Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Efficient Sampling Allocation Strategies for General Graph-Filter-Based Signal Recovery

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.05583 v2 pith:I65ZYE4B submitted 2025-02-08 eess.SP

Efficient Sampling Allocation Strategies for General Graph-Filter-Based Signal Recovery

classification eess.SP
keywords graphsamplingsignalallocationrecoverymethodsalgorithmbmse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sensor placement plays a crucial role in graph signal recovery in underdetermined systems. In this paper, we present the graph-filtered regularized maximum likelihood (GFR-ML) estimator of graph signals, which integrates general graph filtering with regularization to enhance signal recovery performance under a limited number of sensors. Then, we investigate task-based sampling allocation aimed at minimizing the mean squared error (MSE) of the GFR-ML estimator by wisely choosing sensor placement. Since this MSE depends on the unknown graph signals to be estimated, we propose four cost functions for the optimization of the sampling allocation: the biased Cram$\acute{\text{e}}$r-Rao bound (bCRB), the worst-case MSE (WC-MSE), the Bayesian MSE (BMSE), and the worst-case BMSE (WC-BMSE), where the last two assume a Gaussian prior. We investigate the properties of these cost functions and develop two algorithms for their practical implementation: 1) the straightforward greedy algorithm; and 2) the alternating projection gradient descent (PGD) algorithm that reduces the computational complexity. Simulation results on synthetic and real-world datasets of the IEEE 118-bus power system and the Minnesota road network demonstrate that, in the tested scenarios, the proposed sampling allocation methods reduce the MSE by up to $50\%$ compared to the common sampling methods A-design, E-design, and LR-design. Thus, the proposed methods improve the estimation performance and reduce the required number of measurements in graph signal processing (GSP)-based signal recovery in the case of underdetermined systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.