Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Are Large Language Models Robust Coreference Resolvers?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14489 v2 pith:IA3FB2WA submitted 2023-05-23 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords coreferencelanguagemodelsacrossannotateddomainsinstruction-tunedlanguages
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent work on extending coreference resolution across domains and languages relies on annotated data in both the target domain and language. At the same time, pre-trained large language models (LMs) have been reported to exhibit strong zero- and few-shot learning abilities across a wide range of NLP tasks. However, prior work mostly studied this ability using artificial sentence-level datasets such as the Winograd Schema Challenge. In this paper, we assess the feasibility of prompt-based coreference resolution by evaluating instruction-tuned language models on difficult, linguistically-complex coreference benchmarks (e.g., CoNLL-2012). We show that prompting for coreference can outperform current unsupervised coreference systems, although this approach appears to be reliant on high-quality mention detectors. Further investigations reveal that instruction-tuned LMs generalize surprisingly well across domains, languages, and time periods; yet continued fine-tuning of neural models should still be preferred if small amounts of annotated examples are available.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Referential ambiguity and clarification requests: comparing human and LLM behaviour

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Humans seldom ask clarification questions for referential ambiguity, while LLMs ask them more often, and reasoning prompts increase LLM question frequency and relevance.

  2. Evaluating Prompt-Based and Fine-Tuned Approaches to Czech Anaphora Resolution

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned mT5-large outperforms prompt-based LLMs on Czech anaphora resolution (88% vs 74.5% accuracy) on a new dataset derived from the Prague Dependency Treebank.

  3. CORE-KG: An LLM-Driven Knowledge Graph Construction Framework for Human Smuggling Networks

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CORE-KG reduces node duplication by 33.28% and legal noise by 38.37% versus a GraphRAG baseline on 20 human smuggling court cases, through type-aware LLM coreference resolution and domain-filtered extraction prompts.

Pith tools