Research progress in high-pressure tuning of layered magnetic materials

Gao Xin; Liu Zhongyuan; Mu Congpu; Yue Dongdong; Zhai Kun

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 78 references

Research progress in high-pressure tuning of layered magnetic materials

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that high pressure can cleanly rewire layered magnetic materials—switching spin states, raising Curie temperatures, flipping antiferromagnetic order to ferromagnetic—and that pressure quenching can lock such effects into

desk verdict A competent, clearly organized review of high-pressure tuning in layered vdW magnets, but its flagship examples come from the authors' own unverified DAC transport measurements and the manuscript has metadata errors. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.13632 v1 pith:I6JDWZIF submitted 2026-07-15 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yue Dongdong , Gao Xin , Mu Congpu , Liu Zhongyuan , Zhai Kun This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords layeredmagneticmaterialshighpressurevanderWaalsmagnetsspincrossoverCurietemperaturemagnetocrystallineanisotropyquenchingdiamondanvilcell

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

High pressure, the paper argues, is a uniquely effective way to tune layered van der Waals magnets because the weak interlayer bonds make these materials far more compressible along the stacking direction than ordinary bulk crystals. The review collects evidence that pressure can drive transition-metal ions from high-spin to low-spin states, raise the Curie temperature, rotate the easy axis of magnetization, and even flip antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling to ferromagnetic. It also argues that pressure does this without introducing chemical disorder, and that rapid decompression—pressure quenching—can sometimes preserve the high-pressure magnetic phase after the cell is opened. A reader should care because this points to a route for discovering and stabilizing new magnetic states, including room-temperature or above-room-temperature magnets, that are usable outside the pressure cell.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the interlayer van der Waals gap—the weak bond between atomic layers that makes these magnets far more compressible along the stacking direction than ordinary crystals. Pressure acts on this gap first: it shrinks interlayer spacing, changes stacking register, and increases orbital overlap, which in turn renormalizes bands near the Fermi level and alters exchange interactions. A second ingredient is the diamond anvil cell, the tool that squeezes micrometer-scale samples while letting X-rays and lasers pass through; the review pairs it with X-ray emission and absorption spectroscopy to catch spin-state changes and with anomalous Hall and angular transport measurement

What would settle it

Run an empty diamond anvil cell through the same pressure cycles used for Fe5GeTe2 and Co-doped Fe3GaTe2 and measure the same transport and magnetization observables; if the claimed ferromagnetic signal and 400 K retained state survive in the empty cell or disappear after rigorous background subtraction, the central narrative fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that pressure is not just a bulk-compression tool but a continuous, chemical-disorder-free control parameter that acts preferentially on the interlayer degrees of freedom of van der Waals magnets. By compressing interlayer spacing, sliding layers, and reconstructing stacking, pressure can change crystal-field splitting enough to drive high-spin to low-spin transitions of transition-metal ions; can reshape the Fermi surface and density of states enough to raise or lower the Curie temperature; can rotate the easy axis of magnetization through spin-orbit coupling's sensitivity to the crystal field; and can flip the sign of interlayer exchange, turning antiferromagne

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the measured magnetic signals inside high-pressure cells—especially the reported AFM-to-FM conversions and retained high-Tc states—come from the layered samples themselves and not from the pressure apparatus, whose background and parasitic responses the review itself flags in its section on magnetic measurements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In the antiferromagnet FePSe3, compression past the high-spin to low-spin transition drives a semiconductor-to-metal change and then superconductivity, with onset around 2.5 K at ~9 GPa and about 5.5 K at ~30 GPa.
In Fe3GaTe2, pressure lifts the Curie temperature to roughly 480 K near 10.3 GPa while rotating the magnetic easy axis continuously out of plane to in-plane; in Fe5GeTe2 the pressure loop can retain a ferromagnetic state with Tc above 400 K after decompression.
In CrI3, about 1.8 GPa drives an irreversible stacking change from monoclinic to rhombohedral, converting antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling to ferromagnetic and leaving a ferromagnetic state that survives to roughly 60 K.
In Co-doped Fe3GaTe2, pressure restores ferromagnetism from an antiferromagnetic ground state at 4.1 GPa and pushes Tc to a maximum near 282 K at 12.3 GPa, with a dome-shaped phase diagram like the parent compound.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper's own examples of pressure quenching come from nonmagnetic systems (a bismuth-antimony telluride superconductor, a rhenium-sulfide framework, and shear-stabilized beta-titanium); whether layered magnets like Fe5GeTe2 can survive quenching with their high-Tc ferromagnetic state intact after thermal cycling is a direct, testable extension.
If pressure's effect on stacking in CrI3 can be made local—say with a scanning tip or patterned strain—the same AFM-to-FM switching mechanism could act as a write/erase operation for interlayer magnetism, something the review mentions only as a direction.
Because NV-center measurements respond to both local magnetization and local stress, pressure-cell NV magnetometry could map strain inhomogeneity together with magnetic order; the review treats NV centers as a magnetic probe but not as a combined stress-magnetization diagnostic.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

What you should know first: this is a review, explicitly a translated version of a Chinese Acta Physica Sinica paper. It presents no new data. What it does deliver is a clear, well-structured summary of the experimental toolkit (DACs, X-ray/optical probes, NV centers, micro-electrode transport) and of the main pressure-driven effects in layered vdW magnets: spin crossover, Curie temperature enhancement, anisotropy rotation, and AFM-FM conversion. For a newcomer or a colleague looking for a quick orientation, it's genuinely useful.

Where it earns credit: the organization is sensible, the cited literature is broad, and the authors do not oversell the 'clean' control claim. Section 4 explicitly admits that pressure couples to bond lengths, stacking, and sliding, and that many high-pressure phases revert on decompression. That is honest.

Soft spots: first, the central examples of anisotropy switching in Fe3GaTe2, the retained FM3 phase in Fe5GeTe2, and the AFM-to-FM transition in Co-doped Fe3GaTe2 are all from the authors' own group (refs 56, 61, 66), and the review does not flag the single-group nature or discuss why these transport results should be trusted over the strong DAC background the review itself mentions in Sec. 2.3. That is not an accusation; it's just an unaddressed gap in the evidence chain. A one-sentence note on literature selection or a table marking which results are from the authors' group would fix much of it. Second, the bibliography has mechanical errors: the footnote DOI is 10.7498/aps.75.20260107 while the header says 10.7498/aps.74.2020107 and the cstr string uses 74.20260107, and ref [31] has a broken bracket. These are minor but should be corrected. The translation is workmanlike but sometimes stiff; that's a style issue, not a substantive one.

Who this is for: readers who want a map of the field before diving into primary papers, especially experimentalists entering high-pressure magnetism. The review does not claim to be comprehensive in a systematic-review sense, and it doesn't introduce new concepts.

Bottom line: it's a legitimate review that deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject. My recommendation: send it out, but ask for a metadata cleanup, a note on how the self-selected examples were chosen, and ideally a sentence acknowledging the reproducibility caveat for the flagship results.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper is a review of high-pressure tuning of layered van der Waals magnetic materials. It surveys in-situ high-pressure experimental techniques (DAC-based X-ray/optical methods, transport measurements, and emerging NV-center quantum sensing) and reviews representative pressure-induced phenomena: high-spin to low-spin transitions, enhancement of Curie temperature and magnetocrystalline anisotropy switching, and antiferromagnetic-to-ferromagnetic transitions. The paper also discusses future directions such as pressure quenching to retain metastable phases and multi-field control. The central thesis is that high pressure is a uniquely effective, clean tuning knob for these materials because of their high interlayer compressibility.

Significance. If the reported results hold, this review provides a useful and timely synthesis of a rapidly moving field. The paper brings together recent advances in NV-center magnetometry, micro-electrode DAC transport, and pressure quenching, and it gives a reasonably complete introduction to the experimental toolbox. The review explicitly names specific primary sources, which is helpful for an audience entering the field. Its main limitation is that several cornerstone examples come from the authors' own recent DAC transport measurements that are not independently reproduced; the review would be more valuable if it presented them with appropriate caveats and methodological detail.

major comments (2)

[§3.2–3.3, refs [56,61,66]] The central examples supporting the thesis — the continuous PMA-to-in-plane rotation in Fe3GaTe2, the retained FM3 phase in Fe5GeTe2, and the AFM-to-FM transition in Co-doped Fe3GaTe2 — all come from the authors' own DAC transport experiments. Section 2.3 concedes that the high-pressure apparatus introduces significant background signals and parasitic responses, and that sample signals must be separated from those backgrounds. The review does not explain how this separation was done, nor does it discuss non-hydrostatic stress, pressure-medium choice, or electrode-contact stability in these experiments. Because these results are not independently reproduced, the review should either provide the methodological details from the primary papers or explicitly flag them as self-reported and in need of independent confirmation. Without such context, the evidence chain for the review's core narra
[§4] The text describes high pressure as able to alter atomic distances in a 'clean' manner without chemical disorder, but two sentences later states that pressure couples with multiple structural degrees of freedom and that its control parameters are less 'pure' than those of electric fields. This apparent contradiction bears on the paper's central claim that pressure is a uniquely clean tuning knob. The authors should clarify in the abstract and introduction that 'clean' refers only to the absence of chemical disorder, not to mode-selectivity, which is limited. As written, the paper risks overstating the advantage of pressure relative to other knobs.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract/Footnote] The DOI and volume information are inconsistent: the abstract lists DOI 10.7498/aps.74.2020107, while the footnote gives Acta Phys. Sin., 2026, 75(6): 060808, DOI 10.7498/aps.75.20260107. The header also shows cstr 32037.14.aps.74.20260107. These should be reconciled.
[Ref. [31]] The reference contains a broken bracket: '[31.' should be '[31]'.
[§1] The sentence 'the high-pressure techniques had been approached serves as a vital strategy' is ungrammatical and should be rewritten. There are also typographical spacing issues (e.g., 'physicoc hemical', 'in teractions').
[Fig. 3] The figure caption mentions panels (c)–(e) discussing upper critical field, Hall resistance, and Stoner-Wohlfarth analysis, but the text does not explain these panels clearly. The caption should be self-contained.
[§2.3] The sensitivity range '10 -7-10-9 emu' appears without proper superscripts and should be typeset correctly (10^-7 to 10^-9 emu).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No definitional circularity; self-cited flagship examples are review content, not derived outputs.

full rationale

This paper is a review article rather than a derivation chain. Its central claim—that pressure can tune layered magnetic materials by altering interlayer coupling, electronic structure, spin states, and magnetic order—is supported by multiple independent groups beyond the authors' own: CrI3 stacking-driven AFM-to-FM conversion (refs 70–71), Fe3GeTe2 pressure-dependent Tc behavior (refs 67–69), and twisted-bilayer-graphene pressure studies (ref 73). The self-cited examples (Fe3GaTe2 [61], Fe5GeTe2 [66], Co-doped Fe3GaTe2 [56], and the AHE/Arrott analysis [52]) are presented as literature results and experimental techniques, not as conclusions derived from parameters fitted in this paper. There are no equations or derived quantities in the review that reduce by construction to their own inputs, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Section 2.3's acknowledgment that 'the high-pressure apparatus itself ... introduces significant background signals and parasitic responses' is a measurement-validity caveat relevant to data reliability, but it is not a circular-reasoning step. The self-citations are nontrivial but not load-bearing in the definitional sense: the review's overall narrative does not collapse without them, and independent external evidence anchors the central thesis. Therefore, no step satisfies the quoted-equation or by-construction test for circularity; the score reflects only the presence of several self-cited flagship examples that a reader should weigh carefully.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Review article: no new derivation or data, so no free parameters or invented entities. The review rests on the reliability of the cited experimental literature and standard assumptions of high-pressure measurements.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Pressure reported in cited DAC experiments is hydrostatic and uniformly transmitted to the sample, so quoted pressure values correspond to the actual sample environment.
Section 2.1 defines P=F/A noting average pressure, and Section 2.3 lists background/parasitic signals from the apparatus, yet the review's narrative treats the cited pressure values as reflecting the sample.
domain assumption The spectroscopic and electrical probes (XES, XANES, XMCD, AHE) used in the cited works give unambiguous assignments of spin states, anisotropy, and magnetic order.
Section 2.2 and 2.4 describe these techniques, but the review does not discuss known ambiguities, such as AHE interpretation for micro-scale ferromagnets aside from the authors' method.
domain assumption The cited experimental reports are accurate and reproducible.
The review is a tertiary source; it does not re-analyze primary data. All claims about phenomena rest on the reliability of the referenced experimental papers.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Research progress in high-pressure tuning of layered magnetic materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I6JDWZIF

@misc{pith2026260713632,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Research progress in high-pressure tuning of layered magnetic materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I6JDWZIF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13632}
}

read the original abstract

Two-dimensional van der Waals materials have enormous potential applications in many fields due to their unique layered structure and excellent properties. Compared with three-dimensional bulk materials, layered systems are coupled by weak van der Waals interactions between layers, endowing them with much higher structural compressibility, particularly along the interlayer direction, which is more sensitive to external pressure. High pressure can expand the accessible phase space, enabling the synthesis of new materials or the retention of metastable phases. On the microscopic level, pressure can significantly tune the interlayer structure and interactions, induce changes in the electronic structure, and consequently give rise to a variety of rich physical properties. This article systematically introduces in situ high-pressure experimental approaches, including diamond anvil cells combined with X-ray and spectroscopic techniques, high-pressure magnetic transport measurements, and emerging NV-center quantum sensing. It further reviews representative pressure-induced phenomena and underlying tuning mechanisms in layered magnetic materials, such as high-spin to low-spin transitions of transition-metal ions and the accompanying structural phase transitions and superconductivity; substantial enhancement of the Curie temperature and continuous switching of magnetocrystalline anisotropy; and antiferromagnetic-to-ferromagnetic transitions achieved by modulating exchange interactions or via stacking engineering. Finally, we discuss future directions, including synergistic multi-field control by combining pressure with electric fields and twisted heterostructures, as well as strategies such as pressure quenching to retain high-pressure metastable magnetic phases at ambient conditions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references

[31]

Wang X, Kamenev K 2014 Low Temp. Phys. 40 735

2014
[1]

Zhang L J, Wang Y C, Lv J, Ma Y M 2017 Nat. Rev. Mater. 2 17005

2017
[2]

Sun L L, Chen X J, Guo J, Gao P W, Huang Q Z, Wang H D, Fang M H, Chen X L, Chen G F, Wu Q, Zhang C, Gu D C, Dong X L, Wang L, Yang K, Li A G, Mao H K, Zhao Z X 2012 Nature 483 67

2012
[3]

Sun H L, Huo M W, Hu X W, Li J Y , Liu Z J, Han Y F, Tang L Y , Mao Z Q, Yang P T, Wang B S, Cheng J G, Yao D X, Zhang G M, Wang M 2023 Nature 621 493

2023
[4]

Xia J, Yan J X, Wang Z H, He Y M, Gong Y J, Chen W Q, Sum T C, Liu Z, Ajayan P M, Shen Z X 2021 Nat. Phys. 17 92

2021
[5]

Pei S H, Deng Q Y , Wang Z H, Xia J 2021 Chin. J. High Press. Phys. 35 030101

2021
[6]

Mao H K, Chen X J, Ding Y , Li B, Wang L 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 015007

2018
[7]

Wang N N, Yang M W, Yang Z, Chen K Y , Zhang H, Zhang Q H, Zhu Z H, Uwatoko Y , Gu L, Dong X L, Sun J P, Jin K J, Cheng J G 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 4367

2022

Show all 78 references

[8]

Sun J P, Jiao Y Y , Yi C J, Dissanayake S E, Matsuda M, Uwatoko Y , Shi Y G, Li Y Q, Fang Z, Cheng J G 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 047201

2019
[9]

Guo S H, Zhang Y F, Bu K J, Zhan Y Q, Lü X J 2025 Chem. Commun. 61 1773

2025
[10]

Mao H K, Chen B, Chen J H, Li K, Lin J F, Yang W G, Zheng H Y 2016 Matter. Radiat. Extrem. 1 59

2016
[11]

Huang B, Clark G, Navarro-Moratalla E, Klein D R, Cheng R, Seyler K L, Zhong D, Schmidgall E, McGuire M A, Cobden D H 2017 Nature 546 270

2017
[12]

Gong C, Li L, Li Z L, Ji H W, Stern A, Xia Y , Cao T, Bao W, Wang C Z, Wang Y , Qiu Z Q, Cava R J, Louie S G, Xia J, Zhang X 2017 Nature 546 265

2017
[13]

Today Electron

Shi S X, Wang X R, Zhao Y R, Zhao W S 2023 Mater. Today Electron. 6 100060

2023
[14]

Geim A K, Grigorieva I V 2013 Nature 499 419

2013
[15]

Novoselov K S, Mishchenko A, Carvalho A, Castro Neto A 2016 Science 353 aac9439

2016
[16]

Nanotechnol

Gibertini M, Koperski M, Morpurgo A F, Novoselov K S 2019 Nat. Nanotechnol. 14 408

2019
[17]

Liu P, Zhang Y , Li K H, Li Y D, Pu Y 2023 iscience 26 107584

2023
[18]

Electron

Tang M, Huang J W, Qin F, Zhai K, Ideue T, Li Z Y , Meng F H, Nie A M, Wu L L, Bi X Y , Zhang X R, Zhou L, Chen P, Qiu C Y , Tang P Z, Zhang H J, Wan X G, Wang L, Liu Z Y , Tian Y J, Yoshihiro Iwasa, Yuan H T 2023 Nat. Electron. 6 28

2023
[19]

Nanotechnol

Cenker J, Sivakumar S, Xie K, Miller A, Thijssen P, Liu Z, Dismukes A, Fonseca J, Anderson E, Zhu X 2022 Nat. Nanotechnol. 17 256

2022
[20]

Deng Y J, Yu Y J, Song Y C, Zhang Z J, Wang N Z, Sun Z Y , Yi Y F, Wu Y Z, Wu S W, Zhu J Y , Wang J, Chen X H, Zhang Y B 2018 Nature 563 94

2018
[21]

Chi Z H, Zhao X M, Zhang H D, Goncharov A F, Lobanov S S, Kagayama T, Sakata M, Chen X J 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 036802

2014
[22]

Hromadova L, Martoňák R, Tosatti E 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 144105

2013
[23]

Wang X F, Chen X L, Zhou Y H, Park C, An C, Zhou Y , Zhang R R, Gu C C, Yang W G, Yang Z R 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 46694

2017
[24]

6 075008

Zhou Y H, Chen X L, Li N N, Zhang R R, Wang X F, An C, Zhou Y , Pan X C, Song F Q, Wang B G, Yang W G, Yang Z R, Zhang Y H 2016 AIP Adv. 6 075008

2016
[25]

Carter F, Mao Y L, Zhang X, Wang Y , Xiao J 2024 Chem. Rev. 124 1862

2024
[26]

Susilo R A, Jang B G, Feng J J, Du Q H, Yan Z P, Dong H L, Yuan M Z, Petrovic C, Shim J H, Kim D Y , Chen B 2020 npj Quantum Mater. 5 58

2020
[27]

Piermarini G, Weir C 1962 J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. Sect. A 66A 325

1962
[28]

Weir C, Block S, Piermarini G 1965 J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. C 69C 275

1965
[29]

Piermarini G, Block S, Barnett J 1973 J. Appl. Phys. 44 5377

1973
[30]

Barnett J, Block S, Piermarini G J 1973 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 44 1

1973
[32]

Alloys Compd

Pascarelli S, Mathon O, Aquilanti G 2004 J. Alloys Compd. 362 33

2004
[33]

Sereika R, Jose G C, Huang S, Jin R, Shelton W A, Xie W, Zhao J, Lavina B, Alp E E, Xiao Y Zhang D, Bi W 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110 075127

2024
[34]

Wilhelm F, Garbarino G, Jacobs J, Vitoux H, Steinmann R, Guillou F, Snigirev A, Snigireva I, V oisin P, Braithwaite D, Aoki D, Brison J P, Kantor I, Lyatun I, Rogalev A 2016 High Press. Res. 36 445

2016
[35]

Xiao Y M, Paul Chow, Shen G Y 2016 High Press. Res. 36 315

2016
[36]

Torchio R, Mathon O, Pascarelli S 2014 Coord. Chem. Rev. 277-278 80

2014
[37]

Iimori R, Hu S J, Mitsuda A, Kimura T 2024 Commun. Mater. 5 235

2024
[38]

Telford E J, Chica D G, Ziebel M E, Xie K C, Manganaro N S, Huang C Y , Cox J, Dismukes A H, Zhu X Y , Walsh J P S, Cao T, Dean C R, Roy X 2023 Adv. Phys. Res. 2 2300036

2023
[39]

Zhai K, Su N, Sun J P, Cheng J G, Liu Z Y , Sun Y 2019 J. Mater. Chem. C 7 4173

2019
[40]

Zhou H J, Ding H, Gao X, Shen Z W, Zhai K, Wang B C, Mu C P, Wen F S, Xiang J Y , Xue T X, Shu Y , Wang L, Liu Z Y 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 32863

2023
[41]

Chen K Y , Wang N N, Yin Q W, Gu Y H, Jiang K, Tu Z K, Gong C S, Uwatoko Y , Sun J P, Lei H C, Cheng J G 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 247001

2021
[42]

Huang X L, Wang X, Liu M K, Liang Y F, Liu B B, Cui T 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 037403

2017
[43]

Bhattacharyya P, Chen W, Huang X, Chatterjee S, Huang B, K obrin B, Lyu Y , Smart T J, Block M, Wang E, Wang Z, Wu W, Ma H, Mandyam S, Chen B, Davis E, Geballe Z M, Zu C, Struzhkin V , Jeanloz R, Moore J E, Cui T, Galli G, Halperin B I, Laumann C R, Yao N Y 2024 Nature 627 73

2024
[44]

Wang M Q, Wang Y , Liu Z X, Xu G Y , Yang B, Yu P, Sun H Y , Ye X Y , Zhou J W, Goncharov A F, Wang Y , Du J F 2024 Nat. Commun. 15 8843

2024
[45]

Hsieh S, Bhattacharyya P, Zu C, Mittiga T, Smart T, Machado F, Kobrin B, Höhn T, Rui N, Kamrani M 2019 Science 366 1349

2019
[46]

Yip K Y , Ho K O, Yu K Y , Chen Y , Zhang W, Kasahara S, Mizukami Y , Shibauchi T, Matsuda Y , Goh S K 2019 Science 366 1355

2019
[47]

Lesik M, Plisson T, Toraille L, Renaud J, Occelli F, Schmidt M, Salord O, Delobbe A, Debuisschert T, Rondin L 2019 Science 366 1359

2019
[48]

Tzeng Y K, Ke F, Jia C J, Liu Y Y , Park S, Han M Y , Frost M, Cai X X, Mao W L, Ewing R C , Cui Y , Devereaux T P, Lin Y , Chu S 2024 Nat. Commun. 15 7251

2024
[49]

Liu G Q 2025 Acta Phys. Sin. 74 117601

2025
[50]

Wang C J, Shi F Z, Wang P F, Duan C K, Du J F 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 130701

2018
[51]

Chen H H, Huang X L, Cui T 2024 Physics 53 332

2024
[52]

24 15348

Qin F, Li Z Y , Bi X Y , Zhai K, Ao L Y , Chen P, Chen G Y , Huang J W, Qiu C Y , Liu Z Y , Yuan H T 2024 Nano Lett. 24 15348

2024
[53]

Zhang C R, Huang J W, Zhai K, Akhtari K, Shen Z W, Ao L Y , Li Z Y , Qin F, Chang Y K, Zhou L, Tang M, Dai X T, Qiu C Y , Zhang Y , Wang L, Liu Z Y , Tian Y J, Bahramy M S, Yuan H 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 6938

2022
[54]

Matsumoto R, Irifune T, Tanaka M, Takeya H, Takano Y 2017 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 56 05FC01

2017
[55]

Ke F, Zhang L K, Chen Y B, Yin K T, Wang C X, Tzeng Y K, Lin Y , Dong H L, Liu Z X, Tse J S, Mao W L, Wu J Q, Chen B 2020 Nano Lett. 20 5916

2020
[56]

Zhai K, Bi X, Gao X, Yue D D, Ao L Y , Yan J X, Liu X, Nie A M, Mu C P, Cheng Y C, Yuan H T, Liu Z Y 2025 Adv. Funct. Mater. 2500793

2025
[57]

Liu G X, Pi M C, Zhou L, Liu Z H, Shen X D, Ye X B, Qin S J, Mi X R, Chen X, Zhao L, Zhou B W, Guo J, Yu X H, Chai Y S, Weng H M, Long Y W 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 2373

2022
[58]

Chai Y S, Chun S H, Cong J Z, Kim K H 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 104416

2018
[59]

Lu J M, Zheliuk O, Leermakers I, Yuan N F, Zeitler U, Law K T, Ye J T 2015 Science 350 1353

2015
[60]

Shi M Z, Fan K B, Li H P, Pan S Y , Cai J Q, Zhang N, Li H Y , Wu T, Zhang J L, Xi C Y , Xiang Z J, Chen X H 2024 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 33413

2024
[61]

Gao X, Zhai K, Fu H X, Yan J X, Yue D D, Ke F, Zhao Y , Mu C P, Nie A M, Xiang J Y , Wen F S, Wang B C, Xue T Y , Wang L, Yuan H T, Liu Z Y 2024 Adv. Sci. 11 2402819

2024
[62]

Yue D D, Gao X, Yu Z P, Zhai K, Liu Z Y 2026 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 97 033901

2026
[63]

Wang Y G, Bai L G, Wen T, Yang L X, Gou H Y , Xiao Y M, Chow P, Pravica M, Yang W G, Zhao Y S 2016 Angew. Chem. 128 10506

2016
[64]

Wang Y G, Ying J J, Zhou Z Y , Sun J L, Wen T, Zhou Y N, Li N N, Zhang Q, Han F, Xiao Y M, Chow P, Yang W G, Struzhkin V V , Zhao Y S, Mao H K 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 1914

2018
[65]

Wang Y G, Zhou Z Y , Wen T, Zhou Y N, Li N N, Han F, Xiao Y M, Chow P, Sun J L, Pravica M, Cornelius A L, Yang W G, Zhao Y S 2016 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 15751

2016
[66]

Li Z Y , Tang M, Huang J W, Qin F, Ao L Y , Shen Z W, Zhang C R, Chen P, Bi X Y , Qiu C Y , Yu Z P, Zhai K, Ideue T, Wang L, Liu Z Y , Tian Y J, Iwasa Y , Yuan H T 2022 Adv. Mater. 34 2201209

2022
[67]

Xu J M, Wang S Y , Wang W J, Zhou H, Chen X L, Yang Z R, Qu Z 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 076202

2020
[68]

Dang N T, Kozlenko D P, Lis O N, Kichanov S E, Lukin Y V , Golosova N O, Savenko B N, Duong D L, Phan T L, Tran T A 2023 Adv. Sci. 10 2206842

2023
[69]

Wang X Q, Li Z Y , Zhang M, Hou T, Zhao J G, Li L, Rahman A, Xu Z L, Gong J B, Chi Z, Gong J B, Chi Z H, Dai R C, Wang Z P, Qiao Z H, Zhang Z M 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 014407

2019
[70]

Li T X, Jiang S W, Sivadas N, Wang Z F, Xu Y , Weber D, Goldberger J E, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Fennie C J, Kin F M, Shan J 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 1303

2019
[71]

Song T C, Fei Z Y , Yankowitz M, Lin Z, Jiang Q, Hwangbo K, Zhang Q, Sun B, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, McGuire M A, Graf D, Cao T, Chu J H, Cobden D H, Dean C R, Xiao D, Xu X D 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 1298

2019
[72]

Chen Y B, Ke F, Ci P H, Ko C, Park T, Saremi S, Liu H L, Lee Y , Suh J, Martin L W, Ager J W, Chen B, Wu J Q 2017 Nano Lett. 17 194

2017
[73]

Yankowitz M, Chen S, Polshyn H, Zhang Y , Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Graf D, Young A F, Dean C R 2019 Science 363 1059

2019
[74]

Wang Y P, An J Q, Ye C H, Wang X Q, Mai D, Zhao H Z, Zhang Y , Peng C Y , Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Sun X Y , Dai R C, Wang Z P, Qin W, Qiao Z H, Zhang Z M 2025 Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 046303

2025
[75]

Deng L Z, Wang B S, Halbert C, Schulze D J, Gooch M, Bontke T, Trevor Bontke, Kuo T W, Shi X, Song S W, Salkee N, Yang H D, Ren Z F, Hemley R, Zurek E, Prasankumar R, Chu C W 2025 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 122 e2423102122

2025
[76]

Today Phys

Wu Z, Deng L Z, Gooch M, Huyan S, Chu C W 2020 Mater. Today Phys. 15 100291

2020
[77]

Li Z Y , Gong J, Zhu Z K, Liu D H, Hu Q Y , Wang Y M, Liu X Q, Zhou S, Luo H, Wang D, Liu X Y , Yang Z X, Tang M, Kong Q Y , Adama N D, Zhang K, Yan S, Zhang L L, Zeng X H, Yu Z H, Xia W, Yuan J, Li M T, Li N N, Dong H L, Zhang Z Y , Shu H Y , Ding Y , Wang D B, Guo Y F, Xu T,...

2025
[78]

He Y , Adachi N, Todaka Y , Wang L, Sun Y 2025 Appl. Phys. Lett. 127 011906

2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [31]

Wang X, Kamenev K 2014 Low Temp. Phys. 40 735

2014

[2] [1]

Zhang L J, Wang Y C, Lv J, Ma Y M 2017 Nat. Rev. Mater. 2 17005

2017

[3] [2]

Sun L L, Chen X J, Guo J, Gao P W, Huang Q Z, Wang H D, Fang M H, Chen X L, Chen G F, Wu Q, Zhang C, Gu D C, Dong X L, Wang L, Yang K, Li A G, Mao H K, Zhao Z X 2012 Nature 483 67

2012

[4] [3]

Sun H L, Huo M W, Hu X W, Li J Y , Liu Z J, Han Y F, Tang L Y , Mao Z Q, Yang P T, Wang B S, Cheng J G, Yao D X, Zhang G M, Wang M 2023 Nature 621 493

2023

[5] [4]

Xia J, Yan J X, Wang Z H, He Y M, Gong Y J, Chen W Q, Sum T C, Liu Z, Ajayan P M, Shen Z X 2021 Nat. Phys. 17 92

2021

[6] [5]

Pei S H, Deng Q Y , Wang Z H, Xia J 2021 Chin. J. High Press. Phys. 35 030101

2021

[7] [6]

Mao H K, Chen X J, Ding Y , Li B, Wang L 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 015007

2018

[8] [7]

Wang N N, Yang M W, Yang Z, Chen K Y , Zhang H, Zhang Q H, Zhu Z H, Uwatoko Y , Gu L, Dong X L, Sun J P, Jin K J, Cheng J G 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 4367

2022