On the quantum affine vertex algebra associated with trigonometric $R$-matrix

Slaven Ko\v{z}i\'c

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 36 references

On the quantum affine vertex algebra associated with trigonometric $R$-matrix

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For type A, restricted modules of the quantum affine algebra are exactly the phi-coordinated modules of the quantum affine vertex algebra, with irreducibility preserved.

desk verdict Solid, careful trigonometric analogue of the Frenkel–Jing correspondence; the main theorem is new and the proof is honest, with the main soft spot being the imported R-matrix normalization rather than any visible gap. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06517 v2 pith:HZ6DJREK submitted 2019-08-18 math.QA math-phmath.MPmath.RT

Slaven Kožić This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.QAmath-phmath.MPmath.RT MSC 17B3717B6981R50

keywords quantumaffinealgebravertexphi-coordinatedmodulesrestrictedtrigonometricR-matrixcurrentsdeterminanttypeA

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a precise dictionary between two seemingly different kinds of representation theory in type A: restricted modules for the quantum affine algebra and phi-coordinated modules for the corresponding quantum affine vertex algebra. It proves that, at any level c, the two module structures are interchanged by explicit formulas, and that invariant submodules and irreducibility are preserved exactly. This matters because it gives a concrete solution to the problem of associating a quantum vertex algebra to a quantum affine algebra, and it transfers techniques and results between the two settings.

What carries the argument

The central object is the associate $\varphi$(z2,z0)=z2 $e^{{z0}}$ of the one-dimensional additive formal group, which converts the multiplicative quantum-current variable x=ze^u into the additive vertex-algebra variable u. The argument is carried by the normalized trigonometric R-matrix R(e^u)=psi iota_u g(e^u) R+(e^u), together with the quantum currents L(x) and the products L[n](x1,...,xn); the R-matrix identities of unitarity and crossing symmetry are used repeatedly to move R-matrices past quantum currents and to prove S-locality and the converse module structure.

What would settle it

Check the identities (1.19) and (1.20) directly for a small case, for example N=2 with the explicit series f(x) from (1.10); a single failure of R12(e^u)R21($e^{{-u}}$)=1 at any nontrivial order in h would give a restricted module on which the map (0.3) violates S-locality, and the Main Theorem would be false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For gN equal to glN or slN, a topologically free C[[h]]-module W is a restricted level-c module for the quantum affine algebra Uh(hat gN) if and only if it carries a phi-coordinated module structure for the level-c quantum affine vertex algebra Vc(gN), where $\varphi$(z2,z0)=z2 $e^{{z0}}$. The correspondence is given by the module maps YW(T+[n](u)1,z)=L[n](x)|_{xi=$ze^{{ui}}$} and L(z)=YW(T+(0)1,z). A topologically free submodule is a submodule for one structure exactly when it is a submodule for the other, so a module is irreducible for one action if and only if it is irreducible for the other.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument leans on the normalized trigonometric R-matrix satisfying the unitarity and crossing-symmetry identities (1.19) and (1.20); if the chosen normalization fails them, the module correspondence collapses even though the statement of the Main Theorem does not mention them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every restricted level-c module for the quantum affine algebra becomes a phi-coordinated module for the quantum affine vertex algebra via the explicit map (0.3).
Every phi-coordinated module for the quantum affine vertex algebra becomes a restricted level-c module for the quantum affine algebra via L(z)=YW(T+(0)1,z).
The correspondence preserves topologically free submodules, so irreducible modules coincide on both sides.
The vacuum module Vc(gN) is itself a phi-coordinated module, and it is irreducible for the quantum affine algebra exactly when it is irreducible for the quantum affine vertex algebra.
The quantum determinant of T+(0) maps to the quantum determinant of L(z), connecting central elements and invariants of the two structures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same phi-coordinated bijection is likely to extend to quantum affine vertex algebras built from rational or elliptic R-matrices, and to other Cartan types, since the proof only uses the unitarity and crossing symmetry of the normalized R-matrix.
The level-c correspondence suggests a general principle: any quantum vertex algebra whose S-locality is governed by an R-matrix should have its module category governed by restricted modules of the associated quantum current algebra.
The critical-level identities YW(phi_n(0),z)=ell_n(z) hint at a quantum analogue of the Feigin-Frenkel center, where central elements of the vertex algebra map surjectively onto the center of the quantum affine algebra at the critical level.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The trigonometric type A case of the Frenkel–Jing program is done here, and done well. The main theorem gives an explicit bijection between restricted level-c modules for U_h(\hat gl_N), U_h(\hat sl_N) and φ-coordinated modules for the Etingof–Kazhdan quantum affine vertex algebra with φ(z2,z0)=z2 e^{z0}, and it transfers submodules, hence irreducibility. That is a real new result, not a repackaging: the rational case in [27] and the Ding–Iohara case in [32] are different settings, and the proof here needs real work, especially the normalizing-function lemmas and the sl_N fusion argument.

What is genuinely good: the strategy is coherent, the proof is organized so a reader can follow which relation is used where, and the sl_N part is not an afterthought. Using Cherednik's fusion procedure to get the quantum determinant relation is the right move, and the center discussion, while brief, is a sensible application of the correspondence. The citation to the author's own rational-case paper is legitimate; that is where the technical template comes from, and this paper genuinely extends it.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. The largest is the dependence on the normalized R-matrix R(e^u)=ψ ι_u g(e^u)R_+(e^u) satisfying unitarity and crossing symmetry, imported from [10,26]. The stress-test note is correct that these identities are load-bearing: S-locality and the converse module construction both use them. But on reading, this is a citation to established results, not a hidden assumption. Lemma 3.3 explicitly derives the key functional identity ψ²f(e^u)=f(e^{-u})⁻¹ from [26, Prop 2.1], and that is the precise point where the normalization matters. A referee should ask the author to state these imported identities more prominently and perhaps prove them in an appendix, but this is not a collapse. The other soft spot is the number of statements dispatched as “arguing as in [27]” or omitted entirely—Lemma 3.15 gets one line. These are routine or closely parallel to earlier arguments, so the paper is less self-contained than it could be, but the missing details are not novel and are not where the mathematical action is.

No data, no fitting, no circularity. The citation pattern is fine; self-citations are to the author's own prior work and to the papers where the required normalization facts live.

Who is this for? Specialists in quantum vertex algebras, quantum affine algebras, and the Frenkel–Jing program. They will want this on the record. I would send it to a serious referee, with the expectation of acceptance after minor-to-moderate revision. I would not desk-reject it.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a representation-theoretic correspondence between restricted modules of the quantum affine algebra Uh(ˆgN) and φ-coordinated modules of the Etingof–Kazhdan quantum affine vertex algebra Vc(gN), for gN = glN, slN and for the associate φ(z2,z0) = z2 e^{z0}. The forward direction constructs the φ-coordinated module map from the quantum currents L[n](x) via formula (0.3), while the converse direction extracts the quantum current L(z) from the φ-coordinated module map via formula (0.4). The slN case is handled through the fusion procedure and the quantum determinant relation. The paper also proves that topologically free submodules coincide under the correspondence, so irreducibility is preserved, and it discusses the image of centers at noncritical and critical levels, including Corollaries 4.2 and 4.5.

Significance. If correct, the main theorem is a substantial contribution: it realizes Li's φ-coordinated module theory for a trigonometric-type quantum vertex algebra and ties it to Ding's quantum current realization of quantum affine algebras in type A. The paper gives explicit formulas (0.3) and (0.4), works carefully with h-adic completions, and breaks the proof into clearly identified lemmas. The statement is non-vacuous and falsifiable through the submodule and irreducibility correspondence. The proof has a clear logical structure and does not appear to assume its conclusion; the main risk is the reliance on imported normalization and fusion identities whose compatibility with the paper's conventions is not fully demonstrated.

major comments (3)

[§1.1, Lemma 3.3] Equations (1.18)–(1.20) introduce the normalized R-matrix R(eu) through a factor ψ, but the existence and uniqueness of ψ are not proved here; the paper cites [10, Prop. 1.2] and [26, Prop. 2.1]. This normalization is load-bearing throughout the proof: Lemma 3.3 uses the identity ψ² f(eu) = f(e^{-u})^{-1}, and Lemmas 3.7, 3.8, and 3.9 use unitarity (1.19), crossing symmetry (1.20), and the consequence (3.12) at every critical step. The Main Theorem's statement does not mention ψ or these identities, so a reader cannot see from the statement why they are needed. Please include a self-contained derivation, or at least a precise statement, of the identity ψ² f(eu) = f(e^{-u})^{-1} and of the unitarity and crossing properties of (1.18) from the explicit R-matrix (1.2) and the function f(x) in (1.10).
[§2.2, Proposition 2.10] The converse direction of the Main Theorem rests on the Jacobi-type identity (2.32)–(2.34). The proposition is quoted from [31, Prop. 5.9], with the remark that the h-adic version can be proved by arguing as in [31, Lemma 5.8 and Prop. 5.9]. Since the definitions here are modified to be compatible with Etingof–Kazhdan's C[[h]]-setting, and since Lemma 3.9 uses this identity to extract the quantum current relation (1.27), a proof of the h-adic version or a detailed explanation of why Li's proof carries over without additional hypotheses is needed.
[§3.4, Lemma 3.11] The extension to slN uses the fusion identity (3.65), imported from [13, Lemma 4.3], together with identities (3.63), (3.64), and (3.66) for the anti-symmetrizer. These identities are essential in Lemma 3.12 and Lemma 3.14 to verify that the quantum determinant relation qdet L(z) = 1 is respected. Please provide a proof or a precise statement of the normalization appearing in (3.65), and verify that the R-matrix conventions in this paper, including the normalization ψ in (1.18), match those of [13]; a sign or exponent mismatch would invalidate the slN case.

minor comments (4)

[§1.2, Lemma 1.1 and Proposition 1.2] The proofs are omitted with a reference to [27] and the statement that they are straightforward generalizations. A short indication of the changes needed for the trigonometric R-matrix would improve readability and make the paper more self-contained.
[§3.1, Equation (3.10)] The notation δ_{F,r} in (3.10) is not defined until the proof of Lemma 3.2, and the exponent x^{s−δ_{F,r}−1} is easy to misread. Please clarify the intended exponent and define δ_{F,r} before first use.
[§3.2, Lemma 3.8] The proof of Lemma 3.8 is long and relies on the modulo-U0 notation; a short paragraph summarizing the strategy before the calculation would make the argument much easier to follow.
[§2.2, Definition 2.7] The definition of φ-coordinated module is modified from Li's original definition, and the added ˆS-locality is discussed in Remark 2.9. It would be helpful to state explicitly, after Definition 2.7, that the uniqueness assertion in the Main Theorem refers to the module map YW satisfying (0.3) and YW(1,z)=1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the module correspondence is proved from prior external theorems, and the self-citations are load-bearing but independent, published support.

full rationale

The Main Theorem establishes a genuine equivalence between restricted Uh(ĝN)-modules and φ-coordinated Vc(gN)-modules via explicit module maps (0.3) and (0.4). The forward direction starts with a restricted module and constructs YW from the L[n] operators, then verifies the φ-coordinated module axioms (Lemmas 3.5–3.8). The converse starts with a φ-coordinated module and defines L(z) = YW(T+(0)1,z), then derives the quantum current commutation relation via Li's Jacobi-type identity (Proposition 2.10) in Lemma 3.9. None of these steps assumes the conclusion; the φ-coordinated module axioms are not defined to be the same as restricted module axioms, and the verifications are nontrivial calculations. The heavy reliance on the R-matrix normalization ψ is imported from [10] and [26] as prior published theorems, not fitted to the target result; the identities (1.19), (1.20), and ψ²f(eu)=f(e^{-u})^{-1} are parameter-free facts whose statements do not include the module correspondence. The self-citations ([26], [27], [22]) are load-bearing for portions of the proof, but they are independent mathematical results with stated assumptions, so under the given rules they do not constitute circularity. Omitted proof details, such as 'arguing as in [27, Prop. 2.4 and 2.5]', refer to existing arguments rather than to the present theorem. The main fragility is that the normalization ψ is not re-derived in this paper, making it a correctness/rigor risk, but it is not circular because the imported identities are not equivalent to the bijection being proved and are not renamed predictions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard formal power series machinery and on several imported structural results: the existence of the Etingof-Kazhdan quantum vertex algebra, the normalized R-matrix identities, Ding's quantum current realization, Li's Jacobi identity, and the fusion procedure. No parameters are fitted and no new entities are introduced. The proofs are explicit enough that an expert can trace each dependency.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The normalized trigonometric R-matrix R(eu) satisfies unitarity (1.19) and crossing symmetry (1.20).
Imported from [10, Prop. 1.2] and [26, Prop. 2.1]; used throughout Sections 3 and 4 to move R-matrices past currents.
domain assumption The Etingof-Kazhdan quantum vertex algebra Vc(gN) exists with vertex operator map (2.15) and braiding (2.16).
Theorem 2.3 from [11]; the entire module theory is built on this structure.
domain assumption Ding's quantum current realization (1.27) gives the quantum affine algebra Uh(hat gN) and its restricted modules.
Based on [6] and the Ding-Frenkel isomorphism [7]; the paper modifies the algebra over C[[h]] as described in Remark 1.3.
domain assumption Li's Jacobi-type identity (Proposition 2.10) is valid for the modified phi-coordinated modules defined over C[[h]].
The paper cites [31, Prop. 5.9] and says it can be proved by the same arguments; it is the key input for Lemma 3.9.
domain assumption Cherednik's fusion procedure for the two-parameter R-matrix, equation (3.66), yields the anti-symmetrizer identities used in the slN case.
Imported from [4] and [26, 13]; used in Lemma 3.11 and Proposition 4.1.
standard math Standard formal power series facts, including the formal Taylor theorem and delta-function identities.
Used throughout, e.g. equations (1.5), (3.53), (3.61).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the quantum affine vertex algebra associated with trigonometric $R$-matrix." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HZ6DJREK

@misc{pith2026190806517,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the quantum affine vertex algebra associated with trigonometric $R$-matrix},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HZ6DJREK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06517}
}

abstract

We apply the theory of $\phi$-coordinated modules, developed by H.-S. Li, to the Etingof--Kazhdan quantum affine vertex algebra associated with the trigonometric $R$-matrix of type $A$. We prove, for a certain associate $\phi$ of the one-dimensional additive formal group, that any $\phi$-coordinated module for the level $c\in\mathbb{C}$ quantum affine vertex algebra is naturally equipped with a structure of restricted level $c$ module for the quantum affine algebra in type $A$ and vice versa. Moreover, we show that any $\phi$-coordinated module is irreducible with respect to the action of the quantum affine vertex algebra if and only if it is irreducible with respect to the corresponding action of the quantum affine algebra. In the end, we discuss relation between the centers of the quantum affine algebra and the quantum affine vertex algebra.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

[27]

Quantum current algebras associated with rational $R$-matrix

S. Koˇ zi´ c,Quantum current algebras associated with rational R-matrix, Adv. Math. 351 (2019), 1072–1104; arXiv:1801.03543 [math.QA]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[32]

H.-S. Li, S. Tan, Q. Wang, Ding–Iohara algebras and quantum vertex algebras , J. Algebra 511 (2018), 182–214; arXiv:1706.03636 [math.QA]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[13]

Frappat, N

L. Frappat, N. Jing, A. Molev and E. Ragoucy, Higher Sugawara operators for the quantum aﬃne algebras of type A, Comm. Math. Phys. 345 (2016), 631–657; arXiv:1505.03667 [math.QA]

arXiv 2016
[1]

Field Algebras

B. Bakalov, V. G. Kac, Field algebras , Int. Math. Res. Not. (2003), no. 3, 123–159; arXiv:math/0204282 [math.QA]

work page Pith review arXiv 2003
[2]

Borcherds Vertex algebras, Kac–Moody algebras, and the Monster , Proc

R. Borcherds Vertex algebras, Kac–Moody algebras, and the Monster , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83 (1986) 3068–3071

work page 1986
[3]

$h$-adic quantum vertex algebras associated with rational $R$-matrix in types $B$, $C$ and $D$

M. Butorac, N. Jing, S. Koˇ zi´ c,h-Adic quantum vertex algebras associated with rational R-matrix in types B, C and D, Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019), 2439–2471; arXiv:1904.03771 [math.QA]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[4]

I. V. Cherednik, A new interpretation of Gelfand–Tzetlin bases , Duke Math. J. 54 (1987), 563–577

work page 1987
[5]

On the structure of quantum vertex algebras

A. De Sole, M. Gardini, V. G. Kac, On the structure of quantum vertex algebras , J. Math. Phys. 61 (2020), 011701 (29pp); arXiv:1906.05051 [math.QA]

work page Pith review arXiv 2020

Show all 36 references

[6]

Ding, Spinor Representations of Uq( ˆgl(n)) and Quantum Boson-Fermion Correspondence , Comm

J. Ding, Spinor Representations of Uq( ˆgl(n)) and Quantum Boson-Fermion Correspondence , Comm. Math. Phys. 200 (1999), 399–420; arXiv:q-alg/9510014

1999 arXiv
[7]

J. Ding, I. B. Frenkel, Isomorphism of two realizations of quantum aﬃne algebra Uq(ˆgl(n)), Comm. Math. Phys. 156 (1993), 277–300

1993
[8]

J. Ding, K. Iohara, Generalization of Drinfeld Quantum Aﬃne Algebras , Lett. Math. Phys. 41 (1997), 181–193; arXiv:q-alg/9608002

1997 arXiv
[9]

Etingof, D

P. Etingof, D. Kazhdan, Quantization of Lie bialgebras, III , Selecta Math. (N.S.) 4 (1998), 233–269; arXiv:q-alg/9610030

1998 arXiv
[10]

Etingof and D

P. Etingof and D. Kazhdan, Quantization of Lie bialgebras, IV , Selecta Math. (N.S.) 6 (2000), 79–104; arXiv:math/9801043 [math.QA]

2000 arXiv
[11]

Etingof, D

P. Etingof, D. Kazhdan, Quantization of Lie bialgebras, V , Selecta Math. (N.S.) 6 (2000), 105–130; arXiv:math/9808121 [math.QA]

2000 arXiv
[12]

N. Yu. Reshetikhin, L. A. Takhtadzhyan and L. D. Faddeev, Quantization of Lie groups and Lie algebras, Algebra i Analiz 1 (1989), no. 1, 178–206 (Russian); English transl., Leningrad Math . J. 1 (1990), no. 1, 193–225. 33

1989
[14]

Frenkel, Langlands correspondence for loop groups, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics,

E. Frenkel, Langlands correspondence for loop groups, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics,
[15]

Frenkel, D

E. Frenkel, D. Ben-Zvi, Vertex Algebras, Algebraic Curves , Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 88, Second ed., American Mathematical Society, Providence, R I, 2004

2004
[16]

Frenkel, N

E. Frenkel, N. Reshetikhin, Towards deformed chiral algebras , preprint arXiv:q-alg/9706023

arXiv
[17]

I. B. Frenkel, N. Jing, Vertex representations of quantum aﬃne algebras , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85 (1988), 9373–9377

1988
[18]

Frenkel, J

I. Frenkel, J. Lepowsky, A. Meurman, Vertex operator algebras and the Monster , Pure and Applied Mathematics, 134. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1988

1988
[19]

I. B. Frenkel and N. Yu. Reshetikhin, Quantum aﬃne algebras and holonomic diﬀerence equations , Comm. Math. Phys. 146 (1992), 1–60

1992
[20]

I. B. Frenkel and Y.-C. Zhu, Vertex operator algebras associated to representations of aﬃne and Virasoro algebras, Duke Math. J. 66 (1992), 123–168

1992
[21]

Jimbo, A q-diﬀerence analogue of U(G) and the Yang–Baxter equation , Lett

M. Jimbo, A q-diﬀerence analogue of U(G) and the Yang–Baxter equation , Lett. Math. Phys. 10 (1985) 63–69

1985
[22]

N. Jing, S. Koˇ zi´ c, A. Molev, F. Yang, Center of the quantum aﬃne vertex algebra in type A, J. Algebra 496 (2018), 138–186; arXiv:1603.00237 [math.QA]

2018 arXiv
[23]

V. G. Kac, Inﬁnite-dimensional Lie algebras , 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990

1990
[24]

Kac, Vertex algebras for beginners, University Lecture Series, 10

V. Kac, Vertex algebras for beginners, University Lecture Series, 10. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997

1997
[25]

Kassel, Quantum Groups , Graduate texts in mathematics; vol

C. Kassel, Quantum Groups , Graduate texts in mathematics; vol. 155, Springer-Verlag, 1995

1995
[26]

Koˇ zi´ c, A

S. Koˇ zi´ c, A. Molev,Center of the quantum aﬃne vertex algebra associated with tr igonometric R- matrix, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 (2017) 325201 (21pp); arXiv:1611.06700 [math.QA]

2017 arXiv
[28]

Lepowsky, H.-S

J. Lepowsky, H.-S. Li, Introduction to Vertex Operator Algebras and Their Represe ntations, Progress in Math., Vol. 227, Birkhauser, Boston, 2004

2004
[29]

Li, Axiomatic G1-vertex algebras , Commun

H.-S. Li, Axiomatic G1-vertex algebras , Commun. Contemp. Math. 5 (2003), 281–327; arXiv:math/0204308 [math.QA]

2003 arXiv
[30]

Li, ℏ-adic quantum vertex algebras and their modules , Comm

H.-S. Li, ℏ-adic quantum vertex algebras and their modules , Comm. Math. Phys. 296 (2010), 475– 523; arXiv:0812.3156 [math.QA]

2010 arXiv
[31]

Li, φ-Coordinated Quasi-Modules for Quantum Vertex Algebras , Comm

H.-S. Li, φ-Coordinated Quasi-Modules for Quantum Vertex Algebras , Comm. Math. Phys. 308 (2011), 703–741; arXiv:0906.2710 [math.QA]

2011 arXiv
[33]

Lian, On the classiﬁcation of simple vertex operator algebras , Comm

B.-H. Lian, On the classiﬁcation of simple vertex operator algebras , Comm. Math. Phys. 163 (1994), 307–357

1994
[34]

J. H. H. Perk, C. L. Schultz, New families of commuting transfer matrices in q-state vertex models , Phys. Lett. A 84 (1981), 407–410

1981
[35]

N. Yu. Reshetikhin, M. A. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Central extensions of quantum current groups , Lett. Math. Phys. 19 (1990), 133–142. 34

1990
[103]

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007

2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [27]

Quantum current algebras associated with rational $R$-matrix

S. Koˇ zi´ c,Quantum current algebras associated with rational R-matrix, Adv. Math. 351 (2019), 1072–1104; arXiv:1801.03543 [math.QA]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019

[2] [32]

H.-S. Li, S. Tan, Q. Wang, Ding–Iohara algebras and quantum vertex algebras , J. Algebra 511 (2018), 182–214; arXiv:1706.03636 [math.QA]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018

[3] [13]

Frappat, N

L. Frappat, N. Jing, A. Molev and E. Ragoucy, Higher Sugawara operators for the quantum aﬃne algebras of type A, Comm. Math. Phys. 345 (2016), 631–657; arXiv:1505.03667 [math.QA]

arXiv 2016

[4] [1]

Field Algebras

B. Bakalov, V. G. Kac, Field algebras , Int. Math. Res. Not. (2003), no. 3, 123–159; arXiv:math/0204282 [math.QA]

work page Pith review arXiv 2003

[5] [2]

Borcherds Vertex algebras, Kac–Moody algebras, and the Monster , Proc

R. Borcherds Vertex algebras, Kac–Moody algebras, and the Monster , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83 (1986) 3068–3071

work page 1986

[6] [3]

$h$-adic quantum vertex algebras associated with rational $R$-matrix in types $B$, $C$ and $D$

M. Butorac, N. Jing, S. Koˇ zi´ c,h-Adic quantum vertex algebras associated with rational R-matrix in types B, C and D, Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019), 2439–2471; arXiv:1904.03771 [math.QA]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019

[7] [4]

I. V. Cherednik, A new interpretation of Gelfand–Tzetlin bases , Duke Math. J. 54 (1987), 563–577

work page 1987

[8] [5]

On the structure of quantum vertex algebras

A. De Sole, M. Gardini, V. G. Kac, On the structure of quantum vertex algebras , J. Math. Phys. 61 (2020), 011701 (29pp); arXiv:1906.05051 [math.QA]

work page Pith review arXiv 2020