Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The AI Gap: How Socioeconomic Status Affects Language Technology Interactions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.12158 v2 pith:HZSRYWOB submitted 2025-05-17 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords languagesocioeconomictechnologiesdifferenceshigherllmstechnologyacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) fundamentally influences how people interact with each other and more recently, with digital technologies like Large Language Models (LLMs). While previous research has highlighted the interaction between SES and language technology, it was limited by reliance on proxy metrics and synthetic data. We survey 1,000 individuals from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds about their use of language technologies and generative AI, and collect 6,482 prompts from their previous interactions with LLMs. We find systematic differences across SES groups in language technology usage (i.e., frequency, performed tasks), interaction styles, and topics. Higher SES entails a higher level of abstraction, convey requests more concisely, and topics like 'inclusivity' and 'travel'. Lower SES correlates with higher anthropomorphization of LLMs (using ''hello'' and ''thank you'') and more concrete language. Our findings suggest that while generative language technologies are becoming more accessible to everyone, socioeconomic linguistic differences still stratify their use to exacerbate the digital divide. These differences underscore the importance of considering SES in developing language technologies to accommodate varying linguistic needs rooted in socioeconomic factors and limit the AI Gap across SES groups.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. NeoBabel: A Multilingual Open Tower for Visual Generation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 2B multilingual text-to-image model trained on 124M translated pairs matches or beats larger English-only baselines on English while scoring higher on the authors' multilingual benchmark extensions.

Pith tools