REVIEW 6 cited by
Fully-Dynamic Graph Sparsifiers Against an Adaptive Adversary
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Fully-Dynamic Graph Sparsifiers Against an Adaptive Adversary
read the original abstract
Designing dynamic graph algorithms against an adaptive adversary is a major goal in the field of dynamic graph algorithms. While a few such algorithms are known for spanning trees, matchings, and single-source shortest paths, very little was known for an important primitive like graph sparsifiers. The challenge is how to approximately preserve so much information about the graph (e.g., all-pairs distances and all cuts) without revealing the algorithms' underlying randomness to the adaptive adversary. In this paper we present the first non-trivial efficient adaptive algorithms for maintaining spanners and cut sparisifers. These algorithms in turn imply improvements over existing algorithms for other problems. Our first algorithm maintains a polylog$(n)$-spanner of size $\tilde O(n)$ in polylog$(n)$ amortized update time. The second algorithm maintains an $O(k)$-approximate cut sparsifier of size $\tilde O(n)$ in $\tilde O(n^{1/k})$ amortized update time, for any $k\ge1$, which is polylog$(n)$ time when $k=\log(n)$. The third algorithm maintains a polylog$(n)$-approximate spectral sparsifier in polylog$(n)$ amortized update time. The amortized update time of both algorithms can be made worst-case by paying some sub-polynomial factors. Prior to our result, there were near-optimal algorithms against oblivious adversaries (e.g. Baswana et al. [TALG'12] and Abraham et al. [FOCS'16]), but the only non-trivial adaptive dynamic algorithm requires $O(n)$ amortized update time to maintain $3$- and $5$-spanner of size $O(n^{1+1/2})$ and $O(n^{1+1/3})$, respectively [Ausiello et al. ESA'05]. Our results are based on two novel techniques. The first technique, is a generic black-box reduction that allows us to assume that the graph undergoes only edge deletions and, more importantly, remains an expander with almost-uniform degree. The second technique we call proactive resampling. [...]
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Sharp Bounds on Ground State Energy of the SYK Model
For super-constant k = o(√n), the expected operator norm of the k-SYK Hamiltonian equals (1−o(1))√(2n)/k, via a twisted-boson operator whose moments match SYK trace moments exactly.
-
Approximate Single Source Dual Fault Tolerant Distance Oracle
A (1+O(ε))-approximate single-source dual-fault distance oracle uses Õ(n√n) space and Õ(1) query time—the first with o(n^{2}) space.
-
Approximate Single Source Dual Fault Tolerant Distance Oracle
A new data structure answers approximate shortest-path queries from a fixed source after any two edges fail, using subquadratic space and near-constant query time; the correctness proof for the hardest case is incomplete.
-
Quantum Cut Sparsifiers
Any n-qubit QC Hamiltonian sparsifies to Õ(n/ε²) terms preserving all state energies within 1±ε using invariant subspace decomposition and the Alon-Kozma operator inequality.
-
An Online Sparsification Algorithm from the Book
The original online leverage-score sampling algorithm is adaptively robust and yields spectral sparsifiers of size O(d ε^{-2} log^2 d) with memory proportional to the sparsifier.
-
$\tilde{O}$ptimal Algorithm for 2-Approximate All Pair Shortest Paths -- almost
A randomized ~O(n^2)-time algorithm computes 2-approximate distances for all pairs at distance at least a constant (<=906), improving the previous O(log log n) guarantee.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.