Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Evaluating Evidential Reliability In Pattern Recognition Based On Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.00848 v1 pith:I5T65WEX submitted 2024-10-30 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords reliabilityevidencesourcesalgorithmdecisionfuzzyalgorithmsclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Determining the reliability of evidence sources is a crucial topic in Dempster-Shafer theory (DST). Previous approaches have addressed high conflicts between evidence sources using discounting methods, but these methods may not ensure the high efficiency of classification models. In this paper, we consider the combination of DS theory and Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (IFS) and propose an algorithm for quantifying the reliability of evidence sources, called Fuzzy Reliability Index (FRI). The FRI algorithm is based on decision quantification rules derived from IFS, defining the contribution of different BPAs to correct decisions and deriving the evidential reliability from these contributions. The proposed method effectively enhances the rationality of reliability estimation for evidence sources, making it particularly suitable for classification decision problems in complex scenarios. Subsequent comparisons with DST-based algorithms and classical machine learning algorithms demonstrate the superiority and generalizability of the FRI algorithm. The FRI algorithm provides a new perspective for future decision probability conversion and reliability analysis of evidence sources.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools