Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 88 references

Fermi surface nesting driven anomalous Hall effect in magnetically frustrated Mn_2PdIn

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that the inverse Heusler alloy Mn2PdIn, despite a spin-glassy nearly compensated magnetic state, hosts Weyl-type band crossings and an intrinsic anomalous Hall effect driven by Berry curvature and Fermi surface…

desk verdict Solid experimental study of a new AHE material, but the Berry-curvature/Weyl interpretation rests on a collinear magnetic state that the paper's own data say is not the ground state. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.02769 v1 pith:I3XZANEL submitted 2025-05-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Afsar Ahmed , Arnab Bhattacharya , Prashant Singh , Ajay Kumar , Tukai Singha , Anis Biswas , Yaroslav Mudryk , Indranil Das This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Mn2PdIninverseHeusleralloyanomalousHalleffectBerrycurvatureFermisurfacenestingspinclusterglassWeylsemimetalmagnetotransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Mn2PdIn is an inverse Heusler alloy (a cubic intermetallic with four interpenetrating fcc sublattices) whose manganese moments almost cancel, leaving a net magnetization near zero. The paper argues that, despite freezing into a spin cluster glass (a frozen state of disordered magnetic clusters), this compound has a topologically nontrivial electronic structure: Weyl-type band crossings sit near the Fermi level and the Fermi surface contains nested, near-parallel pockets. The measured anomalous Hall effect is then intrinsic, coming from Berry curvature rather than from impurity skew scattering; the key evidence is that the anomalous Hall resistivity scales quadratically with the longitudinal resistivity and the anomalous Hall conductivity is nearly temperature independent. If this is right, Mn2PdIn offers a route to low-moment, frustration-prone magnets that still give clear transverse transport signals, which matters for spintronics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the nesting geometry of the Fermi surface in a time-reversal-broken, spin-orbit-coupled metal. A nesting vector $q_{\rm nest}\sim\Gamma\to X$ connects dispersive Mn $e_g$ electron-like pockets at $\Gamma$ with quasi-flat, hybridized Mn $t_{2g}$-Pd $t_{2g}$ hole-like pockets near $X$; the near-parallel contours and the orbital contrast between them enhance interband scattering, while spin-orbit coupling opens small gaps of order 20-50 meV at the band crossings and turns those crossings into sources and sinks of Berry curvature. The linear-response formalism then integrates this Berry curvature over the Brillouin zone to obtain an intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity, and the quadratic relation $\rho^A_{xy}\propto\rho_{xx}^2$ together with a temperature-independent $\sigma^A_{xy}$ is used as the experimental fingerprint of that intrinsic mechanism.

What would settle it

A neutron diffraction or muon-spin rotation experiment below the freezing temperature could settle it: if it finds no collinear ferrimagnetic order with manganese moments near $\pm 3.5\,\mu_B$, the computed Weyl crossings, nesting vector, and Berry curvature cannot be the mechanism producing the measured anomalous Hall effect.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Mn2PdIn is a topologically nontrivial metal whose anomalous Hall effect is intrinsic. In the paper's picture, the inverse Heusler structure hosts two inequivalent manganese sublattices with opposing moments ($+3.75$ and $-3.48\,\mu_B$ from first-principles calculations; net $0.39\,\mu_B$ per formula unit, against $0.46\,\mu_B$ from magnetization data), leaving a nearly compensated ferrimagnet that freezes into a spin cluster glass below about 65.5 K. First-principles electronic-structure calculations with spin-orbit coupling find Weyl-type band crossings close to the Fermi level and a Fermi surface with an electron-like Mn $e_g$ pocket at $\Gamma$ nested against hole-like Mn $t_{2g}$/Pd $t_{2g}$ pockets near $X$ through a nesting vector $q_{\rm nest}\sim\Gamma\to X$. Linear-response integration of the Berry curvature gives an intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity of about 132 S cm$^{-1}$ at the Fermi level, rising to roughly 937-1003 S cm$^{-1}$ when the chemical potential is shifted by $-2.1$ or $+0.8$ eV. Experimentally, the anomalous Hall resistivity obeys $\rho^A_{xy}\propto\rho_{xx}^2$, the anomalous Hall conductivity is about 50 S cm$^{-1}$ and nearly temperature independent, and scaling analysis places skew scattering as a minor contributor; the paper reads these as confirmation that the anomalous Hall effect is dominated by the intrinsic Berry-curvature/nesting mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The calculations assume a collinear ferrimagnetic arrangement of the manganese moments with values near $+3.75$ and $-3.48\,\mu_B$, whereas the measured sample is a spin cluster glass with no confirmed long-range magnetic order; if the true magnetic structure differs, the predicted Weyl crossings, nesting vector, and Berry curvature need not describe the measured Hall effect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mn2PdIn becomes a concrete example of an inverse Heusler alloy with suppressed net magnetization and an intrinsic anomalous Hall response, relevant for spintronic applications.
  • The Fermi-surface nesting criterion (nested electron- and hole-like pockets with orbital contrast in a spin-orbit-coupled magnet) can be used to screen other Heusler and related intermetallics for anomalous Hall activity.
  • Because the computed anomalous Hall conductivity rises strongly when the chemical potential shifts away from the Fermi level, doping or strain that moves $E_F$ should produce a much larger intrinsic anomalous Hall effect than measured in the stoichiometric compound.
  • The quadratic $\rho^A_{xy}$-$\rho_{xx}$ scaling, together with the scaling analysis, implies that skew scattering is not the origin of the anomalous Hall effect; intrinsic and side-jump contributions dominate even in a spin-glass host.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper, if the true magnetic ground state is a noncollinear cluster glass rather than the collinear ferrimagnet assumed in the calculations, the measured Hall effect might instead arise from local noncollinear spin textures or disorder-modified bands; neutron scattering would decide between these.
  • Going beyond the paper, the predicted sharp rise of the anomalous Hall conductivity when the chemical potential shifts by $-2.1$ or $+0.8$ eV makes doping a direct test: substituting a neighboring element to move $E_F$ should either produce a much larger anomalous Hall effect or rule out the band-structure mechanism.
  • Going beyond the paper, the nesting criterion itself is transferable: screening isostructural Mn$_2$Pd-based and related Heusler compounds for parallel Fermi contours with contrasting orbital character could identify other anomalous-Hall-active magnets.
  • Going beyond the paper, angle-resolved photoemission on a single crystal could directly test the calculated flat Mn $e_g$/Pd $t_{2g}$ bands and the Weyl-type crossings near the Fermi level.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a combined experimental and DFT study of the inverse Heusler compound Mn2PdIn. Experimental characterization by XRD, TEM, magnetometry, ac susceptibility, and transport shows a spin cluster-glass ground state with quenched magnetization and an anomalous Hall effect (σ_xy ≈ 50 S/cm at 5 K) whose ρ_A versus ρ_xx scaling is quadratic. DFT calculations assume a collinear ferrimagnetic state with opposing Mn moments (net 0.39 μB/f.u.) and yield Weyl-type crossings near E_F, pronounced Fermi-surface nesting, and an intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity of about 132 S/cm. The paper argues that the measured AHE originates from this topological electronic structure and proposes nesting-induced inter-orbital scattering as a design criterion for AHE-active Heusler compounds.

Significance. If the interpretation were sound, the work would be significant: it would identify a nearly compensated magnetic Heusler system with a robust AHE and propose a concrete electronic-structure design criterion. The experimental data set is fairly complete and internally consistent, and the use of standard TYJ scaling is appropriate as a first step. The DFT calculation is ab initio and not fitted to the measured AHE. However, the central interpretive link is weakened by the mismatch between the magnetic state assumed in the calculation and the state actually characterized in the experiment; the calculated topological properties and AHC cannot be directly assigned to the measured sample without additional evidence. This issue is load-bearing for the paper's main claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Magnetometry (Figs. 2–3) and DFT electronic structure] The DFT calculations assume a collinear ferrimagnetic state with Mn moments +3.75 and −3.48 μB/f.u. (net 0.39 μB/f.u.), whereas the manuscript's own magnetic characterization shows a spin cluster-glass ground state with quenched magnetization, memory and relaxation effects, and frequency-dependent freezing, i.e., no long-range magnetic order. M(H) at 2 K continues to increase up to 7 T without saturation, so the high-field state probed in transport is not shown to be the calculated FiM state. Because the computed Berry curvature, nesting vectors, and intrinsic AHC (132 S/cm) are properties of the ordered collinear state, they cannot be used to interpret the measured σ_xy ≈ 50 S/cm without independent evidence that the experimental magnetic structure matches the calculation.
  2. [Fig. 4 and accompanying text] The crossings near E_F are described as 'strong candidates for Weyl points' and later as 'Weyl-type band crossings,' but no chiral charge, Chern number, or surface-state calculation is presented. The text also states that SOC creates small gaps of 20–50 meV at these crossings, which is incompatible with genuine Weyl points unless a specific symmetry protection is identified. The claim that Mn2PdIn hosts a 'topologically nontrivial electronic structure' is therefore not established by the provided calculations.
  3. [Text near the T_F estimate] The freezing temperature is estimated as 62.3 K using a mean-field formula with a DFT-derived J between FiM and AFM states. Since the experimentally characterized state is a spin cluster glass, not a collinear FiM or AFM state, the relevance of this J is unclear, and the agreement with T_F = 65.5 K cannot be taken as validation of the collinear FiM model. The formula's inputs (J_i,j,avg over 'all possible configurations,' N=8) are not specified in sufficient detail to be reproducible.
  4. [Fig. 5(f) and TYJ scaling] The TYJ decomposition into skew-scattering and intrinsic/side-jump contributions uses the spontaneous magnetization M, but the sample is a spin glass with quenched and nonsaturating magnetization, making the appropriate M ill-defined. The resulting coefficients (a ≈ −0.062, b ≈ 63 S/cm) therefore do not robustly support the claim that the intrinsic Berry-curvature mechanism dominates the measured AHE.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table II title] The title 'Fiting parameters' should read 'Fitting parameters.'
  2. [Equations and text (magnetization section)] The text contains a typo: 'Slatter-Puling rule' should be 'Slater-Pauling rule.'
  3. [Structural description (Fig. 1 inset and text)] The phrase 'octagonally coordinated' should be 'octahedrally coordinated.'
  4. [Relaxation equation (Fig. 2(c) text)] The relaxation formula M(t)=M0(1+a exp[−(t/τ)^β]) appears to have the wrong sign convention for a zero-field-cooled relaxation; a standard KWW form is M(t)=M0[1−exp(−(t/τ)^β)] over a suitable baseline, and the present form should be checked.
  5. [AHC calculation text] The phrase 'yield numerically equivalent results 82.82' contains a duplicated reference marker; it should be 'results [82]' or similar.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DFT AHC and T_F estimate are independent of the measured transport data, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The intrinsic AHC (about 132 S/cm) is computed from the DFT band structure via the Kubo formalism and is not fitted to the measured transverse resistivity; the experimental value (about 50 S/cm) is quoted separately, and the discrepancy is attributed to polycrystallinity, defects, and finite-temperature effects, which is an independent comparison rather than a fit. The quadratic rho_A vs. rho_xx scaling and the TYJ decomposition are fits to measured transport data using established scaling models (Tian-Ye-Jin), and the fitted coefficient b is not fed back into the DFT calculation. The freezing-temperature estimate T_F = 62.3 K uses a DFT-computed exchange J = -0.04295 eV rather than a value fitted to the experimental T_F = 65.5 K, so the agreement is a genuine, if approximate, prediction. The same-group citations (Refs. 18, 19, and 88) support background and comparison only; no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from them. Any remaining concerns, such as whether the collinear ferrimagnetic DFT state represents the measured spin-cluster-glass ground state, are issues of physical validity and transport interpretation, not circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central mechanistic claims rest on several unproven model assumptions: the collinear FiM ground state, the identification of band crossings as Weyl points without computing topological invariants, and the applicability of mean-field and TYJ scaling analyses to a cluster spin glass. The fitted TYJ coefficient b is interpreted as the intrinsic AHC, but it is a fitting parameter rather than a parameter-free prediction.

free parameters (3)
  • b (TYJ intrinsic coefficient) = ≈63 S/cm
    Obtained from the linear fit of ρ_A/(Mρ_xx) versus ρ_xx in the TYJ scaling (Fig. 5f). This fitted coefficient is interpreted as the intrinsic anomalous Hall contribution and is a key piece of evidence for the intrinsic AHE claim.
  • a (TYJ skew-scattering coefficient) = ≈ -0.062
    Obtained from the same TYJ scaling fit. Used to separate skew-scattering from intrinsic/side-jump contributions.
  • Spontaneous magnetization M_s = 0.46 μB/f.u. at 2 K
    Obtained from a linear extrapolation of M(H) in the 5-7 T range at 2 K. Used to compare with the DFT moment (0.39 μB/f.u.) and as input to the TYJ scaling analysis.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The collinear ferrimagnetic configuration found in DFT is the relevant magnetic ground state for interpreting transport.
    The DFT calculation assumes FiM order with Mn moments +3.75 and -3.48 μB, while the experimental sample is characterized as a spin cluster glass. This assumption is load-bearing for the computed AHC and Weyl crossings.
  • ad hoc to paper Band crossings near the Fermi level are Weyl-type (topologically protected) without an explicit calculation of chiral charge or surface states.
    The paper identifies 'Weyl-type' crossings from band structure plots alone. No topological invariant, Berry curvature distribution at the crossings, or Fermi-arc calculation is provided.
  • domain assumption The mean-field expression T_F = (1/(k_B N)) sqrt(Σ J²) is a valid approximation for the cluster spin-glass freezing temperature.
    Used to estimate T_F = 62.3 K from a single J[FiM-AFM] value obtained from DFT. The formula is taken from literature on metallic spin glasses and may not be accurate for a cluster glass with competing interactions.
  • domain assumption The TYJ scaling relation can separate skew scattering from intrinsic AHE in a spin-glass system.
    The TYJ scaling was developed for ferromagnets, and its validity in a spin-glass with small and temperature-dependent magnetization is not established. The authors apply it without justification beyond a linear fit range.
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA accurately describes the electronic structure and anomalous Hall conductivity of Mn2PdIn.
    The DFT uses PBE without Hubbard U or hybrid functionals. The authors state the f-electron self-interaction issue even though the system has no f-electrons, suggesting boilerplate text. The accuracy of PBE for this intermetallic is not benchmarked.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fermi surface nesting driven anomalous Hall effect in magnetically frustrated Mn_2PdIn." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I3XZANEL

@misc{pith2026250502769,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fermi surface nesting driven anomalous Hall effect in magnetically frustrated Mn_2PdIn},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I3XZANEL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.02769}
}
read the original abstract

Noncollinear magnets with near-zero net magnetization and nontrivial bulk electronic topology hold significant promise for spintronic applications, though their scarcity necessitates purposeful design strategies. In this work, we report a topologically nontrivial electronic structure in metallic Mn_2PdIn, which crystallizes in the inverse Heusler structure and exhibits a spin-glassy ground state with quenched magnetization. The system features Weyl-type band crossings near the Fermi level and reveals a novel interplay among momentum-space nesting, orbital hybridization, and spin-orbit coupling. Comprehensive transport measurements uncover a pronounced anomalous Hall effect (AHE) in Mn_2PdIn. The observed quadratic relationship between the longitudinal and anomalous Hall resistivities highlights the intrinsic Berry curvature contribution to AHE. These findings establish inverse Heusler alloys as compelling platforms for realizing noncollinear magnets that host Weyl-type semimetallic or metallic phases-combining suppressed magnetization with robust electronic transport-thereby offering a promising route toward their seamless integration into next-generation spintronic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.02769 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Rietveld refinement of room temperature XRD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a),(b) Temperature variation of the real ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a, b) Electronic band structure and atom- and orbital-resolved density of states (DOS) for Mn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17031 (2017)

    2017

  2. [2]

    Tokura and N

    Y. Tokura and N. Kanazawa, Magnetic skyrmion materials, Chem. Rev. 121, 2857 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    A. Fert, V. Cros, and J. Sampaio, Skyrmions on the track, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 152 (2013)

    2013

  4. [4]

    J. C. Gallagher, M. D. Stern, Y. Li, T. Liu, H. Zhang, W. Jin, J. L. Zhang, J.-H. Park, and R. He, Robust zero-field skyrmion formation in FeGe epitaxial thin films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 027201 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Ozawa, S

    R. Ozawa, S. Hayami, and Y. Motome, Zero-field skyrmions with a high topological number in itinerant magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 147205 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    Puphal, V

    P. Puphal, V. Pomjakushin, N. Kanazawa, V. Ukleev, D. J. Gawryluk, J. Ma, M. Naamneh, N. C. Plumb, L. Keller, R. Cubitt, et al., Topological magnetic phase in the candidate Weyl semimetal CeAlGe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 017202 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    X. Z. Yu, W. Koshibae, Y. Tokunaga, K. Shibata, Y. Taguchi, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Transformation between meron and skyrmion topological spin textures in a chiral magnet, Nature 564, 95--98 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    Fujishiro, N

    Y. Fujishiro, N. Kanazawa, T. Nakajima, X. Z. Yu, K. Ohishi, Y. Kawamura, K. Kakurai, T. Arima, H. Mitamura, A. Miyake, et al., Topological transitions among skyrmion-and hedgehog-lattice states in cubic chiral magnets, Nat. Commun. 10, 1059 (2019)

    2019

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    J. Zou, S. Zhang, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Topological transport of deconfined hedgehogs in magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 267201 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    S.-H. Yang, R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, and S. S. P. Parkin, Chiral spintronics, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 328--343 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    P. Park, W. Cho, C. Kim, Y. An, Y.-G. Kang, M. Avdeev, R. Sibille, K. Iida, R. Kajimoto, K. H. Lee, et al., Tetrahedral triple-Q magnetic ordering and large spontaneous Hall conductivity in the metallic triangular antiferromagnet Co _ 1/3 TaS _2 , Nat. Commun. 14, 8346 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    N. J. Ghimire, A. S. Botana, J. S. Jiang, J. Zhang, Y.-S. Chen, and J. F. Mitchell, Large anomalous Hall effect in the chiral-lattice antiferromagnet CoNb _3 S _6 , Nat. Commun. 9, 3280 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Suzuki, R

    T. Suzuki, R. Chisnell, A. Devarakonda, Y.-T. Liu, W. Feng, D. Xiao, J. W. Lynn, and J. G. Checkelsky, Large anomalous Hall effect in a half-Heusler antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys. 12, 1119--1123 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Shekhar, N

    C. Shekhar, N. Kumar, V. Grinenko, S. Singh, R. Sarkar, H. Luetkens, S.-C. Wu, Y. Zhang, A. C. Komarek, E. Kampert, et al., Anomalous Hall effect in Weyl semimetal half-Heusler compounds RPtBi (R = Gd and Nd), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9140--9144 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Nakatsuji, N

    S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nature 527, 212--215 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    X. Li, J. Koo, Z. Zhu, K. Behnia, and B. Yan, Field-linear anomalous Hall effect and Berry curvature induced by spin chirality in the kagome antiferromagnet Mn _3 Sn, Nature Commun. 14, 1642 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    S mejkal, T

    L. S mejkal, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Route towards Dirac and Weyl antiferromagnetic spintronics, Phys. Status Solidi (RRL) 11, 1700044 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Bhattacharya, M

    A. Bhattacharya, M. R. Habib, A. Ahmed, B. Satpati, S. DuttaGupta, I. Dasgupta, and I. Das, Spin-valve-like magnetoresistance and anomalous Hall effect in magnetic Weyl metal Mn _2 PdSn, Phys. Rev. B 110, 014417 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Ahmed, J

    A. Ahmed, J. Sharma, A. Bhattacharya, A. Biswas, T. Singha, Y. Mudryk, A. Alam, and I. Das, Unconventional anomalous Hall effect in hexagonal polar magnet Y _3 Co _8 Sn _4 , arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03452 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    T. Graf, C. Felser, and S. P. Parkin, Simple rules for the understanding of Heusler compounds, Prog. Solid State Chem. 39, 1--50 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    W. Shi, L. Muechler, K. Manna, Y. Zhang, K. Koepernik, R. Car, J. Van Den Brink, C. Felser, and Y. Sun, Prediction of a magnetic Weyl semimetal without spin-orbit coupling and strong anomalous Hall effect in the Heusler compensated ferrimagnet Ti _2 MnAl, Phys. Rev. B 97, 0604...

    2018

  14. [22]

    Winterlik, G

    J. Winterlik, G. H. Fecher, B. Balke, T. Graf, V. Alijani, V. Ksenofontov, C. A. Jenkins, O. Meshcheriakova, C. Felser, G. Liu, S. Ueda, K. Kobayashi, T. Nakamura, and M. W\'ojcik, Electronic, magnetic, and structural properties of the ferrimagnet Mn _2 CoSn, Phys. Rev. B 83, ...

    2011

  15. [23]

    Stinshoff, A

    R. Stinshoff, A. K. Nayak, G. H. Fecher, B. Balke, S. Ouardi, Y. Skourski, T. Nakamura, and C. Felser, Completely compensated ferrimagnetism and sublattice spin crossing in the half-metallic Heusler compound Mn _ 1.5 FeV _ 0.5 Al, Phys. Rev. B 95, 060410 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    A. A. Zyuzin, S. Wu, and A. A. Burkov, Weyl semimetal with broken time reversal and inversion symmetries, Phys. Rev. B 85, 165110 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    Chatterjee, P

    S. Chatterjee, P. Dutta, S. Giri, S. Majumdar, S. Sadhukhan, S. Kanungo, S. Chatterjee, M. M. Patidar, G. S. Okram, and V. Ganesan, Glassy magnetic state and negative temperature coefficient of resistivity in Mn ^ 3+ In, Phys. Rev. B 102, 214443 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    See Supplemental material: This material includes further auxiliary data on structural refinement, transverse resistivity, and computational details, Supplementary URL to be added by journal (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    X. Xu, T. Kanomata, M. Hayasaka, R. Umino, K. Endo, H. Nishihara, Y. Adachi, R. Kainuma, and K. A. Ziebeck, Magnetic properties of Mn _2 PdSn and Mn _2 PdIn, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 401, 618--624 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Samanta, P

    T. Samanta, P. A. Bhobe, A. Das, A. Kumar, and A. K. Nigam, Reentrant cluster glass and stability of ferromagnetism in the Ga _2 MnCo Heusler alloy, Phys. Rev. B 97, 184421 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    A. K. Nayak, M. Nicklas, S. Chadov, C. Shekhar, Y. Skourski, J. Winterlik, and C. Felser, Large Zero-Field Cooled Exchange-Bias in Bulk Mn _2 PtGa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 127204 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    Agarwal, B

    S. Agarwal, B. Wang, H. Yang, P. Dhanapal, Y. Shen, J. Wang, H. Wang, J. Zhao, and R.-W. Li, Spin-valve-like magnetoresistance in a Ni-Mn-In thin film, Phys. Rev. B 97, 214427 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Skaftouros, K

    S. Skaftouros, K. \. O zdo g an, E. S a s ıo g lu, and I. Galanakis, Generalized Slater-Pauling rule for the inverse Heusler compounds, Phys. Rev. B 87, 024420 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    M. E. Jamer, Y. J. Wang, G. M. Stephen, I. J. McDonald, A. J. Grutter, G. E. Sterbinsky, D. A. Arena, J. A. Borchers, B. J. Kirby, L. H. Lewis, et al., Compensated ferrimagnetism in the zero-moment Heusler alloy Mn _3 Al, Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 064036 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    A. K. Nayak, M. Nicklas, S. Chadov, P. Khuntia, C. Shekhar, A. Kalache, M. Baenitz, Y. Skourski, V. K. Guduru, A. Puri, et al., Design of compensated ferrimagnetic Heusler alloys for giant tunable exchange bias, Nat. Mater. 14, 679--684 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Hessinger and K

    J. Hessinger and K. Knorr, Field-cooling experiments on the quadrupolar-glass state of (KBr) _ 0.47 (KCN) _ 0.53 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2674--2676 (1990)

    1990

  27. [35]

    Kroder, K

    J. Kroder, K. Manna, D. Kriegner, A. S. Sukhanov, E. Liu, H. Borrmann, A. Hoser, J. Gooth, W. Schnelle, D. S. Inosov, G. H. Fecher, and C. Felser, Spin glass behavior in the disordered half-Heusler compound IrMnGa, Phys. Rev. B 99, 174410 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Pakhira, C

    S. Pakhira, C. Mazumdar, R. Ranganathan, S. Giri, and M. Avdeev, Large magnetic cooling power involving frustrated antiferromagnetic spin-glass state in R _ 2 NiSi _ 3 (R=Gd,Er), Phys. Rev. B 94, 104414 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    J. C. Phillips, Stretched exponential relaxation in molecular and electronic glasses, Rep. Prog. Phys. 59, 1133 (1996)

    1996

  30. [38]

    D. Chu, G. G. Kenning, and R. Orbach, Dynamic measurements in a Heisenberg spin glass: CuMn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3270--3273 (1994)

    1994

  31. [39]

    J. A. Mydosh, Spin glasses: An experimental introduction (CRC Press, 1993)

    1993

  32. [40]

    D. X. Li, S. Nimori, Y. Shiokawa, Y. Haga, E. Yamamoto, and Y. Onuki, ac susceptibility and magnetic relaxation of R _ 2 PdSi _ 3 (R=Nd, Tb, and Dy), Phys. Rev. B 68, 012413 (2003)

    2003

  33. [41]

    S. Khan, E. S. Y. Aw, L. A. V. Nagle-Cocco, A. Sud, S. Ghosh, M. K. B. Subhan, Z. Xue, C. Freeman, D. Sagkovits, A. Gutiérrez-Llorente, et al., Spin-Glass States Generated in a van der Waals Magnet by Alkali-Ion Intercalation, Adv. Mater. 36, 2400270 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    J. A. Mydosh, Spin glasses: redux: an updated experimental/materials survey, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 052501 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 435--479 (1977)

    1977

  36. [44]

    Mori and H

    T. Mori and H. Mamiya, Dynamical properties of a crystalline rare-earth boron cluster spin-glass system, Phys. Rev. B 68, 214422 (2003)

    2003

  37. [45]

    J. Lago, S. J. Blundell, A. Eguia, M. Jansen, and T. Rojo, Three-dimensional Heisenberg spin-glass behavior in SrFe _ 0.90 Co _ 0.10 O _ 3.0 , Phys. Rev. B 86, 064412 (2012)

    2012

  38. [46]

    P. Li, J. Koo, W. Ning, J. Li, L. Miao, L. Min, Y. Zhu, Y. Wang, N. Alem, C.-X. Liu, et al., Giant room temperature anomalous Hall effect and tunable topology in a ferromagnetic topological semimetal Co _2 MnAl, Nat. Commun. 11, 3476 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    Rosch, Interplay of Disorder and Spin Fluctuations in the Resistivity near a Quantum Critical Point, Phys

    A. Rosch, Interplay of Disorder and Spin Fluctuations in the Resistivity near a Quantum Critical Point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4280--4283 (1999)

    1999

  40. [48]

    J. A. Mydosh and P. J. Ford, Low temperature electrical resistivity of the spin glass: CuMn, Phys. Lett. A 49, 189--190 (1974)

    1974

  41. [49]

    Belopolski, K

    I. Belopolski, K. Manna, D. S. Sanchez, G. Chang, B. Ernst, J. Yin, S. S. Zhang, T. Cochran, N. Shumiya, H. Zheng, et al., Discovery of topological Weyl fermion lines and drumhead surface states in a room temperature magnet, Science 365, 1278--1281 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    Hurd, The Hall effect in metals and alloys (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    C. Hurd, The Hall effect in metals and alloys (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    Karplus and J

    R. Karplus and J. M. Luttinger, Hall effect in ferromagnetics, Phys. Rev. 95, 1154 (1954)

    1954

  44. [52]

    Y. Tian, L. Ye, and X. Jin, Proper Scaling of the Anomalous Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 087206 (2009)

    2009

  45. [53]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539--1592 (2010)

    2010

  46. [54]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  47. [55]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  48. [56]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, WannierTools: An open-source software package for novel topological materials, Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 405--416 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    Pizzi, V

    G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Blügel, F. Freimuth, G. Géranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune, et al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32, 165902 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    M. G. Lopez, D. Vanderbilt, T. Thonhauser, and I. Souza, Wannier-based calculation of the orbital magnetization in crystals, Phys. Rev. B 85, 014435 (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, D. Orobengoa, E. Tasci, G. De La Flor, and A. Kirov, Crystallography online: Bilbao crystallographic server, Bulg. Chem. Commun. 43, 183-197 (2011)

    2011

  52. [60]

    X. Wang, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Ab initio calculation of the anomalous Hall conductivity by Wannier interpolation, Phys. Rev. B 74, 195118 (2006)

    2006

  53. [61]

    H. T. Stokes, D. M. Hatch, and B. J. Campbell, FINDSYM, ISOTROPY Software Suite, iso.byu.edu

  54. [62]

    D. M. Hatch and H. T. Stokes, FINDSYM: program for identifying the space-group symmetry of a crystal, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 38, 237-238 (2005)

    2005

  55. [63]

    M. Park, G. Han, and S. H. Rhim, Anomalous Hall effect in a compensated ferrimagnet: Symmetry analysis for Mn _ 3 Al , Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013215 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    Gurung, D

    G. Gurung, D. F. Shao, T. R. Paudel, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Anomalous Hall conductivity of noncollinear magnetic antiperovskites, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 044409 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    J. Zhou, X. Shu, Y. Liu, X. Wang, W. Lin, S. Chen, L. Liu, Q. Xie, T. Hong, P. Yang, B. Yan, X. Han, and J. Chen, Magnetic asymmetry induced anomalous spin-orbit torque in IrMn, Phys. Rev. B 101, 184403 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    X. Wang, D. Vanderbilt, J. R. Yates, and I. Souza, Fermi-surface calculation of the anomalous Hall conductivity, Phys. Rev. B 76, 195109 (2007)

    2007

  59. [67]

    Y. Yao, L. Kleinman, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, D.-S. Wang, E. Wang, and Q. Niu, First principles calculation of anomalous Hall conductivity in ferromagnetic bcc Fe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 037204 (2004)

    2004

  60. [68]

    J. Shen, Q. Yao, Q. Zeng, H. Sun, X. Xi, G. Wu, W. Wang, B. Shen, Q. Liu, and E. Liu, Local Disorder-Induced Elevation of Intrinsic Anomalous Hall Conductance in an Electron-Doped Magnetic Weyl Semimetal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 086602 (2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    Kresse, and J

    G. Kresse, and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558-561 (1993)

    1993

  62. [70]

    Kresse, and D

    G. Kresse, and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758-1775 (1999)

    1999

  63. [71]

    Monkhorst, and J.D

    H.J. Monkhorst, and J.D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188-5192 (1976)

    1976

  64. [72]

    Perdew, K

    J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865-3868 (1996)

    1996

  65. [73]

    Singh, M.K

    P. Singh, M.K. Harbola, M. Hemanadhan, A. Mookerjee, and D.D. Johnson, Better band gaps with asymptotically corrected local exchange potentials, Phys. Rev. B 93, 085204 (2016)

    2016

  66. [74]

    Singh, M.K

    P. Singh, M.K. Harbola, B. Sanyal, and A. Mookerjee, Accurate determination of band gaps within density functional formalism, Phys. Rev. B 87, 235110 (2013)

    2013

  67. [75]

    Kaneyoshi, Sing glass ordering temperature beyond its mean-field, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 15-18, 119-120 (1980)

    T. Kaneyoshi, Sing glass ordering temperature beyond its mean-field, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 15-18, 119-120 (1980)

    1980

  68. [76]

    M. R. A. Shegelski and D. J. W. Geldart, Theory of freezing temperatures of metallic spin glasses, Solid State Commun. 79, 769 (1991)

    1991

  69. [77]

    M. R. A. Shegelski and D. J. W. Geldart, Indirect-exchange interactions in disordered metals at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B 46, 5318 (1992)

    1992

  70. [78]

    M. R. A. Shegelski and D. J. W. Geldart, Theory of impurity-concentration dependence of freezing temperatures of metallic spin glasses, Phys. Rev. B 46, 2853 (1992)

    1992

  71. [79]

    Y. Yao, L. Kleinman, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, D.-S. Wang, E. Wang, and Q. Niu, First Principles Calculation of Anomalous Hall Conductivity in Ferromagnetic bcc Fe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 , 037204 (2004)

    2004

  72. [80]

    Fuh and G.-Y

    H.-R. Fuh and G.-Y. Guo, Intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in nickel: A GGA + U study, Phys. Rev. B 84 , 144427 (2011)

    2011

  73. [81]

    Huang et al., Anomalous Hall effect and current spin polarization in Co2FeX Heusler compounds (X = Al, Ga, In, Si, Ge, and Sn): A systematic ab initio study, Phys

    H.-L. Huang et al., Anomalous Hall effect and current spin polarization in Co2FeX Heusler compounds (X = Al, Ga, In, Si, Ge, and Sn): A systematic ab initio study, Phys. Rev. B 91 , 134409 (2015)

    2015

  74. [82]

    G. Y. Guo, Q. Niu, and N. Nagaosa, Anomalous Nernst and Hall effects in magnetized platinum and palladium, Phys. Rev B 89 , 214406 (2014)

    2014

  75. [83]

    K\"ubler, and C

    J. K\"ubler, and C. Felser, Berry curvature and the anomalous Hall effect in Heusler compounds, Phys. Rev. B 85 , 012405 (2012)

    2012

  76. [84]

    Kudrnovsky, V

    J. Kudrnovsky, V. Drchal, and I. Turek, Anomalous Hall effect in stoichiometric Heusler alloys with native disorder: A first-principles study, Phys. Rev. B 88 , 014422 (2013)

    2013

  77. [85]

    J. C. Tung, and G. Y. Guo, High spin polarization of the anomalous Hall current in Co-based Heusler compounds, New J. Phys. 15 , 033014 (2013)

    2013

  78. [86]

    J. Noky, Y. Zhang, J. Gooth et al. Giant anomalous Hall and Nernst effect in magnetic cubic Heusler compounds, npj Comput Mater 6 , 77 (2020)

    2020

  79. [87]

    Chadov, X

    S. Chadov, X. Qi, J. K\"ubler et al. Tunable multifunctional topological insulators in ternary Heusler compounds, Nature Mater 9 , 541-545 (2010)

    2010

  80. [88]

    Ahmed, A

    A. Ahmed, A. Bhattacharya, and I. Das, Anomalous and large topological Hall effects in -Mn chiral compound Co _ 6.5 Ru _ 1.5 Zn _8 Mn _4 : electron-electron interaction facilitated quantum interference effect, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 37 , 115802 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.