Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 43 references

High-Resolution Imaging of Plant Delayed Luminescence

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A qCMOS-based imaging system maps plant delayed luminescence at 2304×4096 pixels, revealing vein-localized, wound-centered, and species-specific stress patterns in the faint glow of leaves.

desk verdict A first real qCMOS megapixel DL imaging platform, but the headline spatial patterns are not yet separated from flat-field/illumination artifacts, and the biological claims outrun the statistics. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01173 v3 pith:I73FKCIO submitted 2025-01-02 physics.optics physics.bio-phphysics.med-ph

Yan-Xia Liu , Hai-Yu Fan , Yu-Hao Wang , Yan-Liang Wang , Sheng-Wen Li , Shi-Jian Li , Xu-Ri Yao , Qing Zhao This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.bio-phphysics.med-ph
keywords delayedluminescenceplantphenotypingqCMOSimagingreactiveoxygenspeciesstressresponseultra-weakphotonemissionspatialheterogeneitytwo-levelquantummodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that delayed luminescence—the faint light a plant emits after illumination stops, when photoexcited molecules relax—can be imaged across entire leaves at megapixel resolution with a quantitative scientific CMOS (qCMOS) camera operating in photon-number-resolving mode. Using Arabidopsis thaliana, Hydrocotyle vulgaris, and Ginkgo biloba, the authors report that this luminescence is spatially patterned: veins and mechanical wounds emit more strongly, oxidative stress produces characteristic and species-dependent spatial signatures, and excitation wavelength changes both how bright and how persistent the signal is. They also propose a two-level quantum model that links these patterns to the population of excited-state electrons fed by reactive oxygen species. If the interpretation holds, the method would give plant researchers a non-invasive, sub-millimeter-resolution window on stress physiology, with possible use in phenotyping and in tuning growth light for crops.

What carries the argument

The instrument that carries the experimental claim is the qCMOS camera: a quantitative scientific CMOS sensor with sub-electron read noise (0.27 e− RMS) and photon-number-resolving capability, used with pixel binning from N=1 to N=8 and with dark-field subtraction, 3×3 median filtering, and leaf-mask normalization to convert raw frames into photons/pixel/30s images. The theoretical object that carries the interpretation is a two-level quantum model with a ground state g, an emitting excited state e, and an intermediate ROS pool c. Its equations, $\partial_t N_e = -\gamma N_e + \kappa N_c$ and $\partial_t N_c = -\Gamma_t^- N_c + \Gamma_t^+ N_g$, define three parameters: $\Gamma_t^+$ is the ROS chemical-potential gain that encodes spatial gradients and stress spikes, $\gamma$ is the decay rate linked to antioxidant scavenging, and $\kappa$ is the injection efficiency linked to tissue structure. The model's work is to map DL intensity distributions onto excited-state occupancy and to give a parametric language for comparing species, stresses, and light qualities.

What would settle it

Re-analyze the species comparisons with an attenuation correction using measured leaf absorption at the reported DL emission wavelengths; if correcting for the 0.2 mm versus 0.8 mm thickness differences erases the reported absolute intensity differences between Hydrocotyle vulgaris and Ginkgo biloba, the interspecies DL responses are not established as physiological signals.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a qCMOS camera with sub-electron read noise and single-pixel photon counting can map delayed luminescence from whole leaves at 2304×4096 pixels with 30-second frames, and that the resulting images carry stress-related physiology rather than passive pigment structure. In unstressed Arabidopsis leaves the glow is strongest in veins; after a 2-cm incision the signal propagates along veins, while Hydrocotyle vulgaris shows a radial burst at the wound and Ginkgo biloba a broad isotropic enhancement. Under 3% H2O2, H. vulgaris develops central-to-peripheral enhancement, G. biloba an edge-to-center propagation, and Arabidopsis a vein-restricted, suppressed response. White-light excitation gives the highest initial intensity but the fastest decay; red and blue light yield weaker initial signals with slower decay and higher residual percentages. The paper interprets these observations with a two-level model in which DL intensity records excited-state electron occupancy driven by a time- and space-dependent ROS chemical potential.

Load-bearing premise

The whole interpretation rests on the assumption that the counts surviving dark subtraction, median filtering, and masking are genuine delayed luminescence whose spatial pattern reflects ROS-driven emission, rather than artifacts of leaf thickness, chlorophyll distribution, or differential absorption of emitted light within the leaf.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A qCMOS camera, used with pixel binning, can replace point-detector PMTs and low-resolution EMCCDs for full-field plant DL imaging at sub-millimeter spatial resolution.
  • DL imaging can localize mechanical wounds within minutes, with species-specific propagation geometry: vein-guided in Arabidopsis, radial in Hydrocotyle, and isotropic in Ginkgo.
  • Oxidative stress produces species-specific DL signatures—central enhancement, edge-to-center propagation, or suppression—suggesting that DL kinetics report ROS management strategies.
  • Excitation light quality tunes DL dynamics: white light maximizes initial emission while red and blue light prolong persistence, a handle for controlled-environment lighting.
  • The two-level model supplies parameters $\Gamma_t^+$, $\gamma$, and $\kappa$ that connect ROS flux, antioxidant efficiency, and tissue structure to measurable DL kinetics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An open extension is to validate the model's mapping by simultaneous ROS fluorescent probes or spectral filtering; the paper proposes this but does not do it.
  • Because leaf thickness and internal absorption differ by fourfold across the species compared, a quantitative attenuation correction is the natural next test before taking the interspecies intensity differences at face value.
  • The photon-number-resolving data could in principle be analyzed for per-pixel photon statistics, such as sub-Poissonian or correlated emission, which would test the quantum-relaxation interpretation more directly than the two-level rate equations do.
  • A practical extension is screening: if DL spatial patterns track ROS bursts, the same system could rank mutants or cultivars for wound responsiveness and oxidative-stress tolerance non-invasively.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a delayed-luminescence (DL) imaging system built around a Hamamatsu qCMOS camera with a 25 mm C-mount lens, single-photon-counting readout, and pixel binning from N=1 to N=8. Using this system, the authors image DL from Arabidopsis thaliana, Hydrocotyle vulgaris, and Ginkgo biloba leaves, and report spatial heterogeneity (vein-localized signals, injury-site patterns, central/edge patterns), wavelength-dependent decay kinetics, and species-specific responses to mechanical injury and H2O2 stress. They also propose a two-level quantum model that maps ROS-related chemical potential parameters (Gamma+, gamma, kappa) onto DL kinetics. The central quantitative biological claims and the model validation are the focus of my concerns.

Significance. If the technical and biological claims are supported, this would be a useful advance: qCMOS-based DL imaging could provide sub-millimeter, noninvasive mapping of plant stress responses at much higher spatial resolution than previous PMT or EMCCD approaches. The hardware description is sufficiently detailed for reproduction, the binning/SNR rationale is standard, and the figures illustrate the intended method. The paper is also commendably explicit about some limitations, such as the exploratory nature of certain image sequences and the need for future chlorophyll correlation studies. However, the current evidence does not yet establish the headline biological specificity claims or the quantitative model, so the significance is conditional on additional controls and statistical support.

major comments (5)
  1. [§2.2, §3.1, §3.3.2] The imaging pipeline described in §2.2 consists of dark subtraction, median filtering, and leaf-mask normalization, but includes no flat-field correction, no vignetting characterization, and no measurement of the spatial uniformity of the white/red/blue LED excitation. Because a 25 mm C-mount lens on a 2304×4096 sensor has substantial radial falloff, the reported 'centrally symmetric' Ginkgo pattern and the 'edge-to-center' H2O2 patterns in Figures 2 and 5 could be multiplicative optical artifacts rather than genuine DL spatial structure. A flat-field correction with a uniform source and a measured excitation profile should be applied, and corrected images should be shown.
  2. [§2.1, §3.2, §3.3] Absolute DL intensities are compared across species whose leaf thickness differs by a factor of four (Hydrocotyle 0.2 ± 0.05 mm vs. Ginkgo 0.8 ± 0.1 mm, §2.1). If leaf tissue attenuates or scatters its own emission, the reported I0 values and stress enhancements do not directly measure DL production. The normalization I(t)=P(t)/(Apixel·N²) corrects only for mask area and binning, not for tissue attenuation. The authors should provide thickness-normalized values or an attenuation correction, or restrict quantitative interspecies comparisons to within-species contrasts.
  3. [§3.3 and Figures 4-5] The temporal trajectories and percentage enhancements in Figures 4f-h and 5e-g are derived from single exploratory image sequences, as acknowledged in the figure captions, yet only the 5-min injury and 30-min H2O2 endpoints were validated in triplicate. In addition, the endpoint percentages are internally inconsistent: for Hydrocotyle the 5-min injury increase is 18.1% in Figure 4d but 188.7% in Figure 4g and §3.4; for Ginkgo the corresponding values are 27.3% in Figure 4e and 162.8% in Figure 4h. No statistical tests or confidence intervals accompany these percentages, despite the use of the word 'significant.' Replicated full time courses and a consistent quantitative summary are needed to support the species-specific response claims.
  4. [§3.4] The two-level model is not independently validated. Equations (1)-(2) introduce gamma, kappa, and Gamma+, and the 'validation' in §3.4 assigns values to these parameters to match the observed kinetics: high gamma in Arabidopsis, low kappa in Ginkgo, and an instantaneous Gamma+ spike for wounded Hydrocotyle. Because the parameters are defined in terms of the phenomena they are invoked to explain, the agreement is by construction. Parameter estimation with uncertainties, a goodness-of-fit test, or an out-of-sample prediction is required before the model can support the quantitative mechanistic claims made in the Discussion.
  5. [§4 Discussion] The Discussion states that DL heterogeneity reflects 'ROS-driven photophysical processes, not chlorophyll distribution,' but the present dataset contains no chlorophyll concentration maps, no spectral selection, and no co-registered chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. The cited emission peaks at 707.8/730.3 nm come from prior literature, not from the broadband qCMOS measurements described in §2.2. To support this dissociation, the authors would need spectral measurements or a chlorophyll-artifact control, such as imaging before and after pigment extraction or using a spectral filter.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and §2.2] The abstract emphasizes 2304×4096-pixel megapixel resolution, but most biologically interpreted images are 1152×1152 (N=2) or 288×288 (N=8); please clarify which claims depend on native full-frame resolution.
  2. [§2.2 equation] The equation for I(t) omits the exposure time and uses N² without defining whether N is the binning factor or the number of binned pixels; the notation and units should be revised.
  3. [References 19-22] References 19-22, cited for EMCCD/ICCD limitations in the Introduction, appear to be quantum-illumination imaging papers rather than detector-noise comparisons; please verify the citation mapping.
  4. [§4 Discussion] The 707.8/730.3 nm emission-peak values should be explicitly attributed to the cited prior studies, since no spectral measurements are reported in this manuscript.
  5. [§3.3.1] The word 'significant' is used without any statistical test; please either add appropriate tests or use descriptive language.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The two-level quantum model is validated by reusing the very DL observations encoded in its parameters, making the 'confirmation' a relabeling of the fit.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.4, 'Two-Level Quantum Model', validation paragraph after Eqs. (1)-(2)]
    "To validate this model, we systematically analyzed DL responses under diverse stress conditions using qCMOS imaging data and kinetic equations. In Hydrocotyle vulgaris leaves, DL intensity surged to 188.7% of the value of the negative control (i.e., 0.65 vs. 0.35 photons/pixel/30s, Figure 4c) 5 minutes after mechanical stimulation. This corresponds to instantaneous Γ𝑡+ activation and confirms this model’s ability to capture ROS burst-driven electron injection."

    The parameter Γ𝑡+ is defined as the phenomenological driver that 'intrinsically encodes spatiotemporal heterogeneity' and is said to 'spike instantaneously at wound sites (e.g., 188.7% DL surge in Hydrocotyle vulgaris)'. The same observed 188.7% surge is then used to 'confirm' the model. No independent measurement of Γ𝑡+ or out-of-sample prediction is provided; the agreement is by construction because the parameter was assigned to reproduce the observation.

  2. self definitional [Section 3.4, parameter definitions; reiterated in Section 4, Discussion]
    "Meanwhile, γ (decay rate) reflects antioxidant scavenging efficiency (e.g., high γ in Arabidopsis thaliana), and κ (injection efficiency) captures tissue-dependent ROS diffusion (e.g., low κ in thick Ginkgo biloba leaves). ... Arabidopsis thaliana’ high γ (rapid decay) reflects efficient enzymatic ROS scavenging, while Ginkgo biloba’s low κ (injection efficiency) arises from physical ROS retention in thick mesophyll."

    γ and κ are assigned post hoc from the same decay kinetics and leaf anatomy they are then said to explain. The paper states that high γ corresponds to Arabidopsis' rapid decay and low κ corresponds to Ginkgo's thick mesophyll, then uses these assignments to 'mechanistically explain' the interspecies decay differences. The explanatory claim is equivalent to the input: the parameter values are chosen to match the observed decay behavior, so the 'explanation' does not add independent content.

full rationale

The paper's main empirical contributions—qCMOS-based megapixel DL imaging, spatial heterogeneity in veins and injury sites, and wavelength-dependent trends—are self-contained observations rather than circular derivations. No load-bearing self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem appears. However, the two-level quantum model presented as a 'theoretical framework' and 'validation' is circular: its parameters Γ𝑡+, γ, and κ are explicitly defined in terms of the observations they later 'confirm'. The model is openly phenomenological, but phrases such as 'confirms this model’s ability' and 'mechanistically explains variations' go beyond curve-fitting and treat the parameters as independent evidence. Since the model's support reduces to relabeling the data, and this model is one of the paper's stated central deliverables, a partial circularity score of 6 is appropriate. The imaging and biological-pattern claims would remain meaningful even if the model were removed, so the score is not higher.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central observational claim rests mainly on the assumption that camera counts correspond to delayed luminescence photons and that spatial gradients map to ROS-driven excited-state populations. The theoretical model introduces three unmeasured rates (Gamma+, gamma, kappa) that are assigned post hoc to explain the same data they are invoked to predict. No external calibration, independent ROS measurement, or out-of-sample prediction is provided.

free parameters (4)
  • gamma (excited-state decay rate)
    Assigned post hoc to match species decay kinetics, e.g., 'high gamma in Arabidopsis thaliana' and 'gamma_white > gamma_monochromatic' (Section 3.4). No independent measurement or fit.
  • kappa (injection efficiency)
    Assigned post hoc to capture tissue-dependent ROS diffusion, e.g., 'low kappa in thick Ginkgo biloba leaves' (Section 3.4).
  • Gamma+ (ROS chemical potential gain)
    Phenomenological input said to scale with stress intensity and to spike at wound sites; used to explain observed DL surges without any independent ROS flux measurement (Section 3.4).
  • Gamma- (antioxidant scavenging rate)
    Appears in Eq. (2) as a rate governing the intermediate state, but is never quantified or independently constrained.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Delayed luminescence originates from de-excitation of photoexcited species generated through radical cascades, primarily singlet oxygen and excited carbonyls, rather than direct chlorophyll fluorescence, and requires intact photosynthetic machinery.
    Invoked in Section 1 with refs [13-17]; the interpretation of all images as ROS-driven DL depends on this biochemical premise.
  • domain assumption Camera counts after dark subtraction and median filtering correspond to genuine single-photon delayed luminescence events from the leaf.
    Assumed throughout the Imaging System and Results; no external calibration, noise model, or validation against a standard source is reported.
  • domain assumption Leaf thickness and optical path differences do not confound interspecies intensity comparisons.
    Leaf thickness differs by 4x between Hydrocotyle (0.2 mm) and Ginkgo (0.8 mm) (Section 2.1), but no attenuation correction is applied before comparing absolute intensities.
  • domain assumption The qCMOS camera achieves sub-electron read noise and photon-number-resolving single-pixel detection under the 30 s exposure conditions used.
    Relied on for calling the measurements single-photon counting; supported only by manufacturer specs (refs [23-29]) rather than in-house calibration.
  • ad hoc to paper The two-level rate equations provide a valid coarse-grained description of ROS-driven DL dynamics.
    Section 3.4 posits this model with no derivation from microscopic kinetics and no quantitative fit or predictive test.
invented entities (1)
  • Intermediate state c in the two-level model
    purpose: Represents the dynamic equilibrium between ROS generation and antioxidant scavenging that feeds the emitting excited state
    Introduced in Section 3.4 (Eqs. 1-2) as a phenomenological state; no measurable observable is tied to its population.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-Resolution Imaging of Plant Delayed Luminescence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I73FKCIO

@misc{pith2026250101173,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-Resolution Imaging of Plant Delayed Luminescence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I73FKCIO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01173}
}
abstract

Delayed luminescence (DL) is a quantized signal that is characteristic of photoexcited molecules entering a relaxed state. Studying DL provides critical insight into photophysical mechanisms through the analysis of specific spatiotemporal dynamics. In this study, we developed a high-sensitivity DL imaging system using a quantitative scientific complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (qCMOS) camera and a single-photon counting resolution. By optimizing the optical architecture and signal processing algorithms together, we achieved full-field spatiotemporal DL imaging at megapixel resolution (i.e., $2304 \times 4096$ pixels). Key findings include the following: (1) we observed spatial heterogeneity in DL intensity across the leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana, with stronger signals detected in veins and at sites of mechanical injury; (2) species-specific DL responses occur in response to oxidative stress, with Hydrocotyle vulgaris and Ginkgo biloba showing enhanced central DL activity; (3) excitation using white light induced maximum DL intensity, while red and blue light differentially modulated decay kinetics. Finally, we develop a two-level quantum model that links DL dynamics to the populations of excited-state electrons, thereby developing a theoretical framework for future photophysical research. Collectively, this work establishes a theoretical and technological framework for advancing plant phenotyping under stress conditions and optimizing light environments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ultra -weak photon emiss ion from biological samples: Definition, mechanisms, properties, detection and applications, J

    Cifra M., Pospíšil P. Ultra -weak photon emiss ion from biological samples: Definition, mechanisms, properties, detection and applications, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 139 (2014) 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.02.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.02.009 2014

  2. [2]

    Towards the two-dimensional imaging of spontaneous ultra -weak photon emission from microbial, plant, and animal cells, Sci

    Prasad A., Pospíšil P. Towards the two-dimensional imaging of spontaneous ultra -weak photon emission from microbial, plant, and animal cells, Sci. Rep. 3 (2013) 1211. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01211

    work page doi:10.1038/srep01211 2013

  3. [3]

    Role of reactive oxygen species in ultra-weak photon emission in biological systems, J

    Pospíšil P., Prasad A., Rác M. Role of reactive oxygen species in ultra-weak photon emission in biological systems, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 139 (2014) 11 –23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.02.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.02.008 2014

  4. [4]

    Mechanism of the formation of electronically excited species by oxidative metabolic processes: Role of reactive oxygen species, Biomolecules 9 (2019) 258

    Pospíšil P., Prasad A., Rác M. Mechanism of the formation of electronically excited species by oxidative metabolic processes: Role of reactive oxygen species, Biomolecules 9 (2019) 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9070258

    work page doi:10.3390/biom9070258 2019

  5. [5]

    Free radicals and low -level photon emission in human pathogenesis: State of the art, Indian J

    Van Wijk R., Van Wijk E.P.A., et al. Free radicals and low -level photon emission in human pathogenesis: State of the art, Indian J. Exp. Biol. 46 (2008) 273–309

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses, Nat

    Mittler R., Zandalinas S.I., Fichman Y ., et al. Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses, Nat. Rev.. Mol. Cell Biol. 23 (2022) 663 –679. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022- 00499-2 21

    work page doi:10.1038/s41580-022- 2022

  7. [7]

    Singlet molecular oxygen generated by biological hydroperoxides, J

    Miyamoto S., Martinez G.R., Medeiros M.H.G., et al. Singlet molecular oxygen generated by biological hydroperoxides, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 139 (2014) 24 –33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.03.028

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.03.028 2014

  8. [8]

    Effect of exogenous hydrogen peroxide on biophoton emission from radish root cells, Plant Physiol

    Rastogi A., Pospíšil P. Effect of exogenous hydrogen peroxide on biophoton emission from radish root cells, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48 (2010) 117 –123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.12.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.12.011 2010

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Using spontaneous photon emission to image lipid oxidation patterns in plant tissues, Plant J

    Birtic S., Ksas B., Genty B., et al. Using spontaneous photon emission to image lipid oxidation patterns in plant tissues, Plant J. 67 (2011) 1103 –1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 313X.2011.04646.x

    2011 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Noninvasive monitoring of oxidative skin stress by ultraweak photon emission (UPE)-measurement

    Khabiri F., Ha gens R., Smuda C., et al. Noninvasive monitoring of oxidative skin stress by ultraweak photon emission (UPE)-measurement. I: Mechanisms of UPE of biological materials, Skin Res. Technol. 14 (2008) 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2007.00205.x

    2008

  3. [11]

    Linoleic acid-induced ultra-weak photon emission from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as a tool for monitoring lipid peroxidation in cell membranes, PLoS ONE 6 (2011) e22345

    Prasad A., Pospíšil P. Linoleic acid-induced ultra-weak photon emission from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as a tool for monitoring lipid peroxidation in cell membranes, PLoS ONE 6 (2011) e22345. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022345

    2011 doi

  4. [12]

    Highly sensitive determination of transient generation of biophotons during hypersensitive response to cucumber mosaic virus in cowpea, J

    Kobayashi M., Sasaki K., Enomoto M., Ehara Y . Highly sensitive determination of transient generation of biophotons during hypersensitive response to cucumber mosaic virus in cowpea, J. Exp. Bot. 58 (2006) 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl215

    2006 doi

  5. [13]

    H., Wang, X

    Zhai, Z. H., Wang, X. Z., & Ding, M. X. (2000). Cell biology (pp. 149 -170). Beijing: Higher Education Press

    2000

  6. [14]

    C., Wang, W

    Xing, D., Tan, S. C., Wang, W. J., & Li, D. H. (1997). Observation of light -induced and spontaneous ultraweak bioluminescence images. Acta Laser Biology Sinica, 6(2), 1035-1039

    1997

  7. [15]

    H., Xing, D., Luo, M

    Li, D. H., Xing, D., Luo, M. Z., & et al. (19 99). Comparison of ultra-weak biophoton emission among different crop varieties. Acta Photonica Sinica, 28(12), 1057-1060

  8. [16]

    J., Xing, D., Tan, S

    Wang, W. J., Xing, D., Tan, S. C., & et al. (1997). Detection and analysis of ultra -weak luminescence images of biological samples. Acta Biophysica Sinica, 13(4), 677-682

    1997

  9. [17]

    H., Tang, Y

    Li, D. H., Tang, Y . H., He, Y . H., & et al. (2002). Preliminary study on the mechanism of ultra- weak luminescence in Chinese cabbage chloroplasts. Acta Laser Biology Sinica, 11(1), 64. https://doi.org10.3969/j.issn.1007-7146.2002.01.019

    2002

  10. [18]

    Imaging of ultra -weak bio-chemiluminescence and singlet oxygen generation in germinating soybean in respons e to wounding, Luminescence 18 (2003) 37–41

    Chen W.L., Xing D., Tan S., et al. Imaging of ultra -weak bio-chemiluminescence and singlet oxygen generation in germinating soybean in respons e to wounding, Luminescence 18 (2003) 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/bio.703

    2003 doi

  11. [19]

    Sub -shot-noise shadow sensing with quantum correlations, Opt

    Toninelli E., et al. Sub -shot-noise shadow sensing with quantum correlations, Opt. Express 25 (2017) 21826. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.021826 22

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    -A., Toninelli E., Padgett M.J

    Gregory T., Moreau P. -A., Toninelli E., Padgett M.J. Imaging through noise with quantum illumination, Sci. Adv. 6 (2020) eaay2652. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay2652

    2020 doi

  13. [21]

    Hiding images in noise, Opt

    Johnson S., McMillan A., Frick S., et al. Hiding images in noise, Opt. Express 31 (2023) 5290. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.480881

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    -A., Mekhail S., et al

    Gregory T., Moreau P. -A., Mekhail S., et al. Noise rejection through an improved quantum illumination protocol, Sci. Rep. 11 (2021) 21841. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01122-8

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    A 0.27e−rms read noise 220µV/e-conversion gain reset-gate-less CMOS image sensor with 0.11µm CIS process, IEEE Electron Device Lett

    Seo M.-W., Kawahito S., Kagawa K., Yasutomi K. A 0.27e−rms read noise 220µV/e-conversion gain reset-gate-less CMOS image sensor with 0.11µm CIS process, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 36 (2015) 1344–1347. https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2015.2496359

    2015

  16. [24]

    Review of quanta image sensors for ultralow -light imaging, IEEE Trans

    Ma J., Chan S., Fossum E.R. Review of quanta image sensors for ultralow -light imaging, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 69 (2022) 2824–2839. https://doi.org/10.1109/ted.2022.3166716

    2022

  17. [25]

    Photon - number - resolving megapixel image sensor at room temperature without avalanche gain, Optica, 4(12) (2017) 1474 - 1481

    Ma J., et al. Photon - number - resolving megapixel image sensor at room temperature without avalanche gain, Optica, 4(12) (2017) 1474 - 1481

    2017

  18. [26]

    A 1/2.8 - inch 24Mpixel CMOS Image Sensor with 0.9μm Unit Pixels Separated by Full - Depth Deep - Trench Isolation, ISSCC (2018)

    Kim Y ., et al. A 1/2.8 - inch 24Mpixel CMOS Image Sensor with 0.9μm Unit Pixels Separated by Full - Depth Deep - Trench Isolation, ISSCC (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    A comparison between the measurement of quantum spatial correlations using qCMOS photon -number resolving and electron multiplying CCD camera technologies, Sci

    Roberts K., Wolley O., Gregory T., et al. A comparison between the measurement of quantum spatial correlations using qCMOS photon -number resolving and electron multiplying CCD camera technologies, Sci. Rep. 14 (2024) 14687. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64674-5

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    Quantum imaging with a photon counting camera, Sci

    Wolley O., Gregory T., Beer S., et al. Quantum imaging with a photon counting camera, Sci. Rep. 12 (2022) 8286. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10037-x

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    https://www.hamamatsu.com/eu/en/product/cameras/qcmos-cameras/C15550- 20UP.html

    Hamamatsu Orca-Quest qCMOS camera C15550 -20UP technical note, Hamamatsu Photonics (2022). https://www.hamamatsu.com/eu/en/product/cameras/qcmos-cameras/C15550- 20UP.html

    2022

  22. [30]

    Use of a highly sensit ive two- dimensional luminescence imaging system to monitor endogenous bioluminescence in plant leaves, BMC Plant Biol

    Flor-Henry M., McCabe T.C., de Bruxelles G.L., Roberts M.R. Use of a highly sensit ive two- dimensional luminescence imaging system to monitor endogenous bioluminescence in plant leaves, BMC Plant Biol. 4 (2004) 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-4-19

    2004 doi

  23. [31]

    Ultraweak photoemission from dark -adapted leaves and isolated chloroplasts, FEBS Lett

    Hideg È., Kobayashi M., Inaba H. Ultraweak photoemission from dark -adapted leaves and isolated chloroplasts, FEBS Lett. 275 (1990) 121 –124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014- 5793(90)81454-V

    1990 doi

  24. [32]

    Autoluminescence imaging: A non -invasive tool for mapping oxidative stress, Trends Plant Sci

    Havaux M., Triantaphylidès C., Genty B. Autoluminescence imaging: A non -invasive tool for mapping oxidative stress, Trends Plant Sci. 11 (2006) 284 –290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.08.001

    2006 doi

  25. [33]

    Phytochrome signa ling mechanisms and the control of plant development, Trends Cell Biol

    Chen M., Chory J. Phytochrome signa ling mechanisms and the control of plant development, Trends Cell Biol. 21 (2011) 664–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2011.07.002 23

    2011 doi

  26. [34]

    Metabolome and transcriptome analyses reveal the regulatory mechanisms of photosynthesis in developing Ginkgo biloba leaves, Int

    Guo Y ., Wang T., Fu F.F., et al. Metabolome and transcriptome analyses reveal the regulatory mechanisms of photosynthesis in developing Ginkgo biloba leaves, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Cryptochrome struct ure and signal transduction, Annu

    Lin C., Shalitin D. Cryptochrome struct ure and signal transduction, Annu. Rev. . Plant Biol. 54 (2003) 469–496. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV .ARPLANT.54.110901.160901

    2003

  28. [36]

    Spe ctral distribution of ultra -weak photon emission as a response to wounding in plants: An in vivo study, Biology 9 (2020) 139

    Prasad A., Gouripeddi P., Devireddy H.R.N., et al. Spe ctral distribution of ultra -weak photon emission as a response to wounding in plants: An in vivo study, Biology 9 (2020) 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9060139

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    Endogenous chemiluminescence from germinating Arabidopsis thaliana seeds, Sci

    Saeidfirozeh H., Shafiekhani A., Cif ra M., et al. Endogenous chemiluminescence from germinating Arabidopsis thaliana seeds, Sci. Rep. 8 (2018) 16231. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34485-6

    2018 doi

  30. [38]

    Redox homeostasis and antioxid ant signaling: A metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses, Plant Cell 17 (2005) 1866 –1875

    Noctor G. Redox homeostasis and antioxid ant signaling: A metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses, Plant Cell 17 (2005) 1866 –1875. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.033589

    2005 doi

  31. [39]

    Singlet oxygen in plants: Production, detoxification and signaling, Trends Plant Sci

    Triantaphylidès C., Havaux M. Singlet oxygen in plants: Production, detoxification and signaling, Trends Plant Sci. 14 (2009) 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.01.008

    2009 doi

  32. [40]

    Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesis in vivo, Annu

    Baker N.R. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesis in vivo, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59 (2008) 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759

    2008 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Modelling biophoton emission kinetics based on the initial intensity value in Helianthus annuus plants exposed to different types of stress, Sci

    Pónya Z., Somfalvi-Tóth K. Modelling biophoton emission kinetics based on the initial intensity value in Helianthus annuus plants exposed to different types of stress, Sci. Rep. 12 (2022) 2317. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06323-3

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    G., & Scordino, A

    Panebianco, S., Van Wijk, E., Yan, Y ., Cirvilleri, G., Musumarra, A., Pellegriti, M. G., & Scordino, A. (2024). Delayed Luminescence in Monitoring the Postharvest Ripening of Tomato Fruit and Classifying According to Their Maturity Stage at Harvest. Food a nd Bioprocess Techn...

    2024 doi

  35. [2601]

    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052601

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.