Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CTP-LLM: Clinical Trial Phase Transition Prediction Using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.10995 v1 pith:I6XXVHVP submitted 2024-08-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords trialphaseclinicalctp-llmctopdesignmodeltransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

New medical treatment development requires multiple phases of clinical trials. Despite the significant human and financial costs of bringing a drug to market, less than 20% of drugs in testing will make it from the first phase to final approval. Recent literature indicates that the design of the trial protocols significantly contributes to trial performance. We investigated Clinical Trial Outcome Prediction (CTOP) using trial design documents to predict phase transitions automatically. We propose CTP-LLM, the first Large Language Model (LLM) based model for CTOP. We also introduce the PhaseTransition (PT) Dataset; which labels trials based on their progression through the regulatory process and serves as a benchmark for CTOP evaluation. Our fine-tuned GPT-3.5-based model (CTP-LLM) predicts clinical trial phase transition by analyzing the trial's original protocol texts without requiring human-selected features. CTP-LLM achieves a 67% accuracy rate in predicting trial phase transitions across all phases and a 75% accuracy rate specifically in predicting the transition from Phase~III to final approval. Our experimental performance highlights the potential of LLM-powered applications in forecasting clinical trial outcomes and assessing trial design.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can artificial intelligence predict clinical trial outcomes?

    cs.LG 2024-11 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A comparison of LLMs and HINT for clinical trial outcome prediction that is undermined by data leakage and post-hoc exclusions.

  2. From Text to Discovery: How Large Language Models Are Reshaping Research Across Scientific and Humanistic Disciplines

    cs.DL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    LLMs accelerate research workflows from idea generation to writing but introduce challenges like hallucination, bias, opacity, and ten systemic risks requiring new governance frameworks.

Pith tools