Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Optimization-based frequentist confidence intervals for functionals in constrained inverse problems: Resolving the Burrus conjecture

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.02461 v3 pith:I6VMAKTB submitted 2023-10-03 math.ST stat.MEstat.TH

classification math.STstat.MEstat.TH
keywords intervalsburrusconjectureproblemsconstrainedcoverageframeworkfrequentist
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present an optimization-based framework to construct confidence intervals for functionals in constrained inverse problems, ensuring valid one-at-a-time frequentist coverage guarantees. Our approach builds upon the now-called strict bounds intervals, originally pioneered by Burrus (1965) and Rust and Burrus (1972), which offer ways to directly incorporate any side information about the parameters during inference without introducing external biases. This family of methods allows for uncertainty quantification in ill-posed inverse problems without needing to select a regularizing prior. By tying optimization-based intervals to an inversion of a constrained likelihood ratio test, we translate interval coverage guarantees into type I error control and characterize the resulting interval via solutions to optimization problems. Along the way, we refute the Burrus conjecture, which posited that, for possibly rank-deficient linear Gaussian models with positivity constraints, a correction based on the quantile of the chi-squared distribution with one degree of freedom suffices to shorten intervals while maintaining frequentist coverage guarantees. Our framework provides a novel approach to analyzing the conjecture, and we construct a counterexample employing a stochastic dominance argument, which we also use to disprove a general form of the conjecture. We illustrate our framework with several numerical examples and provide directions for extensions beyond the Rust-Burrus method for nonlinear, non-Gaussian settings with general constraints.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Confidence intervals for functionals in constrained inverse problems via data-adaptive sampling-based calibration

    stat.ME 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Constraint-aware confidence intervals for ill-posed inverse problems are made computationally practical via a Berger-Boos bounding set, sampling, and quantile regression, achieving nominal coverage with shorter interv...

Pith tools