, Simon Vandenhende, Xi- aofang Wang, Abhimanyu Dubey, et al. Emu: Enhanc- ing image generation models using photogenic needles in a haystack. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15807, 2023. 2

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Freecustom: Tuning- free customized image generation for multi-concept compo- sition

    Ganggui Ding, Canyu Zhao, Wen Wang, Zhen Yang, Zide Liu, Hao Chen, and Chunhua Shen. Freecustom: Tuning- free customized image generation for multi-concept compo- sition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 9089–9098,

  5. [5]

    Cogview: Mastering text-to-image generation via transformers

    Ming Ding, Zhuoyi Yang, Wenyi Hong, Wendi Zheng, Chang Zhou, Da Yin, Junyang Lin, Xu Zou, Zhou Shao, Hongxia Yang, et al. Cogview: Mastering text-to-image generation via transformers. Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:19822–19835, 2021. 2

    2021

  6. [6]

    Scaling recti- fied flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis

    Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari, Jonas M ¨uller, Harry Saini, Yam Levi, Dominik Lorenz, Axel Sauer, Frederic Boesel, et al. Scaling recti- fied flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learn- ing, 2024. 1, 3

    2024

  7. [7]

    Implicit style-content separation using b-lora

    Yarden Frenkel, Yael Vinker, Ariel Shamir, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Implicit style-content separation using b-lora. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 181–198. Springer, 2025. 3

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    An image is worth one word: Personalizing text-to- image generation using textual inversion

    Rinon Gal, Yuval Alaluf, Yuval Atzmon, Or Patash- nik, Amit H Bermano, Gal Chechik, and Daniel Cohen- Or. An image is worth one word: Personalizing text-to- image generation using textual inversion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01618, 2022. 3

    arXiv 2022

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Styleshot: A snap- shot on any style

    Junyao Gao, Yanchen Liu, Yanan Sun, Yinhao Tang, Yan- hong Zeng, Kai Chen, and Cairong Zhao. Styleshot: A snap- shot on any style. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01414, 2024. 3, 4, 7, 1, 2

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Prompt-to-prompt im- age editing with cross attention control

    Amir Hertz, Ron Mokady, Jay Tenenbaum, Kfir Aberman, Yael Pritch, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Prompt-to-prompt im- age editing with cross attention control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01626, 2022. 3, 7

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Classifier-free diffusion guidance

    Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans. Classifier-free diffusion guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598, 2022. 5, 6

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Arbitrary style transfer in real-time with adaptive instance normalization

    Xun Huang and Serge Belongie. Arbitrary style transfer in real-time with adaptive instance normalization. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE international conference on computer vi- sion, pages 1501–1510, 2017. 4

    2017

  5. [13]

    Visual style prompting with swapping self- attention

    Jaeseok Jeong, Junho Kim, Yunjey Choi, Gayoung Lee, and Youngjung Uh. Visual style prompting with swapping self- attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12974, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Training- free content injection using h-space in diffusion models

    Jaeseok Jeong, Mingi Kwon, and Youngjung Uh. Training- free content injection using h-space in diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Appli- cations of Computer Vision, pages 5151–5161, 2024. 3

    2024

  7. [15]

    An image is worth multiple words: Learn- ing object level concepts using multi-concept prompt learn- ing

    Chen Jin, Ryutaro Tanno, Amrutha Saseendran, Tom Diethe, and Philip Teare. An image is worth multiple words: Learn- ing object level concepts using multi-concept prompt learn- ing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12274, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Auto-encoding variational bayes

    Diederik P Kingma. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013. 3

    2013 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Diffusion models already have a semantic latent space

    Mingi Kwon, Jaeseok Jeong, and Youngjung Uh. Diffusion models already have a semantic latent space. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.10960, 2022. 3

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Towards understanding cross and self-attention in stable diffusion for text-guided image editing

    Bingyan Liu, Chengyu Wang, Tingfeng Cao, Kui Jia, and Jun Huang. Towards understanding cross and self-attention in stable diffusion for text-guided image editing. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7817–7826, 2024. 3, 5

    2024

  11. [19]

    Stylecrafter: Enhancing stylized text-to-video gener- ation with style adapter

    Gongye Liu, Menghan Xia, Yong Zhang, Haoxin Chen, Jinbo Xing, Yibo Wang, Xintao Wang, Yujiu Yang, and Ying Shan. Stylecrafter: Enhancing stylized text-to-video gener- ation with style adapter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00330 ,

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equa- tions

    Chenlin Meng, Yutong He, Yang Song, Jiaming Song, Jia- jun Wu, Jun-Yan Zhu, and Stefano Ermon. Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equa- tions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01073, 2021. 3

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Null-text inversion for editing real im- ages using guided diffusion models

    Ron Mokady, Amir Hertz, Kfir Aberman, Yael Pritch, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Null-text inversion for editing real im- ages using guided diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 6038–6047, 2023. 3

    2023

  14. [22]

    Dreammatcher: Appearance matching self-attention for semantically-consistent text-to- image personalization

    Jisu Nam, Heesu Kim, DongJae Lee, Siyoon Jin, Seungry- ong Kim, and Seunggyu Chang. Dreammatcher: Appearance matching self-attention for semantically-consistent text-to- image personalization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition...

    2024

  15. [23]

    Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion mod- els for high-resolution image synthesis

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas M ¨uller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion mod- els for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023. 1, 2, 3, 5

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Dead- iff: An efficient stylization diffusion model with disentan- gled representations

    Tianhao Qi, Shancheng Fang, Yanze Wu, Hongtao Xie, Ji- awei Liu, Lang Chen, Qian He, and Yongdong Zhang. Dead- iff: An efficient stylization diffusion model with disentan- gled representations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognit...

    2024

  17. [25]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion. In International conference on machine learning, ...

    2021

  18. [26]

    Hierarchical text-conditional image gener- ation with clip latents

    Aditya Ramesh, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alex Nichol, Casey Chu, and Mark Chen. Hierarchical text-conditional image gener- ation with clip latents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125, 1 (2):3, 2022. 2

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 1, 2, 3, 5

    2022

  20. [28]

    U- net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmen- tation

    Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U- net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmen- tation. In Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th international conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, proceedings, pa...

    2015

  21. [29]

    Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation

    Nataniel Ruiz, Yuanzhen Li, Varun Jampani, Yael Pritch, Michael Rubinstein, and Kfir Aberman. Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 2250...

    2023

  22. [30]

    Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding

    Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Jay Whang, Emily L Denton, Kamyar Ghasemipour, Raphael Gontijo Lopes, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Tim Salimans, et al. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. Advances in neural information...

    2022

  23. [31]

    Doubly abductive coun- terfactual inference for text-based image editing

    Xue Song, Jiequan Cui, Hanwang Zhang, Jingjing Chen, Richang Hong, and Yu-Gang Jiang. Doubly abductive coun- terfactual inference for text-based image editing. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9162–9171, 2024. 3

    2024

  24. [32]

    Plug-and-play diffusion features for text-driven image-to-image translation

    Narek Tumanyan, Michal Geyer, Shai Bagon, and Tali Dekel. Plug-and-play diffusion features for text-driven image-to-image translation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1921–1930, 2023. 3, 5

    1921

  25. [33]

    Attention is all you need

    A Vaswani. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017. 3, 5, 2

    2017

  26. [34]

    Instantstyle: Free lunch towards style-preserving in text-to-image generation

    Haofan Wang, Matteo Spinelli, Qixun Wang, Xu Bai, Zekui Qin, and Anthony Chen. Instantstyle: Free lunch towards style-preserving in text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02733, 2024. 3, 4, 7, 1, 2, 5

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Styleadapter: A single-pass lora-free model for stylized image generation

    Zhouxia Wang, Xintao Wang, Liangbin Xie, Zhongang Qi, Ying Shan, Wenping Wang, and Ping Luo. Styleadapter: A single-pass lora-free model for stylized image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.01770, 2023. 1, 2

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Stylealign: Analysis and applications of aligned stylegan models

    Zongze Wu, Yotam Nitzan, Eli Shechtman, and Dani Lischinski. Stylealign: Analysis and applications of aligned stylegan models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.11323, 2021. 3, 7, 2

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Csgo: Content-style composition in text-to-image genera- tion

    Peng Xing, Haofan Wang, Yanpeng Sun, Qixun Wang, Xu Bai, Hao Ai, Renyuan Huang, and Zechao Li. Csgo: Content-style composition in text-to-image genera- tion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16766 , 2024. 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 1

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Ip- adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to- image diffusion models

    Hu Ye, Jun Zhang, Sibo Liu, Xiao Han, and Wei Yang. Ip- adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to- image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721,

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3836–3847, 2023. 1

    2023

  32. [40]

    timestep

    Yuxin Zhang, Nisha Huang, Fan Tang, Haibin Huang, Chongyang Ma, Weiming Dong, and Changsheng Xu. Inversion-based style transfer with diffusion models. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10146–10156, 2023. 3 10 This App...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.