Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 286 references

Across the Horizon: On Gravitational Wave Flux Laws and Tests of Gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The thesis derives balance laws at future null infinity from covariant phase space and uses them to benchmark numerical waveforms, compute echo memory corrections, and forecast the stochastic gravitational wave background for LISA.

desk verdict A careful BMS flux-law derivation and a useful NR benchmarking study, wrapped in a dissertation with speculative LISA and echo forecasts that need to be read as conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06783 v3 pith:HYNWCHJ7 submitted 2025-06-07 gr-qc

classification gr-qc MSC 83C3583C4083C57 PACS 04.30.-w04.70.-s04.80.Nn
keywords asymptoticallyflatspacetimesnullinfinitycovariantphasespacebalancefluxlawsgravitationalwavememorynumericalrelativitywaveformsechoesstochasticbackground
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This dissertation seeks to establish that the covariant phase space formulation of general relativity, applied in asymptotically flat spacetimes, yields a consistent non-conservation law for each symmetry generator at future null infinity, and that these balance laws are practical tools for gravitational wave science. If correct, the laws constrain the gravitational strain exactly: the net change in an asymptotic charge equals the flux of radiative shear crossing null infinity, so any numerical or analytic waveform that violates them is inaccurate to that degree. The thesis applies the laws to benchmark numerical waveform models and to compute quantum corrections to gravitational wave memory from the echo effect, arguing that the space mission LISA could observe such signals. It further forecasts that LISA will constrain the extragalactic stochastic gravitational wave background to a spectral energy density below about $\Omega_\mathrm{GW} \lesssim 10^{-8}$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the asymptotic shear tensor $\sigma_{\mu\nu}$, the gauge-invariant, trace-free, transverse tensor on future null infinity that carries the two radiative degrees of freedom, together with the identity $N_{\mu\nu} = 2\,\partial_u \sigma_{\mu\nu}$ linking shear to the news tensor and hence to the gravitational strain $h = 2\,\sigma$. The covariant phase space symplectic construction promotes the generators of the asymptotic symmetry group at null infinity (the BMS group) to charges, and the non-conservation of a charge is computed as a flux integral over the radiation. The peeling fall-offs of the Weyl curvature, assumed rather than derived, guarantee that the shear and news are well-defined at the boundary.

What would settle it

Take a high-accuracy numerical relativity waveform for a binary black hole merger, extract the asymptotic strain on a sequence of null slices, and evaluate both sides of the balance law, namely the time-integrated strain against the charge change plus energy flux. If the residual does not shrink toward zero as resolution and extraction radius increase, the law as derived fails. For the echo claim, a null detection by LISA of the echo-induced memory at the predicted signal-to-noise for a fiducial event would rule out the particular quantized black hole reflectivity model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper argues that the radiative phase space at null infinity, built from the asymptotic shear tensor and its associated news tensor, follows directly from the covariant phase space of full general relativity rather than from a separate construction. The resulting balance laws take the form: flux of gravitational radiation through null infinity equals the change in the corresponding BMS charge, with the memory contribution tied to the angle-dependent energy flux. This generalizes earlier radiative phase space formulations and is shown to reproduce consistent results in known limits. The dissertation then uses these identities as constraint equations for simulated binary black hole waveforms, and as the basis for computing echo-induced quantum corrections to the memory, whose detectability by LISA is quantified.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that real radiating spacetimes peel: as one goes to future null infinity, the radiative part of the curvature falls off as $1/r$ and the remaining parts fall off faster, so the conformally rescaled spacetime is smooth enough at the boundary. If realistic binary merger spacetimes do not satisfy this fall-off behavior, the definition of radiative shear and the derived balance laws would need to be modified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any waveform family that satisfies the balance laws is internally consistent with energy and momentum flux conservation; the thesis turns this into a quantitative benchmark for comparing and improving numerical waveform models.
  • The non-linear memory of a merger is determined by the radiated energy flux, so the same balance laws fix the memory amplitude and its echo-induced quantum corrections.
  • For the two echo reflectivity models studied, LISA could detect the primary echo and the memory correction, potentially measuring characteristic frequencies that probe black hole area quantization.
  • LISA should constrain the extra-galactic stochastic gravitational wave background to a spectral energy density below about $10^{-8}$, bounding astrophysical and cosmological source scenarios.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same balance-law consistency check could be run on future ground-based detector waveform models, not only the space-based source regime, whenever waveforms can be extracted at null infinity.
  • If the echo memory is measured, comparing its amplitude with the classical memory may help distinguish between the standard asymptotic symmetry group and its extended versions, since the quantum correction is tied to angle-dependent translations.
  • The stochastic background forecast naturally extends to a joint measurement strategy: the kinematic dipole of the background sets a scale below which monopole extraction degrades, so a dipole measurement would improve foreground separation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This dissertation (arXiv:2506.06783) develops a unified asymptotic-spacetime formalism for gravitational radiation in general relativity. Chapter II derives the shear tensor and Bondi news at null infinity, uses covariant phase space methods to obtain balance flux laws, and applies these laws as consistency constraints to compare numerical-relativity waveform models (EOB, Phenom, Surrogate) against SXS catalog simulations. Chapter III uses the same flux laws to compute echo-induced corrections to the waveform and to its memory for exotic-compact-object and quantized-black-hole reflectivity models, and estimates their detectability with LISA. Chapter IV reviews the stochastic gravitational wave background and presents an end-to-end LISA forecasting pipeline, concluding that LISA could constrain the extra-galactic background to a spectral energy density below about 10^-8.

Significance. If the central derivation is accepted, the manuscript's main value lies in a careful unification of the BMS and covariant-phase-space approaches to balance laws at null infinity, together with a concrete application to NR waveform benchmarking. The derivation does not appear circular: it does not assume the target flux law, and the waveform comparisons use SXS simulations as an independent baseline. The echo and stochastic-background chapters are more phenomenological; their conclusions are conditional on the adopted reflectivity models and on the LISA noise and sky assumptions. The paper is strongest where it derives and benchmarks; the more speculative claims, such as probing black hole area quantization through echo memory, require the model parameters to be taken at face value.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sections 2.1.4, 2.2.2, Eq. (2.38), the Lemma after Eq. (2.38), and Eq. (2.133)] The derivation of the balance laws and the identification of the asymptotic shear sigma with the gravitational-wave strain h rest on Penrose peeling, i.e., on the unphysical metric being at least C^4 at null infinity so that the asymptotic Weyl tensor has a smooth limit. The manuscript does not test whether the binary-merger spacetimes used in Section 2.5 and Chapter III satisfy this assumption, nor does it bound the error if finite-extraction NR data or late-time tails violate the peeling hierarchy. Because the same flux laws are used for the waveform benchmarks and the echo-memory computations, this is a load-bearing assumption. I would like to see either a fall-off test using Cauchy-characteristic extraction or Weyl-scalar fall-offs on the SXS data, or an explicit estimate of the size of the corrections if peeling is violated.
  2. [Section 2.2.3, Eq. (2.133)] The text states that for GW measurements it is 'morally' permissible to equate the linearized strain h with the full nonlinear shear sigma, and then treats this identification as absolute in the subsequent flux-law and memory calculations. The linearized derivation leading to Eq. (2.131) does not by itself justify Eq. (2.133) in full GR, where the balance laws are nonlinear statements. A proper full-GR argument, or at least a precise statement of the approximation order and its regime of validity, is needed before the strain can be inserted into the nonlinear balance laws.
  3. [Table 3.1, Figures 3.7 and 3.11, Sections 3.2.1-3.2.4] The LISA detectability and memory-SNR claims are computed with hand-chosen reflectivity parameters (T_QH or alpha, beta, gamma, delta, epsilon) and no prior or uncertainty quantification. Figure 3.7 shows order-unity variation of the normalized echo SNR over the explored parameter ranges, and Figure 3.11 shows that the memory SNR gain is a strong function of epsilon. The abstract's statement that 'the results indicate that LISA could detect such signals' is therefore too strong; the paper should either map out the detectable region in parameter space or state explicitly that detectability holds only for a subset of the phenomenological parameter choices.
  4. [Sections 3.2.2-3.2.4] The phrase 'quantum corrections' overstates the nature of the calculation. The echo corrections are classical wave effects computed from a transfer function whose frequency structure is motivated by area quantization; no quantum field theory calculation is performed. The claim that LISA could 'probe black hole area quantization' should be rephrased as probing the assumed quantization-inspired reflectivity model unless a sharper link between the transfer-function parameters and a specific quantum-gravity calculation is provided.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sections 2.2.1-2.2.2] The symbol ell is used both as a vector field and as a one-form in equations such as Eq. (2.99) and Eq. (2.113). This is understandable from the tetrad context, but it should be stated explicitly to avoid ambiguity.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'Gravitaional Wave' in the List of Abbreviations, 'operatpr' in the List of Symbols, 'mapper dominated' in the caption of Figure 4.5, and 'Boni news tensor' in Section 2.2.2. These should be corrected.
  3. [Section 2.5.6, Eq. (2.285)] The text refers to Eq. (2.285), but the displayed equations in Section 2.5 are not numbered consecutively in the manuscript. The reference should be made self-consistent or replaced with the correct equation number.
  4. [Section 1.4] A key technical point about the treatment of the r-to-infinity limit is deferred to 'the soon-to-be-finished updated version' of reference [2]. If the argument is needed, it should be included in the manuscript or a published source should be cited.
  5. [Section 2.5.6, Figure 2.15] The caption states that the mismatch axis is capped at the maximum value attained by the Surrogate model and that values above the threshold are 'not meaningful.' The averaged mismatch curves in Figures 2.15 and 2.16 should state explicitly how capped or unavailable values enter the averages, otherwise the comparison may be biased.
  6. [Section 4.4.2] The conclusion that LISA can constrain the extra-galactic stochastic background to Omega_GW below about 10^-8 is a projection for a specific injected sky realization and noise model. The abstract wording 'will be capable of constraining' should be qualified as 'under the stated LISA noise and sky assumptions.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the flux-law derivation is self-contained; NR benchmarking and LISA forecasts use external baselines and fixed forward models.

full rationale

The central derivation in Sections 2.1-2.4 does not assume its target result. It rederives the asymptotic shear, Bondi news, and balance flux laws from conformal compactification, null geodesic congruences, and covariant phase space. The text explicitly frames this as an independent path: 'This Chapter aims to complement the latter by providing an alternative, more mathematical viewpoint starting from the bulk of spacetime, ultimately leading to the same outcomes.' The identification of shear with strain in Eq. (2.133) is a definitional bridge, not a fitted prediction, and the subsequent flux laws are derived from Einstein equations rather than imposed by hand. The waveform benchmarking in Section 2.5 compares analytic models against independent SXS numerical relativity simulations, so the constraint equations are used as checks against an external baseline, not as fitted inputs. The echo-memory and stochastic-background studies are forward models with explicitly chosen parameters and sensitivity curves; they do not fit to the quantity they claim to predict. The Penrose peeling smoothness assumption (C^4 at null infinity) is a genuine correctness/robustness caveat, but it is an assumption of the derivation, not a circular step. No self-citation chain is load-bearing for the main claims: the author's own works are used mostly for pedagogical detail or as the published record of the numerical and echo studies, while the theoretical formalism is re-presented with derivation. Thus no specific reduction of a prediction to its input, fitted parameter, or self-citation was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theoretical results depend on the standard BMS framework (asymptotic flatness, peeling theorem) and the covariant phase space formalism. The echo predictions introduce hand-chosen reflectivity parameters for ECO and QBH models, and the SGWB forecast assumes standard cosmological and astrophysical source models plus a specific LISA pipeline.

free parameters (2)
  • ECO reflectivity temperature T_QH = 1/(8π)
    Phenomenological parameter setting the effective temperature and reflectivity of the exotic compact object model (Table 3.1).
  • QBH reflectivity parameters = α=8π, β=10^-15, δ=0.2-0.5, ε=1, γ=4
    Phenomenological parameters controlling the quantized black hole transfer function and echo structure; varied in the detectability study (Table 3.1, Figures 3.6 to 3.12).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Spacetime is asymptotically flat with vanishing cosmological constant (Λ=0)
    The BMS framework and the derived balance laws require Λ=0; the thesis notes this is a necessary assumption (Section 1.2, footnote 3).
  • standard math Penrose peeling: the unphysical metric is at least C^4 at null infinity and the Weyl tensor vanishes there
    Used to define asymptotic Newman-Penrose scalars and the shear tensor, and thus the flux laws (Section 2.1.4).
  • standard math Covariant phase space formalism for diffeomorphism-covariant field theories
    The balance laws are derived using the covariant phase space method (Section 2.4.1), following Wald and collaborators.
  • ad hoc to paper Existence of reflective near-horizon structures (ECOs or quantized black holes) that produce gravitational wave echoes
    The echo analysis adopts phenomenological reflectivity models with no independent observational evidence; the parameters are hand-chosen (Chapter III, Table 3.1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Across the Horizon: On Gravitational Wave Flux Laws and Tests of Gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HYNWCHJ7

@misc{pith2026250606783,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Across the Horizon: On Gravitational Wave Flux Laws and Tests of Gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HYNWCHJ7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06783}
}
abstract

Motivated by the first detection of gravitational waves, this dissertation develops analytical, numerical, and data analysis techniques to address persistent blind spots in our understanding of gravity. Beginning with asymptotically flat spacetimes and the geometry of null geodesic congruences, the derivation of the shear tensor--encoding gravitational radiation--is revisited. The covariant phase space formulation of General Relativity is then employed to derive a non-conservation law associated with the symmetry group at null infinity, generalizing prior constructions of radiative phase space and yielding consistent results. These flux laws are used to derive constraint equations that enable the evaluation and comparison of state-of-the-art numerical waveform models, leading to new insights and a robust algorithm for benchmarking future improvements. These flux laws are further applied to compute quantum corrections to gravitational waveforms arising from the gravitational wave echo effect. Two leading phenomenological scenarios involving echoes from binary black hole mergers are analyzed. The structure of both the primary echo signal and its induced corrections to nonlinear features of the waveform are studied for observability by the upcoming LISA mission. The results indicate that LISA could detect such signals, potentially probing black hole area quantization. Finally, motivated by recent hints of a stochastic gravitational wave background from Pulsar Timing Array data, this work reviews its theoretical basis and studies several astrophysical and cosmological source scenarios. A forecast for detection prospects with LISA is presented using a modern data analysis pipeline. The results suggest LISA will constrain the extra-galactic stochastic background to a spectral energy density below $ \Omega_\text{GW} \lesssim 10^{-8}$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

286 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. P . Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, et al. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 116:061102, Feb

  2. [2]

    Fabio D’Ambrosio, Shaun D. B. Fell, Lavinia Heisenberg, et al. Gravitational waves in full, non-linear general relativity, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2201.11634

  3. [3]

    Joohan Lee and Robert M. Wald. Local symmetries and constraints. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 31(3):725–743, 03 1990. ISSN 0022-2488. doi:10.1063/1.528801. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.528801

  4. [4]

    Test- ing gravitational waveforms in full General Relativity

    Fabio D’Ambrosio, Francesco Gozzini, Lavinia Heisenberg, et al. Test- ing gravitational waveforms in full General Relativity. JCAP, 02:060, 2025. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/060

  5. [5]

    Kidder, et al

    Nils Deppe, Lavinia Heisenberg, Lawrence E. Kidder, et al. Signatures of quantum gravity in gravitational wave memory. Phys. Rev. D, 112(2):024016,

  6. [6]

    Gravitational-wave echoes from numerical-relativity waveforms via spacetime construction near merg- ing compact objects

    Sizheng Ma, Qingwen Wang, Nils Deppe, et al. Gravitational-wave echoes from numerical-relativity waveforms via spacetime construction near merg- ing compact objects. Physical Review D , 105(10), May 2022. ISSN 2470-

  7. [7]

    Echoes from beyond: Detecting gravitational-wave quantum imprints with LISA

    Nils Deppe, Lavinia Heisenberg, Henri Inchauspé, et al. Echoes from beyond: Detecting gravitational-wave quantum imprints with LISA. Phys. Rev. D, 111 (12):124035, 2025. doi:10.1103/k7jh-rhgw

  8. [8]

    Measuring gravitational wave memory with lisa, 2024

    Henri Inchauspé, Silvia Gasparotto, Diego Blas, et al. Measuring gravitational wave memory with lisa, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09228. 282 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Show all 286 references
  1. [9]

    Extracting the signal of cosmic string wakes from 21-cm observations

    David Maibach, Robert Brandenberger, Devin Crichton, and Alexandre Re- fregier. Extracting the signal of cosmic string wakes from 21-cm observations. Phys. Rev. D, 104(12):123535, 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123535

  2. [10]

    Figueroa

    Chiara Caprini and Daniel G. Figueroa. Cosmological Backgrounds of Grav- itational Waves. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 35(16):163001, August 2018. ISSN 0264-9381, 1361-6382. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aac608. URL http:// arxiv.org/abs/1801.04268. arXiv: 1801.04268

  3. [11]

    Abbott, T.D

    R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott, S. Abraham, et al. Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from advanced ligo and advanced virgo’s third observing run. Physical Review D , 104(2), July 2021. ISSN 2470-

  4. [12]

    Metallicity-constrained merger rates of binary black holes and the stochastic gravitational wave back- ground

    Irina Dvorkin, Elisabeth Vangioni, Joseph Silk, et al. Metallicity-constrained merger rates of binary black holes and the stochastic gravitational wave back- ground. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 461(4):3877–3885, June 2016. ISSN 1365-2966. doi:10.1093/mn...

  5. [13]

    Prospects for future binary black hole gravitational wave studies in light of pta measurements.Astronomy and Astrophysics, 676:A38, August 2023

    John Ellis, Malcolm Fairbairn, Gert Hütsi, et al. Prospects for future binary black hole gravitational wave studies in light of pta measurements.Astronomy and Astrophysics, 676:A38, August 2023. ISSN 1432-0746. doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/202346268. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/00...

  6. [14]

    Turner, Martin White, and James E

    Michael S. Turner, Martin White, and James E. Lidsey. Tensor perturbations in inflationary models as a probe of cosmology. Phys. Rev. D, 48:4613–4622, Nov 1993. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.4613. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.4613

  7. [15]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.104.022004

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.022004. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.104.022004

  8. [16]

    Semianalytic calculation of grav- itational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations

    Kazunori Kohri and Takahiro Terada. Semianalytic calculation of grav- itational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations. Physical Review D , 97(12), June 2018. ISSN 2470-

  9. [17]

    Laser interferom- eter space antenna, 2017

    Pau Amaro-Seoane, Heather Audley, Stanislav Babak, et al. Laser interferom- eter space antenna, 2017. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00786

  10. [18]

    Sanidas, Richard A

    Sotirios A. Sanidas, Richard A. Battye, and Benjamin W. Stappers. Pro- jected constraints on the cosmic (super)string tension with future gravitational wave detection experiments. Astrophys. J., 764:108, 2013. doi:10.1088/0004- 637X/764/1/108

  11. [19]

    Science with the space- based interferometer lisa

    Nicola Bartolo, Chiara Caprini, Valerie Domcke, et al. Science with the space- based interferometer lisa. iv: probing inflation with gravitational waves. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , 2016(12):026–026, December

  12. [20]

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/12/026

    ISSN 1475-7516. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/12/026. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/12/026

  13. [21]

    Dorsch, et al

    Chiara Caprini, Mikael Chala, Glauber C. Dorsch, et al. Detecting gravi- tational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , 2020(03):024, March 2020. ISSN 1475-7516. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/024. URL h...

  14. [22]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.97.123532

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.123532. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.97.123532. BIBLIOGRAPHY 283

  15. [23]

    Unified model for the LISA measure- ments and instrument simulations

    Jean-Baptiste Bayle and Olaf Hartwig. Unified model for the LISA measure- ments and instrument simulations. Physical Review D , 107(8):083019, April

  16. [24]

    LALSuite: LIGO Scientific Collaboration Al- gorithm Library Suite

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration. LALSuite: LIGO Scientific Collaboration Al- gorithm Library Suite. Astrophysics Source Code Library , page ascl:2012.021, December 2020

  17. [25]

    Science Requirement Document

    LISA Science Study Team. Science Requirement Document. Technical Re- port ESA-L3-EST-SCI-RS-001, 2018. URL https://www.cosmos.esa.int/ documents/678316/1700384/SciRD.pdf/25831f6b-3c01-e215-5916- 4ac6e4b306fb?t=1526479841000

  18. [26]

    Primordial black holes and stochastic gravitational wave background from inflation with a noncanonical spectator field

    Rong-Gen Cai, Chao Chen, and Chengjie Fu. Primordial black holes and stochastic gravitational wave background from inflation with a noncanonical spectator field. Physical Review D , 104(8), oct 2021. doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.083537. URL https://doi.org/10.1103% 2Fphysrevd.104.083537

  19. [27]

    Advanced virgo: a second-generation interferometric grav- itational wave detector

    F Acernese et al. Advanced virgo: a second-generation interferometric grav- itational wave detector. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 32(2):024001, De- cember 2014. ISSN 1361-6382. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001

  20. [28]

    Observing kine- matic anisotropies of the stochastic background with LISA.JCAP, 01:044, 2025

    Lavinia Heisenberg, Henri Inchauspé, and David Maibach. Observing kine- matic anisotropies of the stochastic background with LISA.JCAP, 01:044, 2025. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/044

  21. [29]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.105.104007

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.104007. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.105.104007

  22. [30]

    Abbott, T.D

    R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott, F. Acernese, et al. Gwtc-3: Compact binary coa- lescences observed by ligo and virgo during the second part of the third observing run. Physical Review X , 13(4), December 2023. ISSN 2160-

  23. [31]

    Abbott, T

    R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, et al. Observation of gravitational waves from two neutron star–black hole coalescences. The Astrophysical Journal Let- ters, 915(1):L5, June 2021. ISSN 2041-8213. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac082e. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac082e

  24. [32]

    Advanced ligo

    J Aasi et al. Advanced ligo. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(7):074001, March

  25. [33]

    The origins of massive black holes

    Marta Volonteri, Mélanie Habouzit, and Monica Colpi. The origins of massive black holes. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(11):732–743, September 2021. ISSN 2522-

  26. [34]

    McClintock

    Ramesh Narayan and Jeffrey E. McClintock. Observational evidence for black holes, 2014. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6698

  27. [36]

    Abbott, R

    B.P . Abbott, R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott, et al. Gwtc-1: A gravitational-wave tran- sient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by ligo and virgo during the first and second observing runs. Physical Review X, 9(3), September 2019. ISSN 2160-3308. doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031040...

  28. [37]

    Abbott, T.D

    R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott, S. Abraham, et al. Gwtc-2: Compact binary coalescences observed by ligo and virgo during the first half of the third observing run. Physical Review X , 11(2), June 2021. ISSN 2160-

  29. [38]

    Romero-Shaw, Kyle Kremer, et al

    Michael Zevin, Isobel M. Romero-Shaw, Kyle Kremer, et al. Implica- tions of eccentric observations on binary black hole formation channels. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , 921(2):L43, November 2021. ISSN 2041-

  30. [39]

    Astrophysical impli- cations of gw190412 as a remnant of a previous black-hole merger

    Davide Gerosa, Salvatore Vitale, and Emanuele Berti. Astrophysical impli- cations of gw190412 as a remnant of a previous black-hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:101103, Sep 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.101103. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.101103

  31. [40]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.13.041039

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.13.041039

  32. [41]

    Constraints on cosmologically coupled black holes from gravitational wave observations and minimal formation mass

    Luca Amendola, Davi C Rodrigues, Sumit Kumar, and Miguel Quar- tin. Constraints on cosmologically coupled black holes from gravitational wave observations and minimal formation mass. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 528(2):2377–2390, January 2024. ISSN 1365-

  33. [42]

    Abbott, R

    B.P . Abbott, R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott, et al. Gw170817: Observation of gravita- tional waves from a binary neutron star inspiral. Physical Review Letters, 119 (16), October 2017. ISSN 1079-7114. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101

  34. [43]

    Kris Walker, Rory Smith, Eric Thrane, and Daniel J. Reardon. Preci- sion constraints on the neutron star equation of state with third-generation gravitational-wave observatories, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2401.02604

  35. [44]

    B. P . Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, et al. Gw190425: Observation of a com- pact binary coalescence with total mass 3.4 solar masses. The Astrophysi- cal Journal Letters, 892(1):L3, March 2020. ISSN 2041-8213. doi:10.3847/2041- 8213/ab75f5. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/204...

  36. [45]

    Kovetz, Ilias Cholis, Patrick C

    Ely D. Kovetz, Ilias Cholis, Patrick C. Breysse, and Marc Kamionkowski. Black hole mass function from gravitational wave measurements. Physical Review BIBLIOGRAPHY 285 D, 95(10), May 2017. ISSN 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.103010. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.103010

  37. [46]

    Brazier, S

    A. Brazier, S. Chatterjee, T. Cohen, et al. The nanograv program for gravita- tional waves and fundamental physics, 2019. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1908.05356

  38. [47]

    The black hole mass function across cosmic time

    Alex Sicilia, Andrea Lapi, Lumen Boco, et al. The black hole mass function across cosmic time. ii. heavy seeds and (super)massive black holes. The As- trophysical Journal, 934(1):66, July 2022. ISSN 1538-4357. doi:10.3847/1538- 4357/ac7873. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4...

  39. [48]

    B. P . Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, et al. Astrophysical implications of the binary black hole merger gw150914. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , 818(2): L22, February 2016. ISSN 2041-8213. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/818/2/l22. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/818/2/L22

  40. [49]

    B. W. Stappers, M. Kramer, A. G. Lyne, et al. The european pulsar tim- ing array. Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics , 6(S2):298, oct 2006. doi:10.1088/1009-9271/6/S2/56. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1009- 9271/6/S2/56

  41. [50]

    R. N. Manchester, G. Hobbs, M. Bailes, et al. The parkes pulsar timing ar- ray project. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , 30, 2013. ISSN 1448-6083. doi:10.1017/pasa.2012.017. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ pasa.2012.017. BIBLIOGRAPHY 287

  42. [51]

    Meerkat pulsar timing array parallaxes and proper motions, 2024

    Mohsen Shamohammadi, Matthew Bailes, Christopher Flynn, et al. Meerkat pulsar timing array parallaxes and proper motions, 2024. URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/2401.06963

  43. [52]

    Abbott, R

    B.P . Abbott, R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott, et al. Gw170104: Observation of a 50-solar- mass binary black hole coalescence at redshift 0.2. Physical Review Letters, 118 (22), June 2017. ISSN 1079-7114. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.221101. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.221101

  44. [53]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, June 2023

    Adeela Afzal, Gabriella Agazie, Akash Anumarlapudi, et al. The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, June 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16219. arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph, physics:gr- qc, physics:hep-ph]

  45. [54]

    Michele Maiorano, Francesco De Paolis, and Achille A. Nucita. Principles of gravitational-wave detection with pulsar timing arrays. Symmetry, 13(12): 2418, dec 2021. doi:10.3390/sym13122418. URL https://doi.org/10.3390% 2Fsym13122418

  46. [55]

    Measuring the neutron star equation of state with gravitational waves: The first forty binary 286 BIBLIOGRAPHY neutron star merger observations

    Francisco Hernandez Vivanco, Rory Smith, Eric Thrane, et al. Measuring the neutron star equation of state with gravitational waves: The first forty binary 286 BIBLIOGRAPHY neutron star merger observations. Physical Review D, 100(10), November 2019. ISSN 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/...

  47. [56]

    Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation

    Albert Einstein. Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften , pages 844–847, Jan- uary 1915

  48. [57]

    Sur la dynamique de l’electron

    Henri Poincare. Sur la dynamique de l’electron. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences, (140):1504–1508, 1905

  49. [58]

    B. P . Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, et al. Gw170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 121:161101, Oct

  50. [59]

    The collected papers of albert einstein

    Albert Einstein. The collected papers of albert einstein. volume 8, the berlin years : Correspondence, 1914-1918. Princeton University Press, 1998

  51. [60]

    The born-einstein letters

    Albert Einstein and Max Born. The born-einstein letters. friendship, politics and physics in uncertain times. Macmillan: London, UK, 2005. 288 BIBLIOGRAPHY

  52. [61]

    K. J. Lee. Prospects of Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Array for Chinese Future Telescopes. In L. Qain and D. Li, editors, Frontiers in Radio Astronomy and FAST Early Sciences Symposium 2015 , volume 502 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Serie...

  53. [62]

    The in- dian pulsar timing array (inpta)

    Ashis Paul, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Achamveedu Gopakumar, et al. The in- dian pulsar timing array (inpta). In2019 URSI Asia-Pacific Radio Science Confer- ence (AP-RASC), pages 1–1, 2019. doi:10.23919/URSIAP-RASC.2019.8738505

  54. [63]

    Bondi, M

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner. Gravitational Waves in General Relativity. VII. Waves from Axi-Symmetric Isolated Systems. Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A , 269(1336):21–52, August 1962. doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.0161

  55. [64]

    R. Sachs. Gravitational Waves in General Relativity. VI. The Outgoing Radi- ation Condition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A , 264(1318): 309–338, November 1961. doi:10.1098/rspa.1961.0202

  56. [65]

    R. K. Sachs. Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymp- totically flat space-times. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A , 270:103–126, 1962. doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.0206

  57. [66]

    Archibald, et al

    Gabriella Agazie, Akash Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald, et al. The nanograv 15 yr data set: Evidence for a gravitational-wave background. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , 951(1):L8, June 2023. ISSN 2041-8213. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041...

  58. [67]

    J. H. Taylor and J. M. Weisberg. New test of general relativity: Gravitational radiation and the binary pulsar psr 1913+16. Astrophys. J.; (United States), 253, 2 1982. doi:10.1086/159690. URL https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5130227

  59. [68]

    Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie

    Karl Schwarzschild. Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pages 189–196, January 1916

  60. [69]

    The astrophysical gravitational wave stochastic background

    Tania Regimbau. The astrophysical gravitational wave stochastic background. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 11(4):369–390, March 2011. ISSN 1674-

  61. [70]

    Perlmutter, G

    S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber, et al. Measurements of ω and λ from 42 high-redshift supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal , 517(2):565, jun

  62. [71]

    Cos- mology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies

    Elcio Abdalla, Guillermo Franco Abellán, Amin Aboubrahim, et al. Cos- mology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies. BIBLIOGRAPHY 289 Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , 34:49–211, Ju...

  63. [72]

    An Approach to Gravitational Radiation by a Method of Spin Coefficients

    Ezra Newman and Roger Penrose. An Approach to Gravitational Radiation by a Method of Spin Coefficients. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 3(3):566– 578, 05 1962. ISSN 0022-2488. doi:10.1063/1.1724257. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1063/1.1724257

  64. [73]

    Näherungsweise Integration der Feldgleichungen der Grav- itation

    Albert Einstein. Näherungsweise Integration der Feldgleichungen der Grav- itation. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wis- senschaften, pages 688–696, January 1916

  65. [74]

    R. Penrose. Twistor Algebra. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 8(2):345–366, 02 1967. ISSN 0022-2488. doi:10.1063/1.1705200. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1063/1.1705200

  66. [75]

    Ostrogradsky

    M. Ostrogradsky. Mémoires sur les équations différentielles, relatives au prob- lème des isopérimètres. Mem. Acad. St. Petersbourg, 6(4):385–517, 1850

  67. [76]

    Einstein Versus the Physical Review

    Daniel Kennefick. Einstein Versus the Physical Review . Physics Today, 58 (9):43–48, 09 2005. ISSN 0031-9228. doi:10.1063/1.2117822. URL https:// doi.org/10.1063/1.2117822

  68. [77]

    H. Bondi. Gravitational Waves in General Relativity. Nature, 186(4724):535– 535, 1960. doi:10.1038/186535a0

  69. [78]

    Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational-wave experiments

    Demetrios Christodoulou. Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational-wave experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 67:1486–1489, Sep

  70. [79]

    Hereditary effects in gravitational radi- ation

    Luc Blanchet and Thibault Damour. Hereditary effects in gravitational radi- ation. Phys. Rev. D, 46:4304–4319, Nov 1992. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.4304. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.46.4304

  71. [80]

    Gravitational-wave memory revisited: Memory from the merger and recoil of binary black holes

    Marc Favata. Gravitational-wave memory revisited: Memory from the merger and recoil of binary black holes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 154: 012043, March 2009. ISSN 1742-6596. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/154/1/012043. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/154/1/012043

  72. [81]

    R. Sachs. Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory. Phys. Rev., 128:2851– 2864, Dec 1962. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.128.2851. URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRev.128.2851

  73. [82]

    V . B. Braginsky and L. P . Grishchuk. Kinematic Resonance and Memory Effect in Free Mass Gravitational Antennas. Sov. Phys. JETP, 62:427–430, 1985. 290 BIBLIOGRAPHY

  74. [83]

    V . B. Braginsky and Kip S. Thorne. Gravitational-wave bursts with mem- ory and experimental prospects. Nature, 327(6118):123–125, May 1987. doi:10.1038/327123a0

  75. [84]

    Roy P . Kerr. Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics. PRL, 11(5):237 – 238, September 1963. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.237

  76. [88]

    Perturbative and gauge invariant treatment of gravitational wave memory

    Lydia Bieri and David Garfinkle. Perturbative and gauge invariant treatment of gravitational wave memory. Phys. Rev. D , 89:084039, Apr

  77. [89]

    Gravitational wave memory and the wave equation

    David Garfinkle. Gravitational wave memory and the wave equation. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 39(13):135010, June 2022. ISSN 1361-6382. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac7203. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361- 6382/ac7203

  78. [90]

    Infrared photons and gravitons

    Steven Weinberg. Infrared photons and gravitons. Phys. Rev., 140:B516–B524, Oct 1965. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.140.B516. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRev.140.B516

  79. [92]

    Gravitational memory effects and bondi- metzner-sachs symmetries in scalar-tensor theories

    Shaoqi Hou and Zong-Hong Zhu. Gravitational memory effects and bondi- metzner-sachs symmetries in scalar-tensor theories. Journal of High Energy BIBLIOGRAPHY 291 Physics, 2021(1), January 2021. ISSN 1029-8479. doi:10.1007/jhep01(2021)083. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2021)083

  80. [93]

    R. P . Woodard. The theorem of ostrogradsky, 2015. URLhttps://arxiv.org/ abs/1506.02210

  81. [94]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and A. G. Polnarev. Radiation of gravitational waves by a cluster of superdense stars. Sov. Astron., 18:17, 1974

  82. [96]

    Asymptotic analysis of chern- simons modified gravity and its memory effects

    Shaoqi Hou, Tao Zhu, and Zong-Hong Zhu. Asymptotic analysis of chern- simons modified gravity and its memory effects. Phys. Rev. D, 105:024025, Jan

  83. [97]

    Isaacson

    Richard A. Isaacson. Gravitational radiation in the limit of high frequency. i. the linear approximation and geometrical optics. Phys. Rev., 166:1263–1271, Feb 1968. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.166.1263. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRev.166.1263

  84. [98]

    Isaacson

    Richard A. Isaacson. Gravitational radiation in the limit of high frequency. ii. nonlinear terms and the effective stress tensor. Phys. Rev., 166:1272–1280, Feb 1968. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.166.1272. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRev.166.1272

  85. [99]

    M. Turner. Gravitational radiation from point-masses in unbound orbits: Newtonian results. APJ, 216:610–619, September 1977. doi:10.1086/155501

  86. [100]

    Misner, K

    Charles W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler. Gravitation. W. H. Free- man, San Francisco, 1973. ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0, 978-0-691-17779-3. 292 BIBLIOGRAPHY

  87. [101]

    Gravitational Waves

    Michele Maggiore. Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments . Ox- ford University Press, 2007. ISBN 978-0-19-171766-6, 978-0-19-852074-0. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001

  88. [103]

    Misner, K

    Charles W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler. Gravitation. W. H. Free- man, San Francisco, 1973. ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0, 978-0-691-17779-3

  89. [104]

    Stein, et al

    Keefe Mitman, Michael Boyle, Leo C. Stein, et al. A review of gravitational memory and bms frame fixing in numerical relativity. 2024. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2405.08868

  90. [105]

    Gravitational memory, bms supertranslations and soft theorems, 2014

    Andrew Strominger and Alexander Zhiboedov. Gravitational memory, bms supertranslations and soft theorems, 2014. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1411.5745

  91. [106]

    in Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research

    Arnowitt R., Deser S., and Misner C.W. in Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research. Wiley, 1962. URL https://books.google.de/books?id= H3YZAAAAIAAJ

  92. [107]

    Role of surface integrals in the hamiltonian for- mulation of general relativity

    T Regge and C Teitelboim. Role of surface integrals in the hamiltonian for- mulation of general relativity. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), v. 88, no. 1, pp. 286-318 , 11 1974. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(74)90404-7. URL https://www.osti.gov/ biblio/4234816

  93. [108]

    conserved quan- tities

    Robert M. Wald and Andreas Zoupas. General definition of “conserved quan- tities” in general relativity and other theories of gravity. Physical Review D , 61(8), March 2000. ISSN 1089-4918. doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.084027. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.61.084027

  94. [109]

    Radiation and Boundary Conditions in the Theory of Gravitation

    Andrzej Trautman. Radiation and Boundary Conditions in the Theory of Gravitation. Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. Ser. Sci. Math. Astron. Phys., 6(6):407–412, 1958

  95. [110]

    Note on the memory effect

    J Frauendiener. Note on the memory effect. Classical and Quantum Grav- ity, 9(6):1639, jun 1992. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/6/018. URL https:// dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/9/6/018

  96. [111]

    Ashtekar and M

    A. Ashtekar and M. Streubel. Symplectic Geometry of Radiative Modes and Conserved Quantities at Null Infinity. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A , 376:585–607,

  97. [112]

    Angular momentum at null infinity

    T Dray and M Streubel. Angular momentum at null infinity. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 1(1):15, jan 1984. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/1/1/005. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/1/1/005

  98. [113]

    Nichols, Alexander Saffer, et al

    Shammi Tahura, David A. Nichols, Alexander Saffer, et al. Brans-dicke the- ory in bondi-sachs form: Asymptotically flat solutions, asymptotic symme- tries, and gravitational-wave memory effects. Phys. Rev. D, 103:104026, May

  99. [114]

    Szekeres

    P . Szekeres. The Gravitational compass. J. Math. Phys. , 6:1387–1391, 1965. doi:10.1063/1.1704788

  100. [115]

    conserved charges

    Shaoqi Hou and Zong-Hong Zhu. “conserved charges” of the bondi-metzner- sachs algebra in the brans-dicke theory *. Chinese Physics C , 45(2):023122, February 2021. ISSN 2058-6132. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abd087. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/abd087

  101. [116]

    A. A. Starobinskii. Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe. ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu, 30:719–723, December 1979

  102. [117]

    V . A. Rubakov, M. V . Sazhin, and A. V . Veryaskin. Graviton creation in the inflationary universe and the grand unification scale. Physics Letters B, 115(3): 189–192, September 1982. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90641-4

  103. [118]

    Fabbri and M.D

    R. Fabbri and M.D. Pollock. The effect of primordially produced gravitons upon the anisotropy of the cosmological microwave back- ground radiation. Physics Letters B , 125(6):445–448, 1983. ISSN 0370-

  104. [119]

    Gravitational memory effects in <scp>brans-dicke</scp> theory

    Shaoqi Hou. Gravitational memory effects in <scp>brans-dicke</scp> theory. Astronomische Nachrichten , 342(1–2):96–102, January 2021. ISSN 1521-3994. doi:10.1002/asna.202113887. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ asna.202113887

  105. [120]

    Implications of a positive cosmological constant for gen- eral relativity

    Abhay Ashtekar. Implications of a positive cosmological constant for gen- eral relativity. Reports on Progress in Physics , 80(10):102901, August 2017. ISSN 1361-6633. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa7bb1. URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/1361-6633/aa7bb1

  106. [121]

    The basics of gravitational wave the- ory.New Journal of Physics, 7(1):204, sep 2005

    Éanna É Flanagan and Scott A Hughes. The basics of gravitational wave the- ory.New Journal of Physics, 7(1):204, sep 2005. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/204. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/204

  107. [122]

    Gravitational Radiation with a Positive Cosmological Constant

    Beatrice Bonga. Gravitational Radiation with a Positive Cosmological Constant . PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University, October 2017. 294 BIBLIOGRAPHY

  108. [123]

    Asymptotically anti-de sitter spacetimes: conserved quantities

    Abhay Ashtekar and Saurya Das. Asymptotically anti-de sitter spacetimes: conserved quantities. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 17(2):L17–L30, Jan- uary 2000. ISSN 1361-6382. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/2/101. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/17/2/101

  109. [124]

    Gravitational wave memory beyond general relativity

    Lavinia Heisenberg, Nicolás Yunes, and Jann Zosso. Gravitational wave memory beyond general relativity. Phys. Rev. D , 108:024010, Jul

  110. [125]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024010

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024010. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024010

  111. [126]

    Bms supertranslations and weinberg’s soft graviton theorem

    Temple He, Vyacheslav Lysov, Prahar Mitra, and Andrew Strominger. Bms supertranslations and weinberg’s soft graviton theorem. Journal of High En- ergy Physics, 2015(5), May 2015. ISSN 1029-8479. doi:10.1007/jhep05(2015)151. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2015)151

  112. [127]

    New grav- itational memories

    Sabrina Pasterski, Andrew Strominger, and Alexander Zhiboedov. New grav- itational memories. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2016(12), December 2016. ISSN 1029-8479. doi:10.1007/jhep12(2016)053. URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/JHEP12(2016)053

  113. [128]

    Flat space ampli- tudes and conformal symmetry of the celestial sphere

    Sabrina Pasterski, Shu-Heng Shao, and Andrew Strominger. Flat space ampli- tudes and conformal symmetry of the celestial sphere. Physical Review D, 96 (6), September 2017. ISSN 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.065026. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.065026

  114. [129]

    Flat holog- raphy: aspects of the dual field theory

    Arjun Bagchi, Rudranil Basu, Ashish Kakkar, and Aditya Mehra. Flat holog- raphy: aspects of the dual field theory. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2016 (12), December 2016. ISSN 1029-8479. doi:10.1007/jhep12(2016)147. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2016)147

  115. [130]

    Celestial hologra- phy, 2021

    Sabrina Pasterski, Monica Pate, and Ana-Maria Raclariu. Celestial hologra- phy, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11392

  116. [131]

    A chapter on celestial holography, 2023

    Sabrina Pasterski. A chapter on celestial holography, 2023. URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/2310.04932

  117. [132]

    Celestial holography: An asymptotic symmetry perspective

    Laura Donnay. Celestial holography: An asymptotic symmetry perspective. Phys. Rept., 1073:1–41, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.04.003. BIBLIOGRAPHY 295

  118. [133]

    Geroch and J

    Robert P . Geroch and J. Winicour. Linkages in general relativity.J. Math. Phys., 22:803–812, 1981. doi:10.1063/1.524987

  119. [134]

    4d scattering amplitudes and asymptotic symmetries from 2d cft

    Clifford Cheung, Anton de la Fuente, and Raman Sundrum. 4d scattering amplitudes and asymptotic symmetries from 2d cft. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017(1), January 2017. ISSN 1029-8479. doi:10.1007/jhep01(2017)112. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2017)112

  120. [135]

    Higher-dimensional supertranslations and weinberg’s soft graviton theorem

    Daniel Kapec, Vyacheslav Lysov, Sabrina Pasterski, and Andrew Strominger. Higher-dimensional supertranslations and weinberg’s soft graviton theorem. Annals of Mathematical Sciences and Applications , 2(1):69–94, 2017. ISSN 2380-

  121. [136]

    Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes

    Sabrina Pasterski and Shu-Heng Shao. Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes. Physical Review D , 96(6), September 2017. ISSN 2470-

  122. [137]

    in Analysis, Geometry and Mechanics: 200 Years after Lagrange

    Ashtekar A., Bombelli L., and Reula O. in Analysis, Geometry and Mechanics: 200 Years after Lagrange. Elsevier, 1991

  123. [138]

    Grant and David A

    Alexander M. Grant and David A. Nichols. Outlook for detecting the gravitational-wave displacement and spin memory effects with current and future gravitational-wave detectors. Physical Review D , 107(6), March 2023. ISSN 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.064056. URL http://...

  124. [139]

    Robert M. Wald. General Relativity. Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001

  125. [140]

    Lasky, and Eric Thrane

    Shun Yin Cheung, Paul D. Lasky, and Eric Thrane. Does spacetime have mem- ories? searching for gravitational-wave memory in the third ligo-virgo-kagra gravitational-wave transient catalogue, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2404.11919. 296 BIBLIOGRAPHY

  126. [141]

    Boersma, David A

    Oliver M. Boersma, David A. Nichols, and Patricia Schmidt. Forecasts for de- tecting the gravitational-wave memory effect with Advanced LIGO and Virgo. PRD, 101(8):083026, April 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083026

  127. [142]

    Inferring fundamen- tal spacetime symmetries with gravitational-wave memory: From lisa to the einstein telescope

    Boris Goncharov, Laura Donnay, and Jan Harms. Inferring fundamen- tal spacetime symmetries with gravitational-wave memory: From lisa to the einstein telescope. Physical Review Letters , 132(24), June 2024. ISSN 1079-7114. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.241401. URL http://dx.doi.o...

  128. [143]

    Lisa parameter estimation and source localization with higher harmonics of the ringdown

    Vishal Baibhav, Emanuele Berti, and Vitor Cardoso. Lisa parameter estimation and source localization with higher harmonics of the ringdown. Physical Re- view D, 101(8), April 2020. ISSN 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.084053. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.084053

  129. [144]

    Gravitational wave ringdown analysis using the -statistic

    Hai-Tian Wang, Garvin Yim, Xian Chen, and Lijing Shao. Gravitational wave ringdown analysis using the -statistic. The Astrophysical Journal , 974(2):230, October 2024. ISSN 1538-4357. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7096. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad7096

  130. [145]

    Starinets

    Emanuele Berti, Vitor Cardoso, and Andrei O. Starinets. TOPICAL REVIEW: Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 26(16):163001, August 2009. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/163001

  131. [146]

    Gravita- tional radiation with λ > 0

    Béatrice Bonga, Claudio Bunster, and Alfredo Pérez. Gravita- tional radiation with λ > 0. Phys. Rev. D , 108:064039, Sep 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.064039. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.064039

  132. [147]

    Emanuele Berti, Vitor Cardoso, and Clifford M. Will. Gravitational-wave spec- troscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA. PRD, 73 (6):064030, March 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.064030

  133. [148]

    Spectroscopy of Kerr Black Holes with Earth- and Space-Based Interferometers

    Emanuele Berti, Alberto Sesana, Enrico Barausse, et al. Spectroscopy of Kerr Black Holes with Earth- and Space-Based Interferometers. PRL, 117(10): 101102, September 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.101102

  134. [149]

    Theso(1, 4) flux-balance laws of de sitter at quadrupolar order, 2024

    Geoffrey Compère, Sk Jahanur Hoque, and Emine ¸ Seyma Kutluk. Theso(1, 4) flux-balance laws of de sitter at quadrupolar order, 2024. URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/2411.16215

  135. [150]

    On bms invariance of gravitational scatter- ing

    Andrew Strominger. On bms invariance of gravitational scatter- ing. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2014(7), July 2014. ISSN 1029-

  136. [151]

    Black Hole Spec- troscopy by Mode Cleaning

    Sizheng Ma, Ling Sun, and Yanbei Chen. Black Hole Spec- troscopy by Mode Cleaning. PRL, 130(14):141401, April 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.141401

  137. [152]

    Overtones and Nonlinearities in Binary Black Hole Ringdowns

    Matthew Giesler et al. Overtones and Nonlinearities in Binary Black Hole Ringdowns. 11 2024

  138. [153]

    Detectability of higher harmonics with lisa

    Chantal Pitte, Quentin Baghi, Sylvain Marsat, et al. Detectability of higher harmonics with lisa. Physical Review D , 108(4), August 2023. ISSN 2470-

  139. [154]

    Gravitational wave echoes from black holes in massive gravity

    Ruifeng Dong and Dejan Stojkovic. Gravitational wave echoes from black holes in massive gravity. Physical Review D, 103(2), January 2021. ISSN 2470-

  140. [155]

    Can the graviton have a large mass near black holes? Physical Review D , 97(8), April 2018

    Jun Zhang and Shuang-Yong Zhou. Can the graviton have a large mass near black holes? Physical Review D , 97(8), April 2018. ISSN 2470-

  141. [156]

    Probing microstructure of black hole spacetimes with gravitational wave echoes

    Naritaka Oshita and Niayesh Afshordi. Probing microstructure of black hole spacetimes with gravitational wave echoes. Physical Review D , 99(4), Febru- ary 2019. ISSN 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.044002. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.044002

  142. [157]

    Gravitational Vacuum Condensate Stars, page 283–352

    Emil Mottola. Gravitational Vacuum Condensate Stars, page 283–352. Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. ISBN 9789819915965. doi:10.1007/978-981-99-1596- 5_8. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1596-5_8

  143. [158]

    Stable gravastars—an alternative to black holes? Classical and Quantum Gravity , 21(4):1135–1151, January 2004

    Matt Visser and David L Wiltshire. Stable gravastars—an alternative to black holes? Classical and Quantum Gravity , 21(4):1135–1151, January 2004. ISSN 1361-6382. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/4/027. URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/0264-9381/21/4/027

  144. [159]

    2d stress tensor for 4d gravity

    Daniel Kapec, Prahar Mitra, Ana-Maria Raclariu, and Andrew Strominger. 2d stress tensor for 4d gravity. Physical Review Letters , 119(12), Septem- ber 2017. ISSN 1079-7114. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.121601. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.121601

  145. [160]

    Searching for gravitational wave echoes from black hole binary events in the third observing run of ligo, virgo, and kagra collaborations

    Nami Uchikata, Tatsuya Narikawa, Hiroyuki Nakano, et al. Searching for gravitational wave echoes from black hole binary events in the third observing run of ligo, virgo, and kagra collaborations. Phys. Rev. D , 108:104040, Nov

  146. [161]

    Iozzo, Neev Khera, et al

    Keefe Mitman, Dante A.B. Iozzo, Neev Khera, et al. Adding gravitational memory to waveform catalogs using bms balance laws.Physical Review D, 103 (2), January 2021. ISSN 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.024031. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.024031

  147. [162]

    Compact binary coalescences: constraints on waveforms

    Abhay Ashtekar, Tommaso De Lorenzo, and Neev Khera. Compact binary coalescences: constraints on waveforms. General Relativity and Gravitation, 52 (11), November 2020. ISSN 1572-9532. doi:10.1007/s10714-020-02764-1. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10714-020-02764-1

  148. [163]

    Balance laws as test of gravitational waveforms, 2023

    Lavinia Heisenberg. Balance laws as test of gravitational waveforms, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12505

  149. [164]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.96.065022

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.065022. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.96.065022

  150. [165]

    Gluon am- plitudes as conformal correlators

    Sabrina Pasterski, Shu-Heng Shao, and Andrew Strominger. Gluon am- plitudes as conformal correlators. Physical Review D , 96(8), October 2017. ISSN 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.085006. URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.085006

  151. [167]

    Detecting the gravitational wave memory effect with tianqin

    Shuo Sun, Changfu Shi, Jian-dong Zhang, and Jianwei Mei. Detecting the gravitational wave memory effect with tianqin. Physical Review D , 107(4), February 2023. ISSN 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.044023. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.044023

  152. [169]

    Improved frequency spectra of gravitational waves with memory in a binary-black-hole simulation

    Yitian Chen et al. Improved frequency spectra of gravitational waves with memory in a binary-black-hole simulation. Phys. Rev. D, 110(6):064049, 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.064049

  153. [170]

    High-Precision Ringdown Surrogate Model for Non-Precessing Binary Black Holes

    Lorena Magana Zertuche et al. High-Precision Ringdown Surrogate Model for Non-Precessing Binary Black Holes. 8 2024

  154. [171]

    Waveform modelling for the laser interferometer space antenna, 2023

    LISA Consortium Waveform Working Group, Niayesh Afshordi, Sarp Akçay, et al. Waveform modelling for the laser interferometer space antenna, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01300

  155. [172]

    Probing anisotropies of the stochastic gravitational wave background with lisa

    Nicola Bartolo, Daniele Bertacca, Robert Caldwell, et al. Probing anisotropies of the stochastic gravitational wave background with lisa. Journal of Cosmol- ogy and Astroparticle Physics , 2022(11):009, November 2022. ISSN 1475-7516. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/009. URL http...

  156. [173]

    Uncovering stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds with lisa, 2023

    Quentin Baghi, Nikolaos Karnesis, Jean-Baptiste Bayle, et al. Uncovering stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds with lisa, 2023. URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/2307.00649

  157. [174]

    Black-hole spectroscopy: testing general relativity through gravitational-wave observations

    Olaf Dreyer, Bernard Kelly, Badri Krishnan, et al. Black-hole spectroscopy: testing general relativity through gravitational-wave observations. Classi- cal and Quantum Gravity , 21(4):787–803, February 2004. doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/21/4/003

  158. [175]

    Impact of a primor- dial gravitational wave background on lisa resolvable sources

    Matteo Braglia, Mauro Pieroni, and Sylvain Marsat. Impact of a primor- dial gravitational wave background on lisa resolvable sources. Phys. Rev. D, 110:083527, Oct 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083527. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083527

  159. [176]

    Guillaume Boileau, Nelson Christensen, Renate Meyer, and Neil J. Cornish. Spectral separation of the stochastic gravitational-wave background for LISA: Observing both cosmological and astrophysical backgrounds. PRD, 103(10): 103529, May 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103529

  160. [177]

    Black Hole Spec- troscopy with Coherent Mode Stacking

    Huan Yang, Kent Yagi, Jonathan Blackman, et al. Black Hole Spec- troscopy with Coherent Mode Stacking. PRL, 118(16):161101, April 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.161101

  161. [178]

    Ring- down overtones, black hole spectroscopy, and no-hair theorem tests.PRD, 101 BIBLIOGRAPHY 297 (4):044033, February 2020

    Swetha Bhagwat, Xisco Jiménez Forteza, Paolo Pani, and Valeria Ferrari. Ring- down overtones, black hole spectroscopy, and no-hair theorem tests.PRD, 101 BIBLIOGRAPHY 297 (4):044033, February 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.044033

  162. [179]

    Littenberg and Neil J

    Tyson B. Littenberg and Neil J. Cornish. Prototype global analysis of lisa data with multiple source types. Physical Review D, 107(6), March 2023. ISSN 2470-

  163. [180]

    Katz, Nikolaos Karnesis, Natalia Korsakova, et al

    Michael L. Katz, Nikolaos Karnesis, Natalia Korsakova, et al. An efficient gpu- accelerated multi-source global fit pipeline for lisa data analysis, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04690

  164. [181]

    Detecting Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds from the Early Universe in the LISA Global Fit

    Robert Rosati and Tyson Littenberg. Detecting Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds from the Early Universe in the LISA Global Fit. In American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , volume 243 of American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, page 456.24, February 2024

  165. [182]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.108.044053

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.044053. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.108.044053

  166. [183]

    Symmetries of asymptotically flat spacetime lecture

    Yannik Herfray. Symmetries of asymptotically flat spacetime lecture. War- saw Celestial School, June 2023. URL https://celestial2023.fuw.edu.pl/wp- content/uploads/sites/158/2023/08/Herfray-1.pdf

  167. [184]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.103.024058

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.024058. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.103.024058

  168. [185]

    Geometry and physics of null infinity, 2015

    Abhay Ashtekar. Geometry and physics of null infinity, 2015. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/1409.1800

  169. [186]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.97.081501

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.081501. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.97.081501

  170. [187]

    Newman and Theodore W

    Ezra T. Newman and Theodore W. J. Unti. Behavior of Asymptotically Flat Empty Spaces. J. Math. Phys., 3(5):891, 1962. doi:10.1063/1.1724303

  171. [188]

    A note on the newman-unti group and the bms charge algebra in terms of newman-penrose coeffi- cients

    Glenn Barnich and Pierre-Henry Lambert. A note on the newman-unti group and the bms charge algebra in terms of newman-penrose coeffi- cients. Advances in Mathematical Physics , 2012:1–16, 2012. ISSN 1687-9139. doi:10.1155/2012/197385. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/197385....

  172. [189]

    Asymptotic properties of fields and space-times

    Roger Penrose. Asymptotic properties of fields and space-times. Phys. Rev. Lett., 10:66–68, Jan 1963. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.66. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.66

  173. [190]

    Quantum black hole spectroscopy: probing the quantum nature of the black hole area using ligo–virgo ringdown detections

    Danny Laghi, Gregorio Carullo, John Veitch, and Walter Del Pozzo. Quantum black hole spectroscopy: probing the quantum nature of the black hole area using ligo–virgo ringdown detections. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 38(9): 095005, April 2021. ISSN 1361-6382. doi:10.1088/136...

  174. [191]

    A. Z. Petrov. The Classification of spaces defining gravitational fields. Gen. Rel. Grav., 32:1661–1663, 2000. doi:10.1023/A:1001910908054

  175. [192]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.104040

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.104040. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.104040

  176. [193]

    Abhay Ashtekar and B. G. Schmidt. Null infinity and killing fields. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 21(4):862–867, 04 1980. ISSN 0022-2488. doi:10.1063/1.524467. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.524467

  177. [194]

    A systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications

    Lavinia Heisenberg. A systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications. Phys. Rept., 796:1–113, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.006

  178. [195]

    On the ambiguity in the notion of trans- verse traceless modes of gravitational waves.General Relativity and Gravitation, 49(9), August 2017

    Abhay Ashtekar and Béatrice Bonga. On the ambiguity in the notion of trans- verse traceless modes of gravitational waves.General Relativity and Gravitation, 49(9), August 2017. ISSN 1572-9532. doi:10.1007/s10714-017-2290-z. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10714-017-2290-z

  179. [196]

    Inconsistent black hole kick estimates from gravitational-wave models

    Angela Borchers and Frank Ohme. Inconsistent black hole kick estimates from gravitational-wave models. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 40(9):095008, April 2023. ISSN 1361-6382. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acc5da. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/acc5da

  180. [199]

    Lectures on the infrared structure of gravity and gauge theory, 2018

    Andrew Strominger. Lectures on the infrared structure of gravity and gauge theory, 2018. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.05448. 302 BIBLIOGRAPHY

  181. [201]

    Myers, Eric Poisson, and Rafael D

    Luis Lehner, Robert C. Myers, Eric Poisson, and Rafael D. Sorkin. Gravita- tional action with null boundaries. Physical Review D , 94(8), October 2016. ISSN 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.084046. URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.084046

  182. [202]

    Vivek Iyer and Robert M. Wald. Some properties of the noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy. Physical Review D , 50(2): 846–864, July 1994. ISSN 0556-2821. doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.846. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.50.846

  183. [203]

    Wald, and Victor G

    Stefan Hollands, Robert M. Wald, and Victor G. Zhang. The entropy of dy- namical black holes, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00818

  184. [204]

    Grant, and Kartik Prabhu

    Béatrice Bonga, Alexander M. Grant, and Kartik Prabhu. Angular momen- tum at null infinity in einstein-maxwell theory. Physical Review D , 101(4), February 2020. ISSN 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.044013. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.044013

  185. [205]

    On the symplectic structure of general relativity

    Abhay Ashtekar and Anne Magnon-Ashtekar. On the symplectic structure of general relativity. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 86:55–68, 01 1982. doi:10.1007/BF01205661

  186. [206]

    Linkages and hamiltonians at null in- finity

    Abhay Ashtekar and Jeffrey Winicour. Linkages and hamiltonians at null in- finity. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 23(12):2410–2417, 12 1982. ISSN 0022-

  187. [207]

    Ashtekar

    A. Ashtekar. Radiative Degrees of Freedom of the Gravitational Field in Exact General Relativity. J. Math. Phys., 22:2885–2895, 1981. doi:10.1063/1.525169

  188. [208]

    Stochas- tic gravitational wave background reconstruction for a nonequilateral and unequal-noise lisa constellation

    Olaf Hartwig, Marc Lilley, Martina Muratore, and Mauro Pieroni. Stochas- tic gravitational wave background reconstruction for a nonequilateral and unequal-noise lisa constellation. Phys. Rev. D , 107:123531, Jun

  189. [209]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.123531

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.123531. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.123531

  190. [210]

    The sxs collabora- tion catalog of binary black hole simulations.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36 (19):195006, September 2019

    Michael Boyle, Daniel Hemberger, Dante A B Iozzo, et al. The sxs collabora- tion catalog of binary black hole simulations.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36 (19):195006, September 2019. ISSN 1361-6382. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab34e2. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab34e2

  191. [211]

    Scheel, and Saul A

    Jordan Moxon, Mark A. Scheel, and Saul A. Teukolsky. Improved cauchy-characteristic evolution system for high-precision numerical rela- tivity waveforms. Physical Review D , 102(4), August 2020. ISSN 2470-

  192. [212]

    Detectability of stochastic gravitational wave background from weakly hyperbolic encounters

    Morteza Kerachian, Sajal Mukherjee, Georgios Lukes-Gerakopoulos, and San- jit Mitra. Detectability of stochastic gravitational wave background from weakly hyperbolic encounters. Astronomy and Astrophysics , 684:A17, March

  193. [213]

    Kidder, Scott E

    Lawrence E. Kidder, Scott E. Field, Francois Foucart, et al. Spec- tre: A task-based discontinuous galerkin code for relativistic astrophysics. Journal of Computational Physics , 335:84–114, April 2017. ISSN 0021-

  194. [214]

    The LISA Global Fit

    Neil Cornish and Tyson Littenberg. The LISA Global Fit. In APS April Meeting Abstracts, volume 2023 of APS Meeting Abstracts, page Q08.001, January 2023

  195. [215]

    LISA Defini- tion Study Report, February 2024

    Monica Colpi, Karsten Danzmann, Martin Hewitson, et al. LISA Defini- tion Study Report, February 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07571. arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph, physics:gr-qc]

  196. [216]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.107.063004

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.063004. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.107.063004

  197. [217]

    Cosmic Explorer: A Submission to the NSF MPSAC ngGW Subcommittee, June 2023

    Matthew Evans, Alessandra Corsi, Chaitanya Afle, et al. Cosmic Explorer: A Submission to the NSF MPSAC ngGW Subcommittee, June 2023. URL http: //arxiv.org/abs/2306.13745. arXiv:2306.13745 [astro-ph]

  198. [218]

    Ya. B. Zel’dovich and A. G. Polnarev. Radiation of gravitational waves by a cluster of superdense stars. Soviet Astronomy, 18:17, August 1974. ISSN 0038- 5301

  199. [219]

    Adamo, C

    T.M. Adamo, C. Kozameh, and E.T. Newman. Null geodesic congruences, asymptotically-flat spacetimes and their physical interpretation. Living Rev. Relativ., 12, 2009. doi:https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2009-6. URL https:// link.springer.com/article/10.12942/lrr-2009-6

  200. [220]

    Wiseman and Clifford M

    Alan G. Wiseman and Clifford M. Will. Christodoulou’s nonlinear gravitational-wave memory: Evaluation in the quadrupole approximation. Phys. Rev. D , 44:R2945–R2949, Nov 1991. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.R2945. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.44.R2945

  201. [221]

    Bondi-sachs formalism

    Thomas Maedler and Jeffrey Winicour. Bondi-sachs formalism. Scholarpedia, 11(12):33528, 2016. ISSN 1941-6016. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.33528. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.33528

  202. [222]

    NONLINEAR GRAVITATIONAL-WAVE MEMORY FROM BI- NARY BLACK HOLE MERGERS

    Marc Favata. NONLINEAR GRAVITATIONAL-WAVE MEMORY FROM BI- NARY BLACK HOLE MERGERS. The Astrophysical Journal, 696(2):L159, April

  203. [223]

    Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time, pages 1–105

    Robert Geroch. Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time, pages 1–105. Springer US, Boston, MA, 1977. ISBN 978-1-4684-2343-3. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2343-3_1. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2343-3_1

  204. [224]

    Field, Mark A

    Jonathan Blackman, Scott E. Field, Mark A. Scheel, et al. A Surrogate Model of Gravitational Waveforms from Numerical Relativity Simulations of Precessing Binary Black Hole Mergers. Phys. Rev. D, 95(10):104023, 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.104023

  205. [225]

    Field, Mark A

    Vijay Varma, Scott E. Field, Mark A. Scheel, et al. Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole simulations with unequal masses. Phys. Rev. Res., 1:033015, Oct 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033015. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033015

  206. [226]

    Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries

    Sascha Husa, Sebastian Khan, Mark Hannam, et al. Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. i. new numer- ical waveforms and anatomy of the signal. Phys. Rev. D , 93:044006, Feb

  207. [227]

    Duval, G

    C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, and P . A. Horvathy. Conformal Carroll groups. J. Phys. A, 47(33):335204, 2014. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/33/335204

  208. [228]

    Compu- tationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes

    Geraint Pratten, Cecilio García-Quirós, Marta Colleoni, et al. Compu- tationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes. Phys. Rev. D , 103:104056, May

  209. [229]

    Symmetries of asymptotically flat 4 di- mensional spacetimes at null infinity revisited

    Glenn Barnich and Cedric Troessaert. Symmetries of asymptotically flat 4 di- mensional spacetimes at null infinity revisited. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 105:111103,

  210. [230]

    Prototype effective- one-body model for nonprecessing spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown wave- forms

    Andrea Taracchini, Yi Pan, Alessandra Buonanno, et al. Prototype effective- one-body model for nonprecessing spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown wave- forms. Physical Review D , 86(2), jul 2012. doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.024011. URL https://doi.org/10.1103%2Fphysrevd.86.024011

  211. [231]

    Lackey, Koutarou Kyutoku, Masaru Shibata, et al

    Benjamin D. Lackey, Koutarou Kyutoku, Masaru Shibata, et al. Extracting equation of state parameters from black hole-neutron star mergers: Aligned- spin black holes and a preliminary waveform model. Physical Review D, 89(4), feb 2014. doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.043009. URL https:...

  212. [232]

    Inspiral- merger-ringdown waveforms of spinning, precessing black-hole binaries in the effective-one-body formalism

    Yi Pan, Alessandra Buonanno, Andrea Taracchini, et al. Inspiral- merger-ringdown waveforms of spinning, precessing black-hole binaries in the effective-one-body formalism. Phys. Rev. D , 89:084006, Apr

  213. [233]

    Improved effective- one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with advanced detectors

    Alejandro Bohé , Lijing Shao, Andrea Taracchini, et al. Improved effective- one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with advanced detectors. Physical Review D, 95(4), feb 2017. doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.044028. ...

  214. [234]

    E. T. Newman and R. Penrose. New conservation laws for zero rest-mass fields in asymptotically flat space-time. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A , 305:175–204,

  215. [235]

    SEOB- NRv5PHM: Next generation of accurate and efficient multipolar precessing- spin effective-one-body waveforms for binary black holes, 2023

    Antoni Ramos-Buades, Alessandra Buonanno, Héctor Estellés, et al. SEOB- NRv5PHM: Next generation of accurate and efficient multipolar precessing- spin effective-one-body waveforms for binary black holes, 2023

  216. [236]

    Centerless bms charge algebra

    Antoine Rignon-Bret and Simone Speziale. Centerless bms charge algebra. Phys. Rev. D, 110:044050, Aug 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.044050. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.044050

  217. [237]

    Flanagan and David A

    Éanna É. Flanagan and David A. Nichols. Conserved charges of the ex- tended bondi-metzner-sachs algebra. Physical Review D, 95(4), February 2017. ISSN 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.044002. URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.044002

  218. [238]

    Analytic systematics in next-generation of effective-one-body gravitational waveform models for future observations, 2023

    Alessandro Nagar, Piero Rettegno, Rossella Gamba, et al. Analytic systematics in next-generation of effective-one-body gravitational waveform models for future observations, 2023

  219. [239]

    Covariant phase space with bound- aries

    Daniel Harlow and Jie-qiang Wu. Covariant phase space with bound- aries. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2020(10), October 2020. ISSN 1029-

  220. [240]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP10(2020)146

    doi:10.1007/jhep10(2020)146. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP10(2020)146

  221. [241]

    Waveform Modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, November 2023

    LISA Consortium Waveform Working Group et al. Waveform Modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, November 2023

  222. [242]

    Harry, and Harald P

    Patricia Schmidt, Ian W. Harry, and Harald P . Pfeiffer. Numerical Relativity Injection Infrastructure. 3 2017

  223. [243]

    Kidder, Mark A

    Lawrence E. Kidder, Mark A. Scheel, Saul A. Teukolsky, et al. Black hole evolution by spectral methods. Physical Review D , 62(8):084032, September

  224. [244]

    Simple model of complete precessing black-hole-binary gravitational waveforms

    Mark Hannam, Patricia Schmidt, Alejandro Bohé, et al. Simple model of complete precessing black-hole-binary gravitational waveforms. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:151101, Oct 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.151101. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.151101. BIBLIO...

  225. [245]

    New effective-one-body description of coalescing nonprecessing spinning black-hole binaries

    Thibault Damour and Alessandro Nagar. New effective-one-body description of coalescing nonprecessing spinning black-hole binaries. Physical Review D, 90(4), August 2014. ISSN 1550-2368. doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.044018. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.044018

  226. [246]

    Transition from inspiral to plunge in precessing binaries of spinning black holes

    Alessandra Buonanno, Yanbei Chen, and Thibault Damour. Transition from inspiral to plunge in precessing binaries of spinning black holes. Physical Review D , 74(10), nov 2006. doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.104005. URL https: //doi.org/10.1103%2Fphysrevd.74.104005

  227. [247]

    Time-domain phenomeno- logical model of gravitational-wave subdominant harmonics for quasicircular nonprecessing binary black hole coalescences

    Héctor Estellés, Sascha Husa, Marta Colleoni, et al. Time-domain phenomeno- logical model of gravitational-wave subdominant harmonics for quasicircular nonprecessing binary black hole coalescences. Phys. Rev. D, 105:084039, Apr

  228. [249]

    Scheel, et al

    Keefe Mitman, Jordan Moxon, Mark A. Scheel, et al. Computation of displace- ment and spin gravitational memory in numerical relativity.Physical Review D, 102(10), November 2020. ISSN 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.104007. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.104007

  229. [250]

    David A. Nichols. Spin memory effect for compact binaries in the post-newtonian approximation. Phys. Rev. D , 95:084048, Apr

  230. [254]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.102.044052

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.044052. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.102.044052

  231. [255]

    Scheel, Saul A

    Jordan Moxon, Mark A. Scheel, Saul A. Teukolsky, et al. The spectre cauchy- characteristic evolution system for rapid, precise waveform extraction, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.08635

  232. [257]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jcp.2016.12.059

    doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.12.059. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jcp.2016.12.059

  233. [258]

    Kidder, et al

    Nils Deppe, William Throwe, Lawrence E. Kidder, et al. SpECTRE v2024.06.18. 10.5281/zenodo.12098412, 6 2024. URL https://spectre- code.org

  234. [260]

    Science case for the Einstein telescope

    Michele Maggiore, Chris Van Den Broeck, Nicola Bartolo, et al. Science case for the Einstein telescope. JCAP, 2020(3):050, March 2020. doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2020/03/050

  235. [263]

    Kip S. Thorne. Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect. Physical Review D , 45(2):520–524, January 1992. 304 BIBLIOGRAPHY doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.520

  236. [265]

    Post-newtonian corrections to the gravitational-wave memory for quasicircular, inspiralling compact binaries

    Marc Favata. Post-newtonian corrections to the gravitational-wave memory for quasicircular, inspiralling compact binaries. Phys. Rev. D , 80:024002, Jul

  237. [266]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.024002

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.024002. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.024002

  238. [268]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/L159

    ISSN 0004-637X. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/L159

  239. [269]

    Field, Mark A

    Jonathan Blackman, Scott E. Field, Mark A. Scheel, et al. Numerical relativity waveform surrogate model for generically precessing binary black hole merg- ers. Phys. Rev. D, 96(2):024058, 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.024058

  240. [273]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.044006

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.044006. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.044006

  241. [274]

    Frequency-domain grav- itational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries

    Sebastian Khan, Sascha Husa, Mark Hannam, et al. Frequency-domain grav- itational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. ii. a phenomeno- logical model for the advanced detector era. Phys. Rev. D , 93:044007, Feb

  242. [275]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.044007

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.044007. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.044007. BIBLIOGRAPHY 305

  243. [277]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104056

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104056. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104056

  244. [278]

    New twists in compact binary waveform modeling: A fast time-domain model for preces- sion

    Héctor Estellés, Marta Colleoni, Cecilio García-Quirós, et al. New twists in compact binary waveform modeling: A fast time-domain model for preces- sion. Phys. Rev. D, 105:084040, Apr 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.084040. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.084040

  245. [282]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084006

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084006. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084006

  246. [284]

    Multi- polar effective-one-body waveforms for precessing binary black holes: Construction and validation

    Serguei Ossokine, Alessandra Buonanno, Sylvain Marsat, et al. Multi- polar effective-one-body waveforms for precessing binary black holes: Construction and validation. Phys. Rev. D , 102:044055, Aug 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.044055. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/P...

  247. [286]

    Time-domain effective-one-body gravitational waveforms for coalescing compact binaries with nonprecessing spins, tides, and self-spin effects

    Alessandro Nagar, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Walter Del Pozzo, et al. Time-domain effective-one-body gravitational waveforms for coalescing compact binaries with nonprecessing spins, tides, and self-spin effects. Physical Review D , 98 (10), November 2018. ISSN 2470-0029. doi:10.110...

  248. [287]

    Effective-one-body waveforms for precessing coalescing compact binaries with post-newtonian twist

    Rossella Gamba, Sarp Akçay, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, and Jake Williams. Effective-one-body waveforms for precessing coalescing compact binaries with post-newtonian twist. Physical Review D , 106(2), July 2022. ISSN 2470-

  249. [288]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.106.024020

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.024020. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.106.024020

  250. [290]

    In- ferring the gravitational wave memory for binary coalescence events

    Neev Khera, Badri Krishnan, Abhay Ashtekar, and Tommaso De Lorenzo. In- ferring the gravitational wave memory for binary coalescence events. Phys. Rev. D, 103(4):044012, 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044012

  251. [291]

    Black-hole kicks: a tool to measure the accuracy of gravitational-wave models

    Angela Borchers and Frank Ohme. Black-hole kicks: a tool to measure the accuracy of gravitational-wave models. In 55th Rencontres de Moriond on Grav- itation, 6 2021

  252. [300]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.084039

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.084039. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.084039

  253. [1968]

    doi:10.1098/rspa.1968.0112

  254. [1981]

    BIBLIOGRAPHY 293

    doi:10.1098/rspa.1981.0109. BIBLIOGRAPHY 293

  255. [1991]

    URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1486

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1486. URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1486

  256. [1999]

    URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/307221

    doi:10.1086/307221. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/307221

  257. [2000]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.084032

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.084032. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.084032. Publisher: American Physical Society

  258. [2010]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.111103

  259. [2014]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084039

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084039. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084039

  260. [2015]

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001

    ISSN 1361-6382. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001. URL http:// dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001. 284 BIBLIOGRAPHY

  261. [2016]

    URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102. URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

  262. [2017]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.084048

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.084048. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.084048. BIBLIOGRAPHY 303

  263. [2018]

    URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161101

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161101. URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161101

  264. [2021]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104026

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104026. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104026

  265. [2022]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.024025

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.024025. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.024025

  266. [2023]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.083019

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.083019. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.083019. Publisher: American Physical Society

  267. [2024]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348747

    ISSN 1432-0746. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348747. URL http:// dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348747. 300 BIBLIOGRAPHY

  268. [2025]

    doi:10.1103/7c2f-975v

  269. [2488]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.525283

    doi:10.1063/1.525283. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.525283

  270. [2693]

    URL https:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370269383913229

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(83)91322-9. URL https:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370269383913229

  271. [2898]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/ AMSA.2017.v2.n1.a2

    doi:10.4310/amsa.2017.v2.n1.a2. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/ AMSA.2017.v2.n1.a2

  272. [2966]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stae143

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae143. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stae143

  273. [3308]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.11.021053

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.021053. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.11.021053

  274. [4048]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jheap.2022.04.002

    doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jheap.2022.04.002

  275. [4527]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 1674-4527/11/4/001

    doi:10.1088/1674-4527/11/4/001. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 1674-4527/11/4/001

  276. [5820]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ s42254-021-00364-9

    doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00364-9. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ s42254-021-00364-9

  277. [8213]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/ac32dc

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac32dc. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/ac32dc

  278. [8479]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP07(2014)152

    doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)152. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP07(2014)152

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.