REVIEW 2 cited by
ArchEnemy: Removing scattered-light glitches from gravitational wave data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Data recorded by gravitational wave detectors includes many non-astrophysical transient noise bursts, the most common of which is caused by scattered-light within the detectors. These so-called ``glitches'' in the data impact the ability to both observe and characterize incoming gravitational wave signals. In this work we use a scattered-light glitch waveform model to identify and characterize scattered-light glitches in a representative stretch of gravitational wave data. We identify $2749$ scattered-light glitches in $5.96$ days of LIGO-Hanford data and $1306$ glitches in $5.93$ days of LIGO-Livingston data taken from the third LIGO-Virgo observing run. By subtracting identified scattered-light glitches we demonstrate an increase in the sensitive volume of the gravitational wave search for binary black hole signals by $\sim1\%$.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Probability of gravitational-wave lensing by intermediate-mass black holes and globular clusters
The rate of compound gravitational-wave lensing by intermediate-mass black holes in globular clusters is at most about 10^-3 of galaxy-scale lensed events, disfavoring GW231123 as such an event.
-
Joint inference for gravitational-wave signal and noise glitch: Method and application
A bilby-based joint signal-glitch inference pipeline recovers unbiased parameters in simulations and shows GW200129 spin-precession evidence is sensitive to the waveform-plus-glitch-model combination.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.